{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T15:37:10Z","timestamp":1786981030876,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":60,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,27]],"date-time":"2024-09-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1727395200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,27]],"date-time":"2024-09-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1727395200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Karlsruher Institut f\u00fcr Technologie (KIT)"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Educ Inf Technol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The rapid and continuing acceleration of digital transformation in education, propelled by the COVID-19 pandemic, has underscored the urgent need to examine how teachers adapt to and integrate digital tools in their teaching practices. Anchored in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as its theoretical framework, this study uniquely uses a longitudinal design to trace the evolving patterns of technology acceptance and integration among teachers. Through qualitative methodology, involving three series of interviews with 13 secondary school teachers over two years, we identify their evolving interactions with digital tools. Our analysis reveals a cyclical pattern of technology acceptance and use across time, characterized by initial rapid adaptation to digital tools, subsequent periods of reflection and skill acquisition, and varied levels of sustained integration or reassessment. Based on our findings we propose an adapted, cyclical TAM framework and highlight the critical role of ongoing support, professional development, and infrastructure improvements, arguing for comprehensive support systems and adequate time for educators to progress through different stages of digital tool integration. We conclude that a deep understanding and support of these cycles are essential for empowering teachers to lead the digital transformation in education effectively.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10639-024-12954-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,26]],"date-time":"2024-09-26T22:01:41Z","timestamp":1727388101000},"page":"6091-6115","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":27,"title":["Longitudinal perspectives on technology acceptance: Teachers' integration of digital tools through the COVID-19 transition"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"30","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5020-6590","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Olivia","family":"Wohlfart","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3915-6793","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ingo","family":"Wagner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"12954_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"238","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2015.11.036","volume":"56","author":"F Abdullah","year":"2016","unstructured":"Abdullah, F., & Ward, R. (2016). Developing a general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors. Computers in Human Behavior,56, 238\u2013256. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.chb.2015.11.036","journal-title":"Computers in Human Behavior"},{"key":"12954_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2018.06.008","volume":"125","author":"M Al-Emran","year":"2018","unstructured":"Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018). Technology acceptance model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Computers & Education,125, 389\u2013412. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.compedu.2018.06.008","journal-title":"Computers & Education"},{"key":"12954_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"200","DOI":"10.4135\/9781849209656.n9","volume-title":"Qualitative research in action","author":"H Becker","year":"2002","unstructured":"Becker, H., Gans, H., Luckmann, T., Burawoy, M., Berger, P., Gerson, K., Glaser, B., Strauss, A., Horowitz, R., Inciardi, J., Pottieger, A., Lewis, O., Liebow, E., Mead, G., & Mills, C. (2002). Observation and interviewing: Options and choices in qualitative research. In T. May (Ed.), Qualitative research in action (pp. 200\u2013224). SAGE Publications Ltd. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4135\/9781849209656.n9"},{"key":"12954_CR4","volume-title":"Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners","author":"V Braun","year":"2013","unstructured":"Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage."},{"issue":"3","key":"12954_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.1080\/14780887.2020.1769238","volume":"18","author":"V Braun","year":"2020","unstructured":"Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2020). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology,18(3), 328\u2013352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14780887.2020.1769238","journal-title":"Qualitative Research in Psychology"},{"key":"12954_CR6","unstructured":"Bresler, F. (2016). Reflective professional development. Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Interdisziplin\u00e4re \u00d6konomische Forschung. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economic Research, 1, 58\u201365."},{"key":"12954_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Burton-Jones, A., & Hubona, G. S. (2006). The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 43, 706\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.im.2006.03.007","DOI":"10.1016\/j.im.2006.03.007"},{"issue":"2","key":"12954_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2361","DOI":"10.1007\/s10639-022-11263-6","volume":"28","author":"JE Casey","year":"2023","unstructured":"Casey, J. E., Kirk, J., Kuklies, K., & Mireles, S. V. (2023). Using the technology acceptance model to assess how preservice teachers\u2019 view educational technology in middle and high school classrooms. Education and Information Technologies,28(2), 2361\u20132382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10639-022-11263-6","journal-title":"Education and Information Technologies"},{"key":"12954_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2012.12.003","volume":"63","author":"R Cheung","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cheung, R., & Vogel, D. (2013). Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Computers & Education,63, 160\u2013175. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.compedu.2012.12.003","journal-title":"Computers & Education"},{"key":"12954_CR10","unstructured":"Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results [PhD]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https:\/\/dspace.mit.edu\/bitstream\/handle\/1721.1\/15192\/14927137MIT.pdf?sequence=2. Accessed\u00a0 05.05.2020."},{"key":"12954_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 319. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/249008","DOI":"10.2307\/249008"},{"key":"12954_CR12","unstructured":"del Barrio-Garc\u00eda, S., Arquero, J. L., & Romero-Fr\u00edas, E. (2015). Personal learning environments acceptance model: The role of need for cognition, elearning satisfaction and students\u2019 perceptions. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 18(3), 129\u2013141. https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/10.2307\/jeductechsoci.18.3.129. Accessed 06.09.2022."},{"key":"12954_CR13","unstructured":"Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE."},{"key":"12954_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dresing, T., & Pehl, T. (2019). Transkription [Transcription]. In G. Mey & K. Mruck (Eds.), Springer reference psychologie. Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie [Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology] (pp. 1\u201320). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-658-18387-5_56-2","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-658-18387-5_56-2"},{"issue":"7","key":"12954_CR15","first-page":"4","volume":"4","author":"D Dwyer","year":"1994","unstructured":"Dwyer, D. (1994). Apple classrooms of tomorrow: What we\u2019ve learned. Educational Leadership,4(7), 4\u201310.","journal-title":"Educational Leadership"},{"issue":"3","key":"12954_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1080\/15391523.2010.10782551","volume":"42","author":"PA Ertmer","year":"2010","unstructured":"Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,42(3), 255\u2013284. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15391523.2010.10782551","journal-title":"Journal of Research on Technology in Education"},{"key":"12954_CR17","unstructured":"European Commission (Ed.). (2020). Digital education action plan (2021\u20132027): Resetting education and training for the digital age. Website. European Union. https:\/\/bit.ly\/3GsJAcH. Accessed\u00a006.09.2022."},{"key":"12954_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sbspro.2012.11.012","volume":"64","author":"T Farahat","year":"2012","unstructured":"Farahat, T. (2012). Applying the technology acceptance model to online learning in the Egyptian universities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,64, 95\u2013104. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.sbspro.2012.11.012","journal-title":"Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences"},{"key":"12954_CR19","unstructured":"Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks. Publications Office of the European Union."},{"key":"12954_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Duckworth, D. (2020). Preparing for life in a digital world. Springer International Publishing. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-38781-5","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-38781-5"},{"key":"12954_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100145","DOI":"10.1016\/j.caeo.2023.100145","volume":"4","author":"D Georgiou","year":"2023","unstructured":"Georgiou, D., Trikoili, A., & Kester, L. (2023). Rethinking determinants of primary school teachers\u2019 technology acceptance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers and Education Open,4, 100145. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.caeo.2023.100145","journal-title":"Computers and Education Open"},{"issue":"7","key":"12954_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9725","DOI":"10.1007\/s10639-022-10951-7","volume":"27","author":"A Grani\u0107","year":"2022","unstructured":"Grani\u0107, A. (2022). Educational technology adoption: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies,27(7), 9725\u20139744. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10639-022-10951-7","journal-title":"Education and Information Technologies"},{"issue":"5","key":"12954_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2572","DOI":"10.1111\/bjet.12864","volume":"50","author":"A Grani\u0107","year":"2019","unstructured":"Grani\u0107, A., & Maranguni\u0107, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology,50(5), 2572\u20132593. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bjet.12864","journal-title":"British Journal of Educational Technology"},{"issue":"3","key":"12954_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.2190\/EC.38.3.a","volume":"38","author":"RX Guo","year":"2008","unstructured":"Guo, R. X., Dobson, T., & Petrina, S. (2008). Digital natives, digital immigrants: An Analysis of age and Ict competency in teacher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research,38(3), 235\u2013254. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2190\/EC.38.3.a","journal-title":"Journal of Educational Computing Research"},{"key":"12954_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1007\/s11528-016-0091-y","volume":"60","author":"ER Hamilton","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The substitution augmentation modification redefinition (SAMR) model: A critical review and suggestions for its use. TechTrends,60, 433\u2013441. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11528-016-0091-y","journal-title":"TechTrends"},{"issue":"3","key":"12954_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1007\/s11423-006-9022-5","volume":"55","author":"KF Hew","year":"2007","unstructured":"Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development,55(3), 223\u2013252.","journal-title":"Educational Technology Research and Development"},{"issue":"5","key":"12954_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5999","DOI":"10.1007\/s10639-022-11417-6","volume":"28","author":"H Khong","year":"2023","unstructured":"Khong, H., Celik, I., Le, T. T. T., van Lai, T. T., Nguyen, A., & Bui, H. (2023). Examining teachers\u2019 behavioural intention for online teaching after COVID-19 pandemic: A large-scale survey. Education and Information Technologies,28(5), 5999\u20136026. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10639-022-11417-6","journal-title":"Education and Information Technologies"},{"issue":"1","key":"12954_CR28","first-page":"60","volume":"9","author":"MJ Koehler","year":"2009","unstructured":"Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education,9(1), 60\u201370.","journal-title":"Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education"},{"key":"12954_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems,12. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17705\/1CAIS.01250","DOI":"10.17705\/1CAIS.01250"},{"key":"12954_CR30","unstructured":"Mayring, P. (2022). Qualitative inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und techniken [Qualitative content analysis: Fundamentals and techniques] (13th ed.). Beltz."},{"issue":"3","key":"12954_CR31","first-page":"40","volume":"23","author":"C Moersch","year":"1995","unstructured":"Moersch, C. (1995). Levels of technology implementation (LoTI): A framework for measuring classroom technology use. Learning and Leading with Technology,23(3), 40\u201342.","journal-title":"Learning and Leading with Technology"},{"issue":"3","key":"12954_CR32","first-page":"22","volume":"29","author":"C Moersch","year":"2001","unstructured":"Moersch, C. (2001). Next steps: Using LoTi as a research tool. Learning & Leading with Technology,29(3), 22\u201327.","journal-title":"Learning & Leading with Technology"},{"key":"12954_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"M\u00fcller, W., & Leyer, M. (2023). Understanding intention and use of digital elements in higher education teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 1\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10639-023-11798-2","DOI":"10.1007\/s10639-023-11798-2"},{"key":"12954_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"770094","DOI":"10.3389\/feduc.2022.770094","volume":"7","author":"L Myyry","year":"2022","unstructured":"Myyry, L., Kallunki, V., Katajavuori, N., Repo, S., Tuononen, T., Anttila, H., Kinnunen, P., Haarala-Muhonen, A., & Py\u00f6r\u00e4l\u00e4, E. (2022). COVID-19 accelerating academic teachers\u2019 digital competence in distance teaching. Frontiers in Education,7, 770094. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/feduc.2022.770094","journal-title":"Frontiers in Education"},{"key":"12954_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Njiku, J. (2022). Attitude and technological pedagogical and content knowledge: The reciprocal predictors? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1\u201316. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15391523.2022.2089409","DOI":"10.1080\/15391523.2022.2089409"},{"key":"12954_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1787\/9789264312012-en","volume-title":"Going digital: Shaping policies","author":"OECD","year":"2019","unstructured":"OECD. (2019). Going digital: Shaping policies. OECD. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1787\/9789264312012-en"},{"issue":"1","key":"12954_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1083-6101.2007.00391.x","volume":"13","author":"N Park","year":"2007","unstructured":"Park, N., Lee, K. M., & Cheong, P. H. (2007). University instructors\u2019 acceptance of electronic courseware: An application of the technology acceptance model. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,13(1), 163\u2013186. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1083-6101.2007.00391.x","journal-title":"Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication"},{"key":"12954_CR38","unstructured":"Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE."},{"key":"12954_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"S\u00e1nchez, R. A., & Hueros, A. D. (2010). Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of moodle using TAM. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1632\u20131640. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.chb.2010.06.011","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2010.06.011"},{"key":"12954_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2018.09.009","volume":"128","author":"R Scherer","year":"2019","unstructured":"Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers\u2019 adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education,128, 13\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.compedu.2018.09.009","journal-title":"Computers & Education"},{"key":"12954_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1016\/j.edurev.2019.03.001","volume":"27","author":"R Scherer","year":"2019","unstructured":"Scherer, R., & Teo, T. (2019). Unpacking teachers\u2019 intentions to integrate technology: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review,27, 90\u2013109. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.edurev.2019.03.001","journal-title":"Educational Research Review"},{"key":"12954_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Schmid, U., Goertz, L., Behrens, J., & Bertelsmann Stiftung. (2017). Monitor digitale bildung : Die schulen im digitalen zeitalter [Digital education monitor: Schools in the digital age].\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11586\/2017041","DOI":"10.11586\/2017041"},{"issue":"1","key":"12954_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1007\/s10758-018-9376-x","volume":"25","author":"M Spiteri","year":"2020","unstructured":"Spiteri, M., & Chang Rundgren, S.-N. (2020). Literature review on the factors affecting primary teachers\u2019 use of digital technology. Technology, Knowledge and Learning,25(1), 115\u2013128. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10758-018-9376-x","journal-title":"Technology, Knowledge and Learning"},{"issue":"6","key":"12954_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2067","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2011.08.005","volume":"27","author":"B \u0160umak","year":"2011","unstructured":"\u0160umak, B., Heri\u010dko, M., & Pu\u0161nik, M. (2011). A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types. Computers in Human Behavior,27(6), 2067\u20132077. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.chb.2011.08.005","journal-title":"Computers in Human Behavior"},{"key":"12954_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144\u2013176. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1287\/isre.6.2.144","DOI":"10.1287\/isre.6.2.144"},{"key":"12954_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Teo, T., Lee, C. B., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Understanding pre-service teachers\u2019 computer attitudes: Applying and extending the technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 128\u2013143.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2729.2007.00247.x"},{"issue":"6","key":"12954_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1139","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8535.2008.00913.x","volume":"40","author":"T Teo","year":"2009","unstructured":"Teo, T. (2009). Is there an attitude problem? Reconsidering the role of attitude in the TAM. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 1139\u20131141. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1467-8535.2008.00913.x","journal-title":"British Journal of Educational Technology"},{"issue":"1","key":"12954_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2011.10.009","volume":"59","author":"J Tondeur","year":"2012","unstructured":"Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134\u2013144. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.compedu.2011.10.009","journal-title":"Computers & Education"},{"issue":"3","key":"12954_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.2307\/30036540","volume":"27","author":"M Venkatesh","year":"2003","unstructured":"Venkatesh, M., & Davis,. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/30036540","journal-title":"MIS Quarterly"},{"issue":"2","key":"12954_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x","volume":"39","author":"V Venkatesh","year":"2008","unstructured":"Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273\u2013315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x","journal-title":"Decision Sciences"},{"issue":"2","key":"12954_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.46.2.186.11926","volume":"46","author":"V Venkatesh","year":"2000","unstructured":"Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186\u2013204. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1287\/mnsc.46.2.186.11926","journal-title":"Management Science"},{"issue":"5","key":"12954_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.17705\/1jais.00428","volume":"17","author":"V Venkatesh","year":"2016","unstructured":"Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328\u2013376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17705\/1jais.00428","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Systems"},{"key":"12954_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Waffner, B. (2020). Unterrichtspraktiken, erfahrungen und einstellungen von lehrpersonen zu digitalen medien in der schule [Teaching practices, experiences and attitudes of teachers towards digital media at school]. In A. Wilmers, C. Anda, C. Keller, & M. Rittberger (Eds.), Bildung im digitalen Wandel: Die Bedeutung f\u00fcr das p\u00e4dagogische Personal und f\u00fcr die Aus- und Fortbildung (pp. 57\u2013102). Waxmann Verlag GmbH.","DOI":"10.31244\/9783830991991.03"},{"key":"12954_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"West, M. (2023). An ed-tech tragedy? Educational technologies and school closures in the time of COVID-19.https:\/\/doi.org\/10.54675\/LYGF2153","DOI":"10.54675\/LYGF2153"},{"key":"12954_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103941","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2020.103941","volume":"156","author":"ML Wilson","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wilson, M. L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Cheng, L. (2020). The impact of teacher education courses for technology integration on pre-service teacher knowledge: A meta-analysis study. Computers & Education,156, 103941. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.compedu.2020.103941","journal-title":"Computers & Education"},{"key":"12954_CR56","unstructured":"Winarto, S. A. (2011). Analysis effect of external variables on system usage and user satisfaction using technology acceptance model (Empirical study on bank Pekreditan Rakyat in Semarang city region). Faculty of Economics, Diponegoro University Semarang."},{"key":"12954_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wohlfart, W., Trumler, T., & Wagner, I. (2021). The unique effects of Covid-19 - A qualitative study of the factors that influence teachers\u2019 acceptance and usage of digital tools. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7359\u20137379. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10639-021-10574-4","DOI":"10.1007\/s10639-021-10574-4"},{"key":"12954_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wohlfart, O., & Wagner, I. (2023).\u00a0Teachers\u2019 role in digitalizing education: An umbrella review. Educational Technology Research and Development\u202f: ETR & D, 71(2), 339\u2013365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11423-022-10166-0","DOI":"10.1007\/s11423-022-10166-0"},{"key":"12954_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wohlfart, O., Wagner, A., & Wagner, I. (2023).\u00a0Digital tools in secondary chemistry education \u2013 added value or modern gimmicks? Frontiers in Education, 8, 1197296. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/feduc.2023.1197296","DOI":"10.3389\/feduc.2023.1197296"},{"issue":"3","key":"12954_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"312","DOI":"10.1016\/S1007-0214(08)70050-6","volume":"13","author":"S Zhang","year":"2008","unstructured":"Zhang, S., Zhao, J., & Tan, W. (2008). Extending TAM for online learning systems: An intrinsic motivation perspective. Tsinghua Science and Technology,13(3), 312\u2013317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S1007-0214(08)70050-6","journal-title":"Tsinghua Science and Technology"}],"container-title":["Education and Information Technologies"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10639-024-12954-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10639-024-12954-y\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10639-024-12954-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,4]],"date-time":"2025-04-04T04:26:59Z","timestamp":1743740819000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10639-024-12954-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,27]]},"references-count":60,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]}},"alternative-id":["12954"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10639-024-12954-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["1360-2357","1573-7608"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1360-2357","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-7608","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,27]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 April 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 August 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 September 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that all principles of ethical and professional conduct have been followed. They further declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}