{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,6]],"date-time":"2025-04-06T04:20:14Z","timestamp":1743913214152,"version":"3.40.3"},"reference-count":66,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,4]],"date-time":"2025-02-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738627200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,4]],"date-time":"2025-02-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738627200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100018719","name":"Koc University","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100018719","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Ethics Inf Technol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:p>Raul Hakli &amp; Pekka M\u00e4kel\u00e4 (2016, 2019) make a popular assumption in machine ethics explicit by arguing that artificial agents cannot be responsible because they are designed. Designed agents, they think, are analogous to manipulated humans and therefore not meaningfully in control of their actions. Contrary to this, I argue that under all mainstream theories of responsibility, designed agents can be responsible. To do so, I identify the closest parallel discussion in the literature on responsibility and free will, which concerns \u2018design cases\u2019. Design cases are theoretical examples of agents that appear to lack responsibility because they were designed, philosophers use these cases to explore the relationship between design and responsibility. This paper presents several replies to design cases from the responsibility literature and uses those replies to situate the corresponding positions on the design and responsibility of artificial agents in machine ethics. I argue that each reply can support the design of responsible agents. However, each reply also entails different levels of severity in the constraints for the design of responsible agents. I offer a brief discussion of the nature of those constraints, highlighting the challenges respective to each reply. I conclude that designing responsible agents is possible, with the caveat that the difficulty of doing so will vary according to one\u2019s favoured reply to design cases.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10676-025-09820-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,4]],"date-time":"2025-02-04T08:16:13Z","timestamp":1738656973000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Designing responsible agents"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"27","author":[{"given":"Zacharus","family":"Gudmunsen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"9820_CR1","unstructured":"Ayer, A. J. (1963). Freedom and Necessity. In A. J. Ayer (Ed.), Philosophical Essays. Springer."},{"key":"9820_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Behdadi, D., & Munthe, C. (2020). A normative approach to artificial moral agency. Minds and Machines, 30(2), 195\u2013218. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11023-020-09525-8","DOI":"10.1007\/s11023-020-09525-8"},{"key":"9820_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Borgo, S., Franssen, M., Garbacz, P., Kitamura, Y., Mizoguchi, R., & Vermaas, P. E. (2014). Technical artifacts: An integrated perspective. Applied Ontology, 9(3\u20134), 217\u2013235. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/ao-140137","DOI":"10.3233\/ao-140137"},{"issue":"4","key":"9820_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1007\/s00146-007-0090-9","volume":"22","author":"S Bringsjord","year":"2008","unstructured":"Bringsjord, S. (2008). Ethical Robots: The Future can heed us. AI and Society, 22(4), 539\u2013550. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00146-007-0090-9","journal-title":"AI and Society"},{"issue":"1","key":"9820_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1007\/s43681-022-00167-3","volume":"3","author":"L Cavalcante Siebert","year":"2023","unstructured":"Cavalcante Siebert, L., Lupetti, M. L., Aizenberg, E., Beckers, N., Zgonnikov, A., Veluwenkamp, H., Abbink, D., Giaccardi, E., Houben, G. J., Jonker, C. M., van den Hoven, J., Forster, D., & Lagendijk, R. L. (2023). Meaningful human control: Actionable properties for AI system development. AI and Ethics, 3(1), 241\u2013255. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s43681-022-00167-3","journal-title":"AI and Ethics"},{"key":"9820_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Chomanski, B. (2019). What\u2019s wrong with designing people to serve? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 22(4), 993\u20131015. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10677-019-10029-3","DOI":"10.1007\/s10677-019-10029-3"},{"issue":"4","key":"9820_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1007\/s10676-016-9403-3","volume":"18","author":"J Danaher","year":"2016","unstructured":"Danaher, J. (2016). Robots, law and the retribution gap. Ethics and Information Technology, 18(4), 299\u2013309. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10676-016-9403-3","journal-title":"Ethics and Information Technology"},{"issue":"4","key":"9820_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2023","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-019-00119-x","volume":"26","author":"J Danaher","year":"2020","unstructured":"Danaher, J. (2020). Welcoming Robots into the Moral Circle: A defence of ethical behaviourism. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(4), 2023\u20132049. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-019-00119-x","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"2","key":"9820_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1007\/s13347-022-00519-1","volume":"35","author":"J Danaher","year":"2022","unstructured":"Danaher, J. (2022). Tragic choices and the Virtue of Techno-responsibility gaps. Philosophy & Technology, 35(2), 26. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13347-022-00519-1","journal-title":"Philosophy & Technology"},{"issue":"2","key":"9820_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-022-01906-2","volume":"180","author":"G De Marco","year":"2023","unstructured":"De Marco, G. (2023). Manipulation, machine induction, and bypassing. Philosophical Studies, 180(2), 487\u2013507. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11098-022-01906-2","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"key":"9820_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"de Santoni, F., & van den Hoven, J. (2018). Meaningful Human Control over Autonomous Systems: A Philosophical Account. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5. https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/frobt.2018.00015","DOI":"10.3389\/frobt.2018.00015"},{"issue":"5","key":"9820_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1255","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-016-0754-8","volume":"174","author":"O Deery","year":"2017","unstructured":"Deery, O., & Nahmias, E. (2017). Defeating manipulation arguments: Interventionist causation and compatibilist sourcehood. Philosophical Studies, 174(5), 1255\u20131276. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11098-016-0754-8","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"key":"9820_CR10","unstructured":"Dennett, D. C. (1984). Elbow room: The varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting. MIT Press."},{"issue":"2","key":"9820_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1093\/analys\/anr008","volume":"71","author":"JM Fischer","year":"2011","unstructured":"Fischer, J. M. (2011). The Zygote argument remixed. Analysis, 71(2), 267\u2013272.","journal-title":"Analysis"},{"key":"9820_CR12","first-page":"202","volume":"1","author":"JM Fischer","year":"2014","unstructured":"Fischer, J. M. (2014). Review of Free will, agency, and meaning in life, by Derk Pereboom. Science Religion and Culture, 1, 202\u2013208.","journal-title":"Science Religion and Culture"},{"issue":"1","key":"9820_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1007\/s10892-016-9225-x","volume":"20","author":"JM Fischer","year":"2016","unstructured":"Fischer, J. M. (2016). How do manipulation arguments work? The Journal of Ethics, 20(1), 47\u201367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10892-016-9225-x","journal-title":"The Journal of Ethics"},{"issue":"3","key":"9820_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1007\/s10892-017-9254-0","volume":"21","author":"JM Fischer","year":"2017","unstructured":"Fischer, J. M. (2017). Responsibility, autonomy, and the Zygote argument. The Journal of Ethics, 21(3), 223\u2013237.","journal-title":"The Journal of Ethics"},{"key":"9820_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Fischer, J. M., & Ravizza, M. (1998). Responsibility and control: A theory of moral responsibility. Cambridge University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9780511814594","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511814594"},{"key":"9820_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Frankfurt, H. G. (1988). The importance of what we care about: Philosophical essays. Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511818172"},{"key":"9820_CR17","unstructured":"Frankfurt, H. G. (2002). Reply to Fischer. In S. Buss, & L. Overton (Eds.), Contours of Agency: Essays on themes from Harry Frankfurt. MIT Press."},{"issue":"2","key":"9820_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1007\/s10676-008-9163-9","volume":"10","author":"FS Grodzinsky","year":"2008","unstructured":"Grodzinsky, F. S., Miller, K. W., & Wolf, M. J. (2008). The ethics of designing artificial agents. Ethics and Information Technology, 10(2), 115\u2013121. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10676-008-9163-9","journal-title":"Ethics and Information Technology"},{"key":"9820_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s43681-024-00444-3","author":"Z Gudmunsen","year":"2024","unstructured":"Gudmunsen, Z. (2024). The moral decision machine: A challenge for artificial moral agency based on moral deference. AI and Ethics. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s43681-024-00444-3","journal-title":"AI and Ethics"},{"key":"9820_CR61","unstructured":"Hakli, R., & M\u00e4kel\u00e4, P. (2016). Robots, autonomy, and responsibility. In J. Seibt, M. N\u00f8rskov & S. S. Andersen (Eds.), What social robots can and should do: Proceedings of robophilosophy 2016 (pp. 145\u2013154). IOS Press."},{"key":"9820_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hakli, R., & M\u00e4kel\u00e4, P. (2019). Moral responsibility of robots and hybrid agents. The Monist, 102(2), 259\u2013275.","DOI":"10.1093\/monist\/onz009"},{"issue":"2","key":"9820_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1007\/s10676-012-9301-2","volume":"15","author":"T Hellstr\u00f6m","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hellstr\u00f6m, T. (2013). On the Moral responsibility of Military Robots. Ethics and Information Technology, 15(2), 99\u2013107. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10676-012-9301-2","journal-title":"Ethics and Information Technology"},{"issue":"1","key":"9820_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1086\/648610","volume":"120","author":"A Hills","year":"2009","unstructured":"Hills, A. (2009). Moral Testimony and Moral Epistemology. Ethics, 120(1), 94\u2013127. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/648610. JSTOR.","journal-title":"Ethics"},{"issue":"1","key":"9820_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1007\/s10676-008-9167-5","volume":"11","author":"KE Himma","year":"2009","unstructured":"Himma, K. E. (2009). Artificial agency, consciousness, and the criteria for moral agency: What properties must an artificial agent have to be a moral agent? Ethics and Information Technology, 11(1), 19\u201329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10676-008-9167-5","journal-title":"Ethics and Information Technology"},{"key":"9820_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ioan, M., & Howard, D. (2017). Artificial Moral Cognition: Moral Functionalism and Autonomous Moral Agency. In T. Powers (Ed.), Philosophy and Computing: Essays in epistemology, philosophy of mind, Logic, and Ethics. Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-61043-6_7"},{"issue":"4","key":"9820_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1007\/s10676-006-9111-5","volume":"8","author":"DG Johnson","year":"2006","unstructured":"Johnson, D. G. (2006). Computer systems: Moral entities but not moral agents. Ethics and Information Technology, 8(4), 195\u2013204. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10676-006-9111-5","journal-title":"Ethics and Information Technology"},{"issue":"3","key":"9820_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-011-9724-3","volume":"160","author":"S Kearns","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kearns, S. (2012). Aborting the Zygote argument. Philosophical Studies, 160(3), 379\u2013389. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11098-011-9724-3","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"issue":"1","key":"9820_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1086\/671391","volume":"124","author":"M King","year":"2013","unstructured":"King, M. (2013). The Problem with Manipulation. Ethics, 124(1), 65\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/671391","journal-title":"Ethics"},{"key":"9820_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"K\u00f6hler, S., Roughley, N., & Sauer, H. (2018). Technologically blurred accountability? Technology, responsibility gaps and the robustness of our everyday conceptual scheme. In C. Ulbert, P. Finkenbusch, E. Sondermann, & T. Debiel (Eds.), Moral Agency and the Politics of Responsibility. Routledge.","DOI":"10.4324\/9781315201399-4"},{"issue":"3","key":"9820_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.5840\/jphil202211939","volume":"119","author":"AJ Latham","year":"2022","unstructured":"Latham, A. J., & Tierney, H. (2022). Defusing existential and universal threats to Compatibilism: A Strawsonian Dilemma for Manipulation arguments. Journal of Philosophy, 119(3), 144\u2013161. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5840\/jphil202211939","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophy"},{"issue":"522","key":"9820_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"535","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/fzaa085","volume":"131","author":"X Liu","year":"2022","unstructured":"Liu, X. (2022). Manipulation and machine induction. Mind, 131(522), 535\u2013548. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/mind\/fzaa085","journal-title":"Mind"},{"issue":"7","key":"9820_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1963","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-015-0587-x","volume":"173","author":"B Matheson","year":"2016","unstructured":"Matheson, B. (2016). In defence of the four-case argument. Philosophical Studies, 173(7), 1963\u20131982. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11098-015-0587-x","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"issue":"3","key":"9820_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1007\/s10676-004-3422-1","volume":"6","author":"A Matthias","year":"2004","unstructured":"Matthias, A. (2004). The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning Automata. Ethics and Information Technology, 6(3), 175\u2013183. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10676-004-3422-1","journal-title":"Ethics and Information Technology"},{"issue":"1","key":"9820_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1933-1592.2008.00179.x","volume":"77","author":"M McKenna","year":"2008","unstructured":"McKenna, M. (2008). A hard-line reply to Pereboom\u2019s four-case Manipulation Argument. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 77(1), 142\u2013159.","journal-title":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research"},{"issue":"1\/3","key":"9820_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1007\/s10892-016-9227-8","volume":"20","author":"M McKenna","year":"2016","unstructured":"McKenna, M. (2016). A modest historical theory of Moral responsibility. The Journal of Ethics, 20(1\/3), 83\u2013105.","journal-title":"The Journal of Ethics"},{"key":"9820_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"McLaughlin, P. (2000). What functions explain: Functional explanation and self-reproducing systems. Cambridge University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9780511498510","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511498510"},{"key":"9820_CR35","unstructured":"Mele, A. R. (2008). Free Will and Luck (1st edition). Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"3","key":"9820_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1007\/s10892-013-9147-9","volume":"17","author":"AR Mele","year":"2013","unstructured":"Mele, A. R. (2013). Manipulation, Moral responsibility, and bullet biting. The Journal of Ethics, 17(3), 167\u2013184. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10892-013-9147-9","journal-title":"The Journal of Ethics"},{"issue":"11","key":"9820_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2911","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-015-0449-6","volume":"172","author":"K Mickelson","year":"2015","unstructured":"Mickelson, K. (2015). The Zygote argument is invalid: Now what? Philosophical Studies, 172(11), 2911\u20132929. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11098-015-0449-6","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"issue":"4","key":"9820_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.2307\/2564702","volume":"96","author":"RG Millikan","year":"1999","unstructured":"Millikan, R. G. (1999). Wings, spoons, pills, and Quills: A pluralist theory of function. The Journal of Philosophy, 96(4), 191\u2013206. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2564702","journal-title":"The Journal of Philosophy"},{"issue":"5","key":"9820_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1087","DOI":"10.1080\/0952813X.2017.1309691","volume":"29","author":"M Musia\u0142","year":"2017","unstructured":"Musia\u0142, M. (2017). Designing (artificial) people to serve \u2013 the other side of the coin. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 29(5), 1087\u20131097. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/0952813X.2017.1309691","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9820_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00146-022-01575-z","author":"M Musia\u0142","year":"2022","unstructured":"Musia\u0142, M. (2022). Can we design artificial persons without being manipulative? AI & SOCIETY. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00146-022-01575-z","journal-title":"AI & SOCIETY"},{"issue":"1","key":"9820_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1007\/s13347-022-00602-7","volume":"36","author":"AK Oimann","year":"2023","unstructured":"Oimann, A. K. (2023). The responsibility gap and LAWS: A critical mapping of the debate. Philosophy & Technology, 36(1), 3. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13347-022-00602-7","journal-title":"Philosophy & Technology"},{"key":"9820_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Pereboom, D. (2001). Living without Free Will. Cambridge University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9780511498824","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511498824"},{"key":"9820_CR43","unstructured":"Petersen, S. (2011). Designing people to serve. In P. Lin, G. Bekey, & K. Abney (Eds.), Robot ethics: The ethical and social implications of robotics (pp. 283\u2013298). MIT Press, Cambridge."},{"issue":"2","key":"9820_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1007\/s11245-012-9149-4","volume":"32","author":"TM Powers","year":"2013","unstructured":"Powers, T. M. (2013). On the Moral Agency of Computers. Topoi, 32(2), 227\u2013236. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11245-012-9149-4","journal-title":"Topoi"},{"key":"9820_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Preston, B. (2009). Philosophical theories of artifact function. In A. Meijers (Ed.), Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences (pp. 213\u2013233). North-Holland. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/B978-0-444-51667-1.50013-6","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-444-51667-1.50013-6"},{"issue":"4","key":"9820_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1007\/s10677-015-9563-y","volume":"18","author":"D Purves","year":"2015","unstructured":"Purves, D., Jenkins, R., & Strawser, B. J. (2015). Autonomous Machines, Moral Judgment, and acting for the right reasons. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 18(4), 851\u2013872. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10677-015-9563-y","journal-title":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice"},{"issue":"2","key":"9820_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1007\/s13347-012-0089-0","volume":"26","author":"M Schulzke","year":"2013","unstructured":"Schulzke, M. (2013). Autonomous weapons and distributed responsibility. Philosophy and Technology, 26(2), 203\u2013219. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13347-012-0089-0","journal-title":"Philosophy and Technology"},{"key":"9820_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sullins, J. P. (2006). When is a robot a moral agent. International Review of Information Ethics, 6(12), 23\u201330.","DOI":"10.29173\/irie136"},{"issue":"4","key":"9820_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"953","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-018-1215-3","volume":"177","author":"H Tierney","year":"2020","unstructured":"Tierney, H., & Glick, D. (2020). Desperately seeking sourcehood. Philosophical Studies, 177(4), 953\u2013970. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11098-018-1215-3","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"issue":"4","key":"9820_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"495","DOI":"10.1007\/s00146-007-0091-8","volume":"22","author":"S Torrance","year":"2008","unstructured":"Torrance, S. (2008). Ethics and consciousness in Artificial agents. AI and Society, 22(4), 495\u2013521. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00146-007-0091-8","journal-title":"AI and Society"},{"key":"9820_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Usher, M. (2018). Agency, teleological control and robust causation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 100(2), 302\u2013324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/phpr.12537","DOI":"10.1111\/phpr.12537"},{"issue":"3","key":"9820_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1007\/s11023-024-09674-0","volume":"34","author":"S Vallor","year":"2024","unstructured":"Vallor, S., & Vierkant, T. (2024). Find the gap: AI, responsible Agency and Vulnerability. Minds and Machines, 34(3), 20. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11023-024-09674-0","journal-title":"Minds and Machines"},{"issue":"2","key":"9820_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1007\/s00146-021-01189-x","volume":"36","author":"C V\u00e9liz","year":"2021","unstructured":"V\u00e9liz, C. (2021). Moral zombies: Why algorithms are not moral agents. AI & SOCIETY, 36(2), 487\u2013497. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00146-021-01189-x","journal-title":"AI & SOCIETY"},{"issue":"4","key":"9820_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1007\/s10676-022-09673-8","volume":"24","author":"H Veluwenkamp","year":"2022","unstructured":"Veluwenkamp, H. (2022). Reasons for Meaningful Human Control. Ethics and Information Technology, 24(4), 51. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10676-022-09673-8","journal-title":"Ethics and Information Technology"},{"issue":"1","key":"9820_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2005.12.002","volume":"37","author":"PE Vermaas","year":"2006","unstructured":"Vermaas, P. E., & Houkes, W. (2006). Technical functions: A drawbridge between the intentional and structural natures of technical artefacts. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 37(1), 5\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.shpsa.2005.12.002","journal-title":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A"},{"issue":"6","key":"9820_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1131","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-011-9885-9","volume":"190","author":"PE Vermaas","year":"2013","unstructured":"Vermaas, P. E., Carrara, M., Borgo, S., & Garbacz, P. (2013). The design stance and its artefacts. Synthese, 190(6), 1131\u20131152.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"9820_CR56","unstructured":"Walker, M. (2006). A moral paradox in the creation of artificial intelligence: Mary Poppins 3000s of the world unite! In T. Metzler (Ed.), Human implications of human-robot interaction: Papers from the AAAI workshop (pp 23\u201328). AAAI Press, Menlo Park."},{"issue":"1","key":"9820_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1007\/s11406-013-9476-8","volume":"42","author":"RR Waller","year":"2014","unstructured":"Waller, R. R. (2014). The threat of effective intentions to Moral responsibility in the Zygote argument. Philosophia, 42(1), 209\u2013222. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11406-013-9476-8","journal-title":"Philosophia"},{"key":"9820_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Watson, G. (1999). Soft libertarianism and hard compatibilism. The Journal of Ethics, 3(4), 351\u2013365. http:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/25115625","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1009819618482"},{"key":"9820_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Woodward, J. (2005). Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/0195155270.001.0001"},{"issue":"2","key":"9820_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1111\/phpr.12095","volume":"91","author":"J Woodward","year":"2015","unstructured":"Woodward, J. (2015). Interventionism and Causal Exclusion. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 91(2), 303\u2013347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/phpr.12095","journal-title":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research"}],"container-title":["Ethics and Information Technology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10676-025-09820-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10676-025-09820-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10676-025-09820-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,5]],"date-time":"2025-04-05T19:11:25Z","timestamp":1743880285000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10676-025-09820-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,4]]},"references-count":66,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,3]]}},"alternative-id":["9820"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10676-025-09820-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["1388-1957","1572-8439"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1388-1957"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1572-8439"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"4 February 2025","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"12"}}