{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,6]],"date-time":"2026-07-06T20:12:06Z","timestamp":1783368726077,"version":"3.54.6"},"reference-count":42,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,21]],"date-time":"2025-11-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1763683200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,21]],"date-time":"2025-11-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1763683200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Discov Computing"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    Accurate prediction of cattle weight gain is critical for optimizing herd management, improving productivity, and promoting sustainable livestock practices. Traditional monitoring methods, such as manual data collection and periodic surveys, often lack the precision and timeliness required for reliable forecasting. This study evaluated multiple machine learning models Linear Regression, Decision Tree Regression, XGBoost, and Support Vector Regression (SVM) to predict cattle weight at 36\u00a0months and identify the key factors influencing growth. A comprehensive historical dataset was preprocessed to handle missing values, correct inconsistencies, and engineer relevant features. Models were assessed using R-squared (R\n                    <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                    ), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) to evaluate predictive accuracy and robustness. Results indicated that weights at 30, 24, and 18\u00a0months were the strongest predictors of final weight, demonstrating the cumulative effect of early growth. Additional influential factors included breed (notably Zebu), grazing type, and cattle movement frequency, while birth weight showed a negative association, reflecting compensatory growth in lighter-born calves. Environmental variables such as temperature and seasonal conditions had moderate but consistent effects. The Decision Tree model, with the highest predictive performance (R\n                    <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                    \u2009=\u20090.927; MAE\u2009=\u20092.21\u00a0kg; RMSE\u2009=\u20092.95\u00a0kg), provided the most interpretable and actionable insights. Linear Regression, XGBoost, and SVM offered complementary predictions but with slightly lower accuracy or interpretability. These findings provide quantitative insights into cattle growth dynamics and demonstrate the utility of machine learning for data-driven decision-making in livestock management. The study supports the adoption of predictive models, improved data collection protocols, and targeted management interventions during critical growth periods to optimize cattle production sustainably.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10791-025-09798-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,21]],"date-time":"2025-11-21T14:20:17Z","timestamp":1763734817000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Data-driven prediction of cattle weight gain for evaluating key growth factors with machine learning approaches"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"28","author":[{"given":"Kenneth","family":"Tuyishime","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael Adelani","family":"Adewusi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"9798_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.foodpol.2023.102843","volume":"130","author":"KA Abay","year":"2025","unstructured":"Abay KA, Amare M, Tiberti L. Improving data for livestock development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Food Policy. 2025;130:102843. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.foodpol.2023.102843.","journal-title":"Food Policy"},{"key":"9798_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compag.2024.109876","volume":"221","author":"O Adebayo","year":"2025","unstructured":"Adebayo O, Ramasamy K, Singh R. AI-enabled vision systems for livestock monitoring in smallholder farms. Comput Electron Agric. 2025;221:109876. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.compag.2024.109876.","journal-title":"Comput Electron Agric"},{"key":"9798_CR3","unstructured":"Adewusi MA, Egbowon SE, Akindoju G. COVID-19 pandemic: an indigenously designed platform to the rescue. In: Proceedings of the NCS International Conference, Innovative Systems for Digital Economy (ISDE\u20192021) (p. 32). 2021. https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/357340311"},{"key":"9798_CR4","unstructured":"Adewusi MA, Egbowon SE, Abodunrin I, Rahman K. Accra Bespoke Multidisciplinary Innovations Conference (ABMIC). 2021."},{"issue":"3","key":"9798_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"715","DOI":"10.1016\/j.agsy.2007.01.001","volume":"94","author":"A Angassa","year":"2007","unstructured":"Angassa A, Oba G. Relating long-term rainfall variability to cattle population dynamics in communal rangelands and a government ranch in southern Ethiopia. Agric Syst. 2007;94(3):715\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.agsy.2007.01.001.","journal-title":"Agric Syst"},{"issue":"5","key":"9798_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1123","DOI":"10.3390\/agronomy14051123","volume":"14","author":"SO Ara\u00fajo","year":"2024","unstructured":"Ara\u00fajo SO, Barata J, Ramalho JC. Emerging trends in AI-based livestock management: challenges and solutions. Agronomy. 2024;14(5):1123. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/agronomy14051123.","journal-title":"Agronomy"},{"issue":"12","key":"9798_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2976","DOI":"10.3390\/agronomy13122976","volume":"13","author":"SO Ara\u00fajo","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ara\u00fajo SO, Peres RS, Ramalho JC, Lidon F, Barata J. Machine learning applications in agriculture: current trends, challenges, and future perspectives. Agronomy. 2023;13(12):2976. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/agronomy13122976.","journal-title":"Agronomy"},{"key":"9798_CR8","first-page":"5","volume-title":"New advances in machine learning","author":"TO Ayodele","year":"2010","unstructured":"Ayodele TO. Types of machine learning algorithms. In: Zhang Y, editor. New advances in machine learning. InTechOpen; 2010. p. 5\u20131."},{"key":"9798_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s11119-021-09860-x","volume":"23","author":"L Benos","year":"2022","unstructured":"Benos L, Bochtis D. Artificial intelligence applications in precision livestock farming. Precision Agric. 2022;23:1\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11119-021-09860-x.","journal-title":"Precision Agric"},{"issue":"11","key":"9798_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3758","DOI":"10.3390\/s21113758","volume":"21","author":"L Benos","year":"2021","unstructured":"Benos L, Tagarakis AC, Dolias G, Berruto R, Kateris D, Bochtis D. Machine learning in agriculture: a comprehensive updated review. Sensors. 2021;21(11):3758. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/s21113758.","journal-title":"Sensors"},{"key":"9798_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1016\/j.landusepol.2013.05.003","volume":"35","author":"T Benson","year":"2013","unstructured":"Benson T, Mugarura S. Livestock development planning in Uganda: Identification of areas of opportunity and challenge. Land Use Policy. 2013;35:131\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.landusepol.2013.05.003.","journal-title":"Land Use Policy"},{"key":"9798_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1124553","DOI":"10.3389\/frai.2023.1124553","volume":"6","author":"H Blockeel","year":"2023","unstructured":"Blockeel H, Devos L, Fr\u00e9nay B, Nanfack G, Nijssen S. Decision trees: From efficient prediction to responsible AI. Front Artif Intell. 2023;6:1124553. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/frai.2023.1124553.","journal-title":"Front Artif Intell"},{"issue":"7","key":"9798_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5664","DOI":"10.3168\/jds.2016-11829","volume":"100","author":"MR Borchers","year":"2017","unstructured":"Borchers MR, Chang YM, Proudfoot KL, Wadsworth BA, Stone AE, Bewley JM. Machine-learning-based calving prediction from activity, lying, and ruminating behaviors in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2017;100(7):5664\u201374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3168\/jds.2016-11829.","journal-title":"J Dairy Sci"},{"key":"9798_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.agsy.2021.103415","volume":"199","author":"C Dang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Dang C, Chen H, Xu X, Wang H. Modeling livestock growth using hybrid regression algorithms. Agric Syst. 2022;199:103415. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.agsy.2021.103415.","journal-title":"Agric Syst"},{"key":"9798_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compag.2020.105826","volume":"179","author":"R Garc\u00eda","year":"2020","unstructured":"Garc\u00eda R, Aguilar J, Toro M, Pinto A, Rodr\u00edguez P. A systematic literature review on the use of machine learning in precision livestock farming. Comput Electron Agric. 2020;179:105826. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.compag.2020.105826.","journal-title":"Comput Electron Agric"},{"key":"9798_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compag.2020.105791","volume":"177","author":"O Garc\u00eda-Cort\u00e9s","year":"2020","unstructured":"Garc\u00eda-Cort\u00e9s O, Rivas A, Mart\u00ednez-Trinidad JF. Machine learning techniques for prediction models of cattle growth in feedlots. Comput Electron Agric. 2020;177:105791. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.compag.2020.105791.","journal-title":"Comput Electron Agric"},{"key":"9798_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compag.2021.106440","volume":"190","author":"O Garc\u00eda-Cort\u00e9s","year":"2021","unstructured":"Garc\u00eda-Cort\u00e9s O, L\u00f3pez R. Predictive modeling of cattle weight gain using machine learning approaches. Comput Electron Agric. 2021;190:106440. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.compag.2021.106440.","journal-title":"Comput Electron Agric"},{"issue":"6","key":"9798_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1237","DOI":"10.1007\/s11250-016-1087-9","volume":"48","author":"F Kabi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kabi F, Muwanika VB, Masembe C. Farmers\u2019 perception of cattle productivity constraints and potential for improvement under smallholder systems in Uganda. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2016;48(6):1237\u201344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11250-016-1087-9.","journal-title":"Trop Anim Health Prod"},{"key":"9798_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1442103","DOI":"10.3389\/fgene.2025.1442103","volume":"16","author":"G Kioroglou","year":"2025","unstructured":"Kioroglou G, Thomas E, Farkas I. Hybrid deep learning and genomic selection approaches for dairy cattle performance prediction. Front Genet. 2025;16:1442103. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fgene.2025.1442103.","journal-title":"Front Genet"},{"key":"9798_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4614-6849-3","volume-title":"Applied predictive modeling","author":"M Kuhn","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kuhn M, Johnson K. Applied predictive modeling. New York: Springer; 2013."},{"issue":"6","key":"9798_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"754","DOI":"10.1111\/age.12345","volume":"55","author":"Y Mao","year":"2024","unstructured":"Mao Y, Xu Q, Li J. Explainable deep learning for genomic trait prediction in beef cattle. Anim Genet. 2024;55(6):754\u201367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/age.12345.","journal-title":"Anim Genet"},{"issue":"3","key":"9798_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.5897\/AJAR2023.145","volume":"19","author":"C Masembe","year":"2023","unstructured":"Masembe C, Mugerwa H, Okello J. Livestock production systems in Uganda: opportunities and challenges for data-driven improvements. Afr J Agric Res. 2023;19(3):45\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5897\/AJAR2023.145.","journal-title":"Afr J Agric Res"},{"issue":"14","key":"9798_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5133","DOI":"10.3390\/s24145133","volume":"24","author":"S Montalv\u00e1n","year":"2024","unstructured":"Montalv\u00e1n S, Serrano E, L\u00f3pez R. Technologies and solutions for cattle tracking: a review. Sensors. 2024;24(14):5133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/s24145133.","journal-title":"Sensors"},{"issue":"3","key":"9798_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.5897\/IJLP2020.0691","volume":"11","author":"A Nyehangane","year":"2020","unstructured":"Nyehangane A, Kugonza DR, Okwee-Acai J, Okello S. Record-keeping and herd productivity in smallholder cattle systems in Uganda. Int J Livestock Prod. 2020;11(3):83\u201392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5897\/IJLP2020.0691.","journal-title":"Int J Livestock Prod"},{"key":"9798_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compag.2020.105528","volume":"175","author":"A Salam","year":"2020","unstructured":"Salam A, McFarlane D. Internet of Things for sustainable livestock farming: recent advances and future perspectives. Comput Electron Agric. 2020;175:105528. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.compag.2020.105528.","journal-title":"Comput Electron Agric"},{"issue":"1","key":"9798_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1080\/09712119.2023.2220134","volume":"52","author":"H Shahab","year":"2024","unstructured":"Shahab H, Ali M, Khan S. Design and implementation of an IoT-based monitoring system for livestock. J Appl Anim Res. 2024;52(1):114\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09712119.2023.2220134.","journal-title":"J Appl Anim Res"},{"issue":"11","key":"9798_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10186","DOI":"10.3168\/jds.2019-16813","volume":"102","author":"S Shahinfar","year":"2019","unstructured":"Shahinfar S, Page D, Guenther JN, Cabrera VE, Fricke PM, Shaver RD. Prediction of insemination outcomes in Holstein dairy cattle using alternative machine learning algorithms. J Dairy Sci. 2019;102(11):10186\u201396. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3168\/jds.2019-16813.","journal-title":"J Dairy Sci"},{"key":"9798_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Shnain AH, Al-Zubaidi F, Al-Dujaili J. IoT-enabled livestock health monitoring systems. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Information Technologies for Sustainable Development (pp. 145\u2013156). EDP Sciences. 2025. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1051\/it-sd\/2025.145156","DOI":"10.1051\/it-sd\/2025.145156"},{"issue":"10","key":"9798_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4073","DOI":"10.3390\/su16104073","volume":"16","author":"S Terence","year":"2024","unstructured":"Terence S, Chijioke A, Yusuf M. Systematic review on Internet of Things in smart livestock. Sustainability. 2024;16(10):4073. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/su16104073.","journal-title":"Sustainability"},{"key":"9798_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1016\/j.agsy.2017.01.023","volume":"153","author":"S Wolfert","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wolfert S, Ge L, Verdouw C, Bogaardt M-J. Big data in smart farming\u2014a review. Agric Syst. 2017;153:69\u201380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.agsy.2017.01.023.","journal-title":"Agric Syst"},{"issue":"1","key":"9798_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1093\/af\/vfz056","volume":"10","author":"S Wolfert","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wolfert S, Ge L, Verdouw C, Bogaardt M-J. Big data applications in smart livestock farming. Anim Front. 2020;10(1):26\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/af\/vfz056.","journal-title":"Anim Front"},{"issue":"9","key":"9798_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3721","DOI":"10.3390\/s24093721","volume":"24","author":"H Zhang","year":"2024","unstructured":"Zhang H, Zhou P, Liu C. Smart farming with IoT and computer vision: real-time weight estimation for cattle. Sensors. 2024;24(9):3721. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/s24093721.","journal-title":"Sensors"},{"key":"9798_CR33","unstructured":"Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS). National Population and Housing Census: Livestock and Agricultural Module Report 2024. Kampala, Uganda; 2024."},{"key":"9798_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mulindwa H, Kabasa JD, Kugonza DR. Assessment of livestock production systems in Uganda: Constraints and opportunities. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2019;51(4):1015\u20131025. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11250-018-1775-4","DOI":"10.1007\/s11250-018-1775-4"},{"key":"9798_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Liakos KG, Busato P, Moshou D, Pearson S, Bochtis D. Machine learning in agriculture: A review. Sensors. 2018;18(8):2674. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/s18082674","DOI":"10.3390\/s18082674"},{"key":"9798_CR36","unstructured":"Wijedasa MBAS, Cooray PLGK, Jayawansha RLC, Karunasekera SD, Caldera A, De Silva DD. Cattle farm management system using machine learning and image processing. Int J Res Eng Sci Manag. 2023;6(11):12\u201320."},{"key":"9798_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Srivastava S, Lopez BI, Kumar H, Jang M, Chai HH, Park W, Park JE, Lim D. Prediction of Hanwoo cattle phenotypes from genotypes using machine learning methods. Animals. 2021;11(7):2066. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ani11072066","DOI":"10.3390\/ani11072066"},{"key":"9798_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jones JW, Antle JM, Basso B, Boote KJ, Conant RT, Foster I, \u2026 Rosenzweig C. Brief history of agricultural systems modeling. Agric Syst. 2017;155:240\u2013254. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.agsy.2016.05.014","DOI":"10.1016\/j.agsy.2016.05.014"},{"key":"9798_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Rivero MJ, L\u00f3pez-Villalobos N, Evans A, Berndt A, Cartmill A, Neal AL, \u2026 Lee MRF. Key traits for ruminant livestock across diverse production systems in the context of climate change. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2021;33(2):1\u201319. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1071\/RD20205","DOI":"10.1071\/RD20205"},{"key":"9798_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Shahinfar S, Page D, Guenther JN, Cabrera VE, Fricke PM, Weigel KA. Prediction of insemination outcomes in Holstein dairy cattle using alternative machine learning algorithms. J Dairy Sci. 2014;97(2):731\u2013742. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3168\/jds.2013-6693","DOI":"10.3168\/jds.2013-6693"},{"key":"9798_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"de Moraes Weber VA, Weber FDL, Gomes RC, Oliveira J\u00fanior ADS, Menezes GV, Abreu UGP, Belete NADS, Pistori H. Prediction of Girolando cattle weight by means of body measurements extracted from images. Rev Bras Zootec. 2020;49:e20190110. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.37496\/RBZ4920190110","DOI":"10.37496\/RBZ4920190110"},{"key":"9798_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wang Z, Vienola K, Rotondo V, Wood KM, Tulpan D. Applications of machine learning for livestock body weight prediction from digital images. J Anim Sci. 2021;99(2):skab022. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jas\/skab022","DOI":"10.1093\/jas\/skab022"}],"container-title":["Discover Computing"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10791-025-09798-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10791-025-09798-6\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10791-025-09798-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,22]],"date-time":"2025-11-22T03:02:43Z","timestamp":1763780563000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10791-025-09798-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,21]]},"references-count":42,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["9798"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10791-025-09798-6","relation":{"has-preprint":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.21203\/rs.3.rs-6880874\/v1","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["2948-2992"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2948-2992","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,21]]},"assertion":[{"value":"12 June 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 November 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 November 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The study was approved by the Directorate of Higher Degrees and Research of Kampala International University. The research utilized secondary cattle herd records and environmental datasets; therefore, no direct experiments on animals or humans were conducted.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"Not applicable, as this study did not involve human participants.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable, as no personal data, images, or identifying information are included in this manuscript.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"275"}}