{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,10]],"date-time":"2026-10-10T01:33:46Z","timestamp":1791596026905,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1-2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,12]],"date-time":"2025-11-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1762905600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,12]],"date-time":"2025-11-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1762905600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"University of Bergen"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J of Log Lang and Inf"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    Motivated by the search for forms of distributed belief that do not collapse in the face of conflicting information, this paper introduces the notions of\n                    <jats:italic>cautious<\/jats:italic>\n                    and\n                    <jats:italic>bold<\/jats:italic>\n                    distributed belief. Both notions rely on maximally consistent subgroups of agents, with\n                    <jats:italic>cautious<\/jats:italic>\n                    quantifying universally and\n                    <jats:italic>bold<\/jats:italic>\n                    quantifying existentially. As a result, while the cautious distributed belief of a group is inconsistent only when all group members are individually inconsistent, the bold distributed belief of a group is never inconsistent. The paper discusses these two notions, presenting their respective modalities and semantic interpretations, discussing some of their basic properties, studying whether they preserve doxastic properties from the members of the group, and comparing them not only with standard distributed belief but also with one another, both at the level of modalities and at the level of language expressivity.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10849-025-09446-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,12]],"date-time":"2025-11-12T03:53:15Z","timestamp":1762919595000},"page":"233-268","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Variations on distributed belief"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"35","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0002-3637-0313","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"John I.","family":"Lindqvist","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fernando R.","family":"Vel\u00e1zquez-Quesada","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Thomas","family":"\u00c5gotnes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"9446_CR1","volume-title":"Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions","author":"J Hintikka","year":"1962","unstructured":"Hintikka, J. (1962). Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press."},{"key":"9446_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-005-4068-5","volume":"128","author":"VF Hendricks","year":"2006","unstructured":"Hendricks, V. F. (2006). Introduction: 8 bridges between mainstream and formal epistemology. Philosophical Studies, 128, 1\u20135.","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"key":"9446_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/5803.001.0001","volume-title":"Reasoning about knowledge","author":"R Fagin","year":"1995","unstructured":"Fagin, R., Halpern, J. Y., Moses, Y., & Vardi, M. Y. (1995). Reasoning about knowledge. Mass.: The MIT Press, Cambridge."},{"key":"9446_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511569852","volume-title":"Epistemic Logic for AI and Computer Science","author":"J-JC Meyer","year":"1995","unstructured":"Meyer, J.-J.C., & van der Hoek, W. (1995). Epistemic Logic for AI and Computer Science. U.S.A.: Cambridge University Press, New York, N.Y."},{"key":"9446_CR5","unstructured":"de\u00a0Bruin, B. (2010). Explaining Games: The Epistemic Programme in Game Theory Vol. 346 of Synthese Library Series (Springer, Dordrecht)."},{"key":"9446_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511844072","volume-title":"Epistemic Game Theory: Reasoning and Choice","author":"A Perea","year":"2012","unstructured":"Perea, A. (2012). Epistemic Game Theory: Reasoning and Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9446_CR7","volume-title":"Convention: A Philosophical Study","author":"D Lewis","year":"1969","unstructured":"Lewis, D. (1969). Convention: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press."},{"key":"9446_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/00455091.1977.10716173","volume":"7","author":"R Hilpinen","year":"1977","unstructured":"Hilpinen, R. (1977). Remarks on personal and impersonal knowledge. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 7, 1\u20139.","journal-title":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"9446_CR9","unstructured":"Halpern, J.\u00a0Y., Moses, Y., & Joshi, A.\u00a0K. (ed.) A guide to the modal logics of knowledge and belief: Preliminary draft. (ed.Joshi, A.\u00a0K.) Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Los Angeles, CA, USA, August 1985, 480\u2013490 (Morgan Kaufmann, 1985). http:\/\/ijcai.org\/Proceedings\/85-1\/Papers\/094.pdf."},{"key":"9446_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"549","DOI":"10.1145\/79147.79161","volume":"37","author":"JY Halpern","year":"1990","unstructured":"Halpern, J. Y., & Moses, Y. (1990). Knowledge and common knowledge in a distributed environment. Journal of the ACM, 37, 549\u2013587.","journal-title":"Journal of the ACM"},{"key":"9446_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1959","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exaa068","volume":"31","author":"T \u00c5gotnes","year":"2021","unstructured":"\u00c5gotnes, T., & W\u00e1ng, Y. N. (2021). Group belief. Journal of Logic and Computation, 31, 1959\u20131978.","journal-title":"Journal of Logic and Computation"},{"key":"9446_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(80)90014-4","volume":"13","author":"R Reiter","year":"1980","unstructured":"Reiter, R. (1980). A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 13, 81\u2013132.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9446_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P. M. (1995). On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77, 321\u2013358.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9446_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1007\/s11225-011-9347-x","volume":"99","author":"J van Benthem","year":"2011","unstructured":"van Benthem, J., & Pacuit, E. (2011). Dynamic logics of evidence-based beliefs. Studia Logica, 99, 61\u201392.","journal-title":"Studia Logica"},{"key":"9446_CR15","unstructured":"Herzig, A., Lorini, E., Perrotin, E., Romero, F., Schwarzentruber, F., & Giacomo, G.\u00a0D. et\u00a0al. (eds) A logic of explicit and implicit distributed belief. (eds Giacomo, G.\u00a0D. et\u00a0al.) ECAI 2020 - 24th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 29 August-8 September 2020, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, August 29 - September 8, 2020 - Including 10th Conference on Prestigious Applications of Artificial Intelligence (PAIS 2020), Vol. 325 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 753\u2013760 (IOS Press, 2020)."},{"key":"9446_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1093\/aristotelian\/76.1.1","volume":"76","author":"A Quinton","year":"1976","unstructured":"Quinton, A. (1976). Social objects. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 76, 1\u201327.","journal-title":"Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society"},{"key":"9446_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199591565.001.0001","volume-title":"Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents","author":"C List","year":"2011","unstructured":"List, C., & Pettit, P. (2011). Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents. New York: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"9446_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lindqvist, J., Vel\u00e1zquez-Quesada, F.\u00a0R., \u00c5gotnes, T. Areces, C., & Costa, D. (eds) Cautious distributed belief. (eds Areces, C. & Costa, D.) Dynamic Logic. New Trends and Applications - 4th International Workshop, DaL\u00ed 2022, Haifa, Israel, July 31 - August 1, 2022, Revised Selected Papers, Vol. 13780 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 106\u2013124 (Springer, 2022). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-031-26622-5_7.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-26622-5_7"},{"key":"9446_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Blackburn, P., de\u00a0Rijke, M., & Venema, Y. (2002). Modal Logic (Cambridge University Press).","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781107050884"},{"key":"9446_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"\u00c5gotnes, T., W\u00e1ng, Y.\u00a0N., Bienvenu, M., Lakemeyer, G., & Erdem, E. (2021). (eds) Somebody knows. (eds Bienvenu, M., Lakemeyer, G. & Erdem, E.) Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR 2021, Online event, November 3-12, 2021, 2\u201311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.24963\/kr.2021\/1.","DOI":"10.24963\/kr.2021\/1"},{"key":"9446_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.3166\/jancl.17.255-273","volume":"17","author":"F Roelofsen","year":"2007","unstructured":"Roelofsen, F. (2007). Distributed knowledge. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 17, 255\u2013273.","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics"},{"key":"9446_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511621192","volume-title":"Modal Logic: An Introduction","author":"BF Chellas","year":"1980","unstructured":"Chellas, B. F. (1980). Modal Logic: An Introduction. Mass.: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge."},{"key":"9446_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-67149-9","volume-title":"Neighborhood Semantics for Modal Logic","author":"E Pacuit","year":"2017","unstructured":"Pacuit, E. (2017). Neighborhood Semantics for Modal Logic. Cham, Switzerland: Springer."},{"key":"9446_CR24","unstructured":"Areces, C., Figueira, D., & Boutilier, C. (2009). (ed.) Which semantics for neighbourhood semantics? (ed.Boutilier, C.) IJCAI 2009, Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Pasadena, California, USA, July 11-17, 2009, 671\u2013676. http:\/\/ijcai.org\/Proceedings\/09\/Papers\/117.pdf."},{"key":"9446_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"\u00c5gotnes, T., & W\u00e1ng, Y.\u00a0N. (2017). Resolving distributed knowledge. Artificial Intelligence 252, 1\u201321. https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0004370217300759.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2017.07.002"},{"key":"9446_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Baltag, A., Smets, S., Albert, E., & Kov\u00e1cs, L. (eds) Learning what others know. (eds Albert, E. & Kov\u00e1cs, L.) LPAR 2020: 23rd International Conference on Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence and Reasoning, Alicante, Spain, May 22-27, 2020, Vol.\u00a073 of EPiC Series in Computing, 90\u2013119 (EasyChair, 2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.29007\/plm4.","DOI":"10.29007\/plm4"}],"container-title":["Journal of Logic, Language and Information"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10849-025-09446-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10849-025-09446-8","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10849-025-09446-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,29]],"date-time":"2026-08-29T11:02:56Z","timestamp":1788001376000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10849-025-09446-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,12]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1-2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,6]]}},"alternative-id":["9446"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10849-025-09446-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["0925-8531","1572-9583"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0925-8531","type":"print"},{"value":"1572-9583","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"5 November 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 October 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"12 November 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflicts of Interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"There are no ethical considerations related to this research in mathematical logic.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethical Approval","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}