{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]],"date-time":"2026-09-30T23:51:32Z","timestamp":1790812292224,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":69,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,30]],"date-time":"2024-07-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1722297600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,30]],"date-time":"2024-07-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1722297600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100014736","name":"Lingnan University","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100014736","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Educ Inf Technol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Grounded in the activity theory, we adopted a sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach to explore the impact of automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) on English as a foreign language (EFL) learners\u2019 academic writing skills (i.e. task achievement, coherence and cohesion, lexicon, and grammatical range and accuracy). To this end, two intact classes were selected and randomly assigned to an electronic class (30 EFL learners), receiving AWCF electronically, and a non-electronic class (26 EFL learners), receiving written corrective feedback (WCF) non-electronically. Both groups of learners engaged in interactive writing activities guided by the principles of the activity theory, which capitalised on the roles of writing collaboration, social environment, and the mediation of electronic\/nonelectronic artefacts to develop the writing skills. The required quantitative and qualitative data were collected via IELTS academic writing Task 1 and Task 2, a stimulated recall technique, and an individual semi-structured interview. The results of one-way ANCOVA indicated that the electronic learners outperformed their non-electronic counterparts in writing performance, task achievement, and grammatical range and accuracy, whilst no significant differences were found between the two groups\u2019 coherence and cohesion and lexicon. The stimulated recall technique, conducted with seven electronic EFL learners, confirmed the electronic learners\u2019 behavioural, cognitive, and affective engagement with the AWCF. The individual semi-structured interview, conducted with the same electronic learners, also indicated the electronic learners\u2019 positive and negative attitudes and perceptions towards the AWCF, further corroborating the findings. Pedagogical implications are discussed within the framework of the activity theory to clarify how instructional procedures and learning environments can be designed to more effectively contribute to EFL learners\u2019 interactive writing activities and, hence, their writing skills development.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10639-024-12896-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,30]],"date-time":"2024-07-30T14:03:44Z","timestamp":1722348224000},"page":"2691-2735","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":37,"title":["Exploring the impact of automated written corrective feedback on the academic writing skills of EFL learners: An activity theory perspective"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"30","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0684-2087","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Masoud","family":"Rahimi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1146-1024","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jalil","family":"Fathi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8435-9739","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Di","family":"Zou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"12896_CR1","unstructured":"Allan, D. (2004). Oxford placement test. Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"1","key":"12896_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1080\/01443410.2016.1223275","volume":"37","author":"L Bai","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bai, L., & Hu, G. (2017). In the face of fallible AWE feedback: How to students respond? Educational Psychology, 37(1), 67\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01443410.2016.1223275","journal-title":"Educational Psychology"},{"issue":"3","key":"12896_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"764","DOI":"10.1177\/0033688220966632","volume":"53","author":"JS Barrot","year":"2022","unstructured":"Barrot, J. S. (2022). Integrating technology into ESL\/EFL writing through Grammarly. RELC Journal, 53(3), 764\u2013768. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0033688220966632","journal-title":"RELC Journal"},{"issue":"4","key":"12896_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.1080\/09588221.2021.1936071","volume":"36","author":"JS Barrot","year":"2023","unstructured":"Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using automated written corrective feedback in the writing classrooms: Effects on L2 writing accuracy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(4), 584\u2013607. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09588221.2021.1936071","journal-title":"Computer Assisted Language Learning"},{"key":"12896_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100510","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asw.2020.100510","volume":"47","author":"JS Barrot","year":"2021","unstructured":"Barrot, J. S., & Agdeppa, J. Y. (2021). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency as indices of college-level L2 writers\u2019 proficiency. Assessing Writing, 47, 100510. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.asw.2020.100510","journal-title":"Assessing Writing"},{"issue":"2","key":"12896_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1515\/iral-2017-0012","volume":"59","author":"JS Barrot","year":"2021","unstructured":"Barrot, J. S., & Gabinete, M. K. (2021). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in the argumentative writing of ESL and EFL learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 59(2), 209\u2013232. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/iral-2017-0012","journal-title":"International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching"},{"issue":"2","key":"12896_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1093\/applin\/amp016","volume":"31","author":"J Bitchener","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten-month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 193\u2013214. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/applin\/amp016","journal-title":"Applied Linguistics"},{"key":"12896_CR8","unstructured":"Boyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage."},{"key":"12896_CR9","unstructured":"Brown, R., & Richards, L. (2017). IELTS advantage writing skills: A step-by-step guide to a high IELTS writing score. Delta Publishing."},{"issue":"3","key":"12896_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.1017\/S095834402100015X","volume":"33","author":"C Brudermann","year":"2021","unstructured":"Brudermann, C., Grosbois, M., & Sarr\u00e9, C. (2021). Accuracy development in L2 writing: Exploring the potential of computer-assisted unfocused indirect corrective feedback in an online EFL course. ReCALL, 33(3), 248\u2013264. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S095834402100015X","journal-title":"ReCALL"},{"key":"12896_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100915","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jslw.2022.100915","volume":"57","author":"M Chen","year":"2022","unstructured":"Chen, M., & Cui, Y. (2022). The effects of AWE and peer feedback on cohesion and coherence in continuation writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 57, 100915. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jslw.2022.100915","journal-title":"Journal of Second Language Writing"},{"key":"12896_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1016\/j.iheduc.2017.04.002","volume":"34","author":"G Cheng","year":"2017","unstructured":"Cheng, G. (2017). The impact of online automated feedback on students\u2019 reflective journal writing in an EFL course. The Internet and Higher Education, 34, 18\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.iheduc.2017.04.002","journal-title":"The Internet and Higher Education"},{"key":"12896_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102880","DOI":"10.1016\/j.system.2022.102880","volume":"109","author":"X Cheng","year":"2022","unstructured":"Cheng, X., & Liu, Y. (2022). Student engagement with teacher written feedback: Insights from low-proficiency and high-proficiency L2 learners. System, 109, 102880. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.system.2022.102880","journal-title":"System"},{"issue":"4","key":"12896_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1080\/1475939X.2019.1660089","volume":"28","author":"C Costa","year":"2019","unstructured":"Costa, C., Hammond, M., & Younie, S. (2019). Theorising technology in education: An introduction. Technology Pedagogy and Education, 28(4), 395\u2013399. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1475939X.2019.1660089","journal-title":"Technology Pedagogy and Education"},{"key":"12896_CR15","unstructured":"Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (2nd ed.). Sage."},{"issue":"3","key":"12896_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1207\/s15430421tip3903_2","volume":"39","author":"JW Creswell","year":"2000","unstructured":"Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124\u2013130. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1207\/s15430421tip3903_2","journal-title":"Theory into Practice"},{"key":"12896_CR17","unstructured":"Creswell, J. W., Clark, P., Gutmann, V. L., M., & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences (pp. 209\u2013240). Sage."},{"issue":"1","key":"12896_CR18","first-page":"1","volume":"5","author":"S Dikli","year":"2006","unstructured":"Dikli, S. (2006). An overview of automated scoring of essays. The Journal of Technology Learning and Assessment, 5(1), 1\u201335. http:\/\/www.jtla.org","journal-title":"The Journal of Technology Learning and Assessment"},{"key":"12896_CR19","unstructured":"D\u00f6rnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"5\u20136","key":"12896_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"617","DOI":"10.1080\/09588221.2018.1449757","volume":"31","author":"S Ebadi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2018). An exploration into the impact of WebQuest-based classroom on EFL learners\u2019 critical thinking and academic writing skills: A mixed-methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(5\u20136), 617\u2013651. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09588221.2018.1449757","journal-title":"Computer Assisted Language Learning"},{"issue":"2","key":"12896_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1017\/S0272263109990544","volume":"32","author":"R Ellis","year":"2010","unstructured":"Ellis, R. (2010). EPILOGUE: A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 335\u2013349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0272263109990544","journal-title":"Studies in Second Language Acquisition"},{"issue":"02","key":"12896_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1017\/S0272263106060141","volume":"28","author":"R Ellis","year":"2006","unstructured":"Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(02), 339\u2013368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0272263106060141","journal-title":"Studies in Second Language Acquisition"},{"key":"12896_CR23","unstructured":"Engestr\u00f6m, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit."},{"key":"12896_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Engestr\u00f6m, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engestr\u00f6m, R. Miettinen, & R. M. Punam\u00e4ki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19\u201338). Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511812774.003"},{"issue":"1","key":"12896_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1080\/13639080020028747","volume":"14","author":"Y Engestr\u00f6m","year":"2001","unstructured":"Engestr\u00f6m, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity-theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133\u2013156.","journal-title":"Journal of Education and Work"},{"key":"12896_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Fathi, J., & Rahimi, M. (2022). Electronic writing portfolio in a collaborative writing environment: Its impact on EFL students\u2019 writing performance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1\u201339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09588221.2022.2097697","DOI":"10.1080\/09588221.2022.2097697"},{"key":"12896_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C., & DeMets, D. L. (2010). Fundamentals of clinical trials (4th ed.). Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4419-1586-3"},{"issue":"5","key":"12896_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"986","DOI":"10.1177\/1362168820915337","volume":"26","author":"J Gao","year":"2022","unstructured":"Gao, J., & Ma, S. (2022). Instructor feedback on free writing and automated corrective feedback in drills: Intensity and efficacy. Language Teaching Research, 26(5), 986\u20131009. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1362168820915337","journal-title":"Language Teaching Research"},{"key":"12896_CR29","unstructured":"Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language acquisition. Erlbaum."},{"key":"12896_CR30","unstructured":"Grammarly (2021). Grammarly: Free online writing assistant. Retrieved February 15, 2021, from https:\/\/www.grammarly.com\/"},{"issue":"9","key":"12896_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2312","DOI":"10.1080\/09588221.2021.1879161","volume":"35","author":"Q Guo","year":"2022","unstructured":"Guo, Q., Feng, R., & Hua, Y. (2022). How effectively can EFL students use automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) in research writing? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2312\u20132331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09588221.2021.1879161","journal-title":"Computer Assisted Language Learning"},{"issue":"1","key":"12896_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1177\/1525822X05282260","volume":"18","author":"NV Ivankova","year":"2006","unstructured":"Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1525822X05282260","journal-title":"Field Methods"},{"issue":"7","key":"12896_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1329","DOI":"10.1080\/09588221.2020.1799824","volume":"35","author":"L Jiang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Jiang, L., & Yu, S. (2022). Appropriating automated feedback in L2 writing: Experiences of Chinese EFL student writers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(7), 1329\u20131353. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09588221.2020.1799824","journal-title":"Computer Assisted Language Learning"},{"key":"12896_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.system.2020.102302","volume":"93","author":"L Jiang","year":"2020","unstructured":"Jiang, L., Yu, S., & Wang, C. (2020). Second language writing instructors\u2019 feedback practice in response to automated writing evaluation: A sociocultural perspective. System, 93, 1\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.system.2020.102302","journal-title":"System"},{"key":"12896_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asw.2020.100450","volume":"44","author":"S Koltovskaia","year":"2020","unstructured":"Koltovskaia, S. (2020). Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study. Assessing Writing, 44, 1\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.asw.2020.100450","journal-title":"Assessing Writing"},{"issue":"4","key":"12896_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1538","DOI":"10.1111\/bjet.13100","volume":"52","author":"D Laxton","year":"2021","unstructured":"Laxton, D., Cooper, L., & Younie, S. (2021). Translational research in action: The use of technology to disseminate information to parents during the COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1538\u20131553. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bjet.13100","journal-title":"British Journal of Educational Technology"},{"key":"12896_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lee, I. (2017). Classroom writing assessment and feedback in L2 school contexts. Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-981-10-3924-9","DOI":"10.1007\/978-981-10-3924-9"},{"key":"12896_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.system.2021.102505","volume":"99","author":"Z Li","year":"2021","unstructured":"Li, Z. (2021). Teachers in automated writing evaluation (AWE) system-supported ESL writing classes: Perception, implementation, and influence. System, 99, 1\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.system.2021.102505","journal-title":"System"},{"issue":"3","key":"12896_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"773","DOI":"10.1111\/bjet.13294","volume":"54","author":"R Li","year":"2023","unstructured":"Li, R. (2023). Still a fallible tool? Revisiting effects of automated writing evaluation from activity theory perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(3), 773\u2013789. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bjet.13294","journal-title":"British Journal of Educational Technology"},{"issue":"1","key":"12896_CR38","first-page":"27","volume":"22","author":"J Li","year":"2018","unstructured":"Li, J., & Li, M. (2018). Turnitin and peer review in ESL academic writing classrooms. Language Learning & Technology, 22(1), 27\u201341. http:\/\/hdl.handle.net\/10125\/44576","journal-title":"Language Learning & Technology"},{"key":"12896_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jslw.2014.10.004","volume":"27","author":"J Li","year":"2015","unstructured":"Li, J., Link, S., & Hegelheimer, V. (2015). Rethinking the role of automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback in ESL writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 1\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jslw.2014.10.004","journal-title":"Journal of Second Language Writing"},{"issue":"3","key":"12896_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.1093\/elt\/ccv058","volume":"70","author":"HC Liao","year":"2016","unstructured":"Liao, H. C. (2016). Using automated writing evaluation to reduce grammar errors in writing. ELT Journal, 70(3), 308\u2013319. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/elt\/ccv058","journal-title":"ELT Journal"},{"issue":"4","key":"12896_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"502","DOI":"10.1109\/TLT.2016.2612659","volume":"10","author":"M Liu","year":"2016","unstructured":"Liu, M., Li, Y., Xu, W., & Liu, L. (2016). Automated essay feedback generation and its impact on revision. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(4), 502\u2013513. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/TLT.2016.2612659","journal-title":"IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies"},{"issue":"6","key":"12896_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1730","DOI":"10.1111\/jcal.12707","volume":"38","author":"GZ Liu","year":"2022","unstructured":"Liu, G. Z., Rahimi, M., & Fathi, J. (2022). Flipping writing metacognitive strategies and writing skills in an English as a foreign language collaborative writing context: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(6), 1730\u20131751. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jcal.12707","journal-title":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning"},{"key":"12896_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Liu, G. Z., Fathi, J., & Rahimi, M. (2023). Enhancing EFL learners\u2019 intercultural communicative effectiveness through telecollaboration with native and non-native speakers of English. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1\u201331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09588221.2022.2164778","DOI":"10.1080\/09588221.2022.2164778"},{"key":"12896_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/00336882231198913","author":"K Osawa","year":"2023","unstructured":"Osawa, K. (2023). Integrating Automated Written Corrective Feedback into E-Portfolios for second language writing: Notion and notion AI. RELC Journal. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/00336882231198913","journal-title":"RELC Journal"},{"issue":"9","key":"12896_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2627","DOI":"10.1080\/09588221.2021.1888753","volume":"35","author":"M Rahimi","year":"2022","unstructured":"Rahimi, M., & Fathi, J. (2022). Exploring the impact of wiki-mediated collaborative writing on EFL students\u2019 writing performance, writing self-regulation, and writing self-efficacy: A mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2627\u20132674. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09588221.2021.1888753","journal-title":"Computer Assisted Language Learning"},{"issue":"7","key":"12896_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"653","DOI":"10.1080\/09588221.2018.1428994","volume":"31","author":"J Ranalli","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ranalli, J. (2018). Automated written corrective feedback: How well can students make use of it? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(7), 653\u2013674. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09588221.2018.1428994","journal-title":"Computer Assisted Language Learning"},{"key":"12896_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jslw.2021.100816","volume":"52","author":"J Ranalli","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ranalli, J. (2021). L2 student engagement with automated feedback on writing: Potential for learning and issues of trust. Journal of Second Language Writing, 52, 1\u201316. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jslw.2021.100816","journal-title":"Journal of Second Language Writing"},{"issue":"3","key":"12896_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1017\/S0958344021000021","volume":"33","author":"A Saricaoglu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Saricaoglu, A., & Bilki, Z. (2021). Voluntary use of automated writing evaluation by content course students. ReCALL, 33(3), 265\u2013277. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0958344021000021","journal-title":"ReCALL"},{"key":"12896_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Shadiev, R., & Feng, Y. (2023). Using automated corrective feedback tools in language learning: A review study. Interactive Learning Environments, 1\u201329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10494820.2022.2153145","DOI":"10.1080\/10494820.2022.2153145"},{"issue":"1","key":"12896_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1080\/10494820.2019.1629601","volume":"30","author":"HF Shang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Shang, H. F. (2022). Exploring online peer feedback and automated corrective feedback on EFL writing performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(1), 4\u201316. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10494820.2019.1629601","journal-title":"Interactive Learning Environments"},{"key":"12896_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shermis, M. D., Burstein, J., & Bursky, S. A. (2013). Introduction to automated essay evaluation. In M. D. Shermis, & J. Burstein (Eds.), Handbook of automated essay evaluation (pp. 23\u201337). Routledge.","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203122761-9"},{"key":"12896_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asw.2013.11.007","volume":"19","author":"M Stevenson","year":"2014","unstructured":"Stevenson, M., & Phakiti, A. (2014). The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing. Assessing Writing, 19, 51\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.asw.2013.11.007","journal-title":"Assessing Writing"},{"key":"12896_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2018.12.005","volume":"131","author":"C Strobl","year":"2019","unstructured":"Strobl, C., Ailhaud, E., Benetos, K., Devitt, A., Kruse, O., Proske, A., & Rapp, C. (2019). Digital support for academic writing: A review of technologies and pedagogies. Computers & Education, 131, 33\u201348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.compedu.2018.12.005","journal-title":"Computers & Education"},{"key":"12896_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1080\/09658410903197264","volume":"18","author":"AML Svalberg","year":"2009","unstructured":"Svalberg, A. M. L. (2009). Engagement with language: Interrogating a construct. Language Awareness, 18, 242\u2013258. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09658410903197264","journal-title":"Language Awareness"},{"key":"12896_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1080\/09658416.2017.1406490","volume":"27","author":"AML Svalberg","year":"2017","unstructured":"Svalberg, A. M. L. (2017). Researching language engagement: Current trends and future directions. Language Awareness, 27, 21\u201339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09658416.2017.1406490","journal-title":"Language Awareness"},{"key":"12896_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Svalberg, A. M. L. (2021). Engagement with language in relation to form-focused versus meaning-focused teaching and learning. In P. Hiver, A. H. Al-Hoorie, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 38\u201355). Multilingual Matters.","DOI":"10.2307\/jj.22730722.8"},{"key":"12896_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1177\/026553220101800302","volume":"18","author":"M Swain","year":"2001","unstructured":"Swain, M. (2001). Examining dialogue: Another approach to content specification and to validating inferences drawn from test scores. Language Testing, 18, 275\u2013302. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/026553220101800302","journal-title":"Language Testing"},{"key":"12896_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tan, S., Cho, Y. W., & Xu, W. (2022). Exploring the effects of automated written corrective feedback, computer-mediated peer feedback and their combination mode on EFL learner\u2019s writing performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 1\u201311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10494820.2022.2066137","DOI":"10.1080\/10494820.2022.2066137"},{"issue":"1","key":"12896_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1080\/17501229.2021.1914062","volume":"17","author":"H Waer","year":"2023","unstructured":"Waer, H. (2023). The effect of integrating automated writing evaluation on EFL writing apprehension and grammatical knowledge. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(1), 47\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17501229.2021.1914062","journal-title":"Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching"},{"issue":"3","key":"12896_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1080\/09588221.2012.655300","volume":"26","author":"Y Wang","year":"2013","unstructured":"Wang, Y., Shang, H., & Briody, P. (2013). Exploring the impact of using automated writing evaluation in English as a foreign language university students\u2019 writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(3), 234\u2013257. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09588221.2012.655300","journal-title":"Computer Assisted Language Learning"},{"issue":"1","key":"12896_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1080\/15544800701771580","volume":"3","author":"M Warschauer","year":"2008","unstructured":"Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D. (2008). Automated writing assessment in the classroom. Pedagogies, 3(1), 22\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15544800701771580","journal-title":"Pedagogies"},{"key":"12896_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2016.05.004","volume":"100","author":"J Wilson","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wilson, J., & Czik, A. (2016). Automated essay evaluation software in English language arts classrooms: Effects on teacher feedback, student motivation, and writing quality. Computers & Education, 100, 94\u2013109. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.compedu.2016.05.004","journal-title":"Computers & Education"},{"issue":"2","key":"12896_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.18806\/tesl.v37i2.1340","volume":"37","author":"J Woodworth","year":"2020","unstructured":"Woodworth, J., & Barkaoui, K. (2020). Perspectives on using automated writing evaluation systems to provide written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom. TESL Canada Journal, 37(2), 234\u2013247. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18806\/tesl.v37i2.1340","journal-title":"TESL Canada Journal"},{"issue":"9","key":"12896_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2391","DOI":"10.1080\/09588221.2021.1880441","volume":"35","author":"R Zhang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2022). Types, features, and effectiveness of technologies in collaborative writing for second language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2391\u20132422. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09588221.2021.1880441","journal-title":"Computer Assisted Language Learning"},{"key":"12896_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2019.103668","volume":"143","author":"M Zhu","year":"2020","unstructured":"Zhu, M., Liu, O. L., & Lee, H. S. (2020). The effect of automated feedback on revision behavior and learning gains in formative assessment of scientific argument writing. Computers and Education, 143, 1\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.compedu.2019.103668","journal-title":"Computers and Education"},{"key":"12896_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zou, D., Xie, H., & Wang, F. L. (2022). Effects of scaffolded peer assessment on students\u2019 holistic critical thinking in academic writing. In International Conference on Blended Learning (pp. 147\u2013156). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-031-08939-8_13","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-08939-8_13"},{"issue":"1","key":"12896_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"166","DOI":"10.1007\/s12528-022-09337-y","volume":"35","author":"D Zou","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zou, D., Xie, H., & Wang, F. L. (2023). Effects of technology enhanced peer, teacher and self-feedback on students\u2019 collaborative writing, critical thinking tendency and engagement in learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 35(1), 166\u2013185. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12528-022-09337-y","journal-title":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education"}],"container-title":["Education and Information Technologies"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10639-024-12896-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10639-024-12896-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10639-024-12896-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,1]],"date-time":"2025-03-01T03:14:59Z","timestamp":1740798899000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10639-024-12896-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,30]]},"references-count":69,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,2]]}},"alternative-id":["12896"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10639-024-12896-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["1360-2357","1573-7608"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1360-2357","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-7608","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,30]]},"assertion":[{"value":"29 July 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 July 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"30 July 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"I confirm that all the research meets ethical guidelines and adheres to the legal requirements of the study country.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}