{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,12]],"date-time":"2026-03-12T06:48:56Z","timestamp":1773298136019,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,24]],"date-time":"2023-04-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682294400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,24]],"date-time":"2023-04-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682294400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000923","name":"Australian Research Council","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["FL170100160"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["FL170100160"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000923","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000155","name":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["752\u20132019-0065"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["752\u20132019-0065"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000155","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000781","name":"European Research Council","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["951631"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["951631"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000781","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Artif Intell Law"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Bayesian approaches to legal reasoning propose causal models of the relation between evidence, the credibility of evidence, and ultimate hypotheses, or verdicts. They assume that legal reasoning is the process whereby one infers the posterior probability of a verdict based on observed evidence, or facts. In practice, legal reasoning does not operate quite that way. Legal reasoning is also an attempt at inferring applicable rules derived from legal precedents or statutes based on the facts at hand. To make such an inference, legal reasoning follows syllogistic logic and first order transitivity. This paper proposes a Bayesian model of legal syllogistic reasoning that complements existing Bayesian models of legal reasoning using a Bayesian network whose variables correspond to legal precedents, statutes, and facts. We suggest that legal reasoning should be modelled as a process of finding the posterior probability of precedents and statutes based on available facts.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-023-09357-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,24]],"date-time":"2023-04-24T16:02:47Z","timestamp":1682352167000},"page":"441-462","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["A Bayesian model of legal syllogistic reasoning"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"32","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1547-8803","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Axel","family":"Constant","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"9357_CR1","unstructured":"Amgoud L, Cayro C (1998) On the acceptability of arguments in preference-based argumentation framework, In: Proceedings of the 14th conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence. pp. 1\u20137"},{"issue":"1","key":"9357_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1014490210693","volume":"34","author":"L Amgoud","year":"2002","unstructured":"Amgoud L, Cayrol C (2002) A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments. Ann Math Artif Intell 34(1):197\u2013215. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1014490210693","journal-title":"Ann Math Artif Intell"},{"key":"9357_CR3","unstructured":"Benyekhlef K, Zhu J (2018). Intelligence artificielle et justice: justice pr\u00e9dictive, conflits de basse intensit\u00e9 et donn\u00e9es massives. Les Cahiers de Propri\u00e9t\u00e9 Intellectuelle. 37"},{"key":"9357_CR5","unstructured":"Civil Code of Quebec. (1991) ccq-1991"},{"key":"9357_CR6","unstructured":"Code of Civil Procedure. (2016). C-25.01"},{"key":"9357_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"d\u2019Almeida LD (2019). On the legal syllogism. in dimensions of normativity (pp. 335\u2013364). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/oso\/9780190640408.003.0015","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780190640408.003.0015"},{"issue":"1","key":"9357_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.2307\/1122404","volume":"85","author":"ED Elliott","year":"1985","unstructured":"Elliott ED (1985) The evolutionary tradition in jurisprudence. Columbia Law Rev 85(1):38\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/1122404","journal-title":"Columbia Law Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"9357_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1111\/cogs.12004","volume":"37","author":"N Fenton","year":"2013","unstructured":"Fenton N, Neil M, Lagnado DA (2013) A general structure for legal arguments about evidence using Bayesian networks. Cogn Sci 37(1):61\u2013102. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/cogs.12004","journal-title":"Cogn Sci"},{"key":"9357_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-statistics-041715-033428","volume":"3","author":"N Fenton","year":"2016","unstructured":"Fenton N, Neil M, Berger D (2016) Bayes and the Law. Annual Rev Stat Appl 3:51\u201377. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1146\/annurev-statistics-041715-033428","journal-title":"Annual Rev Stat Appl"},{"key":"9357_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511551116.003","volume-title":"Some types of law","author":"J Gardner","year":"2007","unstructured":"Gardner J (2007) Some types of law. Cambridge University Press, UK, In Common Law Theory"},{"issue":"2","key":"9357_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jal.2007.11.006","volume":"7","author":"R Haenni","year":"2009","unstructured":"Haenni R (2009) Probabilistic argumentation. J Appl Log 7(2):155\u2013176. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jal.2007.11.006","journal-title":"J Appl Log"},{"key":"9357_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/he\/9780199644704.001.0001","volume-title":"The concept of law","author":"HLA Hart","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hart HLA (2012) The concept of law. Oxford University Press"},{"key":"9357_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2022.04.003","volume":"146","author":"A Hunter","year":"2022","unstructured":"Hunter A (2022) Argument strength in probabilistic argumentation based on defeasible rules. Int J f Approx Reason: Official Publicat North Am Fuzzy Inform Process Soc 146:79\u2013105. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijar.2022.04.003","journal-title":"Int J f Approx Reason: Official Publicat North Am Fuzzy Inform Process Soc"},{"issue":"3","key":"9357_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"404","DOI":"10.1038\/nn.4238","volume":"19","author":"QJM Huys","year":"2016","unstructured":"Huys QJM, Maia TV, Frank MJ (2016) Computational psychiatry as a bridge from neuroscience to clinical applications. Nat Neurosci 19(3):404\u2013413. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/nn.4238","journal-title":"Nat Neurosci"},{"key":"9357_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1525\/9780520312296","volume-title":"Pure theory of law","author":"H Kelsen","year":"1967","unstructured":"Kelsen H (1967) Pure theory of law. University of California Press"},{"issue":"12","key":"9357_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"712","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tins.2004.10.007","volume":"27","author":"DC Knill","year":"2004","unstructured":"Knill DC, Pouget A (2004) The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends Neurosci 27(12):712\u2013719. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tins.2004.10.007","journal-title":"Trends Neurosci"},{"key":"9357_CR19","unstructured":"L\u2019Oratoire Saint-Joseph du Mont-Royal v. J.J. (2019) CSC, 35http:\/\/paperpile.com\/b\/LB2wvV\/tYTJ"},{"issue":"2","key":"9357_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.09.006","volume":"172","author":"KB Laskey","year":"2008","unstructured":"Laskey KB (2008) MEBN: A language for first-order Bayesian knowledge bases. Artif Intell 172(2):140\u2013178. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.artint.2007.09.006","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"9357_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Miller BW (2011). Origin myth: the persons case, the living tree, and the new originalism. In\u00a0The Challenge of Originalism\u00a0(pp. 120\u2013146). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/cbo9781139003926.008","DOI":"10.1017\/cbo9781139003926.008"},{"issue":"4","key":"9357_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-019-09250-3","volume":"27","author":"M Neil","year":"2019","unstructured":"Neil M, Fenton N, Lagnado D, Gill RD (2019) Modelling competing legal arguments using Bayesian model comparison and averaging. Artif Intell Law 27(4):403\u2013430. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-019-09250-3","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9357_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pearl J (1988) Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-08-051489-5.50008-4"},{"key":"9357_CR24","unstructured":"Pharmascience inc. v. Option Consommateurs, 2005 QCCA 437"}],"container-title":["Artificial Intelligence and Law"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-023-09357-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10506-023-09357-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-023-09357-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,25]],"date-time":"2024-05-25T08:08:28Z","timestamp":1716624508000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10506-023-09357-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,24]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,6]]}},"alternative-id":["9357"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-023-09357-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["0924-8463","1572-8382"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0924-8463","type":"print"},{"value":"1572-8382","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,24]]},"assertion":[{"value":"30 March 2023","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 April 2023","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}