{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T07:20:51Z","timestamp":1740122451437,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":134,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,31]],"date-time":"2022-05-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1653955200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,31]],"date-time":"2022-05-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1653955200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100005856","name":"Faculdade de Ci\u00eancias e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["UID\/CEC\/04516\/2019"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["UID\/CEC\/04516\/2019"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100005856","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100010665","name":"H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["690974"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["690974"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100010665","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J of Log Lang and Inf"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10849-022-09369-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,31]],"date-time":"2022-05-31T15:05:17Z","timestamp":1654009517000},"page":"555-589","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Belief Revision and Computational Argumentation: A Critical Comparison"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"31","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5439-9561","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Pietro","family":"Baroni","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9618-2421","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Eduardo","family":"Ferm\u00e9","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4771-4265","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Massimiliano","family":"Giacomin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6247-0428","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Guillermo Ricardo","family":"Simari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,31]]},"reference":[{"key":"9369_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alchourr\u00f3n, C., & Makinson, D. (1981). Hierarchies of regulations and their logic. In Hilpinen, R. (eds.) New studies in deontic logic: Norms, actions, and the foundations of ethics (pp. 125\u2013148).","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-009-8484-4_5"},{"key":"9369_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-2567.1982.tb00480.x","volume":"48","author":"C Alchourr\u00f3n","year":"1982","unstructured":"Alchourr\u00f3n, C., & Makinson, D. (1982). On the logic of theory change: Contraction functions and their associated revision functions. Theoria, 48, 14\u201337.","journal-title":"Theoria"},{"issue":"2","key":"9369_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.2307\/2274239","volume":"50","author":"CE Alchourr\u00f3n","year":"1985","unstructured":"Alchourr\u00f3n, C. E., G\u00e4rdenfors, P., & Makinson, D. (1985). On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 50(2), 510\u2013530.","journal-title":"Journal of Symbolic Logic"},{"issue":"3","key":"9369_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1609\/aimag.v38i3.2704","volume":"38","author":"K Atkinson","year":"2017","unstructured":"Atkinson, K., Baroni, P., Giacomin, M., Hunter, A., Prakken, H., Reed, C., et al. (2017). Towards artificial argumentation. AI Magazine, 38(3), 25\u201336.","journal-title":"AI Magazine"},{"issue":"4","key":"9369_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888911000166","volume":"26","author":"P Baroni","year":"2011","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Caminada, M., & Giacomin, M. (2011). An introduction to argumentation semantics. Knowledge Engineering Review, 26(4), 365\u2013410.","journal-title":"Knowledge Engineering Review"},{"key":"9369_CR6","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Gabbay, D., Giacomin, M., & van\u00a0der Torre, L. (eds). (2018). Handbook of formal argumentation. College Publications."},{"issue":"10\u201315","key":"9369_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"675","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.004","volume":"171","author":"P Baroni","year":"2007","unstructured":"Baroni, P., & Giacomin, M. (2007). On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics. Artificial Intelligence, 171(10\u201315), 675\u2013700.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9369_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baroni, P., & Giacomin, M. Semantics of abstract argument systems. In Simari, G. R., & Rahwan, I. (eds.), Argumentation in artificial intelligence (pp. 25\u201344). Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_2"},{"issue":"6","key":"9369_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"854","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2009.02.006","volume":"50","author":"P Baroni","year":"2009","unstructured":"Baroni, P., & Giacomin, M. (2009). Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 50(6), 854\u2013866.","journal-title":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning"},{"key":"9369_CR10","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Giacomin, M., & Guida, G. (2004). Towards a formalization of skepticism in extension-based argumentation semantics. In Proceedings of 4th workshop on computational models of natural argument (CMNA 2004) (pp. 47\u201352)."},{"key":"9369_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2018.01.003","volume":"257","author":"P Baroni","year":"2018","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Giacomin, M., & Liao, B. (2018). A general semi-structured formalism for computational argumentation: Definition, properties, and examples of application. Artificial Intelligence, 257, 158\u2013207.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"issue":"2","key":"9369_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1142\/S0218213007003278","volume":"16","author":"P Baroni","year":"2007","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Guida, G., & Giacomin, M. (2007). A- and v-uncertainty: An exploration about uncertainty modeling from a knowledge engineering perspective. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools, 16(2), 161\u2013194.","journal-title":"International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools"},{"key":"9369_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"793","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.1.11428","volume":"66","author":"P Baroni","year":"2019","unstructured":"Baroni, P., & Riveret, R. (2019). Enhancing statement evaluation in argumentation via multi-labelling systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 66, 793\u2013860.","journal-title":"Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research"},{"key":"9369_CR14","unstructured":"Baumann, R., & Brewka, G. (2015). AGM meets abstract argumentation: Expansion and revision for dung frameworks. In Yang, Q., & Wooldridge, M. J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th international joint conference on artificial intelligence, IJCAI 2015, Argentina (pp. 2734\u20132740). AAAI Press."},{"key":"9369_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baumann, R., & Brewka, G. (2019). Extension removal in abstract argumentation\u2014An axiomatic approach. In The Thirty-Third AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, AAAI 2019, 31st innovative applications of artificial intelligence conference, IAAI 2019, The 9th AAAI Symposium on educational advances in artificial intelligence, EAAI 2019, USA (pp. 2670\u20132677). AAAI Press.","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v33i01.33012670"},{"issue":"10\u201315","key":"9369_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.05.001","volume":"171","author":"TJM Bench-Capon","year":"2007","unstructured":"Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Dunne, P. E. (2007). Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 171(10\u201315), 619\u2013641.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9369_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Besnard, P., Garc\u00eda, A. J., Hunter, A., Modgil, S., Prakken, H., Simari, G. R., & Toni, F. (eds.), (2014). Argument & computation\u2014Special issue: Tutorials on structured argumentation5(1). Taylor & Francis Online.","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2013.869764"},{"issue":"1","key":"9369_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2013.869764","volume":"5","author":"P Besnard","year":"2014","unstructured":"Besnard, P., Garc\u00eda, A. J., Hunter, A., Modgil, S., Prakken, H., Simari, G. R., & Toni, F. (2014). Introduction to structured argumentation. Argument & Computation, 5(1), 1\u20134.","journal-title":"Argument & Computation"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"9369_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(01)00071-6","volume":"128","author":"P Besnard","year":"2001","unstructured":"Besnard, P., & Hunter, A. (2001). A logic-based theory of deductive arguments. Artificial Intelligence, 128(1\u20132), 203\u2013235.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9369_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/9780262026437.001.0001","volume-title":"Elements of argumentation","author":"P Besnard","year":"2008","unstructured":"Besnard, P., & Hunter, A. (2008). Elements of argumentation. Cambridge: MIT Press."},{"key":"9369_CR21","unstructured":"Birnbaum, L. (1982). Argument molecules: A functional representation of argument structure. In Proceedings of the 2nd national conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI) (pp. 63\u201365)."},{"key":"9369_CR22","unstructured":"Birnbaum, L., Flowers, M., & McGuire, R. (1980). Towards an AI model of argumentation. In Proceedings of the 1st national conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI) (pp. 313\u2013315)."},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"9369_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(97)00015-5","volume":"93","author":"A Bondarenko","year":"1997","unstructured":"Bondarenko, A., Dung, P. M., Kowalski, R. A., & Toni, F. (1997). An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 93(1\u20132), 63\u2013101.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9369_CR24","unstructured":"Booth, R., & Chandler, J. (2016). Extending the Harper identity to iterated belief change. In Proceedings of the twenty-fifth international joint conference on artificial intelligence, IJCAI 2016, New York, NY, USA, 9\u201315 July 2016 (pp. 987\u2013993)."},{"key":"9369_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.1874","volume":"26","author":"R Booth","year":"2006","unstructured":"Booth, R., & Meyer, T. (2006). Admissible and restrained revision. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 26, 127\u2013151.","journal-title":"Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research"},{"key":"9369_CR26","unstructured":"Boutilier, C. (1993). Revision sequences and nested conditionals. In Proceedings of 13th international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI\u201993) (pp. 519\u2013525)."},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"9369_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(97)00066-0","volume":"98","author":"C Boutilier","year":"1998","unstructured":"Boutilier, C. (1998). A unified model of qualitative belief change: A dynamical systems perspective. Artificial Intelligence, 98(1\u20132), 281\u2013316.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"issue":"2","key":"9369_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/11.2.257","volume":"11","author":"G Brewka","year":"2001","unstructured":"Brewka, G. (2001). Dynamic argument systems: A formal model of argumentation processes based on situation calculus. Journal of Logic and Computation, 11(2), 257\u2013282.","journal-title":"Journal of Logic and Computation"},{"key":"9369_CR29","unstructured":"Caminada, M. (2018). Rationality postulates: Applying argumentation theory for non-monotonic reasoning. In Baroni, P., Gabbay, D., Giacomin, M., & van\u00a0der Torre, L. (eds.), Handbook of formal argumentation (pp. 771\u2013795). College Publications."},{"issue":"5\u20136","key":"9369_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.02.003","volume":"171","author":"M Caminada","year":"2007","unstructured":"Caminada, M., & Amgoud, L. (2007). On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms. Artificial Intelligence, 171(5\u20136), 286\u2013310.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9369_CR31","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Belief revision meets philosophy of science, logic, epistemology, and the unity of science","author":"R Carnota","year":"2011","unstructured":"Carnota, R., & Rodr\u00edguez, R. (2011). AGM theory and artificial intelligence. In E. J. Olsson & S. Enqvist (Eds.), Belief revision meets philosophy of science, logic, epistemology, and the unity of science (Vol. 21, pp. 1\u201342). Berlin: Springer."},{"key":"9369_CR32","unstructured":"Casini, G., Ferm\u00e9, E., Meyer, T., & Varzinczak., I. (2018). A semantic perspective on belief change in a preferential non-monotonic framework. In Proceedings of the sixteenth international conference on principles of knowledge representation and reasoning (KR 2018) (pp. 220\u2013229). AAAI Press."},{"key":"9369_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.2965","volume":"38","author":"C Cayrol","year":"2010","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Dupin de Saint-Cyr, F., & Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C. (2010). Change in abstract argumentation frameworks: Adding an argument. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Reserach (JAIR), 38, 49\u201384.","journal-title":"Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Reserach (JAIR)"},{"issue":"4","key":"9369_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1145\/371578.371581","volume":"32","author":"CI Ches\u00f1evar","year":"2000","unstructured":"Ches\u00f1evar, C. I., Maguitman, A. G., & Loui, R. P. (2000). Logical models of argument. ACM Computing Surveys, 32(4), 337\u2013383.","journal-title":"ACM Computing Surveys"},{"key":"9369_CR35","unstructured":"Chopra, S., & Parikh, R. (1999). An inconsistency tolerant model for belief representation and belief revision. In Proceedings of the sixteenth international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI 99) (pp. 192\u2013199)."},{"key":"9369_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cohen, R. (1981). Investigation of processing strategies for the structural analysis of arguments. In Proceedings of the 19th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (pp. 71\u201375).","DOI":"10.3115\/981923.981943"},{"key":"9369_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Coste-Marquis, S., Konieczny, S., Mailly, J.-G., & Marquis, P. (2014a). A translation-based approach for revision of argumentation frameworks. In Ferm\u00e9, E., & Leite, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 14th European conference logics in artificial intelligence, JELIA 2014, Portugal, volume 8761 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 397\u2013411). Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-11558-0_28"},{"key":"9369_CR38","unstructured":"Coste-Marquis, S., Konieczny, S., Mailly, J.-G., & Marquis, P. (2014b). On the revision of argumentation systems: Minimal change of arguments statuses. In Baral, C., De Giacomo, & G., Eiter, T. (eds.), Principles of knowledge representation and reasoning: Proceedings of the 14th international conference, KR 2014, Austria. AAAI Press."},{"key":"9369_CR39","unstructured":"Dalal, M. (1988). Investigations into a theory of knowledge base revision: Preliminary report. In Seventh national conference on artificial intelligence, (AAAI-88) (pp. 475\u2013479), St. Paul."},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"9369_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(96)00038-0","volume":"89","author":"A Darwiche","year":"1997","unstructured":"Darwiche, A., & Pearl, J. (1997). On the logic of iterated belief revision. Artificial Intelligence, 89(1\u20132), 1\u201329.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9369_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2019.05.002","volume":"275","author":"CAD Deagustini","year":"2019","unstructured":"Deagustini, C. A. D., Martinez, M. V., Falappa, M. A., & Simari, G. R. (2019). Belief base contraction by belief accrual. Artificial Intelligence, 275, 78\u2013103.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9369_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"236","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ins.2020.10.050","volume":"555","author":"CAD Deagustini","year":"2021","unstructured":"Deagustini, C. A. D., Teze, J. C., Martinez, M. V., Falappa, M. A., & Simari, G. R. (2021). Merging existential rules programs in multi-agent contexts through credibility accrual. Information Sciences, 555, 236\u2013259.","journal-title":"Information Sciences"},{"key":"9369_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1080\/11663081.1997.10510906","volume":"7","author":"A Del Val","year":"1997","unstructured":"Del Val, A. (1997). Non monotonic reasoning and belief revision: Syntactic, semantic, foundational, and coherence approaches. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 7, 213\u2013240.","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics"},{"issue":"3","key":"9369_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"396","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2011.09.008","volume":"53","author":"JP Delgrande","year":"2012","unstructured":"Delgrande, J. P. (2012). Revising beliefs on the basis of evidence. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 53(3), 396\u2013412.","journal-title":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning"},{"key":"9369_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2017.11.013","volume":"93","author":"M Diller","year":"2018","unstructured":"Diller, M., Haret, A., Linsbichler, T., R\u00fcmmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2018). An extension-based approach to belief revision in abstract argumentation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 93, 395\u2013423.","journal-title":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning"},{"issue":"3","key":"9369_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-180425","volume":"9","author":"S Doutre","year":"2018","unstructured":"Doutre, S., & Mailly, J.-G. (2018). Constraints and changes: A survey of abstract argumentation dynamics. Argument Computation, 9(3), 223\u2013248.","journal-title":"Argument Computation"},{"key":"9369_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(79)90008-0","volume":"12","author":"J Doyle","year":"1979","unstructured":"Doyle, J. (1979). A truth maintenance system. Artificial Intelligence, 12, 231\u2013272.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9369_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511526664.002","volume-title":"Belief revision","author":"J Doyle","year":"1992","unstructured":"Doyle, J. (1992). Reason maintenance and belief revision: Foundations versus coherence theories. In P. G\u00e4rdenfors (Ed.), Belief revision (pp. 29\u201351). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9369_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1145\/1056441.1056442","volume":"71","author":"J Doyle","year":"1980","unstructured":"Doyle, J., & London, P. (1980). A selected descriptor-indexed bibliography to the literature on belief revision. SIGART Bulletin, 71, 7\u201322.","journal-title":"SIGART Bulletin"},{"key":"9369_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dubois, D., Everaere, P., Konieczny, S., & Papini., O. (2020). Main issues in belief revision, belief merging and information fusion. In A guided tour of artificial intelligence research (pp. 441\u2013485). Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-06164-7_14"},{"key":"9369_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1997). Focusing vs. belief revision: A fundamental distinction when dealing with generic knowledge. In Qualitative and quantitative practical reasoning (pp. 96\u2013107). Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/BFb0035615"},{"issue":"3","key":"9369_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1109\/3468.487961","volume":"26","author":"D Dubois","year":"1996","unstructured":"Dubois, D., Prade, H., & Smets, P. (1996). Representing partial ignorance. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A, 26(3), 361\u2013377.","journal-title":"IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A"},{"issue":"2","key":"9369_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P. M. (1995). On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77(2), 321\u2013357.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9369_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2016.04.003","volume":"75","author":"F Dupin de Saint-Cyr","year":"2016","unstructured":"Dupin de Saint-Cyr, F., Bisquert, P., Cayrol, C., & Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C. (2016). Argumentation update in YALLA (yet another logic language for argumentation). International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 75, 57\u201392.","journal-title":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning"},{"key":"9369_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fagin, R., Ullman, J., & Vardi, M. (1983). On the semantics of updates in databases. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD symposium on principles of database systems (pp. 352\u2013365).","DOI":"10.1145\/588058.588100"},{"issue":"1","key":"9369_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-011-9217-z","volume":"42","author":"MA Falappa","year":"2013","unstructured":"Falappa, M. A., Javier Garc\u00eda, A., Kern-Isberner, G., & Simari, G. R. (2013). Stratified belief bases revision with argumentative inference. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 42(1), 161\u2013193.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"9369_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(02)00258-8","volume":"141","author":"MA Falappa","year":"2002","unstructured":"Falappa, M. A., Kern-Isberner, G., & Simari, G. R. (2002). Belief revision, explanations and defeasible reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 141, 1\u201328.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9369_CR58","unstructured":"Ferm\u00e9, E. (1992). Actualizaci\u00f3n de bases de conocimiento usando teor\u00edas de cambio de creencia. In 3rd Ibero-American conference on artificial intelligence 1992 (pp. 419\u2013436)."},{"key":"9369_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-9817-0_12","volume-title":"Frontiers in belief revision, applied logic series","author":"E Ferm\u00e9","year":"2001","unstructured":"Ferm\u00e9, E. (2001). Five faces of recovery. In H. Rott & M.-A. Williams (Eds.), Frontiers in belief revision, applied logic series (pp. 247\u2013259). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers."},{"key":"9369_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-011-9171-9","volume":"40","author":"E Ferm\u00e9","year":"2011","unstructured":"Ferm\u00e9, E., & Hansson, S. O. (2011). AGM 25 years: Twenty-five years of research in belief change. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 40, 295\u2013331.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"9369_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-60535-7","volume-title":"Belief change: Introduction and overview. Springer Briefs in Computer Science Series","author":"E Ferm\u00e9","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ferm\u00e9, E., & Hansson, S. O. (2018). Belief change: Introduction and overview. Springer Briefs in Computer Science Series. Berlin: Springer."},{"key":"9369_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2004.04.007","volume":"157","author":"E Ferm\u00e9","year":"2004","unstructured":"Ferm\u00e9, E., & Rott, H. (2004). Revision by comparison. Artificial Intelligence, 157, 5\u201347.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"issue":"1","key":"9369_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1186\/s13173-018-0072-4","volume":"24","author":"E Ferm\u00e9","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ferm\u00e9, E., & Wassermann, R. (2018). On the logic of theory change: Iteration of expansion. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society, 24(1), 8.","journal-title":"Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society"},{"issue":"3","key":"9369_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1005294718935","volume":"63","author":"EL Ferm\u00e9","year":"1999","unstructured":"Ferm\u00e9, E. L., & Hansson, S. O. (1999). Selective revision. Studia Logica, 63(3), 331\u2013342.","journal-title":"Studia Logica"},{"issue":"4","key":"9369_CR65","first-page":"395","volume":"19","author":"G Flouris","year":"2006","unstructured":"Flouris, G. (2006). On belief change in ontology evolution. AI Communications, 19(4), 395\u2013397.","journal-title":"AI Communications"},{"issue":"2","key":"9369_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888908001367","volume":"23","author":"G Flouris","year":"2008","unstructured":"Flouris, G., Manakanatas, D., Kondylakis, H., Plexousakis, D., & Antoniou, G. (2008). Ontology change: Classification and survey. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 23(2), 117\u2013152.","journal-title":"The Knowledge Engineering Review"},{"key":"9369_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Friedman, N., & Halpern, J. Y. (1994). A knowledge-based framework for belief change\u2014Part i: Foundations. In Proceedings of Fifth conference on theoretical aspects of reasoning about knowledge (pp. 44\u201364). Morgan Kaufmann.","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-1-4832-1453-5.50007-6"},{"issue":"2","key":"9369_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00284974","volume":"20","author":"A Fuhrmann","year":"1991","unstructured":"Fuhrmann, A. (1991). Theory contraction through base contraction. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 20(2), 175\u2013203.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"issue":"1","key":"9369_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1017\/S1471068403001674","volume":"4","author":"AJ Garc\u00eda","year":"2004","unstructured":"Garc\u00eda, A. J., & Simari, G. R. (2004). Defeasible logic programming: An argumentative approach. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 4(1), 95\u2013138.","journal-title":"Theory and Practice of Logic Programming"},{"issue":"3","key":"9369_CR70","first-page":"203","volume":"18","author":"P G\u00e4rdenfors","year":"1981","unstructured":"G\u00e4rdenfors, P. (1981). Conditionals and changes of belief. American Philosophical Quarterly, 18(3), 203\u2013211.","journal-title":"American Philosophical Quarterly"},{"key":"9369_CR71","unstructured":"G\u00e4rdenfors, P. (1982). Rules for rational changes of belief. In Pauli, T. (eds.), Philosophical Essays dedicated to Lennart $$\\dot{{\\rm A}}$$qvist on his fiftieth birthday, number\u00a034 in Philosophical Studies (pp. 88\u2013101)."},{"key":"9369_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1080\/00048408412341331","volume":"62","author":"P G\u00e4rdenfors","year":"1984","unstructured":"G\u00e4rdenfors, P. (1984). Epistemic importance and minimal changes of belief. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 62, 136\u2013157.","journal-title":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"9369_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.2307\/2185133","volume":"95","author":"P G\u00e4rdenfors","year":"1986","unstructured":"G\u00e4rdenfors, P. (1986). Belief revisions and the Ramsey test for conditionals. Philosophical Review, 95, 81\u201393.","journal-title":"Philosophical Review"},{"key":"9369_CR74","volume-title":"Knowledge in flux: Modeling the dynamics of epistemic states","author":"P G\u00e4rdenfors","year":"1988","unstructured":"G\u00e4rdenfors, P. (1988). Knowledge in flux: Modeling the dynamics of epistemic states. Cambridge: MIT Press."},{"key":"9369_CR75","first-page":"24","volume":"44","author":"P G\u00e4rdenfors","year":"1990","unstructured":"G\u00e4rdenfors, P. (1990). The dynamics of belief systems: Foundations vs. coherence theories. Revue Internationale of Philosophie, 44, 24\u201346.","journal-title":"Revue Internationale of Philosophie"},{"issue":"2","key":"9369_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-011-9174-6","volume":"40","author":"P G\u00e4rdenfors","year":"2011","unstructured":"G\u00e4rdenfors, P. (2011). Notes on the history of ideas behind AGM. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 40(2), 115\u2013120.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"9369_CR77","unstructured":"G\u00e4rdenfors, P., & Makinson, D. (1988). Revisions of knowledge systems using epistemic entrenchment. In Vardi, M. Y. (eds.), Proceedings of the second conference on theoretical aspects of reasoning about knowledge (pp. 83\u201395). Los Altos, 1988. Morgan Kaufmann."},{"issue":"9\u201310","key":"9369_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1479","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2010.12.003","volume":"175","author":"N Gorogiannis","year":"2011","unstructured":"Gorogiannis, N., & Hunter, A. (2011). Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: Postulates and properties. Artificial Intelligence, 175(9\u201310), 1479\u20131497.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9369_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00370186","volume":"50","author":"SO Hansson","year":"1991","unstructured":"Hansson, S. O. (1991). Belief contraction without recovery. Studia Logica, 50, 251\u2013260.","journal-title":"Studia Logica"},{"issue":"2","key":"9369_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"602","DOI":"10.2307\/2275221","volume":"58","author":"SO Hansson","year":"1993","unstructured":"Hansson, S. O. (1993). Theory contraction and base contraction unified. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 58(2), 602\u2013625.","journal-title":"The Journal of Symbolic Logic"},{"key":"9369_CR81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hansson, S. O. (1998). Revision of belief sets and belief bases. In Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (eds.), Belief change (pp. 17\u201375). Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-011-5054-5_2"},{"key":"9369_CR82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hansson, S. O. (1999a). Recovery and epistemic residue. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 8(4), 421\u2013428.","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008316915066"},{"key":"9369_CR83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hansson, S. O. (1999b). A survey of non-prioritized belief revision. Erkenntnis, 50, 413\u2013427.","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1005534223776"},{"key":"9369_CR84","unstructured":"Hansson, S. O. (2017). Logic of belief revision. In Zalta, E. N. (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, winter 2017."},{"key":"9369_CR85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hansson, S. O., & Olsson, E. (1999). Providing foundations for coherentism. Erkenntnis,51, 243\u2013265.","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1005510414170"},{"issue":"1","key":"9369_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1014654208944","volume":"70","author":"SO Hansson","year":"2002","unstructured":"Hansson, S. O., & Wassermann, R. (2002). Local change. Studia Logica, 70(1), 49\u201376.","journal-title":"Studia Logica"},{"key":"9369_CR87","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.3132","volume":"40","author":"A Hunter","year":"2011","unstructured":"Hunter, A., & Delgrande, J. P. (2011). Iterated belief change due to actions and observations. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Research (JAIR), 40, 269\u2013304.","journal-title":"Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Research (JAIR)"},{"issue":"1","key":"9369_CR88","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2006.11.002","volume":"171","author":"Y Jin","year":"2007","unstructured":"Jin, Y., & Thielscher, M. (2007). Iterated belief revision, revised. Artificial Intelligence, 171(1), 1\u201318.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9369_CR89","unstructured":"Katsuno, H., & Mendelzon, A. O. (1991). On the difference between updating a knowledge base and revising it. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR\u201991 (pp. 387\u2013394)."},{"issue":"3","key":"9369_CR90","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(91)90069-V","volume":"52","author":"H Katsuno","year":"1991","unstructured":"Katsuno, H., & Mendelzon, A. O. (1991). Propositional knowledge base revision and minimal change. Artificial Intelligence, 52(3), 263\u2013294.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"issue":"7","key":"9369_CR91","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"620","DOI":"10.1109\/TSE.1985.232506","volume":"11","author":"AM Keller","year":"1985","unstructured":"Keller, A. M., & Winslett, M. (1985). On the use of an extended relational model to handle changing incomplete information. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 11(7), 620\u2013633.","journal-title":"IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering"},{"key":"9369_CR92","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Konieczny, S., Pino Perez, R. (2017). On iterated contraction: Syntactic characterization, representation theorem and limitations of the Levi identity. In Moral, S., Pivert, O., S\u00e1nchez, D., Mar\u00edn, N. (eds.), Scalable uncertainty management (pp. 348\u2013362), Cham: Springer International Publishing.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-67582-4_25"},{"key":"9369_CR93","unstructured":"Koons, R. (2017). Defeasible reasoning. In Zalta, E. N. (eds). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, winter 2017."},{"key":"9369_CR94","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Levi, I. (1977). Subjunctives, dispositions, and chances. Synt$$\\grave{{\\rm h}}$$ese, 34, 423\u2013455.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00485649"},{"key":"9369_CR95","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511663819","volume-title":"The fixation of belief and its undoing: Changing beliefs through inquiry","author":"I Levi","year":"1991","unstructured":"Levi, I. (1991). The fixation of belief and its undoing: Changing beliefs through inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"issue":"11","key":"9369_CR96","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1790","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2011.03.006","volume":"175","author":"BS Liao","year":"2011","unstructured":"Liao, B. S., Jin, L., & Koons, R. C. (2011). Dynamics of argumentation systems: A division-based method. Artificial Intelligence, 175(11), 1790\u20131814.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9369_CR97","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8640.1987.tb00178.x","volume":"3","author":"RP Loui","year":"1987","unstructured":"Loui, R. P. (1987). Defeat among arguments: A system of defeasible inference. Computational Intelligence, 3, 100\u2013106.","journal-title":"Computational Intelligence"},{"key":"9369_CR98","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00431184","volume":"16","author":"D Makinson","year":"1987","unstructured":"Makinson, D. (1987). On the status of the postulate of recovery in the logic of theory change. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 16, 383\u2013394.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"issue":"1","key":"9369_CR99","first-page":"3","volume":"1","author":"D Makinson","year":"1996","unstructured":"Makinson, D. (1996). In memoriam carlos eduardo alchourron. Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1(1), 3\u201310.","journal-title":"Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"9369_CR100","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-2567.1997.tb00737.x","volume":"63","author":"D Makinson","year":"1997","unstructured":"Makinson, D. (1997). Screened revision. Theoria, 63, 14\u201323.","journal-title":"Theoria"},{"key":"9369_CR101","unstructured":"Makinson, D., et al. (1997). On the force of some apparent counterexamples to recovery. pp. In Garz\u00f3n Vald\u00e9z, E. (Ed.), Normative systems in legal and moral theory: Festschrift for Carlos Alchourr\u00f3n and Eugenio Bulygin (pp. 475\u2013481). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot."},{"key":"9369_CR102","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"495","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01049408","volume":"23","author":"A Nayak","year":"1994","unstructured":"Nayak, A. (1994). Foundational belief change. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 23, 495\u2013533.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"9369_CR103","unstructured":"Nebel, B. (1989). A knowledge level analysis of belief revision. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on principles of knowledge representation and reasoning (KR\u201989) (pp. 301\u2013311)."},{"key":"9369_CR104","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nebel, B. (1992). Syntax-based approaches to belief revision. In G\u00e4rdenfors, P. (eds.), Belief revision (pp. 52\u201388). Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511526664.003"},{"key":"9369_CR105","unstructured":"Olsson, E. (2017). Coherentist theories of epistemic justification. In Zalta, E. N. (eds., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, spring 2017 edition."},{"key":"9369_CR106","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Peppas, P. (2008). Belief revision. In van Harmelen, F., Lifschitz, V., & Porter, B. (eds.), Handbook of knowledge representation, foundations of artificial intelligence, chapter\u00a08 (pp. 317\u2013359). Elsevier.","DOI":"10.1016\/S1574-6526(07)03008-8"},{"key":"9369_CR107","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Peppas, P. (2014). A panorama of iterated revision. In David Makinson on classical methods for non-classical problems (pp. 71\u201394). Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-7759-0_5"},{"issue":"4","key":"9369_CR108","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1207\/s15516709cog1104_4","volume":"11","author":"JL Pollock","year":"1987","unstructured":"Pollock, J. L. (1987). Defeasible reasoning. Cognitive Science, 11(4), 481\u2013518.","journal-title":"Cognitive Science"},{"issue":"1","key":"9369_CR109","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(92)90103-5","volume":"57","author":"JL Pollock","year":"1992","unstructured":"Pollock, J. L. (1992). How to reason defeasibly. Artificial Intelligence, 57(1), 1\u201342.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9369_CR110","unstructured":"Prakken, H. (2006). Combining sceptical epistemic reasoning with credulous practical reasoning. In Proceedings of of 1st international conference on computational models of argument (COMMA 2006), volume 144 of frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications (pp. 311\u2013322). IOS Press."},{"issue":"2","key":"9369_CR111","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1080\/19462160903564592","volume":"1","author":"H Prakken","year":"2010","unstructured":"Prakken, H. (2010). An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. Argument & Computation, 1(2), 93\u2013124.","journal-title":"Argument & Computation"},{"key":"9369_CR112","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prakken, H., & Sartor, G. (1997). Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 7(1).","DOI":"10.1080\/11663081.1997.10510900"},{"key":"9369_CR113","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prakken, H., & Vreeswijk, G. A. W. (2001). Logics for defeasible argumentation. In Gabbay, D. M., & Guenthner, F. (eds.), Handbook of philosophical logic, second edition. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-0456-4_3"},{"issue":"3","key":"9369_CR114","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-2567.2001.tb00204.x","volume":"67","author":"G Priest","year":"2001","unstructured":"Priest, G. (2001). Paraconsistent belief revision. Theoria, 67(3), 214\u2013228.","journal-title":"Theoria"},{"issue":"6","key":"9369_CR115","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1109\/MIS.2007.109","volume":"22","author":"I Rahwan","year":"2007","unstructured":"Rahwan, I., & McBurney, P. (2007). Guest editors introduction: Argumentation technology. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22(6), 21\u201323.","journal-title":"IEEE Intelligent Systems"},{"key":"9369_CR116","unstructured":"Rahwan, I., & Simari, G. R. (Eds.). (2009). Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Ny: Springer."},{"key":"9369_CR117","unstructured":"Rotstein, N. D., Moguillansky, M. O., Garc\u00eda, A. J., & Simari, G. R. (2010). A dynamic argumentation framework. In Proceedings of 3rd international conference on computational models of argument (COMMA 2010) (pp. 427\u2013438)."},{"issue":"9","key":"9369_CR118","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.2307\/2678489","volume":"97","author":"H Rott","year":"2000","unstructured":"Rott, H. (2000). Two dogmas of belief revision. Journal of Philosophy, 97(9), 503\u2013522.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"9369_CR119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198503064.001.0001","volume-title":"Change, choice and inference","author":"H Rott","year":"2001","unstructured":"Rott, H. (2001). Change, choice and inference. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"9369_CR120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rott, H. (2009). Shifting priorities: Simple representations for twenty-seven iterated theory change operators. In Wansing, H., Makinson, D., & Malinowski, J. (eds.), Towards Mathematical Philosophy, number\u00a028 in Trends in Logic (pp. 269\u2013296). Springer Science.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4020-9084-4_14"},{"issue":"2\u20133","key":"9369_CR121","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(92)90069-A","volume":"53","author":"GR Simari","year":"1992","unstructured":"Simari, G. R., & Loui, R. P. (1992). A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation. Artificial Intelligence, 53(2\u20133), 125\u2013157.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"issue":"1","key":"9369_CR122","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1475-4975.1980.tb00394.x","volume":"5","author":"E Sosa","year":"1980","unstructured":"Sosa, E. (1980). The raft and the pyramid: Coherence versus foundations in the theory of knowledge. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 5(1), 3\u201326.","journal-title":"Midwest Studies in Philosophy"},{"key":"9369_CR123","unstructured":"Strasser, C., & Antonelli, G. A. (2019). Non-monotonic Logic. In Zalta, E. N. (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, summer 2019."},{"key":"9369_CR124","unstructured":"Testa, R., Ferm\u00e9, E., Garapa, M., & Reis, M. D. L. (2018). How to construct remainder sets for paraconsistent revisions. In Proceedings of the 13th international workshop on non-monotonic reasoning (NMR) (pp. 119\u2013125), Tempe."},{"issue":"4","key":"9369_CR125","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"632","DOI":"10.1093\/jigpal\/jzx010","volume":"25","author":"RR Testa","year":"2017","unstructured":"Testa, R. R., Coniglio, M. E., & Ribeiro, M. M. (2017). Agm-like paraconsistent belief change. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 25(4), 632\u2013672.","journal-title":"Logic Journal of the IGPL"},{"key":"9369_CR126","unstructured":"van\u00a0der Torre, L., & Vesic, S. (2018). The principle-based approach to abstract argumentation semantics. In Baroni, P., Gabbay, D., Giacomin, M., & van\u00a0der Torre, L. (eds.), Handbook of formal argumentation (pp. 797\u2013837). College Publications."},{"key":"9369_CR127","unstructured":"van Harmelen, F., Lifschitz, V., & Porter, B. (2008). Handbook of Knowledge Representation: Elsevier Science."},{"key":"9369_CR128","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.2307\/2026735","volume":"87","author":"D Walton","year":"1990","unstructured":"Walton, D. (1990). What is reasoning? What is an argument? Journal of Philosophical Logic, 87, 399\u2013419.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"9369_CR129","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes","author":"D Walton","year":"2008","unstructured":"Walton, D., Reed, C., & Macagno, F. (2008). Argumentation schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9369_CR130","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning","author":"DN Walton","year":"1996","unstructured":"Walton, D. N. (1996). Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates."},{"key":"9369_CR131","volume-title":"Commitment in dialogue: Basic concept of interpersonal reasoning","author":"DN Walton","year":"1995","unstructured":"Walton, D. N., & Krabbe, E. (1995). Commitment in dialogue: Basic concept of interpersonal reasoning. New York: State University of New York Press."},{"key":"9369_CR132","unstructured":"Wassermann, R., & Ferm\u00e9, E. (1999). A note on prototype revision. In Spinning Ideas - Electronic Essays Dedicated to Peter G\u00e4rdenfors on His Fiftieth Birthday. LUCS: Und University Cognitive Science, Department of Philosophy, 1999."},{"key":"9369_CR133","unstructured":"Winslett, M. (1988). Reasoning about action using a possible models approach. In Proceedings of the seventh American association for artificial intelligence conference (pp. 89\u201393)."},{"issue":"4","key":"9369_CR134","first-page":"12","volume":"3","author":"Y Wu","year":"2010","unstructured":"Wu, Y., & Caminada, M. W. A. (2010). A labelling-based justification status of arguments. Studies in Logic, 3(4), 12\u201329.","journal-title":"Studies in Logic"}],"container-title":["Journal of Logic, Language and Information"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10849-022-09369-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10849-022-09369-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10849-022-09369-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,22]],"date-time":"2023-11-22T12:58:36Z","timestamp":1700657916000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10849-022-09369-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,31]]},"references-count":134,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]}},"alternative-id":["9369"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10849-022-09369-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["0925-8531","1572-9583"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0925-8531"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1572-9583"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,31]]},"assertion":[{"value":"5 May 2022","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"31 May 2022","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}