{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,15]],"date-time":"2026-04-15T19:04:17Z","timestamp":1776279857300,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":113,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,6]],"date-time":"2022-08-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1659744000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,6]],"date-time":"2022-08-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1659744000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Artif Intell Law"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-022-09324-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,6]],"date-time":"2022-08-06T16:02:45Z","timestamp":1659801765000},"page":"593-610","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: overviews"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"30","author":[{"given":"Micha\u0142","family":"Araszkiewicz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3975-4398","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Trevor","family":"Bench-Capon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Enrico","family":"Francesconi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Marc","family":"Lauritsen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Antonino","family":"Rotolo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"9324_CR1","unstructured":"Alexy R (1989) A Theory of Legal Argumentation. Clarendon Press. (1st edition in German 1978)"},{"issue":"4","key":"9324_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-007-9048-y","volume":"15","author":"L \u00c5qvist","year":"2007","unstructured":"\u00c5qvist L (2007) An interpretation of probability in the law of evidence based on pro-et-contra argumentation. Artif Intell Law 15(4):391\u2013410","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"4","key":"9324_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-009-9083-y","volume":"17","author":"KD Ashley","year":"2009","unstructured":"Ashley KD (2009) Teaching a process model of legal argument with hypotheticals. Artif Intell Law 17(4):321\u2013370","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9324_CR4","unstructured":"Ashley KD, Baron JR, Conrad JG (eds.) (2010) Artificial Intelligence and Law: Special Issue on Special issue: e-Discovery, 18:4"},{"issue":"3","key":"9324_CR5","first-page":"417","volume":"12","author":"K Atkinson","year":"2021","unstructured":"Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T (2021) Argumentation schemes in AI and Law. Arg Comput 12(3):417\u2013434","journal-title":"Arg Comput"},{"issue":"4","key":"9324_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-006-9001-5","volume":"14","author":"K Atkinson","year":"2006","unstructured":"Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T, McBurney P (2006) PARMENIDES: facilitating deliberation in democracies. Artif Intell Law 14(4):261\u2013275","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"3","key":"9324_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-020-09272-2","volume":"28","author":"K Atkinson","year":"2020","unstructured":"Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T, Bex F, Gordon TF, Prakken H, Sartor G, Verheij B (2020) In memoriam Douglas N. Walton: the influence of Doug Walton on AI and Law. Artif Intell Law 28(3):281\u2013326","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"3","key":"9324_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-019-09258-9","volume":"28","author":"CA Barclay","year":"2020","unstructured":"Barclay CA (2020) Is hybrid formal theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence well suited for negative causation? Artif Intell Law 28(3):361\u2013384","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"4","key":"9324_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-016-9191-4","volume":"24","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (2016) Special issue in memory of Carole Hafner: editor\u2019s introduction. Artif Intell Law 24(4):325\u2013345","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"2","key":"9324_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-017-9201-1","volume":"25","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (2017) HYPO\u2019s legacy: introduction to the virtual special issue. Artif Intell Law 25(2):205\u2013250","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9324_CR11","first-page":"23","volume-title":"International trends in legal informatics: a Festschrift for Erich Schweighofer","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (2020) The need for Good Old Fashioned AI and Law. In: H\u00f6tzendorfer W, Tschohl C, Kummer F (eds) International trends in legal informatics: a Festschrift for Erich Schweighofer. Weblaw, Bern, pp 23\u201336"},{"issue":"5","key":"9324_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1038\/scientificamerican0501-34","volume":"284","author":"T Berners-Lee","year":"2001","unstructured":"Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O (2001) The Semantic Web. Sci Am 284(5):34\u201343","journal-title":"Sci Am"},{"key":"9324_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bex F (2009) Evidence for a good story: a hybrid theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence. In: PhD thesis, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-0140-3_4"},{"key":"9324_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-0140-3","volume-title":"Arguments, stories and criminal evidence: a formal hybrid theory","author":"F Bex","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bex F (2011) Arguments, stories and criminal evidence: a formal hybrid theory. Springer, Berlin"},{"key":"9324_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bex F, Prakken H (2021) On the relevance of algorithmic decision predictors for judicial decision making. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 175\u2013179","DOI":"10.1145\/3462757.3466069"},{"issue":"3","key":"9324_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-012-9137-4","volume":"21","author":"F Bex","year":"2013","unstructured":"Bex F, Verheij B (2013) Legal stories and the process of proof. Artif Intell Law 21(3):253\u2013278","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"2","key":"9324_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1023\/B:ARTI.0000046007.11806.9a","volume":"11","author":"F Bex","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bex F, Prakken H, Reed C, Walton D (2003) Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence: argumentation schemes and generalisations. Artif Intell Law 11(2):125\u2013165","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"2","key":"9324_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-010-9092-x","volume":"18","author":"F Bex","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bex F, Van Koppen P, Prakken H, Verheij B (2010) A hybrid formal theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence. Artif Intell Law 18(2):123\u2013152","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9324_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bex F, Prakken H, van Engers T, Verheij B (eds.) (2017) Artificial Intelligence and Law: Special Issue on Artificial Intelligence for Justice (AI4J), 25:1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-017-9198-5"},{"issue":"2","key":"9324_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-020-09270-4","volume":"29","author":"A Bibal","year":"2021","unstructured":"Bibal A, Lognoul M, De Streel A, Fr\u00e9nay B (2021) Legal requirements on explainability in machine learning. Artif Intell Law 29(2):149\u2013169","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9324_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bizer C, Heath T, Berners-Lee T (2011) Linked data: The story so far. In: Semantic services, interoperability and web applications: emerging concepts, pages 205\u2013227. IGI global","DOI":"10.4018\/978-1-60960-593-3.ch008"},{"key":"9324_CR22","unstructured":"Breuker J, Hoekstra R (2004) Epistemology and ontology in core ontologies: FOLaw and LRI-Core, two core ontologies for law. In: Gangemi Aldo, Borgo Stefano (eds.), Core Ontologies in Ontology Engineering 2004, volume 118 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, pages 1\u201313"},{"key":"9324_CR23","unstructured":"Breuker J, Valente A, Winkels R, et al (1997) Legal ontologies: a functional view. In: Procseedings of 1st LegOnt Workshop on Legal Ontologies, pages 23\u201336"},{"key":"9324_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-1497-7","volume-title":"Legal ontology engineering: methodologies, modelling trends, and the ontology of professional judicial knowledge","author":"N Casellas","year":"2011","unstructured":"Casellas N (2011) Legal ontology engineering: methodologies, modelling trends, and the ontology of professional judicial knowledge. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin"},{"key":"9324_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dayal S, Harmer M, Johnson P, Mead D (1993) Beyond knowledge representation: commercial uses for legal knowledge bases. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Artificial intelligence and law, pages 167\u2013174","DOI":"10.1145\/158976.158997"},{"key":"9324_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2019.04.009","volume":"130","author":"C de Oliveira Rodrigues","year":"2019","unstructured":"de Oliveira Rodrigues C, de Freitas FLG, Barreiros EFS, de Azevedo RR, de Almeida Filho AT (2019) Legal ontologies over time: a systematic mapping study. Exp Syst Appl 130:12\u201330","journal-title":"Exp Syst Appl"},{"key":"9324_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"di Bello M, Verheij B (eds.) (2020) Artificial Intelligence and Law: Special Issue on Evidence and decision making in the law, 28:1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-019-09253-0"},{"issue":"2","key":"9324_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung PM (1995) On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif Intell 77(2):321\u2013357","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"issue":"2","key":"9324_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-006-9013-1","volume":"13","author":"B Emilia","year":"2005","unstructured":"Emilia B, John Z (2005) Developing negotiation decision support systems that support mediators: a case study of the Famil$$\\underline{\\,}$$Winner system. Artif Intell Law 13(2):233\u2013271","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"1","key":"9324_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-013-9147-x","volume":"22","author":"N Fenton","year":"2014","unstructured":"Fenton N, Neil M, Hsu A (2014) Calculating and understanding the value of any type of match evidence when there are potential testing errors. Artif Intell Law 22(1):1\u201328","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9324_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fern\u00e1ndez-Barrera M, Sartor G (2011) The legal theory perspective: doctrinal conceptual systems vs. computational ontologies. In: Approaches to legal ontologies, pages 15\u201347. Springer","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-0120-5_2"},{"key":"9324_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gangemi A, Presutti V (2009) Ontology design patterns. In: Handbook on ontologies, pages 221\u2013243. Springer","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-92673-3_10"},{"key":"9324_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gangemi A, Guarino N, Masolo C, Oltramari A, Schneider L (2002) Sweetening ontologies with DOLCE. In: International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, pages 166\u2013181. Springer","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-45810-7_18"},{"key":"9324_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gangemi A, Sagri M, Tiscornia D (2005) A constructive framework for legal ontologies. In: Law and the semantic web, pages 97\u2013124. Springer","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-32253-5_7"},{"key":"9324_CR35","unstructured":"Gruber TR (1991) The role of common ontology in achieving sharable, reusable knowledge bases. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR\u201991), pages 601\u2013602"},{"issue":"1\u20133","key":"9324_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1019511830613","volume":"10","author":"CD Hafner","year":"2002","unstructured":"Hafner CD, Rissland EL (2002) Editors\u2019 introduction: special issue in memory of Donald H. Berman. Artif Intell Law 10(1\u20133):3","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"1","key":"9324_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00871749","volume":"2","author":"M Harbidge","year":"1993","unstructured":"Harbidge M, Catchpole M (1993) Technology report: pharos: business adviser. Artif Intell Law 2(1):69\u201381","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9324_CR38","unstructured":"Hart Herbert LA (1994) The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press, 2nd edition, (1st ed. 1961)"},{"issue":"4","key":"9324_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1025450015111","volume":"10","author":"J Hokkanen","year":"2002","unstructured":"Hokkanen J, Lauritsen M (2002) Knowledge tools for legal knowledge tool makers. Artif Intell Law 10(4):295\u2013302","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9324_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Johnson P, Mead D (1991) Legislative knowledge base systems for public administration: some practical issues. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 108\u2013117","DOI":"10.1145\/112646.112660"},{"issue":"4","key":"9324_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1011219731903","volume":"8","author":"A J\u00f8sang","year":"2000","unstructured":"J\u00f8sang A, Bondi VA (2000) Legal reasoning with subjective logic. Artif Intell Law 8(4):289\u2013315","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9324_CR42","volume-title":"A probabilistic analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti evidence","author":"JB Kadane","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kadane JB, Schum DA (2011) A probabilistic analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti evidence. John Wiley & Sons"},{"key":"9324_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kennedy Dennis M, Lauritsen M, Oskamp A (eds.) (2002) Artificial Intelligence and Law: Special Issue on Practical Use of AI in Law, 10:4","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1025441728937"},{"issue":"2","key":"9324_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-012-9121-z","volume":"20","author":"J Keppens","year":"2012","unstructured":"Keppens J (2012) Argument diagram extraction from evidential bayesian networks. Artif Intell Law 20(2):109\u2013143","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9324_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Keppens J, Zeleznikow J (2003) A model based reasoning approach for generating plausible crime scenarios from evidence. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 51\u201359","DOI":"10.1145\/1047788.1047796"},{"key":"9324_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kowalski R, Datoo A (2021) Logical English meets legal English for swaps and derivatives. Artif Intell Law, pages 1\u201335","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-021-09295-3"},{"key":"9324_CR47","unstructured":"Kowalski Robert A, Sergot Marek J (1985) Computer representation of the law. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 1985, pages 1269\u20131270"},{"issue":"1","key":"9324_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00118480","volume":"1","author":"M Lauritsen","year":"1992","unstructured":"Lauritsen M (1992) Technology report: building legal practice systems with today\u2019s commercial authoring tools. Artif Intell Law 1(1):87\u2013102","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"4","key":"9324_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00871854","volume":"3","author":"M Lauritsen","year":"1995","unstructured":"Lauritsen M (1995) Technology report: work product retrieval systems in today\u2019s law offices. Artif Intell Law 3(4):287\u2013304","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"2","key":"9324_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-019-09252-1","volume":"28","author":"V Leone","year":"2020","unstructured":"Leone V, Di Caro L, Villata S (2020) Taking stock of legal ontologies: a feature-based comparative analysis. Artif Intell Law 28(2):207\u2013235","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9324_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lodder Arno R, Zeleznikow J (eds.) (2005) Artificial Intelligence and Law: Special Issue onOn-Line Dispute Resolution, 13:2","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-006-9010-4"},{"key":"9324_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lutomski Leonard S (1989) The design of an attorney\u2019s statistical consultant. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 224\u2013233","DOI":"10.1145\/74014.74043"},{"key":"9324_CR53","volume-title":"Legal reasoning and legal theory","author":"N MacCormick","year":"1978","unstructured":"MacCormick N (1978) Legal reasoning and legal theory. Clarendon, Oxford"},{"issue":"4","key":"9324_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00871853","volume":"3","author":"RE Macneel","year":"1995","unstructured":"Macneel RE (1995) Technology report: intelligent summoner. Artif Intell Law 3(4):277\u2013285","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9324_CR55","unstructured":"Martino A, Nissan E (eds.) (2001) Artificial Intelligence and Law: Special Issue on Formal Approaches to Legal Evidence, 9:2\u20133"},{"key":"9324_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McCarty LT (1989) A language for legal discourse I. basic features. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 180\u2013189","DOI":"10.1145\/74014.74037"},{"key":"9324_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McCarty LT (1997) Some arguments about legal arguments. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 215\u2013224","DOI":"10.1145\/261618.261656"},{"issue":"2","key":"9324_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-019-09255-y","volume":"28","author":"M Medvedeva","year":"2020","unstructured":"Medvedeva M, Vols M, Wieling M (2020) Using machine learning to predict decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. Artif Intell Law 28(2):237\u2013266","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9324_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Medvedeva M, Wieling M, Vols M (2022) Rethinking the field of automatic prediction of court decisions. Artif Intell Law, pages 1\u201318","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-021-09306-3"},{"issue":"11","key":"9324_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1145\/219717.219748","volume":"38","author":"GA Miller","year":"1995","unstructured":"Miller GA (1995) Wordnet: a lexical database for English. Commun ACM 38(11):39\u201341","journal-title":"Commun ACM"},{"issue":"3","key":"9324_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-010-9103-y","volume":"18","author":"TA Oriola","year":"2010","unstructured":"Oriola TA (2010) The use of legal software by non-lawyers and the perils of unauthorised practice of law charges in the United States: a review of Jayson Reynoso decision. Artif Intell Law 18(3):285\u2013309","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"4","key":"9324_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1025402013007","volume":"10","author":"A Oskamp","year":"2002","unstructured":"Oskamp A, Lauritsen M (2002) AI in law practice? so far, not much. Artif Intell Law 10(4):227","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"4","key":"9324_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008298517919","volume":"5","author":"A Oskamp","year":"1997","unstructured":"Oskamp A, Tragter MW (1997) Automated legal decision systems in practice: the mirror of reality. Artif Intell Law 5(4):291\u2013322","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"9324_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-0277(93)90038-W","volume":"49","author":"N Pennington","year":"1993","unstructured":"Pennington N, Hastie R (1993) Reasoning in explanation-based decision making. Cognition 49(1\u20132):123\u2013163","journal-title":"Cognition"},{"key":"9324_CR65","unstructured":"Peters W, Sagri Maria T, Tiscornia D, Castagnoli S (2006) The LOIS project. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC\u201906)"},{"issue":"2","key":"9324_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-007-9034-4","volume":"15","author":"W Peters","year":"2007","unstructured":"Peters W, Sagri M, Tiscornia D (2007) The structuring of legal knowledge in LOIS. Artif Intell Law 15(2):117\u2013135","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"4","key":"9324_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1207\/s15516709cog1104_4","volume":"11","author":"JL Pollock","year":"1987","unstructured":"Pollock JL (1987) Defeasible reasoning. Cognit Sci 11(4):481\u2013518","journal-title":"Cognit Sci"},{"key":"9324_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-8975-8","volume-title":"Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument. a Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law","author":"H Prakken","year":"1997","unstructured":"Prakken H (1997) Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument. a Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law. Springer Science Business Media, Dordrech"},{"issue":"1","key":"9324_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-018-9235-z","volume":"28","author":"H Prakken","year":"2020","unstructured":"Prakken H (2020) A new use case for argumentation support tools: supporting discussions of Bayesian analyses of complex criminal cases. Artif Intell Law 28(1):27\u201349","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9324_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prakken H, Sartor G (2007) Formalising arguments about the burden of persuasion. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 97\u2013106","DOI":"10.1145\/1276318.1276338"},{"issue":"04","key":"9324_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"961","DOI":"10.1142\/S0218213004001922","volume":"13","author":"C Reed","year":"2004","unstructured":"Reed C, Rowe G (2004) Araucaria: software for argument analysis, diagramming and representation. Int J Artif Intell Tools 13(04):961\u2013979","journal-title":"Int J Artif Intell Tools"},{"key":"9324_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sartor G, Karl BL (eds.) (1998) Artificial Intelligence and Law: Special Issue on Judicial applications of Artificial Intelligence, 6:2-4","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008223408127"},{"key":"9324_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sartor G, Araszkiewicz M, Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T, Bex F, van Engers T, Francesconi E, Prakken H, Sileno G (2022) Thirty years of AI and Law: The second decade. Artif Intell Law, 30(4)","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-022-09326-7"},{"issue":"1","key":"9324_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1145\/3495564","volume":"65","author":"E Shein","year":"2021","unstructured":"Shein E (2021) Converting laws to programs. Commun ACM 65(1):15\u201316","journal-title":"Commun ACM"},{"issue":"2","key":"9324_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1017995916308","volume":"9","author":"SE Shimony","year":"2001","unstructured":"Shimony SE, Nissan E (2001) Kappa calculus and evidential strength: a note on \u00e5qvist\u2019s logical theory of legal evidence. Artif Intell Law 9(2):153\u2013163","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"4","key":"9324_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00871973","volume":"2","author":"P Soper","year":"1993","unstructured":"Soper P, Bench-Capon T (1993) Coupling hypertext and knowledge based systems: two applications in the legal domain. Artif Intell Law 2(4):293\u2013314","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9324_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9337.1991.tb00094.x","volume":"4","author":"R Stamper","year":"1991","unstructured":"Stamper R (1991) The role of semantics in legal expert systems and legal reasoning. Ratio Juris 4:219","journal-title":"Ratio Juris"},{"key":"9324_CR78","first-page":"349","volume-title":"Signs of work","author":"R Stamper","year":"1996","unstructured":"Stamper R (1996) Signs, information, norms and systems. In: Holmqvist B, Andersenamd Heinz Klein PB, Posner R (eds) Signs of work. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 349\u2013397"},{"key":"9324_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Steging C, Renooij S, Verheij B (2021) Discovering the rationale of decisions: towards a method for aligning learning and reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 235\u2013239","DOI":"10.1145\/3462757.3466059"},{"issue":"1","key":"9324_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-020-09269-x","volume":"29","author":"M Suksi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Suksi M (2021) Administrative due process when using automated decision-making in public administration: some notes from a finnish perspective. Artif Intell Law 29(1):87\u2013110","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"1","key":"9324_CR81","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00871748","volume":"2","author":"R Susskind","year":"1993","unstructured":"Susskind R (1993) The importance of commercial case studies in artificial intelligence and law. Artif Intell Law 2(1):65\u201367","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"4","key":"9324_CR82","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-016-9188-z","volume":"24","author":"A Taal","year":"2016","unstructured":"Taal A, Sherer JA, Bent KA, Fedeles ER (2016) Cognitive computing and proposed approaches to conceptual organization of case law knowledge bases: a proposed model for information preparation, indexing, and analysis. Artif Intell Law 24(4):347\u2013370","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9324_CR83","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"475","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2016.09.002","volume":"80","author":"ST Timmer","year":"2017","unstructured":"Timmer ST, Meyer JC, Prakken H, Renooij S, Verheij B (2017) A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from bayesian networks. Int J Approx Reasoning 80:475\u2013494","journal-title":"Int J Approx Reasoning"},{"issue":"4","key":"9324_CR84","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-008-9071-7","volume":"16","author":"C Unwin","year":"2008","unstructured":"Unwin C (2008) An object model for use in oral and written advocacy. Artif Intell Law 16(4):389\u2013402","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9324_CR85","unstructured":"Valente A (1995) Legal knowledge engineering: a modelling approach. In: IOS Press"},{"key":"9324_CR86","unstructured":"Van den Braak Susan W (2010) Sensemaking software for crime analysis. In: PhD thesis, University Utrecht"},{"key":"9324_CR87","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van Engers Tom M, McIntosh Ann (eds.) (2006) Artificial Intelligence and Law: Special Issue on AI and Law in eGovernment and eDemocracy PART I, 14:4","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-007-9043-3"},{"key":"9324_CR88","volume-title":"Frame-based conceptual models of statute law","author":"R van Kralingen","year":"1995","unstructured":"van Kralingen R (1995) Frame-based conceptual models of statute law. Kluwer Law International, Netherlands"},{"key":"9324_CR89","unstructured":"van Kralingen R(1997) A conceptual frame-based ontology for the law. In: Proceedings of the 1st LegOnt Workshop on legal ontologies, pages 15\u201322"},{"key":"9324_CR90","unstructured":"van Leeuwen L, Verheij B (2019) A comparison of two hybrid methods for analyzing evidential reasoning. In: Proceedings of JURIX 2019, pages 53\u201362"},{"issue":"1","key":"9324_CR91","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-017-9199-4","volume":"25","author":"B Verheij","year":"2017","unstructured":"Verheij B (2017) Proof with and without probabilities. Artif Intell Law 25(1):127\u2013154","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9324_CR92","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Villata S, Araszkiewicz M, Ashley K, Bench-Capon T, Karl Branting L, Conrad Jack G, Wyner A (2022) Thirty years of AI and Law: The third decade. Artif Intell Law, 30(4)","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-022-09327-6"},{"key":"9324_CR93","volume-title":"Knowledge specification for multiple legal tasks; a case study of the interaction problem in the legal domain","author":"P Visser","year":"1995","unstructured":"Visser P (1995) Knowledge specification for multiple legal tasks; a case study of the interaction problem in the legal domain. Kluwer Law Internationa"},{"key":"9324_CR94","unstructured":"Visser P, Bench-Capon T (1996a) The formal specification of a legal ontology. In: Proceedings of JURIX 1996, pages 15\u201324"},{"key":"9324_CR95","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Visser P, Bench-Capon T (1996b) On the reusability of ontologies in knowledge-system design. In: Proceedings of 7th International Conference and Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, pages 256\u2013261. IEEE","DOI":"10.1109\/DEXA.1996.558312"},{"issue":"1","key":"9324_CR96","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008251913710","volume":"6","author":"P Visser","year":"1998","unstructured":"Visser P, Bench-Capon T (1998) A comparison of four ontologies for the design of legal knowledge systems. Artif Intell Law 6(1):27\u201357","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"4","key":"9324_CR97","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-014-9161-7","volume":"22","author":"CS Vlek","year":"2014","unstructured":"Vlek CS, Prakken H, Renooij S, Verheij B (2014) Building Bayesian networks for legal evidence with narratives: a case study evaluation. Artif Intell Law 22(4):375\u2013421","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"3","key":"9324_CR98","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-016-9183-4","volume":"24","author":"CS Vlek","year":"2016","unstructured":"Vlek CS, Prakken H, Renooij S, Verheij B (2016) A method for explaining Bayesian networks for legal evidence with scenarios. Artif Intell Law 24(3):285\u2013324","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9324_CR99","volume-title":"EuroWordNet: a multilingual database with lexical semantic networks","year":"1998","unstructured":"Vossen P (ed) (1998) EuroWordNet: a multilingual database with lexical semantic networks. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York"},{"key":"9324_CR100","volume-title":"Anchored narratives: the psychology of criminal evidence","author":"WA Wagenaar","year":"1993","unstructured":"Wagenaar WA, Van Koppen PJ, Crombag HFM (1993) Anchored narratives: the psychology of criminal evidence. St Martin\u2019s Press, New York"},{"key":"9324_CR101","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning","author":"D Walton","year":"1996","unstructured":"Walton D (1996) Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah"},{"issue":"1","key":"9324_CR102","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1023\/B:ARTI.0000013333.96215.a9","volume":"11","author":"D Walton","year":"2003","unstructured":"Walton D (2003) Is there a burden of questioning? Artif Intell Law 11(1):1\u201343","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"3","key":"9324_CR103","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-006-9025-x","volume":"14","author":"D Walton","year":"2006","unstructured":"Walton D (2006) How to make and defend a proposal in a deliberation dialogue. Artif Intell Law 14(3):177\u2013239","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"2","key":"9324_CR104","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-008-9063-7","volume":"16","author":"D Walton","year":"2008","unstructured":"Walton D (2008) A dialogical theory of presumption. Artif Intell Law 16(2):209\u2013243","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"3","key":"9324_CR105","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-010-9102-z","volume":"18","author":"D Walton","year":"2010","unstructured":"Walton D (2010) Similarity, precedent and argument from analogy. Artif Intell Law 18(3):217\u2013246","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"4","key":"9324_CR106","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-013-9151-1","volume":"22","author":"D Walton","year":"2014","unstructured":"Walton D (2014) Baseballs and arguments from fairness. Artif Intell Law 22(4):423\u2013449","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"4","key":"9324_CR107","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-019-09249-w","volume":"27","author":"D Walton","year":"2019","unstructured":"Walton D (2019) When expert opinion evidence goes wrong. Artif Intell Law 27(4):369\u2013401","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9324_CR108","volume-title":"Commitment in dialogue: basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning","author":"D Walton","year":"1995","unstructured":"Walton D, Krabbe ECW (1995) Commitment in dialogue: basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. SUNY press, New York"},{"issue":"2","key":"9324_CR109","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-012-9132-9","volume":"21","author":"D Walton","year":"2013","unstructured":"Walton D, Zhang N (2013) The epistemology of scientific evidence. Artif Intell Law 21(2):173\u2013219","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9324_CR110","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes","author":"D Walton","year":"2008","unstructured":"Walton D, Reed C, Macagno F (2008) Argumentation schemes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9324_CR111","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wieten R, Bex F, Prakken H, Renooij S (2019) Supporting discussions about forensic bayesian networks using argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 143\u2013152","DOI":"10.1145\/3322640.3326710"},{"key":"9324_CR112","volume-title":"The principles of judicial proof: as given by logic, psychology, and general experience, and illustrated in judicial trials","author":"JH Wigmore","year":"1913","unstructured":"Wigmore JH (1913) The principles of judicial proof: as given by logic, psychology, and general experience, and illustrated in judicial trials. Little and Brown, New York"},{"issue":"3","key":"9324_CR113","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00871889","volume":"2","author":"J Zeleznikow","year":"1993","unstructured":"Zeleznikow J, Vossos G, Hunter D (1993) The IKBALS project: multi-modal reasoning in legal knowledge based systems. Artif Intell Law 2(3):169\u2013203","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"}],"container-title":["Artificial Intelligence and Law"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-022-09324-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10506-022-09324-9\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-022-09324-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,30]],"date-time":"2024-09-30T21:57:26Z","timestamp":1727733446000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10506-022-09324-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,6]]},"references-count":113,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]}},"alternative-id":["9324"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-022-09324-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["0924-8463","1572-8382"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0924-8463","type":"print"},{"value":"1572-8382","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 July 2022","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 August 2022","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}