{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,11]],"date-time":"2026-02-11T17:47:58Z","timestamp":1770832078428,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":89,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,23]],"date-time":"2025-10-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1761177600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,23]],"date-time":"2025-10-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1761177600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Ethics Inf Technol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>I argue that because many forms of viewpoint-based moderation by major social media companies (SMCs) undermine subjects\u2019 equal opportunity for political influence (EOPI), such moderation violates users\u2019 right to free expression and ought to be prohibited. I then refute three common defenses of SMCs\u2019 freedom to moderate as they please, each of which seeks to establish relevant disanalogies between state- and SMC-imposed speech regulations: the substitution argument, argument from government abuse, and argument from corporate rights. I argue that the presence of substitutes does not excuse viewpoint-based regulation, that the risk of abuse does not meaningfully distinguish state from social media moderation, and that corporate rights are limited by users\u2019 right to EOPI.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10676-025-09875-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,23]],"date-time":"2025-10-23T13:39:15Z","timestamp":1761226755000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Limiting the right to moderate: political equality, social media, and viewpoint-based moderation"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"27","author":[{"given":"Chris","family":"Bousquet","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"9875_CR92","unstructured":"(2024) T\u00fcrkiye: Big Tech Should Protect Online Expression, Resist Censorship. Human Rights Watch."},{"key":"9875_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1177\/2053168018816189","volume":"6","author":"NM Anspach","year":"2019","unstructured":"Anspach, N. M., Jennings, J. T., & Arceneaux, K. (2019). A little bit of knowledge: Facebook\u2019s news feed and self-perceptions of knowledge. Research and Politics, 6, 1.","journal-title":"Research and Politics"},{"key":"9875_CR2","unstructured":"Baker, C. E. (1989). Human liberty and freedom of speech. Oxford University Press."},{"key":"9875_CR3","unstructured":"Boos v. Barry (1988). 485 U.S. 312."},{"issue":"1","key":"9875_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1017\/cjlj.2021.18","volume":"35","author":"C Bousquet","year":"2022","unstructured":"Bousquet, C. (2022). Words that harm: Defending the dignity approach to hate speech regulation. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 35(1), 31\u201357.","journal-title":"Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence"},{"issue":"245","key":"9875_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"700","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9213.2011.699.x","volume":"61","author":"J Brennan","year":"2011","unstructured":"Brennan, J. (2011). The right to a competent electorate. The Philosophical Quarterly, 61(245), 700\u2013724.","journal-title":"The Philosophical Quarterly"},{"issue":"2","key":"9875_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9760.1996.tb00045.x","volume":"4","author":"H Brighouse","year":"1996","unstructured":"Brighouse, H. (1996). Egalitarianism and equal availability of political influence. Journal of Political Philosophy, 4(2), 118\u2013141.","journal-title":"Journal of Political Philosophy"},{"key":"9875_CR7","unstructured":"Brown, D., & Younes, R. (2023). Meta\u2019s broken promises. Human Rights Watch."},{"key":"9875_CR8","unstructured":"Carl, J. (2017). How to break silicon Valley\u02bcs Anti-Free-Speech monopoly. National Review."},{"key":"9875_CR9","unstructured":"Cerda, A., & Daniller, A. (2023). 7 facts about americans\u2019 views of money in politics. Pew Research Center."},{"issue":"2","key":"9875_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1080\/08838151.2020.1757365","volume":"64","author":"J Cho","year":"2020","unstructured":"Cho, J., et al. (2020). Do search algorithms endanger democracy? An experimental investigation of algorithm effects on political polarization. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 64(2), 150\u2013172.","journal-title":"Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media"},{"key":"9875_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Christiano, T. (2008). The constitution of equality: Democratic authority and its limits. Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780198297475.001.0001"},{"key":"9875_CR85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cobbe, J. (2021). Algorithmic Censorship by Social Platforms. Philosophy & Technology, 34(4), 739\u2013766.","DOI":"10.1007\/s13347-020-00429-0"},{"key":"9875_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cohen, J. (2001). Money, Politics, and Political Equality in Fact and Value, eds. Byrne, Stalnaker, and Wedgewood. MIT Press.","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/2950.003.0005"},{"key":"9875_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cohen, A., & Cohen, A. (2022). The possibility and defensibility of nonstate censorship. In J.P. Messina (Ed.), New directions in the ethics and politics of speech. Routledge.","DOI":"10.4324\/9781003240785-2"},{"key":"9875_CR15","unstructured":"Cox, K. (2020). Twitter, Facebook face blowback after stopping circulation of NY Post story. Ars Technica."},{"key":"9875_CR16","unstructured":"Data Reportal (2023). Digital 2023 October Global Statshot Report."},{"key":"9875_CR87","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Davis, J. L., & Graham, T. (2021). Emotional Consequences and Attention Rewards. Information, Communication & Society, 24(5), 649\u2013666.","DOI":"10.1080\/1369118X.2021.1874476"},{"key":"9875_CR17","unstructured":"De Guzman, C. (2022). Meta\u2019s Facebook algorithms \u2018Proactively\u2019 promoted violence against the Rohingya. New Amnesty International Report Asserts. Time Magazine."},{"key":"9875_CR19","unstructured":"Dworkin, R. (1996). Freedom\u2019s law: The moral reading of the American constitution. Harvard University Press."},{"key":"9875_CR20","unstructured":"Egan, E. (2022). With customer satisfaction at a new low, federal agencies still fail to measure it well or provide enough digital services. Information Technology & Innovation Foundation."},{"issue":"4","key":"9875_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1479","DOI":"10.3982\/ECTA14281","volume":"88","author":"R Enikolopov","year":"2020","unstructured":"Enikolopov, R., Makarin, A., & Petrova, M. (2020). Social media and protest participation: Evidence from Russia. Econometrica, 88(4), 1479.","journal-title":"Econometrica"},{"key":"9875_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Estlund, D. (2008). Democratic authority: A philosophical framework. Princeton University Press.","DOI":"10.2307\/j.ctt7t8jx"},{"key":"9875_CR91","unstructured":"Fox, C. (2020). TikTok admits restricting some LGBT hashtags. BBC."},{"key":"9875_CR23","unstructured":"Frohwerk v. United States (1919) 249 U.S. 204."},{"key":"9875_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gillespie, T. (2022). Do Not Recommend? Reduction As a Form of Content Moderation. Social Media+Society, 8(3).","DOI":"10.1177\/20563051221117552"},{"key":"9875_CR24","unstructured":"Gillum, J., Coarse, A., & Tong, A. (2024). X algorithm feeds users political Content\u2014Whether they want it or not. Wall Street Journal."},{"key":"9875_CR25","unstructured":"Hamilton, D. (2024). Net neutrality restored as federal communications commission votes to regulate internet providers. The Chicago Tribune."},{"key":"9875_CR26","unstructured":"Hart, H. L. A. (1958). Legal and moral obligation. In A.I. Melden (Ed.), Essays in moral philosophy. University of Washington"},{"key":"9875_CR27","unstructured":"Harwell, D., & Merrill, J. (2024). On Elon musk\u2019s X, Republicans go viral as Democrats disappear. Washington Post."},{"key":"9875_CR28","unstructured":"Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States (1964). 379 U.S. 241."},{"key":"9875_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hong, S., & Kim, S. H. (2016). Political polarization on twitter: Implications for the use of social media in digital governments. Government Information Quarterly 33(4), 777\u2013782.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2016.04.007"},{"issue":"1","key":"9875_CR30","first-page":"36","volume":"15","author":"M Hooker","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hooker, M. (2019). Censorship, free speech & facebook: Applying the first amendment to social media platforms via the public function exception. Washington Journal of Law on Journal of Law Technology & Arts, 15(1), 36.","journal-title":"Washington Journal of Law on Journal of Law Technology & Arts"},{"key":"9875_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Howard, J. (2024). The ethics of social media: Why content moderation is a moral duty. Journal of Practical Ethics.","DOI":"10.3998\/jpe.6195"},{"key":"9875_CR32","unstructured":"Huemer, M. (2013). The problem of political authority: An examination of the right to coerce and the duty to obey. Palgrave Macmillan."},{"key":"9875_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"417","DOI":"10.1177\/0963662519837901","volume":"28","author":"FJ Jennings","year":"2019","unstructured":"Jennings, F. J., & Russell, F. M. (2019). Civility, credibility, and health information: The impact of uncivil comments and source credibility on attitudes about vaccines. Public Understanding of Science, 28, 417.","journal-title":"Public Understanding of Science"},{"key":"9875_CR34","unstructured":"Joyella, M. (2024). Elon musk accused of \u2018Silencing his critics\u2019 as. X Suspends Journalists. Forbes.com."},{"key":"9875_CR35","unstructured":"Jurkowitz, M., & Gottfried, J. (2022). Twitter is the go-to social media site for U.S. journalists, but not for the public. Pew Research Center."},{"key":"9875_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kashyap, B., & Formosa, B. (2023). The authority to moderate: Social media moderation and its limits. Philosophy & Technology 36.","DOI":"10.1007\/s13347-023-00685-w"},{"key":"9875_CR37","unstructured":"Katzenbach v. McClung (1964). 379 U.S. 294."},{"issue":"3","key":"9875_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1111\/papa.12035","volume":"42","author":"N Kolodny","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kolodny, N. (2014a). Rule over none i: What justifies democracy? Philosophy & Public Affairs, 42(3), 195\u2013229.","journal-title":"Philosophy & Public Affairs"},{"issue":"4","key":"9875_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1111\/papa.12037","volume":"42","author":"N Kolodny","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kolodny, N. (2014b). Rule over none II: Social equality and the justification of democracy. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 42(4), 287\u2013336.","journal-title":"Philosophy & Public Affairs"},{"key":"9875_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kolodny, N. (2023). The pecking order. Harvard University Press.","DOI":"10.4159\/9780674292819"},{"key":"9875_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kramer, M. (2004). Legal and moral obligation.In Golding and Edmundsun (Eds.),The blackwell guide to the philosophy of law and legal theory. Blackwell.","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470690116.ch12"},{"key":"9875_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kramer, M. (2021). Freedom of expression as Self-Restraint. Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198868651.001.0001"},{"key":"9875_CR43","unstructured":"Lawrence, I. I. I., C (1993). If he hollers let him go. In M. Matsuda (Ed.), Words that wound: Critical race Theory, assaultive Speech, and the first amendment. Routledge."},{"key":"9875_CR84","unstructured":"Lim, M., & Ghadah, A. (2021). Beyond a technical bug. The Conversation."},{"key":"9875_CR44","unstructured":"Lima, C. (2021). Facebook no longer treating \u2018man-made\u2019 Covid as a crackpot Idea. Politico"},{"key":"9875_CR89","unstructured":"Llans\u00f3, E., Hoboken, J. V., Leerssen, P., & Harambah, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence, content moderation, and freedom of expression. Transatlantic Working Group on Content Moderation Online and Freedom of Expression."},{"key":"9875_CR45","unstructured":"Mackey, R., & Lee, M. (2022). Left-Wing Voices Are Silenced On Twitter As Far-Right Trolls Advise Elon Musk. The Intercept."},{"issue":"2","key":"9875_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1111\/raju.12201","volume":"31","author":"A Marmor","year":"2018","unstructured":"Marmor, A. (2018). Two rights of free speech. Ratio Juris, 31(2), 139.","journal-title":"Ratio Juris"},{"key":"9875_CR47","unstructured":"Matsa, K., & Mitchell, A. (2014). 8 key takeaways about social media and news. Pew Research Center."},{"key":"9875_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Meiklejohn, A. (1948). Free speech and its relation to Self-Government. Harper.","DOI":"10.2307\/1284351"},{"key":"9875_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Messina, J. P. (2023). Private censorship. Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780197581902.001.0001"},{"key":"9875_CR50","unstructured":"Michaelman, F. (1989). Conceptions of democracy in American constitutional argument: The case of pornography Regulation. Tennessee Law Review 56, 291."},{"key":"9875_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Morozov, E. (2011). The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. Perseus.","DOI":"10.1017\/S1537592711004026"},{"key":"9875_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nagel, T. (2002). Concealment and exposure. Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780195152937.001.0001"},{"key":"9875_CR53","unstructured":"Newman, N. (2023). Overview and key findings of the 2023 digital news. Report. Reuters Institute."},{"key":"9875_CR54","unstructured":"Nix, N. (2022). In new election, big tech uses old strategies to fight \u2018big lie\u2019. Washington Post."},{"key":"9875_CR55","unstructured":"Packingham v. North Carolina (2017). 582 U.S. 98."},{"key":"9875_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pallikkathayil, J. (2020). Free speech and the embodied self. In Sobel, et al. (Eds.), Oxford studies in political philosophy (Vol. 6). Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198852636.003.0003"},{"key":"9875_CR57","unstructured":"Perrigo, B. (2021). Why Twitter blocked accounts linked to farmers\u2019 protests in India\u2014Only to reverse course. Time Magazine."},{"key":"9875_CR58","unstructured":"Petrosyan, A. (2024). Worldwide digital population 2024. Statista."},{"key":"9875_CR59","unstructured":"Pew Research Center (2023). Social Media and News Fact Sheet."},{"key":"9875_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Raz, J. (1979). The authority of law: Essays on law and morality. Clarendon.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780198253457.001.0001"},{"key":"9875_CR61","unstructured":"Renzo, M., & Green, L. (2022). Legal Obligation and Authority in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Eds.) Zalta and Nodelman."},{"key":"9875_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ripstein, A. (2009). Force and freedom: Kant\u2019s legal and political philosophy. Harvard University Press.","DOI":"10.4159\/9780674054516"},{"key":"9875_CR63","unstructured":"Robinson, N. (2020). Facebook Has The Power To Repeal The First Amendment. Current Affairs."},{"key":"9875_CR64","unstructured":"Rosenberger v. Rector (1995). 515 U.S. 819."},{"key":"9875_CR65","unstructured":"S\u00e1nchez-Vallejo, M. (2023). Under Elon Musk, Twitter has approved 83% of censorship requests by authoritarian governments. El Pa\u00eds."},{"issue":"2","key":"9875_CR66","first-page":"204","volume":"1","author":"T Scanlon","year":"1972","unstructured":"Scanlon, T. (1972). A theory of freedom of expression. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(2), 204\u2013226.","journal-title":"Philosophy & Public Affairs"},{"issue":"4","key":"9875_CR67","first-page":"519","volume":"40","author":"T Scanlon","year":"1978","unstructured":"Scanlon, T. (1978). Freedom of expression and categories of expression. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 40(4), 519\u2013550.","journal-title":"University of Pittsburgh Law Review"},{"key":"9875_CR68","unstructured":"Schenck v. Unites States (1919). 249 U.S. 47."},{"key":"9875_CR88","unstructured":"Schiffer, Z., & Newton, C. (2023). Yes, Elon Musk Created a Special System for Showing You All His Tweets. The Verge."},{"issue":"2","key":"9875_CR69","first-page":"283","volume":"27","author":"SV Shiffrin","year":"2011","unstructured":"Shiffrin, S. V. (2011). A thinker-based approach to freedom of speech. University of Minnesota Law Review Constitutional Commentary, 27(2), 283.","journal-title":"University of Minnesota Law Review Constitutional Commentary"},{"issue":"2","key":"9875_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.1177\/0974928417700798","volume":"73","author":"A Smidi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Smidi, A., & Shahin, S. (2017). Social media and social mobilisation in the Middle East: A survey of research on the Arab spring. India Quarterly, 73(2), 196\u2013209.","journal-title":"India Quarterly"},{"key":"9875_CR71","unstructured":"Sozan, M. (2024). An American democracy built for the people: Why democracy matters and how to make it work for the 21st century. Center for American Progress."},{"key":"9875_CR72","unstructured":"R.A.V. v. St. Paul (1992). 505 U.S. 377."},{"key":"9875_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Valentine v. Chrestensen (1942). 316 U.S. 52.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01629973"},{"issue":"1","key":"9875_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1017\/S0007123412000294","volume":"43","author":"L Valentini","year":"2013","unstructured":"Valentini, L. (2013). Justice, disagreement and democracy. British Journal of Political Science, 43(1), 177.","journal-title":"British Journal of Political Science"},{"key":"9875_CR75","unstructured":"VanSickle, A., McCabe, D., & Liptak, A. (2024). Supreme court declines to rule on tech platforms\u2019. Free Speech Rights. New York Times."},{"key":"9875_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Varden, H. (2010). A Kantian conception of free speech. In D. Golash (Ed.), Free speech in a diverse world. Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-90-481-8999-1_4"},{"issue":"4","key":"9875_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1111\/papa.12036","volume":"42","author":"D Viehoff","year":"2014","unstructured":"Viehoff, D. (2014). Democratic equality and political authority. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 42(4), 337\u2013375.","journal-title":"Philosophy & Public Affairs"},{"key":"9875_CR79","unstructured":"Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc. (1976). 425 U.S. 748."},{"key":"9875_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Waldron, J. (2012). The harm in hate speech. Harvard University Press.","DOI":"10.4159\/harvard.9780674065086"},{"key":"9875_CR90","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Williams, D. (2023) The Marketplace of Rationalizations. Economics and Philosophy, 39(1), 99\u2013123.","DOI":"10.1017\/S0266267121000389"},{"key":"9875_CR93","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wodak, D. (2024) What Is the Point of Political Equality? Philosophical Review, 133(4), 367\u2013413.","DOI":"10.1215\/00318108-11497679"},{"key":"9875_CR82","unstructured":"Wolff, R. P. (1970). In defense of anarchism. Harper & Row."},{"key":"9875_CR83","unstructured":"Wolny, N. (2024). The Pink shadow ban: How LGBTQ\u2009+\u2009influencers are fighting censorship. Out Magazine."}],"container-title":["Ethics and Information Technology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10676-025-09875-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10676-025-09875-w\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10676-025-09875-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,22]],"date-time":"2025-11-22T03:34:06Z","timestamp":1763782446000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10676-025-09875-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,23]]},"references-count":89,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["9875"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10676-025-09875-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["1388-1957","1572-8439"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1388-1957","type":"print"},{"value":"1572-8439","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,23]]},"assertion":[{"value":"23 October 2025","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"62"}}