{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,27]],"date-time":"2026-05-27T21:38:58Z","timestamp":1779917938706,"version":"3.53.1"},"reference-count":57,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,25]],"date-time":"2024-11-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1732492800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,25]],"date-time":"2024-11-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1732492800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100012650","name":"Technische Universit\u00e4t Wien Bibliothek","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["\u201cOpen Access Funding Programme\u201d"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["\u201cOpen Access Funding Programme\u201d"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100012650","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100012650","name":"Technische Universit\u00e4t Wien Bibliothek","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["\u201cOpen Access Funding Programme\u201d"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["\u201cOpen Access Funding Programme\u201d"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100012650","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100011958","name":"Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["\u201cReliable Outlier Detection\u201d"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["\u201cReliable Outlier Detection\u201d"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100011958","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100011958","name":"Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["\u201cReliable Outlier Detection\u201d"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["\u201cReliable Outlier Detection\u201d"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100011958","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"TU Wien"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Data Min Knowl Disc"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:p>Anomaly detection has become pervasive in modern technology, covering applications from cybersecurity, to medicine or system failure detection. Before outputting a binary outcome (i.e., anomalous or non-anomalous), most algorithms evaluate instances with outlierness scores. But what does a score of 0.8 mean? Or what is the practical difference compared to a score of 1.2? Score ranges are assumed non-linear and relative, their meaning established by weighting the whole dataset (or a dataset model). While this is perfectly true, algorithms also impose dynamics that decisively affect the meaning of outlierness scores. In this work, we aim to gain a better understanding of the effect that both algorithms and specific data particularities have on the meaning of scores. To this end, we compare established outlier detection algorithms and analyze them beyond common metrics related to accuracy. We disclose trends in their dynamics and study the evolution of their scores when facing changes that should render them invariant. For this purpose we abstract characteristic <jats:italic>S<\/jats:italic>-curves and propose indices related to discriminant power, bias, variance, coherence and robustness. We discovered that each studied algorithm shows biases and idiosyncrasies, which habitually persist regardless of the dataset used. We provide methods and descriptions that facilitate and extend a deeper understanding of how the discussed algorithms operate in practice. This information is key to decide which one to use, thus enabling a more effective and conscious incorporation of unsupervised learning in real environments.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10618-024-01077-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,25]],"date-time":"2024-11-25T00:23:41Z","timestamp":1732494221000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["What do anomaly scores actually mean? Dynamic characteristics beyond accuracy"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"39","author":[{"given":"F\u00e9lix","family":"Iglesias V\u00e1zquez","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Henrique O.","family":"Marques","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Arthur","family":"Zimek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tanja","family":"Zseby","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"1077_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jnca.2015.11.016","volume":"60","author":"M Ahmed","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ahmed M, Naser Mahmood A, Hu J (2016) A survey of network anomaly detection techniques. J Netw Comput Appl 60:19\u201331","journal-title":"J Netw Comput Appl"},{"issue":"2","key":"1077_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"268","DOI":"10.1080\/02664763.2020.1808599","volume":"49","author":"CNPG Arachchige","year":"2022","unstructured":"Arachchige CNPG, Prendergast LA, Staudte RG (2022) Robust analogs to the coefficient of variation. J Appl Stat 49(2):268\u2013290. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02664763.2020.1808599","journal-title":"J Appl Stat"},{"key":"1077_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bauder RA, Khoshgoftaar TM (2017) Estimating outlier score probabilities. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on information reuse and integration (IRI), pp 559\u2013568. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/IRI.2017.19","DOI":"10.1109\/IRI.2017.19"},{"issue":"3","key":"1077_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1145\/3444690","volume":"54","author":"A Bl\u00e1zquez-Garc\u00eda","year":"2021","unstructured":"Bl\u00e1zquez-Garc\u00eda A, Conde A, Mori U et al (2021) A review on outlier\/anomaly detection in time series data. ACM Comput Surv 54(3):1\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3444690","journal-title":"ACM Comput Surv"},{"issue":"3","key":"1077_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1145\/3381028","volume":"53","author":"A Boukerche","year":"2020","unstructured":"Boukerche A, Zheng L, Alfandi O (2020) Outlier detection: methods, models, and classification. ACM Comput Surv 53(3):1\u201337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3381028","journal-title":"ACM Comput Surv"},{"key":"1077_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Breunig MM, Kriegel HP, Ng RT et\u00a0al (2000) LOF: identifying density-based local outliers. In: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, SIGMOD \u201900, pp 93\u2013104","DOI":"10.1145\/342009.335388"},{"issue":"1","key":"1077_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1145\/2733381","volume":"10","author":"RJGB Campello","year":"2015","unstructured":"Campello RJGB, Moulavi D, Zimek A et al (2015) Hierarchical density estimates for data clustering, visualization, and outlier detection. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data 10(1):1\u201351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2733381","journal-title":"ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data"},{"issue":"4","key":"1077_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"891","DOI":"10.1007\/s10618-015-0444-8","volume":"30","author":"GO Campos","year":"2016","unstructured":"Campos GO, Zimek A, Sander J et al (2016) On the evaluation of unsupervised outlier detection: measures, datasets, and an empirical study. Data Min Knowl Discov 30(4):891\u2013927","journal-title":"Data Min Knowl Discov"},{"issue":"3","key":"1077_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1145\/1541880.1541882","volume":"41","author":"V Chandola","year":"2009","unstructured":"Chandola V, Banerjee A, Kumar V (2009) Anomaly detection: a survey. ACM Comput Surv 41(3):1\u201358. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/1541880.1541882","journal-title":"ACM Comput Surv"},{"key":"1077_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-39940-9_487","volume-title":"Average precision at n","author":"N Craswell","year":"2009","unstructured":"Craswell N, Robertson S (2009) Average precision at n. Springer, Boston, pp 193\u2013194. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-0-387-39940-9_487"},{"key":"1077_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Djenouri Y, Zimek A (2018) Outlier detection in urban traffic data. In: Akerkar R, Ivanovic M, Kim S et\u00a0al (eds) Proceedings of the 8th international conference on web intelligence, mining and semantics, WIMS 2018, Novi Sad, Serbia, June 25\u201327, 2018, pp 3:1\u20133:12. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3227609.3227692","DOI":"10.1145\/3227609.3227692"},{"key":"1077_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"406","DOI":"10.1016\/j.patcog.2017.09.037","volume":"74","author":"R Domingues","year":"2018","unstructured":"Domingues R, Filippone M, Michiardi P et al (2018) A comparative evaluation of outlier detection algorithms: experiments and analyses. Pattern Recognit 74:406\u2013421. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.patcog.2017.09.037","journal-title":"Pattern Recognit"},{"key":"1077_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Falc\u00e3o F, Zoppi T, Silva CBV et\u00a0al (2019) Quantitative comparison of unsupervised anomaly detection algorithms for intrusion detection. In: Proceedings of the 34th ACM\/SIGAPP symposium on applied computing. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, SAC \u201919, pp 318\u2013327","DOI":"10.1145\/3297280.3297314"},{"issue":"7","key":"1077_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1145\/3464423","volume":"54","author":"T Fernando","year":"2021","unstructured":"Fernando T, Gammulle H, Denman S et al (2021) Deep learning for medical anomaly detection\u2014a survey. ACM Comput Surv 54(7):1\u201337","journal-title":"ACM Comput Surv"},{"key":"1077_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gao J, Tan P (2006) Converting output scores from outlier detection algorithms into probability estimates. In: ICDM, pp 212\u2013221","DOI":"10.1109\/ICDM.2006.43"},{"key":"1077_CR16","unstructured":"Goix N (2016) How to evaluate the quality of unsupervised anomaly detection algorithms? arXiv:1607.01152"},{"key":"1077_CR17","first-page":"59","volume":"1","author":"M Goldstein","year":"2012","unstructured":"Goldstein M, Dengel A (2012) Histogram-based outlier score (HBOS): a fast unsupervised anomaly detection algorithm. KI-2012 Poster Demo Track 1:59\u201363","journal-title":"KI-2012 Poster Demo Track"},{"key":"1077_CR18","unstructured":"Han S, Hu X, Huang H et\u00a0al (2022) Adbench: anomaly detection benchmark. In: Koyejo S, Mohamed S, Agarwal A et\u00a0al (eds) Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 32142\u201332159. https:\/\/proceedings.neurips.cc\/paper_files\/paper\/2022\/file\/cf93972b116ca5268827d575f2cc226b-Paper-Datasets_and_Benchmarks.pdf"},{"issue":"1","key":"1077_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.143.1.7063747","volume":"143","author":"JA Hanley","year":"1982","unstructured":"Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143(1):29\u201336","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"1077_CR20","unstructured":"Hartl A, Iglesias F, Zseby T (2024) SDOoop: capturing periodical patterns and out-of-phase anomalies in streaming data analysis. arXiv:2409.02973 [cs.LG]"},{"key":"1077_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01908075","volume":"2","author":"LJ Hubert","year":"1985","unstructured":"Hubert LJ, Arabie P (1985) Comparing partitions. J Classif 2:193\u2013218","journal-title":"J Classif"},{"key":"1077_CR22","unstructured":"Iglesias F (2023) Key characteristics of algorithms\u2019 dynamics: evaluation experiments. TU Wien CN Group. Github: https:\/\/github.com\/CN-TU\/py-outlier-detection-dynamics"},{"key":"1077_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Iglesias F (2024) Key characteristics of algorithms\u2019 dynamics beyond accuracy\u2014evaluation tests (v2). TU Wien Research Data. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48436\/9x3kb-ha870","DOI":"10.48436\/9x3kb-ha870"},{"key":"1077_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Iglesias F, Zseby T, Zimek A (2018) Outlier detection based on low density models. In: 2018 IEEE international conference on data mining workshops (ICDMW), pp 970\u2013979","DOI":"10.1109\/ICDMW.2018.00140"},{"key":"1077_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s00357-019-9312-3","volume":"36","author":"F Iglesias","year":"2019","unstructured":"Iglesias F, Zseby T, Ferreira DC et al (2019) MDCGen: multidimensional dataset generator for clustering. J Classif 36:1\u201320","journal-title":"J Classif"},{"key":"1077_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Iglesias F, Zseby T, Hartl A et\u00a0al (2023) SDOclust: clustering with sparse data observers. In: Pedreira O, Estivill-Castro V (eds) Similarity search and applications. Springer, Cham, pp 185\u2013199. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-031-46994-7_16","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-46994-7_16"},{"issue":"2","key":"1077_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1007\/s10618-019-00661-z","volume":"34","author":"S Kandanaarachchi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kandanaarachchi S, Mu\u00f1oz MA, Hyndman RJ et al (2020) On normalization and algorithm selection for unsupervised outlier detection. Data Min Knowl Discov 34(2):309\u2013354. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10618-019-00661-z","journal-title":"Data Min Knowl Discov"},{"key":"1077_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kriegel HP, Schubert M, Zimek A (2008) Angle-based outlier detection in high-dimensional data. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, KDD \u201908, pp 444\u2013452","DOI":"10.1145\/1401890.1401946"},{"key":"1077_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kriegel HP, Kr\u00f6ger P, Schubert E et\u00a0al (2011) Interpreting and unifying outlier scores. In: Proceedings of the 2011 SIAM international conference on data mining (SDM), pp 13\u201324","DOI":"10.1137\/1.9781611972818.2"},{"issue":"6","key":"1077_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2517","DOI":"10.1007\/s10618-023-00967-z","volume":"37","author":"Z Li","year":"2023","unstructured":"Li Z, van Leeuwen M (2023) Explainable contextual anomaly detection using quantile regression forests. Data Min Knowl Discov 37(6):2517\u20132563. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10618-023-00967-z","journal-title":"Data Min Knowl Discov"},{"key":"1077_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Liu FT, Ting KM, Zhou ZH (2008) Isolation forest. In: Proceedings of the 2008 eighth IEEE international conference on data mining. IEEE Computer Society, USA, ICDM \u201908, pp 413\u2013422","DOI":"10.1109\/ICDM.2008.17"},{"key":"1077_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Liu Y, Li Z, Xiong H et\u00a0al (2010) Understanding of internal clustering validation measures. In: 2010 IEEE international conference on data mining, pp 911\u2013916. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ICDM.2010.35","DOI":"10.1109\/ICDM.2010.35"},{"issue":"4","key":"1077_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47:1","DOI":"10.1145\/3394053","volume":"14","author":"HO Marques","year":"2020","unstructured":"Marques HO, Campello RJGB, Sander J et al (2020) Internal evaluation of unsupervised outlier detection. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data 14(4):47:1-47:42. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3394053","journal-title":"ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data"},{"key":"1077_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Marques HO, Zimek A, Campello RJGB et\u00a0al (2022) Similarity-based unsupervised evaluation of outlier detection. In: Skopal T, Falchi F, Lokoc J et\u00a0al (eds) Similarity search and applications\u201415th international conference, SISAP 2022, Bologna, Italy, October 5\u20137, 2022, Proceedings, pp 234\u2013248. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-031-17849-8_19","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-17849-8_19"},{"issue":"11","key":"1077_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.21105\/joss.00205","volume":"2","author":"L McInnes","year":"2017","unstructured":"McInnes L, Healy J, Astels S (2017) hdbscan: hierarchical density based clustering. J Open Source Softw 2(11):205","journal-title":"J Open Source Softw"},{"key":"1077_CR36","unstructured":"Menon AK, Williamson RC (2018) A loss framework for calibrated anomaly detection. In: NeurIPS, pp 1494\u20131504"},{"issue":"7","key":"1077_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4445","DOI":"10.1007\/s10994-023-06501-y","volume":"113","author":"P Mignone","year":"2024","unstructured":"Mignone P, Corizzo R, Ceci M (2024) Distributed and explainable GHSOM for anomaly detection in sensor networks. Mach Learn 113(7):4445\u20134486. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10994-023-06501-y","journal-title":"Mach Learn"},{"issue":"4","key":"1077_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1080\/00031305.1986.10475415","volume":"40","author":"J Moors","year":"1986","unstructured":"Moors J (1986) The meaning of kurtosis: Darlington reexamined. Am Stat 40(4):283\u2013284","journal-title":"Am Stat"},{"key":"1077_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ojdani\u0107 D (2019) Mdcstream: a stream dataset generator for testing and evaluating stream data analysis algorithms. PhD thesis, TU Wien. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.34726\/hss.2019.57168","DOI":"10.34726\/hss.2019.57168"},{"key":"1077_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Perini L, Galvin C, Vercruyssen V (2020a) A ranking stability measure for quantifying the robustness of anomaly detection methods. In: PKDD\/ECML workshops, pp 397\u2013408","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-65965-3_27"},{"key":"1077_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Perini L, Vercruyssen V, Davis J (2020b) Quantifying the confidence of anomaly detectors in their example-wise predictions. In: ECML\/PKDD (3), pp 227\u2013243","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-67664-3_14"},{"issue":"2","key":"1077_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"427","DOI":"10.1145\/335191.335437","volume":"29","author":"S Ramaswamy","year":"2000","unstructured":"Ramaswamy S, Rastogi R, Shim K (2000) Efficient algorithms for mining outliers from large data sets. SIGMOD Rec 29(2):427\u2013438","journal-title":"SIGMOD Rec"},{"key":"1077_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10618-024-01056-5","author":"P R\u00f6chner","year":"2024","unstructured":"R\u00f6chner P, Marques H, Campello R et al (2024) Evaluating outlier probabilities: assessing sharpness, refinement, and calibration using stratified and weighted measures. Data Min Knowl Discov. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10618-024-01056-5","journal-title":"Data Min Knowl Discov"},{"key":"1077_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1109\/JPROC.2021.3052449","volume":"109","author":"L Ruff","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ruff L, Kauffmann J, Vandermeulen R et al (2021) A unifying review of deep and shallow anomaly detection. Proc IEEE 109:1\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/JPROC.2021.3052449","journal-title":"Proc IEEE"},{"issue":"2","key":"1077_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1080\/00031305.1984.10483182","volume":"38","author":"JG Saw","year":"1984","unstructured":"Saw JG, Yang MCK, Mo TC (1984) Chebyshev inequality with estimated mean and variance. Am Stat 38(2):130\u2013132","journal-title":"Am Stat"},{"issue":"7","key":"1077_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1443","DOI":"10.1162\/089976601750264965","volume":"13","author":"B Sch\u00f6lkopf","year":"2001","unstructured":"Sch\u00f6lkopf B, Platt JC, Shawe-Taylor J et al (2001) Estimating the support of a high-dimensional distribution. Neural Comput 13(7):1443\u20131471","journal-title":"Neural Comput"},{"key":"1077_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Schubert E, Wojdanowski R, Zimek A et\u00a0al (2012) On evaluation of outlier rankings and outlier scores. In: Proceedings of the twelfth SIAM international conference on data mining, Anaheim, California, USA, April 26\u201328, 2012, pp 1047\u20131058. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1137\/1.9781611972825.90","DOI":"10.1137\/1.9781611972825.90"},{"issue":"1","key":"1077_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1007\/s10618-012-0300-z","volume":"28","author":"E Schubert","year":"2014","unstructured":"Schubert E, Zimek A, Kriegel H (2014) Local outlier detection reconsidered: a generalized view on locality with applications to spatial, video, and network outlier detection. Data Min Knowl Discov 28(1):190\u2013237. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10618-012-0300-z","journal-title":"Data Min Knowl Discov"},{"issue":"4","key":"1077_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1145\/3441453","volume":"15","author":"G Steinbuss","year":"2021","unstructured":"Steinbuss G, B\u00f6hm K (2021) Benchmarking unsupervised outlier detection with realistic synthetic data. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data 15(4):1\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3441453","journal-title":"ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data"},{"key":"1077_CR50","unstructured":"Thirey B, Hickman R (2015) Distribution of Euclidean distances between randomly distributed Gaussian points in n-space. SAO\/NASA ADS arXiv e-prints Abstract Service, pp 1\u201313. Eprint arXiv:1508.02238"},{"issue":"3","key":"1077_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1080\/00031305.2014.917055","volume":"68","author":"PH Westfall","year":"2014","unstructured":"Westfall PH (2014) Kurtosis as peakedness, 1905\u20132014. R.I.P. Am Stat 68(3):191\u2013195","journal-title":"Am Stat"},{"key":"1077_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-39940-9_482","volume-title":"Average precision","author":"E Zhang","year":"2009","unstructured":"Zhang E, Zhang Y (2009) Average precision. Springer, Boston, pp 192\u2013193. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-0-387-39940-9_482"},{"issue":"96","key":"1077_CR53","first-page":"1","volume":"20","author":"Y Zhao","year":"2019","unstructured":"Zhao Y, Nasrullah Z, Li Z (2019) Pyod: a python toolbox for scalable outlier detection. J Mach Learn Res 20(96):1\u20137","journal-title":"J Mach Learn Res"},{"issue":"6","key":"1077_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/widm.1280","volume":"8","author":"A Zimek","year":"2018","unstructured":"Zimek A, Filzmoser P (2018) There and back again: outlier detection between statistical reasoning and data mining algorithms. WIREs Data Mining Knowl Discov 8(6):e1280. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/widm.1280","journal-title":"WIREs Data Mining Knowl Discov"},{"issue":"5","key":"1077_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"363","DOI":"10.1002\/sam.11161","volume":"5","author":"A Zimek","year":"2012","unstructured":"Zimek A, Schubert E, Kriegel H (2012) A survey on unsupervised outlier detection in high-dimensional numerical data. Stat Anal Data Min 5(5):363\u2013387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/sam.11161","journal-title":"Stat Anal Data Min"},{"key":"1077_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zimek A, Gaudet M, Campello RJ et\u00a0al (2013) Subsampling for efficient and effective unsupervised outlier detection ensembles. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, KDD \u201913, pp 428\u2013436","DOI":"10.1145\/2487575.2487676"},{"issue":"1","key":"1077_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1145\/2594473.2594476","volume":"15","author":"A Zimek","year":"2014","unstructured":"Zimek A, Campello RJ, Sander J (2014) Ensembles for unsupervised outlier detection: challenges and research questions a position paper. SIGKDD Explor Newsl 15(1):11\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2594473.2594476","journal-title":"SIGKDD Explor Newsl"}],"container-title":["Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10618-024-01077-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10618-024-01077-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10618-024-01077-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,16]],"date-time":"2025-01-16T11:46:14Z","timestamp":1737027974000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10618-024-01077-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,25]]},"references-count":57,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,1]]}},"alternative-id":["1077"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10618-024-01077-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["1384-5810","1573-756X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1384-5810","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-756X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,25]]},"assertion":[{"value":"26 November 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 November 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 November 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Arthur Zimek is serving as action editor for DAMI.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}],"article-number":"2"}}