{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,23]],"date-time":"2026-03-23T14:01:26Z","timestamp":1774274486800,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":48,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,1]],"date-time":"2024-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1709251200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,4]],"date-time":"2024-03-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1709510400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":3,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100010269","name":"Wellcome Trust","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["WT203132\/Z\/16\/Z"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["WT203132\/Z\/16\/Z"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100010269","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"NUHS Internal Grant Funding","award":["NUHSRO\/2022\/078\/Startup\/13"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["NUHSRO\/2022\/078\/Startup\/13"]}]},{"name":"NUHS Internal Grant Funding","award":["NUHSRO\/2020\/138\/Startup\/07"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["NUHSRO\/2020\/138\/Startup\/07"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Ethics Inf Technol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>This paper argues that one problem that besets black-box AI is that it lacks algorithmic justifiability. We argue that the norm of shared decision making in medical care presupposes that treatment decisions ought to be justifiable to the patient. Medical decisions are justifiable to the patient only if they are compatible with the patient\u2019s values and preferences and the patient is able to see that this is so. Patient-directed justifiability is threatened by black-box AIs because the lack of rationale provided for the decision makes it difficult for patients to ascertain whether there is adequate fit between the decision and the patient\u2019s values. This paper argues that achieving algorithmic transparency does not help patients bridge the gap between their medical decisions and values. We introduce a hypothetical model we call Justifiable AI to illustrate this argument. Justifiable AI aims at modelling normative and evaluative considerations in an explicit way so as to provide a stepping stone for patient and physician to jointly decide on a course of treatment. If our argument succeeds, we should prefer these justifiable models over alternatives if the former are available and aim to develop said models if not.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10676-024-09754-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,4]],"date-time":"2024-03-04T09:02:43Z","timestamp":1709542963000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["AI and the need for justification (to the patient)"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"26","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3380-0402","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anantharaman","family":"Muralidharan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1691-6403","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Julian","family":"Savulescu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6915-6148","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"G. Owen","family":"Schaefer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"9754_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Akata, Z., Hendricks, L. A., & Alaniz, S. (2018). and Trevor Darell. \u2018Generating Post-Hoc Rationales of Deep Visual Classification Decisions\u2019. In Explainable and Interpretable Models in Computer Vision and Machine Learning, edited by Hugo Jair Escalante, Sergio Escalera, Isabelle Guyon, Xavier Baro, Yagmur Gucluturk, Umut Guclu, and Marcel van Gerven, 135\u201354. Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-98131-4.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-98131-4"},{"issue":"6552","key":"9754_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"284","DOI":"10.1126\/science.abg1834","volume":"373","author":"B Babic","year":"2021","unstructured":"Babic, B., Gerke, S., Evgeniou, T., & Glenn Cohen, I. (2021). Beware explanations from AI in Health Care. Science, 373(6552), 284\u2013286. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.abg1834.","journal-title":"Health Care \u2019 Science"},{"key":"9754_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"116443","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-021-03305-2","volume":"199","author":"C Beisbart","year":"2021","unstructured":"Beisbart, C. (2021). Opacity thought through: On the intransparency of computer simulations. Synthese, 199, 116443\u2013111666. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-021-03305-2.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"9754_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Broniatowski, D. A. (2021). \u2018Psychological Foundations of Explainability and Interpretability in Artificial Intelligence\u2019. Internal Report 8367. National Institute of Standards and Technology. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.6028\/NIST.IR.8367.","DOI":"10.6028\/NIST.IR.8367"},{"key":"9754_CR5","unstructured":"Caplan, A. L. (1997). \u2018The Concepts of Health, Illness and Disease\u2019. In Medical Ethics, edited by Robert M. Veatch, 2nd ed., 57\u201371."},{"issue":"2","key":"9754_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1159\/000048159","volume":"45","author":"A Colby","year":"2002","unstructured":"Colby, A. (2002). Moral understanding, motivation and identity. Human Development, 45(2), 130\u2013135.","journal-title":"Human Development"},{"key":"9754_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1177\/23743735211018066","volume":"8","author":"S Deniz","year":"2021","unstructured":"Deniz, S., Akbolat, M., & Cimen, M., and Ozgun Unal (2021). The Mediating Role of Shared decision-making in the Effect of the patient\u2013physician relationship on Compliance with Treatment. Journal of Patient Experience, 8, 1\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/23743735211018066.","journal-title":"Journal of Patient Experience"},{"key":"9754_CR8","unstructured":"Downie, R. S. (1994). \u2018The Doctor-Patient Relationship\u2019. In Principles of Health Care Ethics, edited by Raanan Gillon and Ann Lloyd, 343\u201352."},{"key":"9754_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1007\/s11023-018-9481-6","volume":"28","author":"JM Dur\u00e1n","year":"2018","unstructured":"Dur\u00e1n, J. M., and Nico Formanek (2018). Grounds for Trust: Essential epistemic opacity and computational reliabilism. Minds and Machines, 28, 645\u2013666. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11023-018-9481-6.","journal-title":"Minds and Machines"},{"key":"9754_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103498","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2021.103498","volume":"297","author":"JM Dur\u00e1n","year":"2021","unstructured":"Dur\u00e1n, J. M. (2021). Dissecting scientific explanation in AI (sXAI): A case for Medicine and Healthcare. Artificial Intelligence, 297, 103498. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.artint.2021.103498.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9754_CR10","unstructured":"Dur\u00e1n, J. M. (2023). \u2018Machine Learning, Justification, and Computational Reliabilism\u2019. https:\/\/philpapers.org\/archive\/DURMLJ.pdf."},{"key":"9754_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"329","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2020-106820","volume":"47","author":"JM Dur\u00e1n","year":"2021","unstructured":"Dur\u00e1n, J. M., & Karin Rolanda, J. (2021). Who is afraid of Black Box algorithms? On the epistemological and ethical basis of Trust in Medical AI. Journal of Medical Ethics, 47, 329\u2013335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/medethics-2020-106820.","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"key":"9754_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Elgin, C. Z. (2017). True enough. MIT Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7551\/mitpress\/11118.001.0001.","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/11118.001.0001"},{"issue":"16","key":"9754_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2221","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1992.03480160079038","volume":"267","author":"EJ Emanuel","year":"1992","unstructured":"Emanuel, E. J., & Linda, L. E. (1992). Four models of the physician-patient relationship. Journal of the American Medical Association, 267(16), 2221\u20132226.","journal-title":"Journal of the American Medical Association"},{"key":"9754_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Escalante, H., Jair, S., Escalera, I., Guyon, X., Baro, Y., Gucluturk, U., Guclu, & Marcel van, G. (2018). \u2018Preface\u2019. In Explainable and Interpretable Models in Computer Vision and Machine Learning, edited by Hugo Jair Escalante, Sergio Escalera, Isabelle Guyon, Xavier Baro, Yagmur Gucluturk, Umut Guclu, and Marcel van Gerven, vii\u2013ix. Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-98131-4.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-98131-4"},{"issue":"1","key":"9754_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00372404","volume":"48","author":"R Feldman","year":"1985","unstructured":"Feldman, R., and Earl Conee (1985). Evidentialism. Philosophical Studies, 48(1), 15\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF00372404.","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"key":"9754_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1007786207614","volume":"11","author":"AI Goldman","year":"1997","unstructured":"Goldman, A. I. (1997). Argumentation and interpersonal justification. Argumentation, 11, 155\u2013164. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1007786207614.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9754_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Goldman, A. I. (2011). \u2018Toward a Synthesis of Reliabilism and Evidentialism? Or: Evidentialism\u2019s Troubles, Reliabilism\u2019s Rescue Package\u2019. In Evidentialism and Its Discontents, edited by Trent Dougherty, 254\u201380.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199563500.003.0017"},{"issue":"1","key":"9754_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1086\/648610","volume":"120","author":"A Hills","year":"2009","unstructured":"Hills, A. (2009). Moral Testimony and Moral Epistemology. Ethics, 120(1), 94\u2013127.","journal-title":"Ethics"},{"key":"9754_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"615","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-008-9435-2","volume":"169","author":"P Humphreys","year":"2009","unstructured":"Humphreys, P. (2009). The philosophical novelty of Computer Simulation methods. Synthese, 169, 615\u2013626. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-008-9435-2.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"9754_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jie, Z., Zhiying, Z., Li, & Li (2021). A Meta\u2013analysis of Watson for Oncology in Clinical Application. Nature Scientific Reports, 11, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-021-84973-5.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-84973-5"},{"issue":"14","key":"9754_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2081","DOI":"10.1080\/1369118X.2018.1477967","volume":"22","author":"J Kemper","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kemper, J., and Daan Kolkman (2019). Transparent to whom? No algorithmic accountability without a critical audience. Information Communication and Society, 22(14), 2081\u20132096. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1369118X.2018.1477967.","journal-title":"Information Communication and Society"},{"issue":"4","key":"9754_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"525","DOI":"10.1080\/00455091.2000.10717542","volume":"30","author":"K Korcz","year":"2000","unstructured":"Korcz, K. (2000). The causal-doxastic theory of the basing relation. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 30(4), 525\u2013550.","journal-title":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"9754_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Li, O., Liu, H., & Chen, C. (2017). and Cynthia Rudin. \u2018Deep learning for case-based reasoning through prototypes: A neural network that Explains Its Predictions.\u2019 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.1710.04806.","DOI":"10.48550\/arXiv.1710.04806"},{"issue":"1","key":"9754_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1002\/hast.973","volume":"49","author":"AJ London","year":"2019","unstructured":"London, A. J. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and Black-Box Medical decisions: Accuracy versus Explainability. Hastings Center Report, 49(1), 15\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/hast.973.","journal-title":"Hastings Center Report"},{"key":"9754_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2018-105118","volume":"45","author":"RJ McDougall","year":"2019","unstructured":"McDougall, R. J. (2019). Computer Knows Best? The need for Value-Flexibility in Medical AI. Journal of Medical Ethics, 45, 156\u2013160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/medethics-2018-105118.","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"issue":"7","key":"9754_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1080\/15265161.2022.2040647","volume":"22","author":"LJ Meier","year":"2022","unstructured":"Meier, L. J., Alice Hein, K., Diepold, & Buyx, A. (2022). Algorithms for ethical decision-making in the clinic: A proof of Concept. American Journal of Bioethics, 22(7), 4\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15265161.2022.2040647.","journal-title":"American Journal of Bioethics"},{"issue":"2","key":"9754_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1177\/2053951716679679","volume":"3","author":"B Mittelstadt","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mittelstadt, B., Daniel, P., Allo, M., Taddeo, S., Wachter, & Luciano Floridi (2016). The Ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data and Society, 3(2), 1\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2053951716679679.","journal-title":"Big Data and Society"},{"key":"9754_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1007\/s10462-005-4609-5","volume":"24","author":"C Nugent","year":"2005","unstructured":"Nugent, C., & Cunningham, P. (2005). A case-based explanation system for black-Box systems. Artificial Intelligence Review, 24, 163\u2013178. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10462-005-4609-5.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence Review"},{"key":"9754_CR30","unstructured":"Pellegrino, E. D. (1994). \u2018The Four Principles and the Doctor Patient Relationship\u2019. In Principles of Health Care Ethics, edited by Raanan Gillon and Ann Lloyd, 353\u201365."},{"key":"9754_CR31","unstructured":"Pollock, J., & Cruz, J. (1999). Contemporary theories of knowledge (2nd ed.). Rowman and Littlefield."},{"key":"9754_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/15265161.2023.2233356","author":"S Porsdam Mann","year":"2023","unstructured":"Porsdam Mann, S., Earp, B. D., M\u00f8ller, N., Vynn, S., & Julian Savulescu (2023). AUTOGEN: A personalized large Language Model for Academic Enhancement\u2014Ethics and Proof of Principle. American Journal of Bioethics. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15265161.2023.2233356.","journal-title":"American Journal of Bioethics"},{"key":"9754_CR33","unstructured":"Raz, J. (1986). The morality of Freedom. Clarendon."},{"key":"9754_CR34","unstructured":"Raz, J. (1999). Engaging reason. Oxford University Press."},{"key":"9754_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ribeiro, M., Tulio, S., Singh, & Carlos Guestrin (2016). \u2018Why Should I Trust You? Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier\u2019. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1135\u201344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2939672.2939778.","DOI":"10.1145\/2939672.2939778"},{"issue":"5","key":"9754_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"589","DOI":"10.1109\/TKDE.2007.190734","volume":"20","author":"M Robnik-Sikonja","year":"2008","unstructured":"Robnik-Sikonja, M., and Igor Kononenko (2008). Explaining classifications for individual instances. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 20(5), 589\u2013600. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/TKDE.2007.190734.","journal-title":"IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering"},{"key":"9754_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1038\/s42256-019-0048-x","volume":"1","author":"C Rudin","year":"2019","unstructured":"Rudin, C. (2019). Stop Explaining Black Box Machine Learning Models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 206\u2013215. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s42256-019-0048-x.","journal-title":"Nature Machine Intelligence"},{"key":"9754_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1016\/S1532-0464(03)00037-6","volume":"35","author":"CM Ruland","year":"2002","unstructured":"Ruland, C. M., & Bakken, S. (2002). Developing, implementing, and evaluating decision support Systemsfor Shared decision making in Patient Care: A conceptual model and case illustration. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 35, 313\u2013321.","journal-title":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics"},{"key":"9754_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1007\/s11017-009-9114-4","volume":"30","author":"L Sandman","year":"2009","unstructured":"Sandman, L., and Christian Munthe (2009). Shared decision-making and patient autonomy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 30, 289\u2013310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11017-009-9114-4.","journal-title":"Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics"},{"key":"9754_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1007\/s11019-011-9336-x","volume":"15","author":"L Sandman","year":"2012","unstructured":"Sandman, L., Granger, B. B., Inger Ekman, and, & Munthe, C. (2012). Adherence, Shared decision-making and patient autonomy. Medicine Healthcare and Philosophy, 15, 115\u2013127. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11019-011-9336-x.","journal-title":"Medicine Healthcare and Philosophy"},{"issue":"3","key":"9754_CR41","first-page":"1085","volume":"87","author":"AD Selbst","year":"2018","unstructured":"Selbst, A. D., and Solon Barocas (2018). The intuitive appeal of Explainable machines. Fordham Law Review, 87(3), 1085\u20131138.","journal-title":"Fordham Law Review"},{"key":"9754_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Swain, M. (1979). \u2018Justification and the Basis of Belief\u2019. In Justification and Knowledge, edited by George S Pappas. Vol. 17. Philosophy, Philosophical Studies Series. Dodrecht: Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-009-9493-5_2"},{"issue":"2","key":"9754_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"312","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1933-1592.2010.00331.x","volume":"80","author":"J Turri","year":"2010","unstructured":"Turri, J. (2010). On the relationship between Propositional and Doxastic Justification. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 80(2), 312\u2013326.","journal-title":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research"},{"issue":"2","key":"9754_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"W11","DOI":"10.1080\/15265161.2017.1409844","volume":"18","author":"PA Ubel","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ubel, P. A., Karen, A., Scherr, & Fagerlin, A. (2018). Autonomy: What\u2019s Shared decision making have to do with it? American Journal of Bioethics, 18(2), W11\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15265161.2017.1409844.","journal-title":"American Journal of Bioethics"},{"issue":"5","key":"9754_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2021-107462","volume":"47","author":"C Veliz","year":"2021","unstructured":"Veliz, C., Prunkl, C., Phillips-Brown, M., & Theodore, M. L. (2021). We might be afraid of Black-Box algorithms. Journal of Medical Ethics, 47(5), 339\u2013340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/medethics-2021-107462.","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"issue":"2","key":"9754_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"841","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3063289","volume":"31","author":"S Wachter","year":"2018","unstructured":"Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B. D., & Russell, C. (2018). Counterfactual explanations without opening the Black Box: Automated decisions and the GDPR. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 31(2), 841\u2013887. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2139\/ssrn.3063289.","journal-title":"Harvard Journal of Law and Technology"},{"key":"9754_CR47","unstructured":"Weber, R. O., Haolin, H., & Goel, P. (2019). \u2018Explaining Citation Recommendations: Abstracts or Full Texts?\u2019 In Proceedings of the IJCAI 2019 Workshop on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), 136\u201342."},{"key":"9754_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1007\/s10728-016-0337-z","volume":"26","author":"D Wilkinson","year":"2018","unstructured":"Wilkinson, D., and Julian Savulescu (2018). Cost-equivalence and pluralism in publicly funded Healthcare systems. Health Care Analysis, 26, 287\u2013309. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10728-016-0337-z.","journal-title":"Health Care Analysis"}],"container-title":["Ethics and Information Technology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10676-024-09754-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10676-024-09754-w\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10676-024-09754-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,23]],"date-time":"2024-03-23T02:33:10Z","timestamp":1711161190000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10676-024-09754-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,3]]},"references-count":48,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,3]]}},"alternative-id":["9754"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10676-024-09754-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["1388-1957","1572-8439"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1388-1957","type":"print"},{"value":"1572-8439","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"4 March 2024","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"As this is a purely conceptual and normative project, with no human or animal subjects, no ethics approval was necessary.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"This manuscript is not currently submitted elsewhere for consideration.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"Julian Savulescu is a Bioethics Committee consultant for Bayer.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"16"}}