{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,17]],"date-time":"2025-09-17T15:27:32Z","timestamp":1758122852652,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":92,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,25]],"date-time":"2022-03-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1648166400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,25]],"date-time":"2022-03-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1648166400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100012325","name":"National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["20CZX049"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["20CZX049"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100012325","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Artif Intell Law"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,6]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-022-09311-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,25]],"date-time":"2022-03-25T18:22:13Z","timestamp":1648232533000},"page":"239-268","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["How to justify a backing\u2019s eligibility for a warrant: the justification of a legal interpretation in a hard case"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"31","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1834-7419","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Shiyang","family":"Yu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6001-7830","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Xi","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"9311_CR90","unstructured":"Aarnio A (1997) Reason and Authority. Aldershot: Ashgate"},{"key":"9311_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"413","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00127412","volume":"10","author":"C Alchourr\u00f3n","year":"1991","unstructured":"Alchourr\u00f3n C (1991) Conflicts of norms and the revision of normative systems. Law Philos 10:413\u2013425","journal-title":"Law Philos"},{"key":"9311_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aleven V, Ashley K (1995) Doing things with factors. In: Proceedings of the 4th conference on artificial intelligence and law, ACM, pp 152\u2013161","DOI":"10.1145\/222092.222106"},{"key":"9311_CR3","unstructured":"Aleven V (1997) Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples. PhD thesis. University of Pittsburgh"},{"key":"9311_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9337.2004.00261.x","volume":"17","author":"R Alexy","year":"2004","unstructured":"Alexy R (2004) The nature of legal philosophy. Ratio Juris 17:156\u2013167","journal-title":"Ratio Juris"},{"key":"9311_CR5","unstructured":"Alexy R (2002) The argument from injustice. (B. L. Paulson & S. L. Paulson trans.) Clarendon Press"},{"key":"9311_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Asgeirsson H (2020) The nature and value of vagueness in the law. Hart Publishing","DOI":"10.5040\/9781474202756"},{"key":"9311_CR7","volume-title":"Modeling legal arguments: reasoning with cases and hypotheticals","author":"K Ashley","year":"1990","unstructured":"Ashley K (1990) Modeling legal arguments: reasoning with cases and hypotheticals. MIT Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9311_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ashley K, Rissland E (1987) But, see, accord: generating blue book citations in hypo. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ACM, pp 67\u201374","DOI":"10.1145\/41735.41744"},{"key":"9311_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-009-1932-7","volume-title":"Procedural justice: allocating to individuals","author":"MD Bayles","year":"1990","unstructured":"Bayles MD (1990) Procedural justice: allocating to individuals. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht"},{"key":"9311_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008242417011","volume":"5","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"1997","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (1997) Argument in artificial intelligence and law. Artif Intell Law 5:249\u2013261","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9311_CR83","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (1998) Specification and implementation of Toulmin dialogue game. In Legal Knowledge-Based Systems. JURIX: The Eleventh Conference, pp. 5\u201319, Nijmegen. Gerard Noodt Instituut"},{"key":"9311_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1019501830692","volume":"10","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2002","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (2002) The missing link revisited: the role of teleology in representing legal argument. Artif Intell Law 10:79\u201394","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9311_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-017-9194-9","volume":"25","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Modgil S (2017) Norms and value based reasoning: justifying compliance and violation. Artif Intell Law 25:29\u201364","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9311_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bench-Capon TJM (2017) HYPO\u2019S legacy: introduction to the virtual special issue. Artificial Intelligence and Law 25(2):205\u2013250. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-017-9201-1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-017-9201-1"},{"key":"9311_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Berman D, Hafner C (1993) Representing teleological structure in case-based legal reasoning: the missing link. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ACM, pp 50\u201359","DOI":"10.1145\/158976.158982"},{"key":"9311_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Berman D (1991) Developer\u2019s choice in the legal domain: the Sisyphean journey with CBR or down hill with rules (a working paper for the case-rules panel at the third international conference on artificial intelligence and law). In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ACM, pp 307\u2013309","DOI":"10.1145\/112646.112685"},{"key":"9311_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/9780262026437.001.0001","volume-title":"Elements of argumentation","author":"P Besnard","year":"2008","unstructured":"Besnard P, Hunter A (2008) Elements of argumentation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA"},{"key":"9311_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-009-9074-z","volume":"17","author":"F Bex","year":"2009","unstructured":"Bex F, Bench-Capon T, Atkinson K (2009) Did he jump or was he pushed? Artif Intell Law 17:79\u201399","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9311_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(97)00015-5","volume":"93","author":"A Bondarenko","year":"1997","unstructured":"Bondarenko A, Dung P, Kowalski R, Toni F (1997) An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning. Artif Intell 93:63\u2013101","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"9311_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Durkheim E (1982) [1st pub. 1895]. The rules of sociological method and selected texts on sociology and its method. (S. Lukes, Ed., W.D. Halls, Trans.). Free Press, New York","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-349-16939-9"},{"key":"9311_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1057","DOI":"10.2307\/1340249","volume":"88","author":"R Dworkin","year":"1975","unstructured":"Dworkin R (1975) Hard Cases. Harv Law Rev 88:1057\u20131109","journal-title":"Harv Law Rev"},{"key":"9311_CR80","unstructured":"Dworkin R (1977) Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press"},{"key":"9311_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1017\/S1352325206070108","volume":"12","author":"J Ferrer","year":"2006","unstructured":"Ferrer J (2006) Legal proof and fact finders\u2019 beliefs. Leg Theory 12:293\u2013314","journal-title":"Leg Theory"},{"key":"9311_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Freeman JB (1985) Dialectical situations and argument analysis. Informal Logic 7(2). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22329\/il.v7i2.2713","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v7i2.2713"},{"key":"9311_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00118492","volume":"4","author":"K Freeman","year":"1996","unstructured":"Freeman K, Farley A (1996) A model of argumentation and its application to legal reasoning. Artif Intell Law 4:163\u2013197","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"volume-title":"Black\u2019s Law Dictionary (8th)","year":"2004","key":"9311_CR22","unstructured":"Garner BA (ed) (2004) Black\u2019s Law Dictionary (8th). Thomson West, St. Paul MN"},{"key":"9311_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v15i1.2468","volume":"15","author":"GT Goodnight","year":"1993","unstructured":"Goodnight GT (1993) Legitimation inferences: an additional component for the Toulmin model. Informal Logic 15:41\u201352","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"9311_CR81","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gordon TF (1994) The pleadings game. Artificial Intelligence and Law 2(4):239\u2013292. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF00871972","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00871972"},{"key":"9311_CR82","unstructured":"Gordon T (1995) The Pleading Game. An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice. Kluwer Academic Publication, Dordrecht\/Boston\/London"},{"key":"9311_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grabmair M (2017) Predicting trade secret case outcomes using argument schemes and learned quantitative value effect tradeoffs. In Proceedings of the 16th Edition of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ACM, pp 89\u201398","DOI":"10.1145\/3086512.3086521"},{"key":"9311_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00118493","volume":"4","author":"J Hage","year":"1996","unstructured":"Hage J (1996) A theory of legal reasoning and a logic to match. Artif Intell Law 4:199\u2013273","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9311_CR104","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hage J (1997) Reasoning with Rules. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-8873-7_3"},{"key":"9311_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00871759","volume":"2","author":"J Hage","year":"1994","unstructured":"Hage J, Leenes R, Lodder A (1994) Hard cases: a procedural approach. Artif Intell Law 2:113\u2013167","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9311_CR27","volume-title":"The concept of law","author":"H Hart","year":"1994","unstructured":"Hart H (1994) The concept of law, Updated. Clarendon Press, Oxford","edition":"Updated"},{"key":"9311_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-1078-8_6","volume-title":"Anyone who has a view theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation","author":"D Hitchcock","year":"2003","unstructured":"Hitchcock D (2003) Toulmin\u2019s warrants. In: van Eemeren FH, Blair JA, Willard CA, Snoeck Henkemans AF (eds) Anyone who has a view theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 69\u201382"},{"key":"9311_CR29","first-page":"203","volume-title":"Arguing on the Toulmin model. New essays in argument analysis and evaluation","author":"D Hitchcock","year":"2006","unstructured":"Hitchcock D (2006) Good reasoning on the Toulmin model. In: Hitchcock D, Verheij B (eds) Arguing on the Toulmin model. New essays in argument analysis and evaluation. Springer, Netherlands, pp 203\u2013218"},{"key":"9311_CR30","first-page":"89","volume-title":"Legal Conventionalism","author":"MV Josep","year":"2019","unstructured":"Josep MV (2019) Social facts and law: Why the rule of recognition is a convention. In: Ram\u00edrez-Lude\u00f1a L, Vilajosana JM (eds) Legal Conventionalism. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, pp 89\u2013108"},{"key":"9311_CR31","unstructured":"Kelsen H (1949) General theory of law and state (trans. by Anders Wedberg). Harvard University Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9311_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008385531494","volume":"8","author":"H Kloosterhuis","year":"2000","unstructured":"Kloosterhuis H (2000) Analogy argumentation in law: a dialectical perspective. Artif Intell Law 8:173\u2013187","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9311_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-011-9209-8","volume":"25","author":"ECW Krabbe","year":"2011","unstructured":"Krabbe ECW, van Laar JA (2011) The ways of criticisms. Argumentation 25:199\u2013227","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9311_CR85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lodder A (1999) Dialaw. On Legal Justification and Dialogical Models of Argumentation. Law and Philosophy Library. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht\/Boston\/London","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-011-3957-1"},{"key":"9311_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203124352","volume-title":"The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Law","author":"A Marmor","year":"2012","unstructured":"Marmor A (2012) The nature of law: an introduction. In: Marmor A (ed) The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Law. Taylor & Francis, New York, pp 3\u201315"},{"key":"9311_CR86","unstructured":"McCarty LT, Sridharan NS (1981) The representation of an evolving system of legal concepts: II. Prototypes and deformations. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 246\u2013253."},{"key":"9311_CR35","first-page":"349","volume":"22","author":"R Michaels","year":"2012","unstructured":"Michaels R, Pauwelyn J (2012) Conflict of norms or conflict of laws? Different techniques in the fragmentation of international law. Duke J Comp Int Law 22:349\u2013376","journal-title":"Duke J Comp Int Law"},{"key":"9311_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9337.2012.00522.x","volume":"25","author":"M Moore","year":"2012","unstructured":"Moore M (2012) The various relations between law and morality in contemporary legal philosophy. Ratio Juris 25:435\u2013471","journal-title":"Ratio Juris"},{"key":"9311_CR37","unstructured":"Mulligan K, Correia F (2017) \u201cFacts,\u201d The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition), E.N. Zalta (ed.), URL = https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/archives\/win2017\/entries\/facts\/.)"},{"key":"9311_CR38","volume-title":"Law as Fact","author":"K Olivecrona","year":"1971","unstructured":"Olivecrona K (1971) Law as Fact. Stevens & Sons, London"},{"key":"9311_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-349-09583-4","volume-title":"For science in the social Science","author":"D Papineau","year":"1978","unstructured":"Papineau D (1978) For science in the social Science. The Macmillan Press, London"},{"key":"9311_CR40","volume-title":"A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory","year":"2010","unstructured":"Patterson D (ed) (2010) A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, 2nd edn. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA","edition":"2"},{"key":"9311_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4020-8730-1","volume-title":"On law and reason","author":"A Peczenik","year":"2009","unstructured":"Peczenik A (2009) On law and reason. Springer, Dordrecht"},{"key":"9311_CR42","unstructured":"Perelman C (1963) The Idea of justice and the problem of argument (trans. by John Petrie). Routledge & Kegan Paul, London"},{"key":"9311_CR89","unstructured":"Perelman C, Olbrechts-Tyteca L (1958) La nouvelle rh\u00e9torique. Trait\u00e9 de l\u2019argumentation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. [Perelman, C., and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. 1969. The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation (trans: Wilkinson, J., and Weaver, P.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press]."},{"key":"9311_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1207\/s15516709cog1104_4","volume":"11","author":"JL Pollock","year":"1987","unstructured":"Pollock JL (1987) Defeasible reasoning. Cogn Sci 11:481\u2013518","journal-title":"Cogn Sci"},{"key":"9311_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/1887.001.0001","volume-title":"Cognitive carpentry. A blueprint for how to build a person","author":"JL Pollock","year":"1995","unstructured":"Pollock JL (1995) Cognitive carpentry. A blueprint for how to build a person. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA"},{"key":"9311_CR87","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prakken H (1993) Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument. Doctoral dissertation Free University Amsterdam","DOI":"10.1145\/158976.158977"},{"key":"9311_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prakken H (2000) On dialogue systems with speech acts, arguments, and counterarguments. In Proceedings of the 7th European Workshop on Logic for Artificial Intelligence, no. 1919 in Springer Lecture Notes in AI, pp. 224\u2013238, Berlin. Springer Verlag","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-40006-0_16"},{"key":"9311_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prakken H (2001). Modelling reasoning about evidence in legal procedure. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 119\u2013128, New York. ACM Press.","DOI":"10.1145\/383535.383550"},{"key":"9311_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-005-4418-7","volume":"19","author":"H Prakken","year":"2005","unstructured":"Prakken H (2005) AI & law, logic and argument schemes. Argumentation 19:303\u2013320","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9311_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Prakken H (2006) Formal systems for persuasion dialogue. The Knowledge Engineering Review 21(2):163\u2013188. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0269888906000865","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888906000865"},{"key":"9311_CR49","unstructured":"Prakken H (2010) On the nature of argument schemes. In Dialectics, Dialogue and Argumentation. An examination of Douglas Walton\u2019s Theories of Reasoning and Argument, Reed CA, C. Tindale C (eds), pp 167\u2013185. London: College Publications. http:\/\/www.cs.uu.nl\/groups\/IS\/archive\/henry\/schemes10.pdf. Accessed 18 Feb 2020"},{"key":"9311_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00118496","volume":"4","author":"H Prakken","year":"1996","unstructured":"Prakken H, Sartor G (1996) A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning. Artif Intell Law 4:331\u2013368","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9311_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008278309945","volume":"6","author":"H Prakken","year":"1998","unstructured":"Prakken H, Sartor G (1998) Modelling reasoning with precedents in a formal dialogue game. Artif Intell Law 6:231\u2013287","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9311_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prakken H, Reed C, Walton D (2005) Dialogues about the burden of proof. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp 115\u2013124","DOI":"10.1145\/1165485.1165503"},{"key":"9311_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780198253457.001.0001","volume-title":"The authority of law: essays on law and morality","author":"J Raz","year":"1979","unstructured":"Raz J (1979) The authority of law: essays on law and morality. Oxford University Press, Oxford"},{"key":"9311_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.5840\/monist198568335","volume":"68","author":"J Raz","year":"1985","unstructured":"Raz J (1985) Authority, law and morality. Monist 68:295\u2013324","journal-title":"Monist"},{"key":"9311_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rissland E, Ashley K (1987) A case-based system for trade secrets law. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ACM, pp 60\u201366","DOI":"10.1145\/41735.41743"},{"key":"9311_CR75","unstructured":"Rundle B (1993) Facts.\u00a0London: Duckworth."},{"key":"9311_CR53","volume-title":"Construction of Social Reality","author":"JR Searle","year":"1995","unstructured":"Searle JR (1995) Construction of Social Reality. Free Press, New York"},{"key":"9311_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/j.ctvjnrsd5","volume-title":"Legality","author":"S Shapiro","year":"2011","unstructured":"Shapiro S (2011) Legality. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA"},{"key":"9311_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00118477","volume":"1","author":"D Skalak","year":"1992","unstructured":"Skalak D, Rissland E (1992) Arguments and cases: an inevitable intertwining. Artif Intell Law 1:3\u201344","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9311_CR56","first-page":"497","volume":"18","author":"RS Summers","year":"1999","unstructured":"Summers RS (1999) Formal legal truth and substantive truth in judicial fact-finding. Their justified divergence in some particular cases. Law Philos 18:497\u2013511","journal-title":"Law Philos"},{"key":"9311_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511840005","volume-title":"The Uses of Argument","author":"SE Toulmin","year":"2003","unstructured":"Toulmin SE (2003) The Uses of Argument, Updated. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge","edition":"Updated"},{"key":"9311_CR77","unstructured":"Toulmin SE, Rieke R, Janik A (1979) An Introduction to Reasoning. New York: Macmillan. (2nd ed. 1984)"},{"key":"9311_CR58","volume-title":"Argumentation, communication, and fallacies","author":"FH van Eemeren","year":"1992","unstructured":"van Eemeren FH, Grootendorst R (1992) Argumentation, communication, and fallacies. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale"},{"key":"9311_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-012-9272-9","volume":"27","author":"JA van Laar","year":"2013","unstructured":"van Laar JA, Krabbe ECW (2013) The burden of criticism: consequences of taking a critical stance. Argumentation 27:201\u2013224","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9311_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-90-481-9473-5","volume-title":"Handbook of argumentation theory","author":"FH van Eemeren","year":"2014","unstructured":"van Eemeren FH, Garssen B, Krabbe ECW, Snoek Henkemans F, Verheij B, Wagemans JHM (2014) Handbook of argumentation theory. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht"},{"key":"9311_CR88","unstructured":"Verheij B (1996) Rules, Reasons, Argument. Formal Studies of Argumentation and Defeat. Doctoral dissertation University of Maastricht"},{"key":"9311_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(96)00041-0","volume":"90","author":"G Vreeswijk","year":"1997","unstructured":"Vreeswijk G (1997) Abstract argumentation systems. Artif Intell 90:225\u2013279","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"9311_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1023\/B:ARTI.0000046008.49443.36","volume":"11","author":"B Verheij","year":"2003","unstructured":"Verheij B (2003) Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: an approach to legal logic. Artif Intell Law 11:167\u2013195","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9311_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Verheij B (2006) Evaluating arguments based on Toulmin\u2019s scheme. In Arguing on the Toulmin Model. New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation, eds. D. Hitchcock and B. Verheij, pp. 181\u2013202. Netherlands: Springer","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4020-4938-5_12"},{"key":"9311_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1023\/B:ARTI.0000013333.96215.a9","volume":"11","author":"D Walton","year":"2003","unstructured":"Walton D (2003) Is there a burden of questioning? Artif Intell Law 11:1\u201343","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9311_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-010-9102-z","volume":"18","author":"D Walton","year":"2010","unstructured":"Walton D (2010) Similarity, precedent and argument from analogy. Artif Intell Law 18:217\u2013246","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9311_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-013-9139-x","volume":"21","author":"D Walton","year":"2013","unstructured":"Walton D (2013) Argument from analogy in legal rhetoric. Artif Intell Law 21:279\u2013302","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9311_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781107110311","volume-title":"Burden of Proof, Presumption and Argumentation","author":"D Walton","year":"2014","unstructured":"Walton D (2014) Burden of Proof, Presumption and Argumentation. Cambridge University Press, NY"},{"key":"9311_CR67","first-page":"369","volume":"27","author":"D Walton","year":"2019","unstructured":"Walton D (2019) When expert opinion evidence goes wrong. Artif Intell 27:369\u2013401","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"9311_CR84","unstructured":"Walton D, Krabbe E (1995) Commitment in Dialogue. Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY"},{"key":"9311_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-009-9078-8","volume":"17","author":"M Wardeh","year":"2009","unstructured":"Wardeh M, Bench-Capon T, Coenen F (2009) PADUA: a protocol for argumentation dialogue using association rules. Artif Intell Law 17:183\u2013215","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9311_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wardeh M, Bench-Capon T, Coenen F (2007) PADUA protocol: Strategies and tactics. In: Proceedings of ECSQARU, 10th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, LNAI 4724. pp 465\u2013476","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-75256-1_42"},{"key":"9311_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-017-9438-6","volume":"32","author":"M Xiong","year":"2018","unstructured":"Xiong M, Zenker F (2018) Legal facts in argumentation-based litigation games. Argumentation 32:197\u2013211","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9311_CR71","first-page":"345","volume":"3","author":"I Younger","year":"1980","unstructured":"Younger I (1980) The facts of a case. Univ Arkansas Little Rock Law J 3:345\u2013360","journal-title":"Univ Arkansas Little Rock Law J"},{"key":"9311_CR98","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yu S, Zenker F (2020) Schemes, critical questions, and complete argument evaluation. Argumentation 34:469\u2013498","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-020-09512-4"}],"container-title":["Artificial Intelligence and Law"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-022-09311-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10506-022-09311-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-022-09311-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,13]],"date-time":"2023-04-13T07:18:56Z","timestamp":1681370336000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10506-022-09311-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,25]]},"references-count":92,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,6]]}},"alternative-id":["9311"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-022-09311-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["0924-8463","1572-8382"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0924-8463"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1572-8382"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,25]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2 March 2022","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 March 2022","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}