{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,31]],"date-time":"2025-12-31T00:44:28Z","timestamp":1767141868745,"version":"build-2238731810"},"reference-count":62,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,2]],"date-time":"2024-10-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1727827200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,2]],"date-time":"2024-10-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1727827200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Educ Inf Technol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10639-024-13032-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,2]],"date-time":"2024-10-02T01:01:39Z","timestamp":1727830899000},"page":"6339-6366","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["The impact of different peer feedback types on student academic writing performance from dyadic and individual analyses"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"30","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1022-2777","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Han","family":"Zhang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1685-3863","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jamie","family":"Costley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Matthew","family":"Courtney","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Galina","family":"Shulgina","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9383-1510","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mik","family":"Fanguy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,2]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"13032_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s40561-020-00118-7","volume":"7","author":"JAN Ansari","year":"2020","unstructured":"Ansari, J. A. N., & Khan, N. A. (2020). Exploring the role of social media in collaborative learning the new domain of learning. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 1\u201316. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40561-020-00118-7","journal-title":"Smart Learning Environments"},{"issue":"5","key":"13032_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"633","DOI":"10.1080\/13562517.2019.1590327","volume":"25","author":"HJ Benzie","year":"2020","unstructured":"Benzie, H. J., & Harper, R. (2020). Developing student writing in higher education: Digital third-party products in distributed learning environments. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(5), 633\u2013647. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13562517.2019.1590327","journal-title":"Teaching in Higher Education"},{"key":"13032_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Carless, D. (2020). Longitudinal perspectives on students\u2019 experiences of feedback: A need for teacher\u2013student partnerships. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(3), 425\u2013438. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07294360.2019.1684455","DOI":"10.1080\/07294360.2019.1684455"},{"issue":"2","key":"13032_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1177\/1469787420945845","volume":"23","author":"D Carless","year":"2022","unstructured":"Carless, D. (2022). From teacher transmission of information to student feedback literacy: Activating the learner role in feedback processes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 143\u2013153. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1469787420945845","journal-title":"Active Learning in Higher Education"},{"key":"13032_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103856","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2020.103856","volume":"150","author":"IC Chen","year":"2020","unstructured":"Chen, I. C., Hwang, G. J., Lai, C. L., & Wang, W. C. (2020). From design to reflection: Effects of peer-scoring and comments on students\u2019 behavioral patterns and learning outcomes in musical theater performance. Computers & Education, 150, 103856.","journal-title":"Computers & Education"},{"key":"13032_CR6","unstructured":"Clabough, E. B., & Clabough, S. W. (2016). Using rubrics as a scientific writing instructional method in early stage undergraduate neuroscience study. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 15(1), A85\u2013A93. Retrieved online on September 12, 2024 at https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC5105970\/"},{"issue":"1","key":"13032_CR7","first-page":"178","volume":"13","author":"P Coffin","year":"2020","unstructured":"Coffin, P. (2020). Implementing collaborative writing in EFL classrooms: Teachers and students\u2019 perspectives. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 13(1), 178\u2013194.","journal-title":"LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network"},{"issue":"1","key":"13032_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.112.1.155","volume":"112","author":"J Cohen","year":"1992","unstructured":"Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0033-2909.112.1.155","journal-title":"Psychological Bulletin"},{"key":"13032_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Costley, J., Zhang, H., Courtney, M., Shulgina, G., Baldwin, M., & Fanguy, M. (2023). Peer editing using shared online documents: The effects of comments and track changes on student L2 academic writing quality. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09588221.2023.2233573","DOI":"10.1080\/09588221.2023.2233573"},{"issue":"6","key":"13032_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1838","DOI":"10.1080\/07294360.2021.1969541","volume":"41","author":"Y Cui","year":"2022","unstructured":"Cui, Y., Schunn, C. D., & Gai, X. (2022). Peer feedback and teacher feedback: A comparative study of revision effectiveness in writing instruction for EFL learners. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(6), 1838\u20131854. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07294360.2021.1969541","journal-title":"Higher Education Research & Development"},{"issue":"2","key":"13032_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.46809\/jpse.v2i2.20","volume":"2","author":"S Dawadi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S., & Giri, R. A. (2021). Mixed-methods research: A discussion on its types, challenges, and criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 25\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.46809\/jpse.v2i2.20","journal-title":"Journal of Practical Studies in Education"},{"key":"13032_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1016\/j.learninstruc.2012.06.001","volume":"24","author":"DL Dinsmore","year":"2013","unstructured":"Dinsmore, D. L., & Parkinson, M. M. (2013). What are confidence judgments made of? Students\u2019 explanations for their confidence ratings and what that means for calibration. Learning and Instruction, 24, 4\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.learninstruc.2012.06.001","journal-title":"Learning and Instruction"},{"key":"13032_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Fanguy, M., & Costley, J. (2021). Creating a framework for understanding and defining flipped learning. Journal of Educators Online, 18(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.9743\/JEO.2021.18.1.2","DOI":"10.9743\/JEO.2021.18.1.2"},{"issue":"1","key":"13032_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1037\/edu0000053","volume":"108","author":"ER Fyfe","year":"2016","unstructured":"Fyfe, E. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2016). Feedback both helps and hinders learning: The causal role of prior knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(1), 82. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/edu0000053","journal-title":"Journal of Educational Psychology"},{"issue":"6","key":"13032_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"861","DOI":"10.1007\/s11251-014-9319-4","volume":"42","author":"MJ Gan","year":"2014","unstructured":"Gan, M. J., & Hattie, J. (2014). Prompting secondary students\u2019 use of criteria, feedback specificity and feedback levels during an investigative task. Instructional Science, 42(6), 861\u2013878. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11251-014-9319-4","journal-title":"Instructional Science"},{"key":"13032_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2015.06.019","volume":"52","author":"M Gielen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Gielen, M., & De Wever, B. (2015). Structuring peer assessment: Comparing the impact of the degree of structure on peer feedback content. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 315\u2013325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.chb.2015.06.019","journal-title":"Computers in Human Behavior"},{"issue":"5","key":"13032_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"680","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2019.1689545","volume":"45","author":"Y Han","year":"2020","unstructured":"Han, Y., & Xu, Y. (2020). The development of student feedback literacy: The influences of teacher feedback on peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(5), 680\u2013696. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2019.1689545","journal-title":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education"},{"key":"13032_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hattie, J., & Clarke, S. (2018). Visible learning: Feedback. Routledge. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780429485480","DOI":"10.4324\/9780429485480"},{"issue":"6","key":"13032_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"863","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2018.1545896","volume":"44","author":"B Huisman","year":"2019","unstructured":"Huisman, B., Saab, N., van den Broek, P., & van Driel, J. (2019). The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students\u2019 academic writing: A Meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 863\u2013880. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2018.1545896","journal-title":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education"},{"key":"13032_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9780511667251","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511667251"},{"issue":"1","key":"13032_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1093\/reseval\/rvaa032","volume":"30","author":"L Langfeldt","year":"2021","unstructured":"Langfeldt, L., Reymert, I., & Aksnes, D. W. (2021). The role of metrics in peer assessments. Research Evaluation, 30(1), 112\u2013126. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/reseval\/rvaa032","journal-title":"Research Evaluation"},{"issue":"2","key":"13032_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1080\/14703297.2019.1687005","volume":"58","author":"S Latifi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., & Biemans, H. J. (2021). How does online peer feedback improve argumentative essay writing and learning? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(2), 195\u2013206. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14703297.2019.1687005","journal-title":"Innovations in Education and Teaching International"},{"key":"13032_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Talaee, E. (2023). Worked example or scripting? Fostering students\u2019 online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing and learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 655\u2013669. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10494820.2020.1799032","DOI":"10.1080\/10494820.2020.1799032"},{"issue":"2","key":"13032_CR24","first-page":"1","volume":"11","author":"L Li","year":"2019","unstructured":"Li, L., & Grion, V. (2019). The power of giving feedback and receiving feedback in peer assessment. AISHE-J, 11(2), 1\u201317.","journal-title":"AISHE-J"},{"issue":"3","key":"13032_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"525","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8535.2009.00968.x","volume":"41","author":"L Li","year":"2010","unstructured":"Li, L., Liu, X., & Steckelberg, A. L. (2010). Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 525\u2013536. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1467-8535.2009.00968.x","journal-title":"British Journal of Educational Technology"},{"issue":"3","key":"13032_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8535.2011.01180.x","volume":"43","author":"L Li","year":"2012","unstructured":"Li, L., Liu, X., & Zhou, Y. (2012). Give and take: A re-analysis of assessor and assessee\u2019s roles in technology\u2010facilitated peer assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 376\u2013384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1467-8535.2011.01180.x","journal-title":"British Journal of Educational Technology"},{"issue":"3","key":"13032_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1016\/j.esp.2011.10.002","volume":"31","author":"L Lin","year":"2012","unstructured":"Lin, L., & Evans, S. (2012). Structural patterns in empirical research articles: A cross-disciplinary study. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 150\u2013160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.esp.2011.10.002","journal-title":"English for Specific Purposes"},{"key":"13032_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"720195","DOI":"10.3389\/feduc2021720195","volume":"6","author":"AA Lipnevich","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lipnevich, A. A., & Panadero, E. (2021). A review of feedback models and theories: Descriptions, definitions, and conclusions. Frontiers in Education, 6, 720195. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/feduc2021720195","journal-title":"Frontiers in Education"},{"issue":"10","key":"13032_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13027","DOI":"10.1007\/s10639-023-11697-6","volume":"28","author":"CC Liu","year":"2023","unstructured":"Liu, C. C., Liu, S. J., Hwang, G. J., Tu, Y. F., Wang, Y., & Wang, N. (2023). Engaging EFL students\u2019 critical thinking tendency and in-depth reflection in technology-based writing contexts: A peer assessment-incorporated automatic evaluation approach. Education and Information Technologies, 28(10), 13027\u201313052. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10639-023-11697-6","journal-title":"Education and Information Technologies"},{"key":"13032_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Luo, T., Dani, D. E., & Cheng, L. (2016). Viability of using Twitter to support peer instruction in teacher education. International Journal of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments, 4(4), 287\u2013304. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1504\/IJSMILE.2016.081280","DOI":"10.1504\/IJSMILE.2016.081280"},{"key":"13032_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2015.12.002","volume":"95","author":"U Maier","year":"2016","unstructured":"Maier, U., Wolf, N., & Randler, C. (2016). Effects of a computer-assisted formative assessment intervention based on multiple-tier diagnostic items and different feedback types. Computers & Education, 95, 85\u201398. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.compedu.2015.12.002","journal-title":"Computers & Education"},{"key":"13032_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.4324\/9781003090694-3","volume":"2","author":"JA Maxwell","year":"2008","unstructured":"Maxwell, J. A. (2008). Designing a qualitative study. The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, 2, 214\u2013253. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9781003090694-3","journal-title":"The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods"},{"key":"13032_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mayer, R. E., & Alexander, P. A. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of research on learning and instruction. Taylor & Francis. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9781315736419","DOI":"10.4324\/9781315736419"},{"key":"13032_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Narciss, S. (2008). Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. In M. J. Spector, M. D. Merrill, van J. Merri\u00ebnboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 125\u2013144). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780203880869.CH11","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203880869.CH11"},{"issue":"5","key":"13032_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"756","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2020.1823314","volume":"46","author":"D Nicol","year":"2021","unstructured":"Nicol, D. (2021). The power of internal feedback: Exploiting natural comparison processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(5), 756\u2013778. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2020.1823314","journal-title":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education"},{"issue":"1","key":"13032_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2013.795518","volume":"39","author":"D Nicol","year":"2014","unstructured":"Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102\u2013122. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2013.795518","journal-title":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education"},{"key":"13032_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.iheduc.2016.05.002","volume":"31","author":"O Noroozi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Noroozi, O., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2016). Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 20\u201331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.iheduc.2016.05.002","journal-title":"The Internet and Higher Education"},{"issue":"1","key":"13032_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1111\/jcal.12114","volume":"32","author":"J Novakovich","year":"2016","unstructured":"Novakovich, J. (2016). Fostering critical thinking and reflection through blog-mediated peer feedback. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(1), 16\u201330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jcal.12114","journal-title":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning"},{"key":"13032_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"\u00d6chsner, A. (2013). Introduction to scientific publishing: Backgrounds, concepts, strategies (p. 3). Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-38646-6","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-38646-6"},{"key":"13032_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Strijbos, J. W. (2016). Scaffolding self-regulated learning through self-assessment and peer assessment: Guidelines for classroom implementation. Assessment for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation (pp. 311\u2013326). Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-39211-0_18","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-39211-0_18"},{"key":"13032_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.edurev.2021.100416","volume":"35","author":"E Panadero","year":"2022","unstructured":"Panadero, E., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2022). A review of feedback models and typologies: Towards an integrative model of feedback elements. Educational Research Review, 35,. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.edurev.2021.100416","journal-title":"Educational Research Review"},{"key":"13032_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"591","DOI":"10.1007\/s11251-015-9353-x","volume":"43","author":"MM Patchan","year":"2015","unstructured":"Patchan, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2015). Understanding the benefits of providing peer feedback: How students respond to peers\u2019 texts of varying quality. Instructional Science, 43, 591\u2013614. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11251-015-9353-x","journal-title":"Instructional Science"},{"issue":"4","key":"13032_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2371","DOI":"10.1080\/10494820.2021.188488","volume":"31","author":"MA Qureshi","year":"2023","unstructured":"Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2023). Factors affecting students\u2019 learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2371\u20132391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10494820.2021.188488","journal-title":"Interactive Learning Environments"},{"key":"13032_CR44","unstructured":"R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved online on September 12, 2024 at https:\/\/www.R-project.org\/"},{"key":"13032_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103701","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2019.103701","volume":"144","author":"RA Rasheed","year":"2020","unstructured":"Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.compedu.2019.103701","journal-title":"Computers & Education"},{"issue":"3","key":"13032_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1177\/073953291103200306","volume":"32","author":"AD Santana","year":"2011","unstructured":"Santana, A. D. (2011). Online readers\u2019 comments represent new opinion pipeline. Newspaper Research Journal, 32(3), 66\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/073953291103200306","journal-title":"Newspaper Research Journal"},{"issue":"1","key":"13032_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1080\/10494820.2019.1629601","volume":"30","author":"HF Shang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Shang, H. F. (2022). Exploring online peer feedback and automated corrective feedback on EFL writing performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(1), 4\u201316. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10494820.2019.1629601","journal-title":"Interactive Learning Environments"},{"issue":"3","key":"13032_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1080\/1045988X.2013.876958","volume":"59","author":"K Sprouls","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sprouls, K., Mathur, S. R., & Upreti, G. (2015). Is positive feedback a forgotten classroom practice? Findings and implications for at-risk students. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 59(3), 153\u2013160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1045988X.2013.876958","journal-title":"Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth"},{"issue":"1","key":"13032_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10212-017-0353-x","volume":"33","author":"JW Strijbos","year":"2018","unstructured":"Strijbos, J. W., & Wichmann, A. (2018). Promoting learning by leveraging the collaborative nature of formative peer assessment with instructional scaffolds. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33(1), 1\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10212-017-0353-x","journal-title":"European Journal of Psychology of Education"},{"key":"13032_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2015.12.003","volume":"95","author":"YT Sung","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sung, Y. T., Liao, C. N., Chang, T. H., Chen, C. L., & Chang, K. E. (2016). The effect of online summary assessment and feedback system on the summary writing on 6th graders: The LSA-based technique. Computers and Education, 95, 1\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.compedu.2015.12.003","journal-title":"Computers and Education"},{"issue":"3","key":"13032_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1177\/1362168820951207","volume":"27","author":"A Tajabadi","year":"2023","unstructured":"Tajabadi, A., Ahmadian, M., Dowlatabadi, H., & Yazdani, H. (2023). EFL learners\u2019 peer negotiated feedback, revision outcomes, and short-term writing development: The effect of patterns of interaction. Language Teaching Research, 27(3), 689\u2013717. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1362168820951207","journal-title":"Language Teaching Research"},{"key":"13032_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3087","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2019.03087","volume":"10","author":"B Wisniewski","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3087. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2019.03087","journal-title":"Frontiers in Psychology"},{"key":"13032_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101826","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cedpsych.2019.101826","volume":"60","author":"Y Wu","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2020a). From feedback to revisions: Effects of feedback features and perceptions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101826. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cedpsych.2019.101826","journal-title":"Contemporary Educational Psychology"},{"key":"13032_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101897","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cedpsych.2020.101897","volume":"62","author":"Y Wu","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2020b). When peers agree, do students listen? The central role of feedback quality and feedback frequency in deter- mining uptake of feedback. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62, 101897. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cedpsych.2020.101897","journal-title":"Contemporary Educational Psychology"},{"issue":"3","key":"13032_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"492","DOI":"10.3102\/0002831220945266","volume":"58","author":"Y Wu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2021). The effects of providing and receiving peer feedback on writing performance and learning of secondary school students. American Educational Research Journal, 58(3), 492\u2013526. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3102\/0002831220945266","journal-title":"American Educational Research Journal"},{"issue":"6","key":"13032_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2004","DOI":"10.1111\/jcal.12861","volume":"39","author":"Y Xiong","year":"2023","unstructured":"Xiong, Y., Schunn, C. D., & Wu, Y. (2023). What predicts variation in reliability and validity of online peer assessment? A large-scale cross\u2010context study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(6), 2004\u20132024. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jcal.12861","journal-title":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning"},{"key":"13032_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2018.01.009","volume":"82","author":"L Yan","year":"2018","unstructured":"Yan, L., & Wang, X. (2018). Why posters contribute different content in their positive online reviews: A social information-processing perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 82, 199\u2013216. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.chb.2018.01.009","journal-title":"Computers in Human Behavior"},{"key":"13032_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yim, S., Wang, D., Olson, J., Vu, V., & Warschauer, M. (2017). Synchronous collaborative writing in the classroom: undergraduates\u2019 collaboration practices and their impact on writing style, quality, and quantity. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 468\u2013479). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2998181.2998356","DOI":"10.1145\/2998181.2998356"},{"key":"13032_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100525","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asw.2021.100525","volume":"48","author":"S Yu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Yu, S., & Liu, C. (2021). Improving student feedback literacy in academic writing: An evidence-based framework. Assessing Writing, 48, 100525. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.asw.2021.100525","journal-title":"Assessing Writing"},{"issue":"1","key":"13032_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1016\/j.emj.2015.12.004","volume":"34","author":"MA Zaharie","year":"2016","unstructured":"Zaharie, M. A., & Osoian, C. L. (2016). Peer review motivation frames: A qualitative approach. European Management Journal, 34(1), 69\u201379. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.emj.2015.12.004","journal-title":"European Management Journal"},{"key":"13032_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100439","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asw.2019.100439","volume":"43","author":"ZV Zhang","year":"2020","unstructured":"Zhang, Z. V. (2020). Engaging with automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback on L2 writing: Student perceptions and revisions. Assessing Writing, 43, 100439. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.asw.2019.100439","journal-title":"Assessing Writing"},{"issue":"4","key":"13032_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"883","DOI":"10.1080\/07294360.2018.1446417","volume":"37","author":"Q Zhu","year":"2018","unstructured":"Zhu, Q., & Carless, D. (2018). Dialogue within peer feedback processes: Clarification and negotiation of meaning. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(4), 883\u2013897. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07294360.2018.1446417","journal-title":"Higher Education Research & Development"}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.1007\/s10639-024-13132-w","type":"correction","label":"Correction","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,4]],"date-time":"2024-11-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1730678400000}}],"container-title":["Education and Information Technologies"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10639-024-13032-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10639-024-13032-z\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10639-024-13032-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,4]],"date-time":"2025-04-04T04:28:44Z","timestamp":1743740924000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10639-024-13032-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,2]]},"references-count":62,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]}},"alternative-id":["13032"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10639-024-13032-z","relation":{},"ISSN":["1360-2357","1573-7608"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1360-2357","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-7608","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"12 April 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 August 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 October 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 November 2024","order":4,"name":"change_date","label":"Change Date","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Correction","order":5,"name":"change_type","label":"Change Type","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"A Correction to this paper has been published:","order":6,"name":"change_details","label":"Change Details","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10639-024-13132-w","URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10639-024-13132-w","order":7,"name":"change_details","label":"Change Details","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interest"}}]}}