{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,8]],"date-time":"2026-05-08T11:20:40Z","timestamp":1778239240709,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":52,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,12]],"date-time":"2025-06-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1749686400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,12]],"date-time":"2025-06-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1749686400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"University Foundation of the Andean Area"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Med Syst"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:p>In the context of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP), Systematic Reviews (SRs), Meta-Analyses (MAs) and overview of reviews have become cornerstones for the synthesis of research findings. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 and Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR) statements have become major reporting guidelines for SRs\/MAs and for overviews of reviews, respectively. In recent years, advances in Generative Artificial Intelligence (genAI) have been proposed as a potential major paradigm shift in scientific research. The main aim of this research was to examine the performance of four LLMs for the analysis of adherence to PRISMA 2020 and PRIOR, in a sample of 20 SRs and 20 overviews of reviews. We tested the free versions of four commonly used LLMs: ChatGPT (GPT-4o), DeepSeek (V3), Gemini (2.0 Flash) and Qwen (2.5 Max). Adherence to PRISMA 2020 and PRIOR was compared with scores defined previously by human experts, using several statistical tests. In our results, all the four LLMs showed a low performance for the analysis of adherence to PRISMA 2020, overestimating the percentage of adherence (from 23 to 30%). For PRIOR, the LLMs presented lower differences in the estimation of adherence (from 6 to 14%) and ChatGPT showed a performance similar to human experts. This is the first report of the performance of four commonly used LLMs for the analysis of adherence to PRISMA 2020 and PRIOR. Future studies of adherence to other reporting guidelines will be helpful in health sciences research.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10916-025-02212-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,12]],"date-time":"2025-06-12T03:17:00Z","timestamp":1749698220000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Large Language Models and the Analyses of Adherence to Reporting Guidelines in Systematic Reviews and Overviews of Reviews (PRISMA 2020 and PRIOR)"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"49","author":[{"given":"Diego A.","family":"Forero","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Sandra E.","family":"Abreu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Blanca E.","family":"Tovar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Marilyn H.","family":"Oermann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,12]]},"reference":[{"issue":"10092","key":"2212_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)31592-6","volume":"390","author":"B Djulbegovic","year":"2017","unstructured":"Djulbegovic B, Guyatt GH. Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century on. Lancet. 2017;390(10092):415\u201323.","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"7695","key":"2212_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1038\/nature25753","volume":"555","author":"J Gurevitch","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gurevitch J, Koricheva J, Nakagawa S, Stewart G. Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis. Nature. 2018;555(7695):175\u201382.","journal-title":"Nature"},{"issue":"5","key":"2212_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1006922","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pcbi.1006922","volume":"15","author":"DA Forero","year":"2019","unstructured":"Forero DA, Lopez-Leon S, Gonzalez-Giraldo Y, Bagos PG. Ten simple rules for carrying out and writing meta-analyses. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019;15(5):e1006922.","journal-title":"PLoS Comput Biol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2212_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1177\/0163278702025001003","volume":"25","author":"I Chalmers","year":"2002","unstructured":"Chalmers I, Hedges LV, Cooper H. A brief history of research synthesis. Eval Health Prof. 2002;25(1):12\u201337.","journal-title":"Eval Health Prof"},{"issue":"19","key":"2212_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2362","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.293.19.2362","volume":"293","author":"NA Patsopoulos","year":"2005","unstructured":"Patsopoulos NA, Analatos AA, Ioannidis JP. Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences. JAMA. 2005;293(19):2362\u20136.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"2","key":"2212_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2014.5559","volume":"312","author":"MH Murad","year":"2014","unstructured":"Murad MH, Montori VM, Ioannidis JP, Jaeschke R, Devereaux PJ, Prasad K, et al. How to read a systematic review and meta-analysis and apply the results to patient care: users\u2019 guides to the medical literature. JAMA. 2014;312(2):171\u20139.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"3","key":"2212_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1136\/ebmental-2018-300014","volume":"21","author":"P Fusar-Poli","year":"2018","unstructured":"Fusar-Poli P, Radua J. Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews. Evid Based Ment Health. 2018;21(3):95\u2013100.","journal-title":"Evid Based Ment Health"},{"key":"2212_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2022.11.003","volume":"153","author":"KI Bougioukas","year":"2023","unstructured":"Bougioukas KI, Pamporis K, Vounzoulaki E, Karagiannis T, Haidich AB. Types and associated methodologies of overviews of reviews in health care: a methodological study with published examples. J Clin Epidemiol. 2023;153:13\u201325.","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2212_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1177\/0141076815625599","volume":"109","author":"DG Altman","year":"2016","unstructured":"Altman DG, Simera I. A history of the evolution of guidelines for reporting medical research: the long road to the EQUATOR Network. J R Soc Med. 2016;109(2):67\u201377.","journal-title":"J R Soc Med"},{"key":"2212_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"n71","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","volume":"372","author":"MJ Page","year":"2021","unstructured":"Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2212_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e070849","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj-2022-070849","volume":"378","author":"M Gates","year":"2022","unstructured":"Gates M, Gates A, Pieper D, Fernandes RM, Tricco AC, Moher D, et al. Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement. BMJ. 2022;378:e070849.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"8","key":"2212_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1930","DOI":"10.1038\/s41591-023-02448-8","volume":"29","author":"AJ Thirunavukarasu","year":"2023","unstructured":"Thirunavukarasu AJ, Ting DSJ, Elangovan K, Gutierrez L, Tan TF, Ting DSW. Large language models in medicine. Nat Med. 2023;29(8):1930\u201340.","journal-title":"Nat Med"},{"key":"2212_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111533","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2024.111533","volume":"175","author":"T Woelfle","year":"2024","unstructured":"Woelfle T, Hirt J, Janiaud P, Kappos L, Ioannidis JPA, Hemkens LG. Benchmarking Human-AI collaboration for common evidence appraisal tools. J Clin Epidemiol. 2024;175:111533.","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"4","key":"2212_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"616","DOI":"10.1002\/jrsm.1715","volume":"15","author":"Q Khraisha","year":"2024","unstructured":"Khraisha Q, Put S, Kappenberg J, Warraitch A, Hadfield K. Can large language models replace humans in systematic reviews? Evaluating GPT-4\u2019s efficacy in screening and extracting data from peer-reviewed and grey literature in multiple languages. Res Synth Methods. 2024;15(4):616\u201326.","journal-title":"Res Synth Methods"},{"issue":"3","key":"2212_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e2005468","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pbio.2005468","volume":"16","author":"JPA Ioannidis","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ioannidis JPA. Meta-research: Why research on research matters. PLoS Biol. 2018;16(3):e2005468.","journal-title":"PLoS Biol"},{"key":"2212_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"r718","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.r718","volume":"389","author":"GS Collins","year":"2025","unstructured":"Collins GS. Innovative solutions are needed to overcome implementation barriers to using reporting guidelines. BMJ. 2025;389:r718.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2212_CR17","unstructured":"Achiam J, Adler S, Agarwal S, Ahmad L, Akkaya I, Aleman FL, et al. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv (preprint). 2023."},{"key":"2212_CR18","unstructured":"Liu A, Feng B, Xue B, Wang B, Wu B, Lu C, et al. Deepseek-v3 technical report. arXiv (preprint). 2024."},{"key":"2212_CR19","unstructured":"Gemini Team, Anil R, Borgeaud S, Alayrac J-B, Yu J, Soricut R, et al. Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models. arXiv (preprint). 2023."},{"key":"2212_CR20","unstructured":"Yang A, Yang B, Zhang B, Hui B, Zheng B, Yu B, et al. Qwen2. 5 technical report. arXiv (preprint). 2024."},{"key":"2212_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Roberts RH, Ali SR, Hutchings HA, Dobbs TD, Whitaker IS. Comparative study of ChatGPT and human evaluators on the assessment of medical literature according to recognised reporting standards. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023;30(1).","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjhci-2023-100830"},{"issue":"3","key":"2212_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e088735","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2024-088735","volume":"15","author":"JG Wrightson","year":"2025","unstructured":"Wrightson JG, Blazey P, Moher D, Khan KM, Ardern CL. GPT for RCTs? Using AI to determine adherence to clinical trial reporting guidelines. BMJ Open. 2025;15(3):e088735.","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"2212_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Srinivasan A, Berkowitz J, Kivelson S, Friedrich N, Tatonetti N. Evaluating the Reporting Quality of 21,041 Randomized Controlled Trial Articles. Preprint, medRxiv. 2025:2025.03. 06.25323528.","DOI":"10.1101\/2025.03.06.25323528"},{"key":"2212_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111746","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2025.111746","volume":"181","author":"JL Lieberum","year":"2025","unstructured":"Lieberum JL, Tows M, Metzendorf MI, Heilmeyer F, Siemens W, Haverkamp C, et al. Large language models for conducting systematic reviews: on the rise, but not yet ready for use-a scoping review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2025;181:111746.","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"39","key":"2212_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e39933","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000039933","volume":"103","author":"C Qin","year":"2024","unstructured":"Qin C, Ma H, Mandizadza OO, Xu X, Ji C. Reporting quality of meta-analyses in acupuncture: Investigating adherence to the PRISMA statement. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103(39):e39933.","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"key":"2212_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103034","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ctim.2024.103034","volume":"82","author":"T Lu","year":"2024","unstructured":"Lu T, Liu B, Lu C, Du Z, Yang K, Ge L. Reporting quality of acupuncture overviews: A methodological investigation based on the PRIOR statement. Complement Ther Med. 2024;82:103034.","journal-title":"Complement Ther Med"},{"key":"2212_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"j4008","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.j4008","volume":"358","author":"BJ Shea","year":"2017","unstructured":"Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"22","key":"2212_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10323","DOI":"10.3390\/app142210323","volume":"14","author":"F Alharbi","year":"2024","unstructured":"Alharbi F, Asiri S. Automated Assessment of Reporting Completeness in Orthodontic Research Using LLMs: An Observational Study. Applied Sciences. 2024;14(22):10323.","journal-title":"Applied Sciences"},{"issue":"5","key":"2212_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100450","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjpt.2022.100450","volume":"26","author":"T Innocenti","year":"2022","unstructured":"Innocenti T, Feller D, Giagio S, Salvioli S, Minnucci S, Brindisino F, et al. Adherence to the PRISMA statement and its association with risk of bias in systematic reviews published in rehabilitation journals: A meta-research study. Braz J Phys Ther. 2022;26(5):100450.","journal-title":"Braz J Phys Ther"},{"issue":"12","key":"2212_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e83138","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0083138","volume":"8","author":"N Panic","year":"2013","unstructured":"Panic N, Leoncini E, de Belvis G, Ricciardi W, Boccia S. Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e83138.","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"1","key":"2212_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.4103\/aca.ACA_157_18","volume":"22","author":"P Mishra","year":"2019","unstructured":"Mishra P, Pandey CM, Singh U, Gupta A, Sahu C, Keshri A. Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Ann Card Anaesth. 2019;22(1):67\u201372.","journal-title":"Ann Card Anaesth"},{"issue":"2","key":"2212_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1186\/cc2836","volume":"8","author":"V Bewick","year":"2004","unstructured":"Bewick V, Cheek L, Ball J. Statistics review 9: one-way analysis of variance. Crit Care. 2004;8(2):130\u20136.","journal-title":"Crit Care"},{"issue":"3","key":"2212_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.11613\/BM.2011.029","volume":"21","author":"ML McHugh","year":"2011","unstructured":"McHugh ML. Multiple comparison analysis testing in ANOVA. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2011;21(3):203\u20139.","journal-title":"Biochem Med (Zagreb)"},{"issue":"6","key":"2212_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.1186\/cc2401","volume":"7","author":"V Bewick","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bewick V, Cheek L, Ball J. Statistics review 7: Correlation and regression. Crit Care. 2003;7(6):451\u20139.","journal-title":"Crit Care"},{"issue":"2","key":"2212_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.11613\/BM.2015.015","volume":"25","author":"D Giavarina","year":"2015","unstructured":"Giavarina D. Understanding Bland Altman analysis. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015;25(2):141\u201351.","journal-title":"Biochem Med (Zagreb)"},{"key":"2212_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Li Z, Luo X, Yang Z, Zhang H, Wang B, Ge L, et al. RAPID: Reliable and efficient Automatic generation of submission rePorting checklists with Large language moDels. Preprint, bioRxiv. 2025:2025.02. 13.638015.","DOI":"10.1101\/2025.02.13.638015"},{"key":"2212_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gartlehner G, Kahwati L, Nussbaumer-Streit B, Crotty K, Hilscher R, Kugley S, et al. From promise to practice: challenges and pitfalls in the evaluation of large language models for data extraction in evidence synthesis. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjebm-2024-113199"},{"key":"2212_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.18637\/jss.v088.i02","volume":"88","author":"J Love","year":"2019","unstructured":"Love J, Selker R, Marsman M, Jamil T, Dropmann D, Verhagen J, et al. JASP: Graphical statistical software for common statistical designs. Journal of Statistical Software. 2019;88:1\u201317.","journal-title":"Journal of Statistical Software"},{"issue":"10","key":"2212_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"865","DOI":"10.3348\/kjr.2024.0843","volume":"25","author":"SH Park","year":"2024","unstructured":"Park SH, Suh CH, Lee JH, Kahn CE, Moy L. Minimum Reporting Items for Clear Evaluation of Accuracy Reports of Large Language Models in Healthcare (MI-CLEAR-LLM). Korean J Radiol. 2024;25(10):865\u20138.","journal-title":"Korean J Radiol"},{"issue":"11","key":"2212_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0000388","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pdig.0000388","volume":"2","author":"AL Smith","year":"2023","unstructured":"Smith AL, Greaves F, Panch T. Hallucination or Confabulation? Neuroanatomy as metaphor in Large Language Models. PLOS Digit Health. 2023;2(11):e0000388.","journal-title":"PLOS Digit Health"},{"key":"2212_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kim Y, Jeong H, Chen S, Li SS, Lu M, Alhamoud K, et al. Medical Hallucination in Foundation Models and Their Impact on Healthcare. medRxiv (Preprint). 2025:2025.02. 28.25323115.","DOI":"10.1101\/2025.02.28.25323115"},{"key":"2212_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Miao BY, Chen IY, Williams CYK, Davidson J, Garcia-Agundez A, Sun S, et al. The MI-CLAIM-GEN checklist for generative artificial intelligence in health. Nat Med. 2025.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41591-024-03470-0"},{"issue":"2","key":"2212_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"166","DOI":"10.1038\/s41587-024-02534-3","volume":"43","author":"S Lobentanzer","year":"2025","unstructured":"Lobentanzer S, Feng S, Bruderer N, Maier A, BioChatter C, Wang C, et al. A platform for the biomedical application of large language models. Nat Biotechnol. 2025;43(2):166\u20139.","journal-title":"Nat Biotechnol"},{"key":"2212_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e50174","DOI":"10.2196\/50174","volume":"10","author":"T Nguyen","year":"2024","unstructured":"Nguyen T. ChatGPT in Medical Education: A Precursor for Automation Bias? JMIR Med Educ. 2024;10:e50174.","journal-title":"JMIR Med Educ"},{"issue":"6","key":"2212_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"517","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tics.2024.01.011","volume":"28","author":"K Mahowald","year":"2024","unstructured":"Mahowald K, Ivanova AA, Blank IA, Kanwisher N, Tenenbaum JB, Fedorenko E. Dissociating language and thought in large language models. Trends Cogn Sci. 2024;28(6):517\u201340.","journal-title":"Trends Cogn Sci"},{"issue":"5","key":"2212_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e2412687","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2024.12687","volume":"7","author":"H Lai","year":"2024","unstructured":"Lai H, Ge L, Sun M, Pan B, Huang J, Hou L, et al. Assessing the Risk of Bias in Randomized Clinical Trials With Large Language Models. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(5):e2412687.","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"issue":"4","key":"2212_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"700","DOI":"10.1111\/jebm.12662","volume":"17","author":"I Kuitunen","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kuitunen I, Ponkilainen VT, Liukkonen R, Nyrhi L, Pakarinen O, Vaajala M, et al. Evaluating the Performance of ChatGPT-4o in Risk of Bias Assessments. J Evid Based Med. 2024;17(4):700\u20132.","journal-title":"J Evid Based Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"2212_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjebm-2024-112990","volume":"30","author":"J Barsby","year":"2025","unstructured":"Barsby J, Hume S, Lemmey HA, Cutteridge J, Lee R, Bera KD. Pilot study on large language models for risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews: A(I) new type of bias? BMJ Evid Based Med. 2025;30(1):71\u20134.","journal-title":"BMJ Evid Based Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"2212_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"611","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-024-01847-2","volume":"8","author":"Z Lin","year":"2024","unstructured":"Lin Z. How to write effective prompts for large language models. Nat Hum Behav. 2024;8(4):611\u20135.","journal-title":"Nat Hum Behav"},{"key":"2212_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Anisuzzaman D, Malins JG, Friedman PA, Attia ZI. Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Specialized Use Cases. Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2025;3(1):100184.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mcpdig.2024.11.005"},{"key":"2212_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100130","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gloepi.2023.100130","volume":"7","author":"LA Cox","year":"2024","unstructured":"Cox LA, Jr. An AI assistant to help review and improve causal reasoning in epidemiological documents. Glob Epidemiol. 2024;7:100130.","journal-title":"Glob Epidemiol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2212_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109713","DOI":"10.1016\/j.isci.2024.109713","volume":"27","author":"X Meng","year":"2024","unstructured":"Meng X, Yan X, Zhang K, Liu D, Cui X, Yang Y, et al. The application of large language models in medicine: A scoping review. iScience. 2024;27(5):109713.","journal-title":"iScience"}],"container-title":["Journal of Medical Systems"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10916-025-02212-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10916-025-02212-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10916-025-02212-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,12]],"date-time":"2025-06-12T07:05:43Z","timestamp":1749711943000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10916-025-02212-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,12]]},"references-count":52,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["2212"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10916-025-02212-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["1573-689X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1573-689X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"28 March 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 May 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"12 June 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This manuscript describes only computational analyses and did not describe research involving human participants or animal models.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Research Involving Human Participants and\/or Animals"}},{"value":"No generative AI tools were used for scientific writing.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declaration of generative AI in Scientific Writing"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing Interests"}}],"article-number":"80"}}