{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T04:13:13Z","timestamp":1780459993506,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":44,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,19]],"date-time":"2022-10-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1666137600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,19]],"date-time":"2022-10-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1666137600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001821","name":"WWTF","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001821","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J of Log Lang and Inf"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Centered around the analysis of the prescriptive portion of the Vedas, the Sanskrit philosophical school of M\u012bm\u0101\u1e43s\u0101 provides a treasure trove of normative investigations. We focus on the leading M\u012bm\u0101\u1e43s\u0101 authors Prabh\u0101kara, Kum\u0101rila and Ma\u1e47\u1e0dana, and discuss three modal logics that formalize their deontic theories. In the first part of this paper, we use logic to analyze, compare and clarify the various solutions to the <jats:italic>\u015byena<\/jats:italic> controversy, a two-thousand-year-old problem arising from seemingly conflicting commands in the Vedas. In the second part, the formalized M\u012bm\u0101\u1e43s\u0101 theories are analyzed and employed to provide alternative perspectives on well-known paradoxes from the contemporary field of deontic logic. Thus, we go from logic to M\u012bm\u0101\u1e43s\u0101 and back again.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10849-022-09375-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,19]],"date-time":"2022-10-19T13:04:20Z","timestamp":1666184660000},"page":"19-62","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Deontic Paradoxes in M\u012bm\u0101\u1e43s\u0101 Logics: There and Back Again"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"32","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5246-1824","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kees","family":"van Berkel","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6947-8772","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Agata","family":"Ciabattoni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8017-9466","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Elisa","family":"Freschi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9316-6813","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Francesca","family":"Gulisano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9926-058X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maya","family":"Olszewski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,19]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2\u20133","key":"9375_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-011-9109-0","volume":"19","author":"M Abraham","year":"2011","unstructured":"Abraham, M., Gabbay, D. M., & Schild, U. (2011). Obligations and prohibitions in Talmudic deontic logic. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 19(2\u20133), 117\u2013148. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-011-9109-0.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence and Law"},{"issue":"1","key":"9375_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.2307\/2088759","volume":"22","author":"AR Anderson","year":"1957","unstructured":"Anderson, A. R., & Moore, O. K. (1957). The formal analysis of normative concepts. American Sociological Review, 22(1), 9\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2088759.","journal-title":"American Sociological Review"},{"key":"9375_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01531259","volume":"9","author":"P Bartha","year":"1993","unstructured":"Bartha, P. (1993). Conditional obligation, deontic paradoxes, and the logic of agency. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 9, 1\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF01531259.","journal-title":"Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9375_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Benzm\u00fcller, C., Parent, X., & van\u00a0der Torre, L. W. N. (2018). A deontic logic reasoning infrastructure. In F. Manea, R.G. Miller, & D.\u00a0Nowotka (Eds.), Conference on Computability in Europe, CiE 2018 (Vol 10936 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 60\u201369). Springer. 10.1007\/978-3-319-94418-0_6.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-94418-0_6"},{"key":"9375_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"van Berkel, K., & Pascucci, M. (2018). Notions of instrumentality in agency logic. In T. Miller, N. Oren, Y. Sakurai, I. Noda, B. T. R. Savarimuthu, & T. CaoSon (Eds.), PRIMA 2018: Principles and practice of multi-agent systems (pp. 403\u2013419). Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-03098-8_25.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-03098-8_25"},{"key":"9375_CR6","unstructured":"van Berkel, K., Ciabattoni, A., Freschi, E., Gulisano, F., & Olszewski, M. (2021). The gentle murder paradox in sanskrit philosophy. In F. Liu, A. Marra, P. Portner, & F. V. D. Putte (Eds.), 15th international conference on deontic logic and normative systems, DEON 2020\/2021. College Publications."},{"key":"9375_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"van\u00a0Berkel, K., Lyon, T., & Olivieri, F. (2020). A decidable multi-agent logic for reasoning about actions, instruments, and norms, In M. Dastani, H.\u00a0Dong, & L.\u00a0van\u00a0der Torre (Eds.), International conference on logic and argumentation (pp. 219\u2013241). Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-44638-3_14","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-44638-3_14"},{"key":"9375_CR8","unstructured":"Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., & Venema, Y. (2004). Modal logic. Number 53 in Cambridge tracts in theoretical computer science. Cambridge University Press."},{"issue":"1","key":"9375_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-007-9059-8","volume":"16","author":"G Boella","year":"2008","unstructured":"Boella, G., & van der Torre, L. (2008). Institutions with a hierarchy of authorities in distributed dynamic environments. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 16(1), 53\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-007-9059-8.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence and Law"},{"key":"9375_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-010-0387-2_4","volume":"8","author":"J Carmo","year":"2002","unstructured":"Carmo, J., & Jones, A. J. (2002). Deontic logic and contrary-to-duties. Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 8, 265\u2013345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-94-010-0387-2_4.","journal-title":"Handbook of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"9375_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Casta\u00f1eda, H. N. (1972). On the semantics of the ought-to-do. In D. Davidson & G. Harman (Eds.), Semantics of natural language, Volume 40 of Synthese Library (pp. 675\u2013694). Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-94-010-2557-7_21.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-010-2557-7_21"},{"key":"9375_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Casta\u00f1eda, H. N. (1981). The paradoxes of deontic logic: The simplest solution to all of them in one fell swoop. In R. Hilpinen (Ed.), New Studies in Deontic Logic: Norms, Actions, and the Foundations of Ethics (pp. 37\u201385). Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-94-009-8484-4_2.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-009-8484-4_2"},{"key":"9375_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chellas, B. F. (1980). Modal logic. Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511621192"},{"issue":"2","key":"9375_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1093\/analys\/24.2.33","volume":"24","author":"RM Chisholm","year":"1963","unstructured":"Chisholm, R. M. (1963). Contrary-to-duty imperatives and deontic logic. Analysis, 24(2), 33\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/analys\/24.2.33.","journal-title":"Analysis"},{"key":"9375_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ciabattoni, A., Freschi, E., Genco, F. A., & Lellmann, B. (2015). M\u012bm\u0101m\u0323s\u0101 deontic logic: Proof theory and applications. In H. De Nivelle (Ed.), Automated reasoning with analytic tableaux and related methods (pp. 323\u2013338). Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-24312-2_22.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-24312-2_22."},{"key":"9375_CR16","unstructured":"Edgerton, F. (Ed.). (1929). M\u012bm\u0101m\u0323s\u0101ny\u0101yaprak\u0101\u015ba of \u0100padeva. Yale University Press."},{"issue":"2","key":"9375_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-0000(79)90046-1","volume":"18","author":"MJ Fischer","year":"1979","unstructured":"Fischer, M. J., & Ladner, R. E. (1979). Propositional dynamic logic of regular programs. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 18(2), 194\u2013211. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0022-0000(79)90046-1.","journal-title":"Journal of Computer and System Sciences"},{"issue":"4","key":"9375_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.2307\/2026120","volume":"81","author":"J Forrester","year":"1984","unstructured":"Forrester, J. (1984). Gentle murder, or the adverbial samaritan. Journal of Philosophy, 81(4), 193\u2013197. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2026120.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"9375_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Freschi, E. (2018). The role of paribh\u0101\u1e63\u0101s in M\u012bm\u0101m\u0323s\u0101: Rational rules of textual exegesis. Asiatische Studien\/\u00c9tudes Asiatiques, 72(2), 567\u2013595. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/asia-2018-0018.","DOI":"10.1515\/asia-2018-0018"},{"issue":"1","key":"9375_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.2979\/jourworlphil.2.1.05","volume":"2","author":"E Freschi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Freschi, E., Ciabattoni, A., Genco, F. A., & Lellmann, B. (2017). Understanding prescriptive texts: Rules and logic as elaborated by the M\u012bm\u0101m\u0323s\u0101 school. Journal of World Philosophies, 2(1), 47\u201366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2979\/jourworlphil.2.1.05.","journal-title":"Journal of World Philosophies"},{"issue":"4","key":"9375_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1080\/01445340.2019.1615366","volume":"40","author":"E Freschi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Freschi, E., Ollett, A., & Pascucci, M. (2019). Duty and sacrifice: A logical analysis of the theory of Vedic injunctions. History and Philosophy of Logic, 40(4), 323\u2013354. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01445340.2019.1615366.","journal-title":"History and Philosophy of Logic"},{"key":"9375_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Freschi, E., & Pascucci, M. (2021). Deontic concepts and their clash in M\u012bm\u0101m\u0323s\u0101: Towards an interpretation. Theoria, 87(3), 659\u2013703. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/theo.12307.","DOI":"10.1111\/theo.12307"},{"key":"9375_CR23","unstructured":"Giordani, A., & Canavotto, I. (2016). Basic action deontic logic. In O. Roy, A. M. Tamminga, & M. Willer (Eds.), 13th International Conference on Deontic logic and normative systems, DEON 2016 (pp. 80\u201392). College Publications."},{"key":"9375_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"421","DOI":"10.1007\/s10781-021-09465-2","volume":"49","author":"E Guhe","year":"2021","unstructured":"Guhe, E. (2021). Killing gently by means of the \u015byena: The Navya-Ny\u0101ya analysis of Vedic and secular injunctions (vidhi) and prohibitions (ni\u1e63edha) from the perspective of dynamic deontic logic. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 49, 421\u2013449. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10781-021-09465-2.","journal-title":"Journal of Indian Philosophy"},{"issue":"1","key":"9375_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1007\/s10458-007-9016-7","volume":"17","author":"J Hansen","year":"2008","unstructured":"Hansen, J. (2008). Prioritized conditional imperatives: Problems and a new proposal. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 17(1), 11\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10458-007-9016-7.","journal-title":"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems"},{"issue":"1","key":"9375_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01417957","volume":"23","author":"JF Horty","year":"1994","unstructured":"Horty, J. F. (1994). Moral dilemmas and nonmonotonic logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 23(1), 35\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF01417957.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"issue":"2","key":"9375_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-006-9036-x","volume":"158","author":"J Hughes","year":"2007","unstructured":"Hughes, J., Kroes, P., & Zwart, S. (2007). A semantics for means-end relations. Synthese, 158(2), 207\u2013231. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-006-9036-x.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"9375_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kanger, S. (1971). New foundations for ethical theory, Deontic logic: Introductory and systematic readings (pp. 36\u201358). Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-94-010-3146-2_2","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-010-3146-2_2"},{"key":"9375_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"351","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-020-09278-w","volume":"29","author":"B Lellmann","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lellmann, B., Gulisano, F., & Ciabattoni, A. (2021). M\u012bm\u0101m\u0323s\u0101 deontic reasoning using specificity: a proof theoretic approach. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 29, 351\u2013394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-020-09278-w.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence and Law"},{"key":"9375_CR30","unstructured":"McCrea, L. & Rao, A. eds. (forthcoming). The Age of Ved\u0101nta."},{"key":"9375_CR31","unstructured":"McCrea, L. (2008). The Teleology of Poetics in Medieval Kashmir. Cambridge (Mass.): Department of Sanskrit and Indian Studies, Harvard University."},{"key":"9375_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"McCrea, L. (2010). Hindu jurisprudence and scriptural hermeneutics. In T. Lubin, J. Davis, R. Donald, & J. K. Krishnan (Eds.), Hinduism and Law: An Introduction (Vol. 7, pp. 123\u2013136). Cambridge University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9780511781674.012.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511781674.012"},{"key":"9375_CR33","unstructured":"Meyer, J. J. C., Broersen, J. M., & Herzig, A. (2015). BDI logics. In H. van Ditmarsch, J. Y. Halpern, W. van der Hoek, & B. Kooi (Eds.), Handbook of logics of knowledge and belief (pp. 453\u2013498). College Publications."},{"key":"9375_CR34","unstructured":"Meyer, J., Dignum, F., & Wieringa, R. (1994). The paradoxes of deontic logic revisited: A computer science perspective (or: Should computer scientists be bothered by the concerns of philosophers?). Technical Report UU-CS-1994-38, Department of Computer Sciences, Utrecht University."},{"issue":"1","key":"9375_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1305\/ndjfl\/1093637776","volume":"29","author":"JJC Meyer","year":"1988","unstructured":"Meyer, J. J. C. (1988). A different approach to deontic logic: Deontic logic viewed as a variant of dynamic logic. Notre Dame J. Formal Log., 29(1), 109\u2013136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1305\/ndjfl\/1093637776.","journal-title":"Notre Dame J. Formal Log."},{"key":"9375_CR36","unstructured":"Parent, X., & van der Torre, L. W. N. (2018). I\/O logics with a consistency check. In J. M. Broersen, C. Condoravdi, N. Shyam, & G. Pigozzi (Eds.), 14th International Conference on Deontic logic and normative systems, DEON 2018 (pp. 285\u2013299). College Publications."},{"issue":"1","key":"9375_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00370671","volume":"57","author":"H Prakken","year":"1996","unstructured":"Prakken, H., & Sergot, M. (1996). Contrary-to-duty obligations. Studia Logica, 57(1), 91\u2013115. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF00370671.","journal-title":"Studia Logica"},{"key":"9375_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Prior, A. N. (1958). Escapism: The logical basis of ethics. In A. Melden (Ed.), Essays in moral philosophy. University of Washington Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2271385.","DOI":"10.2307\/2271385"},{"issue":"1","key":"9375_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1086\/286823","volume":"11","author":"A Ross","year":"1944","unstructured":"Ross, A. (1944). Imperatives and logic. Philosophy of Science, 11(1), 30\u201346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/286823.","journal-title":"Philosophy of Science"},{"key":"9375_CR40","unstructured":"Stcherbatsky, T. I. (1926). \u00dcber die Ny\u0101yakan\u0323ik\u0101 des V\u0101caspatimi\u015bra und die indische Lehre des kategorischen Imperativ, In Beitr\u00e4ge zur Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte Indiens. Festgabe Hermann Jacobi zum 75. Geburtstag, ed. Kirfel, W., 369\u2013380. Bonn: Kommissionsverlag F. Klopp."},{"key":"9375_CR41","unstructured":"\u015aubba\u015b\u0101str\u012b ed. 1929-1934. \u015ar\u012bmajjaiminipran\u0323\u012btam\u0323, m\u012bm\u0101m\u0323s\u0101dar\u015banam Poona:Anandasramamudarnalaya."},{"key":"9375_CR42","unstructured":"Viraraghavacharya, U. T. ed. (1971). Se\u015bvaram\u012bm\u0101m\u0323s\u0101-m\u012bm\u0101m\u0323s\u0101p\u0101duke, Seswara mimamsa and paduka [by Ve$$\\dot{\\rm n}$$katan\u0101tha]. Ubhaya Vedanta Granthamala."},{"issue":"237","key":"9375_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/LX.237.1","volume":"60","author":"GH von Wright","year":"1951","unstructured":"von Wright, G. H. (1951). Deontic logic. Mind, 60(237), 1\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/mind\/LX.237.1.","journal-title":"Mind"},{"issue":"1","key":"9375_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"507","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/65.1.507","volume":"65","author":"GH von Wright","year":"1956","unstructured":"von Wright, G. H. (1956). A note on deontic logic and derived obligation. Mind, 65(1), 507\u2013509. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/mind\/65.1.507.","journal-title":"Mind"}],"container-title":["Journal of Logic, Language and Information"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10849-022-09375-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10849-022-09375-w\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10849-022-09375-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,17]],"date-time":"2023-02-17T12:11:03Z","timestamp":1676635863000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10849-022-09375-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,19]]},"references-count":44,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,3]]}},"alternative-id":["9375"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10849-022-09375-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["0925-8531","1572-9583"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0925-8531","type":"print"},{"value":"1572-9583","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,19]]},"assertion":[{"value":"1 July 2022","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 October 2022","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 January 2023","order":3,"name":"change_date","label":"Change Date","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Update","order":4,"name":"change_type","label":"Change Type","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Missing Open Access funding information has been added in the Funding Note.","order":5,"name":"change_details","label":"Change Details","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}