{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,30]],"date-time":"2026-03-30T15:09:11Z","timestamp":1774883351302,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":52,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,3]],"date-time":"2026-01-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1767398400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,3]],"date-time":"2026-01-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1767398400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100003252","name":"Lund University","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100003252","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Empir Software Eng"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    Code review is a well-established and valued practice in the software engineering community contributing to both code quality and interpersonal benefits. However, there are challenges in both tools and processes that give rise to misalignments and frustrations. Recent research seeks to address this by automating code review entirely, but we believe that this risks losing the majority of the interpersonal benefits such as knowledge transfer and shared ownership. We believe that by better understanding the cognitive processes involved in code review, it would be possible to improve tool support, with or without AI, and make code review both more efficient, more enjoyable, while increasing or maintaining all of its benefits. In this paper, we conduct an ethnographic think-aloud study involving 10 participants and 34 code reviews. We build a cognitive model of code review bottom up through thematic, statistical, temporal, and sequential analysis of the transcribed material. Through the data, the similarities between the cognitive process in code review and decision-making processes, especially recognition-primed decision-making, become apparent. The result is the Code Review as Decision-Making (\n                    <jats:bold>CRDM<\/jats:bold>\n                    ) model that shows how the developers move through two phases during the code review; first an orientation phase to establish context and rationale and then an analytical phase to understand, assess, and plan the rest of the review. Throughout the process several decisions must be taken, on writing comments, finding more information, voting, running the code locally, verifying continuous integration results, etc. Analysis software and process-coded data publicly available at:\n                    <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" xlink:href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.15758266\" ext-link-type=\"uri\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.15758266<\/jats:ext-link>\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10664-025-10791-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,3]],"date-time":"2026-01-03T08:51:27Z","timestamp":1767430287000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Code review as decision-making - building a cognitive model from the questions asked during code review"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"31","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0695-4580","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lo","family":"Gullstrand Heander","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7966-4560","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Emma","family":"S\u00f6derberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1495-8263","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Christofer","family":"Rydenf\u00e4lt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,3]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"10791_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/0749-5978(91)90020-T","volume":"50","author":"I Ajzen","year":"1991","unstructured":"Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior Hum Decision Process 50(2):179\u2013211. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0749-5978(91)90020-T","journal-title":"Organizational Behavior Hum Decision Process"},{"key":"10791_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bacchelli A, Bird C (2013) Expectations, outcomes, and challenges of modern code review. In: 2013 35th International conference on software engineering (ICSE), pp 712\u2013721. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ICSE.2013.6606617","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSE.2013.6606617"},{"key":"10791_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bird C, Ford D, Zimmermann T et al (2023) Taking flight with copilot: Early insights and opportunities of AI-powered pair-programming tools. Queue 20(6):35\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3582083, place: New York, NY, USA Publisher: Association for Computing Machinery","DOI":"10.1145\/3582083"},{"issue":"13","key":"10791_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1802","DOI":"10.1177\/1049732316654870","volume":"26","author":"L Birt","year":"2016","unstructured":"Birt L, Scott S, Cavers D et al (2016) Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation? Qualitative Health Res 26(13):1802\u20131811. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1049732316654870","journal-title":"Qualitative Health Res"},{"key":"10791_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bosu A, Carver JC (2013) Impact of peer code review on peer impression formation: A survey. In: 2013 ACM\/IEEE International symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement, IEEE, pp 133\u2013142. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ESEM.2013.23","DOI":"10.1109\/ESEM.2013.23"},{"key":"10791_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bosu A, Greiler M, Bird C (2015) Characteristics of Useful Code Reviews: An Empirical Study at Microsoft. In: 2015 IEEE\/ACM 12th working conference on mining software repositories, pp 146\u2013156. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/MSR.2015.21","DOI":"10.1109\/MSR.2015.21"},{"issue":"2","key":"10791_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa","volume":"3","author":"V Braun","year":"2006","unstructured":"Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Res Psychol 3(2):77\u2013101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa","journal-title":"Qualitative Res Psychol"},{"key":"10791_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Brothers L, Sembugamoorthy V, Muller M (1990) ICICLE: Groupware for Code Inspection. In: Proceedings of the 1990 ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, CSCW \u201990, pp 169\u2013181. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/99332.99353, event-place: Los Angeles, California, USA","DOI":"10.1145\/99332.99353"},{"key":"10791_CR9","volume-title":"Constructing grounded theory","author":"K Charmaz","year":"2014","unstructured":"Charmaz K (2014) Constructing grounded theory, 2nd edn. Introducing qualitative methods, Sage, London, UK","edition":"2"},{"key":"10791_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Chouchen M, Ouni A, Kula RG et\u00a0al (2021) Anti-patterns in modern code review: Symptoms and prevalence. In: 2021 IEEE International conference on software analysis, evolution and reengineering (SANER), pp 531\u2013535. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/SANER50967.2021.00060","DOI":"10.1109\/SANER50967.2021.00060"},{"issue":"3","key":"10791_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1080\/17439760.2016.1262613","volume":"12","author":"V Clarke","year":"2017","unstructured":"Clarke V, Braun V (2017) Thematic analysis J Positive Psychol 12(3):297\u2013298. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17439760.2016.1262613","journal-title":"Thematic analysis J Positive Psychol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10791_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1007\/s10664-024-10560-7","volume":"30","author":"F Coelho","year":"2025","unstructured":"Coelho F, Tsantalis N, Massoni T et al (2025) A qualitative study on refactorings induced by code review. Empirical Softw Eng 30(1):17. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10664-024-10560-7","journal-title":"Empirical Softw Eng"},{"key":"10791_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2021.110951","volume":"177","author":"N Davila","year":"2021","unstructured":"Davila N, Nunes I (2021) A systematic literature review and taxonomy of modern code review. J Syst Softw 177:110951. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jss.2021.110951","journal-title":"J Syst Softw"},{"issue":"3","key":"10791_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-4375(02)00032-4","volume":"33","author":"SW Dekker","year":"2002","unstructured":"Dekker SW (2002) Reconstructing human contributions to accidents: the new view on error and performance. J Safety Res 33(3):371\u2013385. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0022-4375(02)00032-4","journal-title":"J Safety Res"},{"key":"10791_CR15","unstructured":"DORA (2023) Accelerate state of devops 2023. Tech. rep., DORA. https:\/\/dora.dev\/research\/2023\/dora-report\/"},{"key":"10791_CR16","unstructured":"DORA (2024) Accelerate state of devops 2024. Tech. rep., DORA. https:\/\/dora.dev\/research\/2024\/dora-report\/"},{"issue":"1","key":"10791_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1007\/s10664-024-10442-y","volume":"30","author":"M Dorner","year":"2025","unstructured":"Dorner M, Mendez D, Wnuk K et al (2025) The upper bound of information diffusion in code review. Empirical Softw Eng 30(1):2. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10664-024-10442-y","journal-title":"Empirical Softw Eng"},{"key":"10791_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2021.106737","volume":"142","author":"E Do\u011fan","year":"2022","unstructured":"Do\u011fan E, T\u00fcz\u00fcn E (2022) Towards a taxonomy of code review smells. Inf Softw Technol 142:106737. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.infsof.2021.106737","journal-title":"Inf Softw Technol"},{"key":"10791_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/7221.001.0001","volume-title":"Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction","author":"P Dourish","year":"2001","unstructured":"Dourish P (2001) Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass"},{"key":"10791_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Froemmgen A, Austin J, Choy P et\u00a0al (2024) Resolving code review comments with machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 46th International conference on software engineering: software engineering in practice. ACM, pp 204\u2013215. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3639477.3639746","DOI":"10.1145\/3639477.3639746"},{"key":"10791_CR21","unstructured":"Gerrit (2025) User guide. https:\/\/gerrit-review.googlesource.com\/Documentation\/intro-user.html, accessed 2025-02-27"},{"key":"10791_CR22","unstructured":"GitHub Inc. (2025) Github code review. https:\/\/github.com\/features\/code-review, accessed 2025-02-27"},{"issue":"4","key":"10791_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1007\/s10664-022-10123-8","volume":"27","author":"PW Gon\u00e7alves","year":"2022","unstructured":"Gon\u00e7alves PW, Fregnan E, Baum T et al (2022) Do explicit review strategies improve code review performance? towards understanding the role of cognitive load. Empirical Softw Eng 27(4):99. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10664-022-10123-8","journal-title":"Empirical Softw Eng"},{"key":"10791_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gon\u00e7alves PW, Rani P, Storey MA et\u00a0al (2025) Code review comprehension: Reviewing strategies seen through code comprehension theories. In: 2025 IEEE\/ACM 33rd international conference on program comprehension (ICPC), pp 589\u2013601. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ICPC66645.2025.00068","DOI":"10.1109\/ICPC66645.2025.00068"},{"key":"10791_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Heander L, S\u00f6derberg E, Rydenf\u00e4lt C (2024) Design of flexible code block comparisons to improve code review of refactored code. In: Companion proceedings of the 8th international conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming, pp 57\u201367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3660829.3660842","DOI":"10.1145\/3660829.3660842"},{"key":"10791_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Heander L, S\u00f6derberg E, Rydenf\u00e4lt C (2025) Support, not automation: Towards AI-supported code review for code quality and beyond. In: In 33rd ACM International conference on the foundations of software engineering (FSE Companion \u201925). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3696630.3728505","DOI":"10.1145\/3696630.3728505"},{"key":"10791_CR27","unstructured":"Klein G (1998) Sources of Power : How People Make Decisions. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., USA"},{"key":"10791_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Krause-Glau A, Damerau L, Hansen M et\u00a0al (2024) Visual integration of static and dynamic software analysis in code reviews via software city visualization. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/ARXIV.2408.08141, version Number: 1","DOI":"10.48550\/ARXIV.2408.08141"},{"key":"10791_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kudrjavets G, Kumar A, Nagappan N et\u00a0al (2022) Mining code review data to understand waiting times between acceptance and merging: An empirical analysis. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on mining software repositories. association for computing machinery, MSR \u201922, pp 579\u2013590. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3524842.3528432, event-place: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania","DOI":"10.1145\/3524842.3528432"},{"issue":"1","key":"10791_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.3102\/00346543052001031","volume":"52","author":"MD LeCompte","year":"1982","unstructured":"LeCompte MD, Goetz JP (1982) Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Rev Educ Res 52(1):31\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3102\/00346543052001031","journal-title":"Rev Educ Res"},{"issue":"6","key":"10791_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1007\/s10664-024-10550-9","volume":"29","author":"CS Lee","year":"2024","unstructured":"Lee CS, Hicks CM (2024) Understanding and effectively mitigating code review anxiety. Empirical Softw Eng 29(6):161. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10664-024-10550-9","journal-title":"Empirical Softw Eng"},{"issue":"4","key":"10791_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1016\/0164-1212(87)90032-X","volume":"7","author":"S Letovsky","year":"1987","unstructured":"Letovsky S (1987) Cognitive processes in program comprehension. J Syst Softw 7(4):325\u2013339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0164-1212(87)90032-X","journal-title":"J Syst Softw"},{"issue":"3","key":"10791_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1007\/s10115-009-0192-4","volume":"22","author":"S Liu","year":"2010","unstructured":"Liu S, Duffy AHB, Whitfield RI et al (2010) Integration of decision support systems to improve decision support performance. Knowl Inf Syst 22(3):261\u2013286. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10115-009-0192-4","journal-title":"Knowl Inf Syst"},{"key":"10791_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lu J, Yu L, Li X et\u00a0al (2023) LLaMA-reviewer: Advancing code review automation with large language models through parameter-efficient fine-tuning. In: 2023 IEEE 34th International symposium on software reliability engineering (ISSRE), pp 647\u2013658. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ISSRE59848.2023.00026","DOI":"10.1109\/ISSRE59848.2023.00026"},{"issue":"4","key":"10791_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1109\/MS.2017.265100500","volume":"35","author":"L MacLeod","year":"2018","unstructured":"MacLeod L, Greiler M, Storey MA et al (2018) Code Reviewing in the Trenches: Challenges and Best Practices. IEEE Softw 35(4):34\u201342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/MS.2017.265100500","journal-title":"IEEE Softw"},{"issue":"5","key":"10791_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2146","DOI":"10.1007\/s10664-015-9381-9","volume":"21","author":"S McIntosh","year":"2016","unstructured":"McIntosh S, Kamei Y, Adams B et al (2016) An empirical study of the impact of modern code review practices on software quality. Empirical Softw Eng 21(5):2146\u20132189. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10664-015-9381-9","journal-title":"Empirical Softw Eng"},{"key":"10791_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Pascarella L, Spadini D, Palomba F et\u00a0al (2018) Information Needs in Contemporary Code Review. Proceed ACM Hum-Computer Interaction 2(CSCW):1\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3274404","DOI":"10.1145\/3274404"},{"key":"10791_CR38","first-page":"9","volume-title":"A field guide to postphenomenology","author":"R Rosenberger","year":"2015","unstructured":"Rosenberger R, Verbeek PP (2015) A field guide to postphenomenology. Essays on human-technology relations, Postphenomenological investigations, pp 9\u201341"},{"key":"10791_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Russo D, Baltes S, Van Berkel N et al (2024) Generative AI in Software Engineering Must Be Human-Centered: The Copenhagen Manifesto. J Syst Softw 216:112115. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jss.2024.112115","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2024.112115"},{"key":"10791_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sadowski C, S\u00f6derberg E, Church L et\u00a0al (2018) Modern code review: A case study at google. In: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, ICSE-SEIP \u201918, pp 181\u2013190. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3183519.3183525","DOI":"10.1145\/3183519.3183525"},{"key":"10791_CR41","volume-title":"The coding manual for qualitative researchers","author":"J Salda\u00f1a","year":"2015","unstructured":"Salda\u00f1a J (2015) The coding manual for qualitative researchers, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA","edition":"3"},{"issue":"8","key":"10791_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"786","DOI":"10.1109\/TSE.2016.2519887","volume":"42","author":"H Sharp","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sharp H, Dittrich Y, de Souza CRB (2016) The Role of Ethnographic Studies in Empirical Software Engineering. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 42(8):786\u2013804. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/TSE.2016.2519887","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Softw Eng"},{"key":"10791_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly J Econ 69(1):99\u2013118. http:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/1884852","DOI":"10.2307\/1884852"},{"key":"10791_CR44","volume-title":"The sciences of the artificial","author":"HA Simon","year":"1996","unstructured":"Simon HA (1996) The sciences of the artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA","edition":"3"},{"key":"10791_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"S\u00f6derberg E, Church L, B\u00f6rstler J et\u00a0al (2022) Understanding the Experience of Code Review: Misalignments, Attention, and Units of Analysis. In: Proceedings of the international conference on evaluation and assessment in software engineering 2022. Association for Computing Machinery, EASE \u201922, pp 170\u2013179. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3530019.3530037","DOI":"10.1145\/3530019.3530037"},{"key":"10791_CR46","unstructured":"Statistia (2025) Number of software developers worldwide in 2018 to 2024. https:\/\/www.statista.com\/statistics\/627312\/worldwide-developer-population\/, accessed 2025-01-15"},{"key":"10791_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tang X, Kim K, Song Y et\u00a0al (2024) CodeAgent: Autonomous communicative agents for code review. In: Proceedings of the 2024 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. Association for computational linguistics, pp 11279\u201311313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18653\/v1\/2024.emnlp-main.632","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2024.emnlp-main.632"},{"issue":"4157","key":"10791_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1124","DOI":"10.1126\/science.185.4157.1124","volume":"185","author":"A Tversky","year":"1974","unstructured":"Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science 185(4157):1124\u20131131. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.185.4157.1124","journal-title":"Science"},{"issue":"4481","key":"10791_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"453","DOI":"10.1126\/science.7455683","volume":"211","author":"A Tversky","year":"1981","unstructured":"Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481):453\u2013458. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.7455683","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"10791_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Unterkalmsteiner M, Badampudi D, Britto R et\u00a0al (2024) Help me to understand this commit!-a vision for contextualized code reviews. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM\/IEEE workshop on integrated development environments, pp 18\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3643796.3648447","DOI":"10.1145\/3643796.3648447"},{"issue":"1","key":"10791_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1353\/lib.2006.0054","volume":"55","author":"K Williamson","year":"2006","unstructured":"Williamson K (2006) Research in constructivist frameworks using ethnographic techniques. Libr Trends 55(1):83\u2013101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1353\/lib.2006.0054","journal-title":"Libr Trends"},{"key":"10791_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yu Y, Rong G, Shen H et\u00a0al (2024) Fine-tuning large language models to improve accuracy and comprehensibility of automated code review. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol 34(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3695993","DOI":"10.1145\/3695993"}],"container-title":["Empirical Software Engineering"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10664-025-10791-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10664-025-10791-2","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10664-025-10791-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,30]],"date-time":"2026-03-30T14:38:25Z","timestamp":1774881505000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10664-025-10791-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,3]]},"references-count":52,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10791"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10664-025-10791-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["1382-3256","1573-7616"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1382-3256","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-7616","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"15 July 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 December 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 January 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"All participants received complete information about the research study and have given their signed consent to participate.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to Participate"}}],"article-number":"54"}}