{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,4]],"date-time":"2026-03-04T14:21:09Z","timestamp":1772634069307,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":170,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,8]],"date-time":"2022-08-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1659916800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,8]],"date-time":"2022-08-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1659916800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Artif Intell Law"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-022-09326-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,8]],"date-time":"2022-08-08T03:11:38Z","timestamp":1659928298000},"page":"521-557","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":21,"title":["Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the second decade"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"30","author":[{"given":"Giovanni","family":"Sartor","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Micha\u0142","family":"Araszkiewicz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Katie","family":"Atkinson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Floris","family":"Bex","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Tom","family":"van Engers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Enrico","family":"Francesconi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Henry","family":"Prakken","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Giovanni","family":"Sileno","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Frank","family":"Schilder","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Adam","family":"Wyner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3975-4398","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Trevor","family":"Bench-Capon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"9326_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Agnoloni T, Barrera MF, Sagri MT, Tiscorni D, Venturi G (2009) When a framenet-style knowledge description meets an ontological characterization of fundamental legal concepts. In: Palmirani M, Pagallo U, Casanovas P, Sartor G (eds) AI approaches to the complexity of legal systems. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 93\u2013112","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-16524-5_7"},{"key":"9326_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Al-Abdulkarim L, Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T (2015) Factors, issues and values: revisiting reasoning with cases. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 3\u201312","DOI":"10.1145\/2746090.2746103"},{"issue":"1","key":"9326_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-016-9178-1","volume":"24","author":"L Al-Abdulkarim","year":"2016","unstructured":"Al-Abdulkarim L, Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T (2016) A methodology for designing systems to reason with legal cases using ADFs. Artif Intell Law 24(1):1\u201349","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"1","key":"9326_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-181005","volume":"10","author":"L Al-Abdulkarim","year":"2019","unstructured":"Al-Abdulkarim L, Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T, Whittle S, Williams R, Wolfenden C (2019) Noise induced hearing loss: building an application using the ANGELIC methodology. Argum Comput 10(1):5\u201322","journal-title":"Argum Comput"},{"key":"9326_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e93","DOI":"10.7717\/peerj-cs.93","volume":"2","author":"N Aletras","year":"2016","unstructured":"Aletras N, Tsarapatsanis D, Preo\u0163iuc-Pietro D, Lampos V (2016) Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. PeerJ Comput Sci 2:e93","journal-title":"PeerJ Comput Sci"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"9326_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(03)00105-X","volume":"150","author":"V Aleven","year":"2003","unstructured":"Aleven V (2003) Using background knowledge in case-based legal reasoning: a computational model and an intelligent learning environment. Artif Intell 150(1\u20132):183\u2013237","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"9326_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aleven V, Ashley KD (1995) Doing things with factors. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 31\u201341","DOI":"10.1145\/222092.222106"},{"key":"9326_CR8","first-page":"1","volume":"63","author":"L Alexander","year":"1989","unstructured":"Alexander L (1989) Constrained by precedent. South Calif Law Rev 63:1","journal-title":"South Calif Law Rev"},{"key":"9326_CR9","volume-title":"Automated analysis of legal texts","author":"LE Allen","year":"1986","unstructured":"Allen LE, Saxon CS (1986) Analysis of the logical structure of legal rules by a modernized and formalized version of Hohfeld legal conceptions. In: Martino A, Natali F (eds) Automated analysis of legal texts. North Holland, Amsterdam"},{"key":"9326_CR10","first-page":"205","volume-title":"Deontic logic in computer science: normative system specification","author":"LE Allen","year":"1993","unstructured":"Allen LE, Saxon CS (1993) A-Hofeld: a language for robust structural representation of knowledge in the legal domain to build interpretation-assistance expert systems. In: Meyer J-J, Wieringa R (eds) Deontic logic in computer science: normative system specification. Chichester, Wiley, pp 205\u2013224"},{"issue":"1","key":"9326_CR11","first-page":"291","volume":"8","author":"M Araszkiewicz","year":"2021","unstructured":"Araszkiewicz M (2021) Critical questions to argumentation schemes in statutory interpretation. J Appl Log 8(1):291\u2013320","journal-title":"J Appl Log"},{"key":"9326_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Araszkiewicz M, Bench-Capon T, Francesconi E, Lauritsen M, Rotolo A (2022) Thirty years of AI and law: overviews. Artif Intell Law 30(2):147\u2013161","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-022-09309-8"},{"key":"9326_CR13","volume-title":"Modeling legal arguments: reasoning with cases and hypotheticals","author":"KD Ashley","year":"1990","unstructured":"Ashley KD (1990) Modeling legal arguments: reasoning with cases and hypotheticals. MIT Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9326_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.26826\/law-in-context.v36i1.88","volume":"36","author":"KD Ashley","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ashley KD (2019) A brief history of the changing roles of case prediction in AI and law. Law Context Socio-Legal J 36:93","journal-title":"Law Context Socio-Legal J"},{"issue":"2","key":"9326_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-009-9077-9","volume":"17","author":"KD Ashley","year":"2009","unstructured":"Ashley KD, Br\u00fcninghaus S (2009) Automatically classifying case texts and predicting outcomes. Artif Intell Law 17(2):125\u2013165","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9326_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Atkinson K (ed) (2012) Artificial intelligence and law: special issue on modelling Popov v Hayashi vol 20:1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-012-9122-y"},{"issue":"3","key":"9326_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"417","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-200543","volume":"12","author":"K Atkinson","year":"2021","unstructured":"Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T (2021) Argumentation schemes in AI and Law. Argum Comput 12(3):417\u2013434","journal-title":"Argum Comput"},{"issue":"4","key":"9326_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-006-9001-5","volume":"14","author":"K Atkinson","year":"2006","unstructured":"Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T, McBurney P (2006) PARMENIDES: facilitating deliberation in democracies. Artif Intell Law 14(4):261\u2013275","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"3","key":"9326_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-020-09272-2","volume":"28","author":"K Atkinson","year":"2020","unstructured":"Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T, Bex F, Gordon TF, Prakken H, Sartor G, Verheij B (2020) In memoriam Douglas N. Walton: the influence of Doug Walton on AI and Law. Artif Intell Law 28(3):281\u2013326","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9326_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T, Bollegala D (2020b) Explanation in AI and law: past, present and future. Artif Intell, p 103387","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2020.103387"},{"key":"9326_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (1989) Deep models, normative reasoning and legal expert systems. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 37\u201345","DOI":"10.1145\/74014.74020"},{"key":"9326_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (1999) Some observations on modelling case based reasoning with formal argument models. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 36\u201342","DOI":"10.1145\/323706.323713"},{"issue":"1","key":"9326_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1019501830692","volume":"10","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2002","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (2002) The missing link revisited: the role of teleology in representing legal argument. Artif Intell Law 10(1):79\u201394","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"1","key":"9326_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-012-9118-7","volume":"20","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (2012) Representing Popov v Hayashi with dimensions and factors. Artif Intell Law 20(1):15\u201335","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9326_CR25","first-page":"23","volume-title":"International trends in legal informatics: a Festschrift for Erich Schweighofer","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T (2020) The need for Good Old Fashioned AI and Law. In: H\u00f6tzendorfer W, Tschohl C, Kummer F (eds) International trends in legal informatics: a Festschrift for Erich Schweighofer. Weblaw, Bern, pp 23\u201336"},{"key":"9326_CR26","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Atkinson K (2018) Lessons from implementing factors with magnitude. In: Proceedings of Jurix-2018, pp 11\u201320. IOS"},{"key":"9326_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Atkinson K (2021) Precedential constraint: the role of issues. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 12\u201321","DOI":"10.1145\/3462757.3466062"},{"key":"9326_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Modgil S (2009) Case law in extended argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 118\u2013127","DOI":"10.1145\/1568234.1568248"},{"issue":"2","key":"9326_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-010-9094-8","volume":"18","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Prakken H (2010) Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in law. Artif Intell Law 18(2):153\u2013174","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"9326_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(03)00108-5","volume":"150","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Sartor G (2003) A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values. Artif Intell 150(1\u20132):97\u2013143","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"issue":"1","key":"9326_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1080\/13600834.1993.9965668","volume":"2","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"1993","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Coenen F, Orton P (1993) Argument-based explanation of the British Nationality Act as a logic program. Inf Commun Technol Law 2(1):53\u201366","journal-title":"Inf Commun Technol Law"},{"issue":"3","key":"9326_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-012-9131-x","volume":"20","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bench-Capon T, Araszkiewicz M, Ashley K, Atkinson K, Bex F, Borges F, Bourcier D, Bourgine P, Conrad JG, Francesconi E et al (2012) A history of AI and Law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and law. Artif Intell Law 20(3):215\u2013319","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9326_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Berman DH, Hafner CL (1991) Incorporating procedural context into a model of case-based legal reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 12\u201320","DOI":"10.1145\/112646.112648"},{"key":"9326_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Berman DH, Hafner CL (1993) Representing teleological structure in case-based legal reasoning: The missing link. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 50\u201359","DOI":"10.1145\/158976.158982"},{"key":"9326_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Berman DH, Hafner CL (1995) Understanding precedents in a temporal context of evolving legal doctrine. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 42\u201351","DOI":"10.1145\/222092.222116"},{"key":"9326_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-0140-3","volume-title":"Arguments, stories and criminal evidence: a formal hybrid theory","author":"F Bex","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bex F (2011) Arguments, stories and criminal evidence: a formal hybrid theory. Springer, Berlin"},{"key":"9326_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bex F, Prakken H (2021) On the relevance of algorithmic decision predictors for judicial decision making. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 175\u2013179","DOI":"10.1145\/3462757.3466069"},{"issue":"3","key":"9326_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-011-9257-0","volume":"26","author":"F Bex","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bex F, Verheij B (2012) Solving a murder case by asking critical questions: an approach to fact-finding in terms of argumentation and story schemes. Argumentation 26(3):325\u2013353","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"3","key":"9326_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-012-9137-4","volume":"21","author":"F Bex","year":"2013","unstructured":"Bex F, Verheij B (2013) Legal stories and the process of proof. Artif Intell Law 21(3):253\u2013278","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"2","key":"9326_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1023\/B:ARTI.0000046007.11806.9a","volume":"11","author":"F Bex","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bex F, Prakken H, Reed C, Walton D (2003) Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence: argumentation schemes and generalisations. Artif Intell Law 11(2):125\u2013165","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9326_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bhattacharya P, Hiware K, Rajgaria S, Pochhi N, Ghosh K, Ghosh S (2019) A comparative study of summarization algorithms applied to legal case judgments. In: Advances in information retrieval\u201441st European conference on IR research, ECIR 2019, pp 413\u2013428","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-15712-8_27"},{"key":"9326_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Branting LK (1991) Reasoning with portions of precedents. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 145\u2013154","DOI":"10.1145\/112646.112664"},{"issue":"1","key":"9326_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00871744","volume":"2","author":"LK Branting","year":"1993","unstructured":"Branting LK (1993) A computational model of ratio decidendi. Artif Intell Law 2(1):1\u201331","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"2","key":"9326_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-020-09273-1","volume":"29","author":"LK Branting","year":"2021","unstructured":"Branting LK, Pfeifer C, Brown B, Ferro L, Aberdeen J, Weiss B, Pfaff M, Liao B (2021) Scalable and explainable legal prediction. Artif Intell Law 29(2):213\u2013238","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9326_CR45","unstructured":"Breuker J, Elhag A, Petkov E, Winkels R (2002) IT support for the judiciary: Use of ontologies in the e-court project. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on conceptual structures, integration and interfaces, pp 15\u201319"},{"key":"9326_CR46","unstructured":"Breuker J, Hoekstra R et\u00a0al. (2004a) Core concepts of law: taking common-sense seriously. In: Proceedings of formal ontologies in information systems, pp 210\u2013221"},{"key":"9326_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Breuker J, Tiscornia D, Winkels R, Gangemi A (eds) (2004) Artificial intelligence and law: special issue on ontologies for law 12:4","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-006-0001-2"},{"issue":"4","key":"9326_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-006-0002-1","volume":"12","author":"J Breuker","year":"2004","unstructured":"Breuker J, Valente A, Winkels R (2004) Legal ontologies in knowledge engineering and information management. Artif Intell Law 12(4):241\u2013277","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9326_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Br\u00fcninghaus S, Ashley KD (2003) Predicting outcomes of case based legal arguments. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 233\u2013242","DOI":"10.1145\/1047788.1047838"},{"key":"9326_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chalkidis I, Androutsopoulos I, Aletras N (2019) Neural legal judgment prediction in english. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.02059","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/P19-1424"},{"key":"9326_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chalkidis I, Fergadiotis M, Malakasiotis P, Aletras N, Androutsopoulos I (2020) Legal-bert: the muppets straight out of law school. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02559","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2020.findings-emnlp.261"},{"key":"9326_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cheng J, Lapata M (2016) Neural summarization by extracting sentences and words. In: Proceedings of the 54th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Berlin, Germany, pp 484\u2013494","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/P16-1046"},{"issue":"3","key":"9326_CR53","first-page":"323","volume":"13","author":"A Chorley","year":"2005","unstructured":"Chorley A, Bench-Capon T (2005) An empirical investigation of reasoning with legal cases through theory construction and application. Artif Intell Law 13(3):323\u2013371","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9326_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"de\u00a0Oliveira\u00a0Lima JA, Griffo C, Almeida JPA, Guizzardi G, Aranha MI (2021) Casting the light of the Theory of Opposition onto Hohfeld\u2019s fundamental legal concepts. Legal Theory, pp 1\u201334","DOI":"10.1017\/S1352325221000070"},{"key":"9326_CR55","unstructured":"Devlin J, Chang M-W, Lee K, Toutanova K (2019) BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: Proceedings of the 2019 conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for computational linguistics: human language technologies, NAACL-HLT 2019, vol 1, pp 4171\u20134186"},{"key":"9326_CR56","volume-title":"Feature engineering for machine learning and data analytics","year":"2018","unstructured":"Dong G, Liu H (eds) (2018) Feature engineering for machine learning and data analytics. CRC Press, Boca Raton"},{"issue":"2","key":"9326_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung PM et al (1995) On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif Intell 77(2):321\u2013357","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"9326_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"de\u00a0Vargas Feijo D, Moreira VP (2021) Improving abstractive summarization of legal rulings through textual entailment. Artificial Intelligence and law, pp1\u201323","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-021-09305-4"},{"issue":"3","key":"9326_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-014-9158-2","volume":"22","author":"E Francesconi","year":"2014","unstructured":"Francesconi E (2014) A description logic framework for advanced accessing and reasoning over normative provisions. Artif Intell Law 22(3):291\u2013311","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9326_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Francesconi E (2022) The winter, the summer and the summer dream of artificial intelligence in law. Artif Intell Law, pp 1\u201315","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-022-09309-8"},{"key":"9326_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gargett A, Firth R, Aletras N (2020) Legalops: a summarization corpus of legal opinions. In: IEEE international conference on big data 2020, pp 2117\u20132120","DOI":"10.1109\/BigData50022.2020.9378308"},{"issue":"4","key":"9326_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00871972","volume":"2","author":"TF Gordon","year":"1993","unstructured":"Gordon TF (1993) The Pleadings game. Artif Intell Law 2(4):239\u2013292","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9326_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gordon TF (2008) Constructing legal arguments with rules in the legal knowledge interchange format (LKIF). In: Computable models of the law. Springer, Berlin, pp 162\u2013184","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-85569-9_11"},{"key":"9326_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gordon TF, Walton D (2009) Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 137\u2013146","DOI":"10.1145\/1568234.1568250"},{"issue":"1","key":"9326_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-012-9120-0","volume":"20","author":"TF Gordon","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gordon TF, Walton D (2012) A Carneades reconstruction of Popov v Hayashi. Artif Intell Law 20(1):37\u201356","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"10\u201315","key":"9326_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"875","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.010","volume":"171","author":"TF Gordon","year":"2007","unstructured":"Gordon TF, Prakken H, Walton D (2007) The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artif Intell 171(10\u201315):875\u2013896","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"9326_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Governatori G, Bench-Capon T, Verheij B, Araszkiewicz M, Francesconi E, Matthias G (2022) Thirty years of AI and law: the first decade. Artif Intell Law 30(4)","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-022-09329-4"},{"key":"9326_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grabmair M (2017) Predicting trade secret case outcomes using argument schemes and learned quantitative value effect tradeoffs. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 89\u201398","DOI":"10.1145\/3086512.3086521"},{"key":"9326_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grabmair M, Ashley KD (2011) Facilitating case comparison using value judgments and intermediate legal concepts. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 161\u2013170","DOI":"10.1145\/2018358.2018382"},{"key":"9326_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Greenwood K, Capon TB, McBurney P (2003) Towards a computational account of persuasion in law. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 22\u201331","DOI":"10.1145\/1047788.1047792"},{"key":"9326_CR71","unstructured":"Griffo C, Almeida JPA, Guizzardi G (2016) Legal relations in a core ontology of legal aspects based on Alexy\u2019s theory of constitutional rights. In: Proceedings of JURIX 2016"},{"issue":"4","key":"9326_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-007-9039-z","volume":"14","author":"B Hachey","year":"2006","unstructured":"Hachey B, Grover C (2006) Extractive summarisation of legal texts. Artif Intell Law 14(4):305\u2013345","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"1","key":"9326_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1019516031847","volume":"10","author":"CD Hafner","year":"2002","unstructured":"Hafner CD, Berman DH (2002) The role of context in case-based legal reasoning: teleological, temporal, and procedural. Artif Intell Law 10(1):19\u201364","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9326_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-8873-7","volume-title":"Reasoning with rules: an essay on legal reasoning and its underlying logic","author":"J Hage","year":"1997","unstructured":"Hage J (1997) Reasoning with rules: an essay on legal reasoning and its underlying logic. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht"},{"issue":"2","key":"9326_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00871759","volume":"2","author":"J Hage","year":"1993","unstructured":"Hage J, Leenes R, Lodder AR (1993) Hard cases: a procedural approach. Artif Intell Law 2(2):113\u2013167","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9326_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hahn U, Oaksford M, Harris A (2013) Testimony and argument: a bayesian perspective. In: Bayesian argumentation. Springer, Berlin, pp 15\u201338","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-5357-0_2"},{"key":"9326_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Henderson J, Bench-Capon T (2019) Describing the development of case law. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 32\u201341","DOI":"10.1145\/3322640.3326697"},{"key":"9326_CR78","first-page":"43","volume":"07","author":"R Hoekstra","year":"2007","unstructured":"Hoekstra R, Breuker J, Di Bello M, Boer A (2007) The LKIF core ontology of basic legal concepts. Proc LOAIT 07:43\u201363","journal-title":"Proc LOAIT"},{"issue":"1","key":"9326_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.2307\/785533","volume":"23","author":"WN Hohfeld","year":"1913","unstructured":"Hohfeld WN (1913) Some fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning. Yale Law J 23(1):16\u201359","journal-title":"Yale Law J"},{"key":"9326_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Horty J (2017) Reasoning with dimensions and magnitudes. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on artificial intelligence and law","DOI":"10.1145\/3086512.3086523"},{"key":"9326_CR81","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1017\/S1352325204000151","volume":"10","author":"JF Horty","year":"2004","unstructured":"Horty JF (2004) The result model of precedent. Leg Theory 10:19\u201331","journal-title":"Leg Theory"},{"key":"9326_CR82","first-page":"1","volume":"10","author":"JF Horty","year":"2011","unstructured":"Horty JF (2011) Rules and reasons in the theory of precedent. Leg Theory 10:1\u201333","journal-title":"Leg Theory"},{"key":"9326_CR83","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-020-09275-z","volume":"29","author":"JF Horty","year":"2021","unstructured":"Horty JF (2021) Modifying the reason model. Artif Intell Law 29:271\u201383","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"2","key":"9326_CR84","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-012-9125-8","volume":"20","author":"JF Horty","year":"2012","unstructured":"Horty JF, Bench-Capon T (2012) A factor-based definition of precedential constraint. Artif Intell Law 20(2):181\u2013214","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9326_CR85","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1016\/j.datak.2012.12.004","volume":"87","author":"S Ingolfo","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ingolfo S, Siena A, Mylopoulos J, Susi A, Perini A (2013) Arguing regulatory compliance of software requirements. Data Knowl Eng 87:279\u2013296","journal-title":"Data Knowl Eng"},{"key":"9326_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jo Y, Visser J, Reed C, Hovy EH (2019) A cascade model for proposition extraction in argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 6th workshop on argument mining, pp 11\u201324","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/W19-4502"},{"issue":"1","key":"9326_CR87","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-007-9045-1","volume":"16","author":"A Jones","year":"2008","unstructured":"Jones A, Parent X (2008) Normative-informational positions: a modal-logical approach. Artif Intell Law 16(1):7\u201323","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"1","key":"9326_CR88","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00118478","volume":"1","author":"A Jones","year":"1992","unstructured":"Jones A, Sergot M (1992) Deontic logic in the representation of law: towards a methodology. Artif Intell Law 1(1):45\u201364","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"3","key":"9326_CR89","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-2567.1972.tb00928.x","volume":"38","author":"S Kanger","year":"1972","unstructured":"Kanger S (1972) Law and logic. Theoria 38(3):105\u2013132","journal-title":"Theoria"},{"key":"9326_CR90","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1525\/9780520312296","volume-title":"Pure theory of law","author":"H Kelsen","year":"1967","unstructured":"Kelsen H (1967) Pure theory of law. University of California Press, Berkeley"},{"key":"9326_CR91","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kornilova A, Eidelman V (2019) Billsum: a corpus for automatic summarization of us legislation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.00523","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/D19-5406"},{"key":"9326_CR92","unstructured":"Lafferty JD, McCallum A, Pereira FCN (2001) Conditional random fields: probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on machine learning (ICML 2001), pp 282\u2013289"},{"issue":"1","key":"9326_CR93","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1017\/S1352325205050019","volume":"11","author":"G Lamond","year":"2005","unstructured":"Lamond G (2005) Do precedents create rules? Leg Theory 11(1):1\u201326","journal-title":"Leg Theory"},{"issue":"4","key":"9326_CR94","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"765","DOI":"10.1162\/coli_a_00364","volume":"45","author":"J Lawrence","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lawrence J, Reed C (2019) Argument mining: a survey. Comput Linguist 45(4):765\u2013818","journal-title":"Comput Linguist"},{"key":"9326_CR95","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lewis M, Liu Y, Goyal N, Ghazvininejad M, Mohamed A, Levy O, Stoyanov V, Zettlemoyer L (2020) BART: denoising sequence-to-sequence pre-training for natural language generation, translation, and comprehension. In: Proceedings of the 58th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, ACL 2020, pp 7871\u20137880","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2020.acl-main.703"},{"key":"9326_CR96","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-010-1202-7","volume-title":"Position and change\u2014a study in law and logic","author":"L Lindahl","year":"1977","unstructured":"Lindahl L (1977) Position and change\u2014a study in law and logic. Reidel, Dordrecht"},{"issue":"2","key":"9326_CR97","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10:1","DOI":"10.1145\/2850417","volume":"16","author":"M Lippi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lippi M, Torroni P (2016) Argumentation mining: state of the art and emerging trends. ACM Trans Internet Technol 16(2):10:1-10:25","journal-title":"ACM Trans Internet Technol"},{"issue":"3","key":"9326_CR98","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00872529","volume":"3","author":"RP Loui","year":"1995","unstructured":"Loui RP, Norman J (1995) Rationales and argument moves. Artif Intell Law 3(3):159\u2013189","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9326_CR99","unstructured":"Manor L, Li JJ (2019) Plain (e)nglish summarization of contracts. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.00424"},{"key":"9326_CR100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maranh\u00e3o J, de\u00a0Souza EG, Sartor G (2021) A dynamic model for balancing values. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 89\u201398","DOI":"10.1145\/3462757.3466143"},{"key":"9326_CR101","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Marshall CC (1989) Representing the structure of a legal argument. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 121\u2013127","DOI":"10.1145\/74014.74031"},{"key":"9326_CR102","volume-title":"Automated analysis of legal texts","author":"LT McCarty","year":"1986","unstructured":"McCarty LT (1986) Permissions and obligations: an informal introduction. In: Martino A, Socci F (eds) Automated analysis of legal texts. North Holland, Amsterdam"},{"issue":"2","key":"9326_CR103","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-019-09255-y","volume":"28","author":"M Medvedeva","year":"2020","unstructured":"Medvedeva M, Vols M, Wieling M (2020) Using machine learning to predict decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. Artif Intell Law 28(2):237\u2013266","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9326_CR104","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Medvedeva M, Wieling M, Vols M (2022) Rethinking the field of automatic prediction of court decisions. Artif Intell Law, pp 1\u201318","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-021-09306-3"},{"issue":"1","key":"9326_CR105","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-010-9104-x","volume":"19","author":"R Mochales","year":"2011","unstructured":"Mochales R, Moens M-F (2011) Argumentation mining. Artif Intell Law 19(1):1\u201322","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9326_CR106","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mumford J, Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T (2021) Explaining factor ascription. In: Proceedings of JURIX 2021. IOS Press, pp 191\u2013196","DOI":"10.3233\/FAIA210335"},{"key":"9326_CR107","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Muthuri R, Boella G, Hulstijn J, Capecchi S, Humphreys L (2017) Compliance patterns: harnessing value modeling and legal interpretation to manage regulatory conversations. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on articial intelligence and law, pp 139\u2013148","DOI":"10.1145\/3086512.3086526"},{"key":"9326_CR108","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nallapati R, Zhai F, Zhou B (2017) Summarunner: a recurrent neural network based sequence model for extractive summarization of documents. In: Proceedings of the 31st AAAI conference on artificial intelligence","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v31i1.10958"},{"key":"9326_CR109","unstructured":"Palau RM, Moens M-F (2008) Study on the structure of argumentation in case law. In: Proceedings of JURIX, pp 11\u201320"},{"key":"9326_CR110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pascucci M, Sileno G (2021) The search for symmetry in Hohfeldian modalities. In: International conference on theory and application of diagrams, pp 87\u2013102","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-86062-2_9"},{"issue":"1","key":"9326_CR111","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.4018\/jcini.2013010101","volume":"7","author":"A Peldszus","year":"2013","unstructured":"Peldszus A, Stede M (2013) From argument diagrams to argumentation mining in texts: a survey. Int J Cogn Inform Nat Intell 7(1):1\u201331","journal-title":"Int J Cogn Inform Nat Intell"},{"key":"9326_CR112","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Peldszus A, Stede M (2016) Rhetorical structure and argumentation structure in monologue text. In: Proceedings of the 3rd workshop on argument mining, pp 103\u2013112","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/W16-2812"},{"issue":"4","key":"9326_CR113","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1207\/s15516709cog1104_4","volume":"11","author":"JL Pollock","year":"1987","unstructured":"Pollock JL (1987) Defeasible reasoning. Cogn Sci 11(4):481\u2013518","journal-title":"Cogn Sci"},{"issue":"1","key":"9326_CR114","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1019536206548","volume":"10","author":"H Prakken","year":"2002","unstructured":"Prakken H (2002) An exercise in formalising teleological case-based reasoning. Artif Intell Law 10(1):113\u2013133","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"2","key":"9326_CR115","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1080\/19462160903564592","volume":"1","author":"H Prakken","year":"2010","unstructured":"Prakken H (2010) An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. Argum Comput 1(2):93\u2013124","journal-title":"Argum Comput"},{"issue":"1","key":"9326_CR116","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-012-9117-8","volume":"20","author":"H Prakken","year":"2012","unstructured":"Prakken H (2012) Reconstructing Popov v. Hayashi in a framework for argumentation with structured arguments and Dungean semantics. Artif Intell Law 20(1):57\u201382","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"4","key":"9326_CR117","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-021-09284-6","volume":"29","author":"H Prakken","year":"2021","unstructured":"Prakken H (2021) A formal analysis of some factor-and precedent-based accounts of precedential constraint. Artif Intell Law 29(4):559\u2013585","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"3\u20134","key":"9326_CR118","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00118496","volume":"4","author":"H Prakken","year":"1996","unstructured":"Prakken H, Sartor G (1996) A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning. Artif Intell Law 4(3\u20134):331\u2013368","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"2\u20134","key":"9326_CR119","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008278309945","volume":"6","author":"H Prakken","year":"1998","unstructured":"Prakken H, Sartor G (1998) Modelling reasoning with precedents in a formal dialogue game. Artif Intell Law 6(2\u20134):231\u2013287","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9326_CR120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prakken H, Reed C, Walton D (2005) Dialogues about the burden of proof. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 115\u2013124","DOI":"10.1145\/1165485.1165503"},{"issue":"5","key":"9326_CR121","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1141","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/ext010","volume":"25","author":"H Prakken","year":"2015","unstructured":"Prakken H, Wyner A, Bench-Capon T, Atkinson K (2015) A formalization of argumentation schemes for legal case-based reasoning in ASPIC+. J Log Comput 25(5):1141\u20131166","journal-title":"J Log Comput"},{"key":"9326_CR122","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rahwan I, Reed C (2009) The Argument Interchange Format. In: Argumentation in artificial intelligence, pp 383\u2013402. Springer","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_19"},{"key":"9326_CR123","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780198253457.001.0001","volume-title":"The authority of law: essays on law and morality","author":"J Raz","year":"1979","unstructured":"Raz J (1979) The authority of law: essays on law and morality. Clarendon, Oxford"},{"issue":"04","key":"9326_CR124","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"961","DOI":"10.1142\/S0218213004001922","volume":"13","author":"C Reed","year":"2004","unstructured":"Reed C, Rowe G (2004) Araucaria: software for argument analysis, diagramming and representation. Int J Artif Intell Tools 13(04):961\u2013979","journal-title":"Int J Artif Intell Tools"},{"issue":"2","key":"9326_CR125","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-015-9166-x","volume":"23","author":"A Rigoni","year":"2015","unstructured":"Rigoni A (2015) An improved factor based approach to precedential constraint. Artif Intell Law 23(2):133\u2013160","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9326_CR126","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-017-9216-7","volume":"26","author":"A Rigoni","year":"2018","unstructured":"Rigoni A (2018) Representing dimensions within the reason model of precedent. Artif Intell Law 26:1\u201322","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9326_CR127","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rissland EL, Ashley KD (1987) A case-based system for Trade Secrets law. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 60\u201366","DOI":"10.1145\/41735.41743"},{"key":"9326_CR128","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rissland EL, Xu X (2011) Catching gray cygnets: an initial exploration. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 151\u2013160","DOI":"10.1145\/2018358.2018381"},{"key":"9326_CR129","volume-title":"Directives and norms","author":"A Ross","year":"1968","unstructured":"Ross A (1968) Directives and norms. Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd., London"},{"issue":"1","key":"9326_CR130","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-010-9087-7","volume":"18","author":"M Saravanan","year":"2010","unstructured":"Saravanan M, Ravindran B (2010) Identification of rhetorical roles for segmentation and summarization of a legal judgment. Artif Intell Law 18(1):45\u201376","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"1","key":"9326_CR131","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1019589831118","volume":"10","author":"G Sartor","year":"2002","unstructured":"Sartor G (2002) Teleological arguments and theory-based dialectics. Artif Intell Law 10(1):95\u2013112","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9326_CR132","volume-title":"Legal reasonimg: a cognitive approach to law","author":"G Sartor","year":"2005","unstructured":"Sartor G (2005) Legal reasonimg: a cognitive approach to law. Springer, Dordrecht"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"9326_CR133","first-page":"101","volume":"14","author":"G Sartor","year":"2006","unstructured":"Sartor G (2006) Fundamental legal concepts: a formal and teleological characterisation. Artif Intell Law 14(1\u20132):101\u2013142","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"2","key":"9326_CR134","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-010-9095-7","volume":"18","author":"G Sartor","year":"2010","unstructured":"Sartor G (2010) Doing justice to rights and values: teleological reasoning and proportionality. Artif Intell Law 18(2):175\u2013215","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"6","key":"9326_CR135","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1109\/64.363263","volume":"9","author":"G Schreiber","year":"1994","unstructured":"Schreiber G, Wielinga B, de Hoog R, Akkermans H, Van de Velde W (1994) Commonkads: a comprehensive methodology for KBS development. IEEE expert 9(6):28\u201337","journal-title":"IEEE expert"},{"key":"9326_CR136","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139173438","volume-title":"Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language","author":"JR Searle","year":"1969","unstructured":"Searle JR (1969) Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"issue":"4","key":"9326_CR137","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"581","DOI":"10.1145\/383779.383786","volume":"2","author":"MJ Sergot","year":"2001","unstructured":"Sergot MJ (2001) A computational theory of normative positions. ACM Trans Comput Log 2(4):581\u2013622","journal-title":"ACM Trans Comput Log"},{"key":"9326_CR138","first-page":"353","volume-title":"Handbook of deontic logic and normative systems","author":"MJ Sergot","year":"2013","unstructured":"Sergot MJ (2013) Normative positions. In: Gabbay D, Horty J, Parent X, van der Meyden R, van der Torre L (eds) Handbook of deontic logic and normative systems. College Publications, Rickmansworth, pp 353\u2013406"},{"key":"9326_CR139","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sileno G, Boer A, van Engers T (2015) Revisiting constitutive rules. In: 6th workshop on AI approaches to the complexity of legal systems, pp 39\u201355","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-00178-0_3"},{"key":"9326_CR140","volume-title":"The concept of legal competence: an essay in conceptual analysis","author":"T Spaak","year":"1994","unstructured":"Spaak T (1994) The concept of legal competence: an essay in conceptual analysis. Dartmouth Pub Co, Hanover, NH"},{"key":"9326_CR141","volume-title":"Argumentation mining, synthesis lectures on human language technologies","author":"M Stede","year":"2018","unstructured":"Stede M, Schneider J (2018) Argumentation mining, synthesis lectures on human language technologies. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael"},{"key":"9326_CR142","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Steging C, Renooij S, Verheij B (2021) Discovering the rationale of decisions: towards a method for aligning learning and reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 235\u2013239","DOI":"10.1145\/3462757.3466059"},{"key":"9326_CR143","unstructured":"Steinberger R, Pouliquen B, Widiger A, Ignat C, Erjavec T, Tufis D, Varga D (2006) The JRC-Acquis: a multilingual aligned parallel corpus with 20+ languages. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on language resources and evaluation, LREC 2006, pp 2142\u20132147"},{"key":"9326_CR144","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"\u015eulea O-M, Zampieri M, Vela M, van Genabith J (2017) Predicting the law area and decisions of French Supreme Court cases. In: Proceedings of the international conference recent advances in natural language processing, RANLP 2017, pp 716\u2013722","DOI":"10.26615\/978-954-452-049-6_092"},{"key":"9326_CR145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tagarelli A, Simeri A (2021) Unsupervised law article mining based on deep pre-trained language representation models with application to the Italian Civil Code. Artif Intell Law, pp 1\u201357","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-021-09301-8"},{"key":"9326_CR146","unstructured":"Teufel S, Moens M (1997) Sentence extraction as a classification task. In: Proceedings of the ACL\/EACL\u201997 workshop on intelligent scalable text summarization"},{"issue":"4","key":"9326_CR147","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1162\/089120102762671936","volume":"28","author":"S Teufel","year":"2002","unstructured":"Teufel S, Moens M (2002) Summarizing scientific articles: experiments with relevance and rhetorical status. Comput Linguist 28(4):409\u2013445","journal-title":"Comput Linguist"},{"key":"9326_CR148","volume-title":"The uses of argument","author":"SE Toulmin","year":"1958","unstructured":"Toulmin SE (1958) The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"issue":"4","key":"9326_CR149","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-020-09262-4","volume":"28","author":"V Tran","year":"2020","unstructured":"Tran V, Le Nguyen M, Tojo S, Satoh K (2020) Encoded summarization: summarizing documents into continuous vector space for legal case retrieval. Artif Intell Law 28(4):441\u2013467","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9326_CR150","volume-title":"Legal knowledge engineering: a modelling approach","author":"A Valente","year":"1995","unstructured":"Valente A (1995) Legal knowledge engineering: a modelling approach. IOS Press, Amsterdam"},{"issue":"6","key":"9326_CR151","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1079","DOI":"10.1006\/ijhc.1999.0298","volume":"51","author":"A Valente","year":"1999","unstructured":"Valente A, Breuker J, Brouwer B (1999) Legal modeling and automated reasoning with ON-LINE. Int J Hum Comput Stud 51(6):1079\u20131125","journal-title":"Int J Hum Comput Stud"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"9326_CR152","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(03)00107-3","volume":"150","author":"B Verheij","year":"2003","unstructured":"Verheij B (2003) Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation. Artif Intell 150(1\u20132):291\u2013324","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"issue":"3","key":"9326_CR153","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/13.3.319","volume":"13","author":"B Verheij","year":"2003","unstructured":"Verheij B (2003) Deflog: on the logical interpretation of prima facie justified assumptions. J Log Comput 13(3):319\u2013346","journal-title":"J Log Comput"},{"issue":"2","key":"9326_CR154","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1023\/B:ARTI.0000046008.49443.36","volume":"11","author":"B Verheij","year":"2003","unstructured":"Verheij B (2003) Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: an approach to legal logic. Artif Intell Law 11(2):167\u2013195","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"4","key":"9326_CR155","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-016-9189-y","volume":"24","author":"B Verheij","year":"2016","unstructured":"Verheij B (2016) Formalizing value-guided argumentation for ethical systems design. Artif Intell Law 24(4):387\u2013407","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9326_CR156","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Villata S, Araszkiewicz M, Ashley K, Bench-Capon T, Branting LK, Conrad JG, Wyner A (2022) Thirty years of AI and Law: The third decade. Artif Intell Law 30(4)","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-022-09327-6"},{"key":"9326_CR157","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning","author":"D Walton","year":"1996","unstructured":"Walton D (1996) Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York"},{"key":"9326_CR158","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wegner DM (2002) The illusion of conscious will. Bradford Books, MIT Press. Cambridge, ISBN 9780262731621","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/3650.001.0001"},{"key":"9326_CR159","unstructured":"Winkels R, Boer A, Hoekstra R (2002) Clime: lessons learned in legal information serving. In: ECAI, pp 230\u2013234"},{"key":"9326_CR160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wolf T, Debut L, Sanh V, Chaumond J, Delangue C, Moi A, Cistac P, Rault T, Louf R, Funtowicz M et\u00a0al (2020) Transformers: state-of-the-art natural language processing. In: Proceedings of the 2020 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing: system demonstrations, pp 38\u201345","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2020.emnlp-demos.6"},{"issue":"6","key":"9326_CR161","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"941","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exp009","volume":"19","author":"A Wyner","year":"2009","unstructured":"Wyner A, Bench-Capon T (2009) Modelling judicial context in argumentation frameworks. J Log Comput 19(6):941\u2013968","journal-title":"J Log Comput"},{"issue":"1","key":"9326_CR162","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-012-9119-6","volume":"20","author":"A Wyner","year":"2012","unstructured":"Wyner A, Hoekstra R (2012) A legal case OWL ontology with an instantiation of Popov v. Hayashi. Artif Intell Law 20(1):83\u2013107","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9326_CR163","unstructured":"Wyner A, Bench-Capon T, Atkinson K (2007) Arguments, values and baseballs: representation of Popov v. Hayashi. In: Proceedings of JURIX 2007, vol 165, pp 151\u2013160"},{"issue":"1","key":"9326_CR164","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-160002","volume":"7","author":"A Wyner","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wyner A, van Engers T, Hunter A (2016) Working on the argument pipeline: through flow issues between natural language argument, instantiated arguments, and argumentation frameworks. Argum Comput 7(1):69\u201389","journal-title":"Argum Comput"},{"issue":"2","key":"9326_CR165","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-019-09242-3","volume":"27","author":"H Yamada","year":"2019","unstructured":"Yamada H, Teufel S, Tokunaga T (2019) Building a corpus of legal argumentation in Japanese judgement documents: towards structure-based summarisation. Artif Intell Law 27(2):141\u2013170","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9326_CR166","unstructured":"Zhang J, Zhao Y, Saleh M, Liu P (2020) PEGASUS: pre-training with extracted gap-sentences for abstractive summarization. In: Proceedings of the 37th international conference on machine learning, pp 11328\u201311339"},{"key":"9326_CR167","volume-title":"Feature engineering for machine learning: principles and techniques for data scientists","author":"A Zheng","year":"2018","unstructured":"Zheng A, Casari A (2018) Feature engineering for machine learning: principles and techniques for data scientists. O\u2019Reilly Press, Sebastopol"},{"key":"9326_CR168","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zheng H, Grossi D, Verheij B (2021a) Hardness of case-based decisions: a formal theory. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 149\u2013158","DOI":"10.1145\/3462757.3466071"},{"key":"9326_CR169","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zheng L, Guha N, Anderson BR, Henderson P, Ho DE (2021b) When does pretraining help? Assessing self-supervised learning for law and the CaseHOLD dataset of 53,000+ legal holdings. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp 159\u2013168","DOI":"10.1145\/3462757.3466088"},{"key":"9326_CR170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhong H, Guo Z, Tu C, Xiao C, Liu Z, Sun M (2018) Legal judgment prediction via topological learning. In: Proceedings of the 2018 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/D18-1390"}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-022-09333-8","type":"correction","label":"Correction","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,5]],"date-time":"2022-11-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1667606400000}}],"container-title":["Artificial Intelligence and Law"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-022-09326-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10506-022-09326-7\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-022-09326-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,19]],"date-time":"2022-11-19T21:39:52Z","timestamp":1668893992000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10506-022-09326-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,8]]},"references-count":170,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]}},"alternative-id":["9326"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-022-09326-7","relation":{"correction":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1007\/s10506-022-09333-8","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["0924-8463","1572-8382"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0924-8463","type":"print"},{"value":"1572-8382","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"21 July 2022","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 August 2022","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 November 2022","order":3,"name":"change_date","label":"Change Date","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Correction","order":4,"name":"change_type","label":"Change Type","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"A Correction to this paper has been published:","order":5,"name":"change_details","label":"Change Details","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-022-09333-8","URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-022-09333-8","order":6,"name":"change_details","label":"Change Details","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}