{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,16]],"date-time":"2026-03-16T19:46:36Z","timestamp":1773690396036,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":62,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,11,25]],"date-time":"2011-11-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1322179200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Philos Logic"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,2]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-011-9217-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,11,24]],"date-time":"2011-11-24T15:20:33Z","timestamp":1322148033000},"page":"161-193","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Stratified Belief Bases Revision with\u00a0Argumentative\u00a0Inference"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"42","author":[{"given":"Marcelo Alejandro","family":"Falappa","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Alejandro Javier","family":"Garc\u00eda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Gabriele","family":"Kern-Isberner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Guillermo Ricardo","family":"Simari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,11,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"9217_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.2307\/2274239","volume":"50","author":"C Alchourr\u00f3n","year":"1985","unstructured":"Alchourr\u00f3n, C., G\u00e4rdenfors, P., & Makinson, D. (1985). On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 50, 510\u2013530.","journal-title":"The Journal of Symbolic Logic"},{"key":"9217_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"405","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00370430","volume":"44","author":"C Alchourr\u00f3n","year":"1985","unstructured":"Alchourr\u00f3n, C., & Makinson, D. (1985). On the logic of theory change: Safe contraction. Studia Logica, 44, 405\u2013422.","journal-title":"Studia Logica"},{"key":"9217_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-75256-1_21","volume-title":"9th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, (ECSQARU 2007)","author":"P Baroni","year":"2007","unstructured":"Baroni, P., & Giacomin, M. (2007). Comparing argumentation semantics with respect to skepticism. In 9th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, (ECSQARU 2007) (pp. 210\u2013221). Tunisia: Hammamet."},{"key":"9217_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baroni, P., & Giacomin, M. (2009). Semantics of abstract argument systems. In I. Rahwan, & G.\u00a0R. Simari (Eds.), Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, (pp. 24\u201344). Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_2"},{"issue":"6","key":"9217_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"854","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2009.02.006","volume":"50","author":"P Baroni","year":"2009","unstructured":"Baroni, P., & Giacomin, M. (2009). Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics. International Journal Approximate Reasoning, 50(6), 854\u2013866.","journal-title":"International Journal Approximate Reasoning"},{"issue":"10\u201315","key":"9217_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.05.001","volume":"171","author":"TJM Bench-Capon","year":"2007","unstructured":"Bench-Capon, T.\u00a0J.\u00a0M., & Dunne, P.\u00a0E. (2007). Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 171(10\u201315), 619\u2013641.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9217_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1993). Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases. In D. Heckerman, & E.\u00a0H. Mamdani (Eds.), Proceedings 9th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI\u20191993 (pp.\u00a0411\u2013419). Morgan Kaufmann.","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-1-4832-1451-1.50054-8"},{"key":"9217_CR8","unstructured":"Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1995). How to infer from inconsistent beliefs without revising. In Proceedings of IJCAI\u20191995 (pp. 1449\u20131455)."},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"9217_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2003.08.003","volume":"153","author":"S Benferhat","year":"2004","unstructured":"Benferhat, S., Kaci, S., Berre, D.\u00a0L., & Williams, M.-A. (2004). Weakening conflicting information for iterated revision and knowledge integration. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 153(1\u20132), 339\u2013371.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence Journal"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"9217_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(01)00071-6","volume":"128","author":"P Besnard","year":"2001","unstructured":"Besnard, P., & Hunter, A. (2001). A logic-based theory of deductive arguments. Artificial Intelligence, 128(1\u20132), 203\u2013235.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9217_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Besnard, P., & Hunter, A. (2009). Argumentation based on classical logic. In I. Rahwan, & G.\u00a0R. Simari (Eds.), Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, (pp. 133\u2013152). Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_7"},{"key":"9217_CR12","unstructured":"Boella, G., Costa\u00a0Perera, C.\u00a0d., Tettamanzi, A., & van\u00a0der Torre, L. (2008). Dung argumentation and AGM belief revision. In 5th International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, ArgMAS\u20192008."},{"key":"9217_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Boella, G., Costa\u00a0Perera, C.\u00a0d., Tettamanzi, A., & van\u00a0der Torre, L. (2008). Making others believe what they want. Artificial Intelligence in Theory and Practice II (pp. 215\u2013224).","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-09695-7_21"},{"key":"9217_CR14","unstructured":"Brewka, G. (1989). Belief revision in a framework for default reasoning. In A. Fuhrmann, & M. Morreau (Eds.), The logic of theory change. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 465, pp. 206\u2013222). Springer."},{"key":"9217_CR15","unstructured":"Brewka, G. (1989). Preferred subtheories: An extended logical framework for default reasoning. In Proceedings 11th Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 1989 (Vol.\u00a02, pp. 1043\u20131048). San\u00a0Mateo, California."},{"issue":"2","key":"9217_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008296216319","volume":"7","author":"J Cantwell","year":"1998","unstructured":"Cantwell, J. (1998). Resolving conflicting information. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 7(2), 191\u2013220.","journal-title":"Journal of Logic, Language and Information"},{"key":"9217_CR17","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., de\u00a0Saint\u00a0Cyr, F.\u00a0D., & Lagasquie\u00a0Schiex, M.\u00a0C. (2008). Revision of an argumentation system. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and reasoning, KR 2008 (pp. 124\u2013134)."},{"key":"9217_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(96)00038-0","volume":"89","author":"A Darwiche","year":"1997","unstructured":"Darwiche, A., & Pearl, J. (1997). On the logic of iterated belief revision. Artificial Intelligence, 89, 1\u201329.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9217_CR19","unstructured":"Delgrande, J., Dubois, D., & Lang, J. (2006). Iterated revision and prioritized merging. In Proceedings of KR 2006 (pp. 210\u2013220). AAAI Press."},{"key":"9217_CR20","unstructured":"Delgrande, J., Schaub, T., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2008). Belief revision of logic programs under answer set semantics. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (pp. 411\u2013421)."},{"key":"9217_CR21","unstructured":"Delgrande, J.\u00a0P., Schaub, T., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2008). Belief revision of logic programs under answer set semantics. In G. Brewka, & J. Lang (Eds.), KR (pp. 411\u2013421). AAAI Press."},{"key":"9217_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(79)90008-0","volume":"12","author":"J Doyle","year":"1979","unstructured":"Doyle, J. (1979). A truth maintenance system. Artificial Intelligence, 12, 231\u2013272.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9217_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Doyle, J. (1992). Reason maintenance and belief revision: Foundations versus coherence theories. In P. G\u00e4rdenfors (Ed.), Belief revision, (pp. 29\u201351). Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511526664.002"},{"key":"9217_CR24","unstructured":"Dubois, D. (2006). Three scenarios for the revision of epistemic states. In Proceedings of NMR\u20192006."},{"issue":"2","key":"9217_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.\u00a0M. (1995). On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77(2), 321\u2013358.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9217_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.\u00a0M. (1995). On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77, 321\u2013357.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9217_CR27","unstructured":"Falappa, M.\u00a0A., Ferm\u00e9, E.\u00a0L., & Kern-Isberner, G. (2006). On the logic of theory change: Relations between incision and selection functions. In Proceedings of ECAI-2006 (pp. 402\u2013406)."},{"key":"9217_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Falappa, M.\u00a0A., Kern-Isberner, G., Reis, M.\u00a0D.\u00a0L., & Simari, G.\u00a0R. (2011). Prioritized and non-prioritized multiple change on belief bases. The Journal of Philosophical Logic. doi: 10.1007\/s10992-011-9200-8","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-011-9200-8"},{"key":"9217_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(02)00258-8","volume":"141","author":"MA Falappa","year":"2002","unstructured":"Falappa, M.\u00a0A., Kern-Isberner, G., & Simari, G.\u00a0R. (2002). Belief revision, explanations and defeasible reasoning. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 141, 1\u201328.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence Journal"},{"key":"9217_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Falappa, M.\u00a0A., Kern-Isberner, G., & Simari, G.\u00a0R. (2009) Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence. In I.\u00a0Rahwan, & G.\u00a0R.\u00a0Simari (Eds.), Chapt. Belief Revision and Argumentation Theory (pp. 341\u2013360). Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_17"},{"key":"9217_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01066356","volume":"3","author":"A Fuhrmann","year":"1994","unstructured":"Fuhrmann, A., & Hansson, S.\u00a0O. (1994). A survey of multiple contractions. The Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 3, 39\u201376.","journal-title":"The Journal of Logic, Language and Information"},{"issue":"1","key":"9217_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1017\/S1471068403001674","volume":"4","author":"AJ Garc\u00eda","year":"2004","unstructured":"Garc\u00eda, A.\u00a0J., & Simari, G.\u00a0R. (2004). Defeasible logic programming: An argumentative approach. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 4(1), 95\u2013138.","journal-title":"Theory and Practice of Logic Programming"},{"key":"9217_CR33","volume-title":"Knowledge in flux: Modelling the dynamics of epistemic states","author":"P G\u00e4rdenfors","year":"1988","unstructured":"G\u00e4rdenfors, P. (1988). Knowledge in flux: Modelling the dynamics of epistemic states. The MIT Press, Bradford Books: Cambridge."},{"key":"9217_CR34","first-page":"24","volume":"44","author":"P G\u00e4rdenfors","year":"1990","unstructured":"G\u00e4rdenfors, P. (1990). The dynamics of belief systems: Foundations vs. coherence theories. Revue Internationale of Philosophie, 44, 24\u201346.","journal-title":"Revue Internationale of Philosophie"},{"key":"9217_CR35","unstructured":"G\u00e4rdenfors, P., & Makinson, D. (1988). Revisions of knowledge systems using epistemic entrenchment. 2nd conference on theoretical aspects of reasoning about knowledge (pp. 83\u201395)."},{"key":"9217_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"G\u00f3mez\u00a0Lucero, M.\u00a0J., Ches\u00f1evar, C.\u00a0I., & Simari, G.\u00a0R. (2009). Modelling argument accrual in possibilistic defeasible logic programming. In Proceedings of ECSQARU\u20192009 (pp. 131\u2013143).","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-02906-6_13"},{"key":"9217_CR37","unstructured":"G\u00f3mez\u00a0Lucero, M.\u00a0J., Ches\u00f1evar, C.\u00a0I., & Simari, G.\u00a0R. (2009). On the accrual of arguments in defeasible logic programming. In Proceedings of IJCAI\u20192009 (pp. 804\u2013809)."},{"key":"9217_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00247909","volume":"17","author":"A Grove","year":"1988","unstructured":"Grove, A. (1988). Two modellings for theory change. The Journal of Philosophical Logic, 17, 157\u2013170.","journal-title":"The Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"9217_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"637","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01054039","volume":"22","author":"SO Hansson","year":"1993","unstructured":"Hansson, S.\u00a0O. (1993). Reversing the levi identity. The Journal of Philosophical Logic, 22, 637\u2013669.","journal-title":"The Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"9217_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"845","DOI":"10.2307\/2275912","volume":"59","author":"SO Hansson","year":"1994","unstructured":"Hansson, S.\u00a0O. (1994). Kernel contraction. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 59, 845\u2013859.","journal-title":"The Journal of Symbolic Logic"},{"key":"9217_CR41","unstructured":"Hansson, S.\u00a0O. (1999). A textbook of belief dymanics: Theory change and database updating. Kluwer Academic Publishers."},{"key":"9217_CR42","unstructured":"Kern-Isberner, G. (1999). Postulates for conditional belief revision. In Proceedings of 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 1999 (pp. 186\u2013191). Morgan Kaufmann."},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"9217_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1026110129951","volume":"40","author":"G Kern-Isberner","year":"2004","unstructured":"Kern-Isberner, G. (2004). A thorough axiomatization of a principle of conditional preservation in belief revision. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 40(1\u20132), 127\u2013164.","journal-title":"Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9217_CR44","first-page":"166","volume-title":"Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR 2008","author":"G Kern-Isberner","year":"2008","unstructured":"Kern-Isberner, G. (2008). Linking iterated belief change operations to nonmonotonic reasoning. In G. Brewka, & J. Lang (Eds.), Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR 2008 (pp. 166\u2013176). Menlo Park: AAAI Press."},{"key":"9217_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00485649","volume":"34","author":"I Levi","year":"1977","unstructured":"Levi, I. (1977). Subjunctives, dispositions, and chances. Synth\u0300ese, 34, 423\u2013455.","journal-title":"Synth\u0300ese"},{"key":"9217_CR46","unstructured":"Lindstr\u00f6m, S. & Rabinowicz, W. (1989). Epistemic entrenchment with incomparabilities and relational belief revision. In In A. Fuhrmann, & M. Morreau (eds.), The logic of theory change. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 93\u2013126). Springer"},{"key":"9217_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1007\/BFb0018421","volume":"465","author":"D Makinson","year":"1991","unstructured":"Makinson, D., & G\u00e4rdenfors, P. (1991). Relations between the logic of theory change and nonmonotonic logic. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 465, 183\u2013205.","journal-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science"},{"key":"9217_CR48","unstructured":"Moguillansky, M.\u00a0O., Rotstein, N.\u00a0D., Falappa, M.\u00a0A., Garc\u00eda, A.\u00a0J., & Simari, G.\u00a0R. (2008). Argument theory change applied to defeasible logic programming. In Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2008 (pp. 132\u2013137)."},{"key":"9217_CR49","unstructured":"Moguillansky, M.\u00a0O., Rotstein, N.\u00a0D., Falappa, M.\u00a0A., Garc\u00eda, A.\u00a0J., & Simari, G.\u00a0R. (2011). Argument Theory change applied to defeasible logic programming. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP), (in press)"},{"key":"9217_CR50","first-page":"359","volume-title":"The toulmin test: Framing argumentation within belief revision theories","author":"F Paglieri","year":"2006","unstructured":"Paglieri, F., & Castelfranchi, C. (2006). The toulmin test: Framing argumentation within belief revision theories (pp. 359\u2013377). Berlin: Springer."},{"issue":"3","key":"9217_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/14.3.355","volume":"14","author":"P Peppas","year":"2004","unstructured":"Peppas, P. (2004). The limit assumption and multiple revision. Journal of Logic and Computation, 14(3), 355\u2013371.","journal-title":"Journal of Logic and Computation"},{"key":"9217_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)90057-4","volume":"67","author":"JL Pollock","year":"1994","unstructured":"Pollock, J.\u00a0L. (1994). Justification and defeat. Artificial Intelligence, 67, 377\u2013407.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"9217_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1005220010407","volume":"122","author":"JL Pollock","year":"2000","unstructured":"Pollock, J.\u00a0L., & Gillies, A.\u00a0S. (2000). Belief revision and epistemology. Synthese, 122(1\u20132), 69\u201392.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"9217_CR54","unstructured":"Prakken, H. (1993). Logical tools for modelling legal argument. Ph.D. thesis, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdan."},{"key":"9217_CR55","unstructured":"Rahwan, I., & Simari, G.\u00a0R. (2009). Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Springer."},{"key":"9217_CR56","unstructured":"Rotstein, N.\u00a0D., Moguillansky, M.\u00a0O., Falappa, M.\u00a0A., Garc\u00eda, A.\u00a0J., & Simari, G.\u00a0R. (2008). Argument theory change: Revision upon warrant. In Proceedings of the Computational Models of Argument, COMMA\u20192008 (pp.\u00a0336\u2013347)."},{"key":"9217_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00203386","volume":"1","author":"H Rott","year":"1992","unstructured":"Rott, H. (1992). Preferential belief change using generalized epistemic entrenchment. The Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 1, 45\u201378.","journal-title":"The Journal of Logic, Language and Information"},{"key":"9217_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(92)90069-A","volume":"53","author":"GR Simari","year":"1992","unstructured":"Simari, G.\u00a0R., & Loui, R.\u00a0P. (1992). A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation. Artificial Intelligence, 53, 125\u2013157.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"issue":"3","key":"9217_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"427","DOI":"10.1023\/B:STUD.0000032106.55407.c8","volume":"76","author":"A Tamminga","year":"2004","unstructured":"Tamminga, A. (2004). Expansion and contraction of finite states. Studia Logica, 76(3), 427\u2013442.","journal-title":"Studia Logica"},{"key":"9217_CR60","unstructured":"Verheij, B. (1995). Accrual of arguments in defeasible argumentation. In Proceedings of the 2nd Dutch\/German Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning, (pp. 217\u2013224). Utrecht."},{"key":"9217_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Williams, M.-A. (1994). Transmutations of knowledge systems. In J. Doyle, E. Sandewall, & P. Torasso (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 1994), (pp. 619\u2013629). Bonn, Germany.","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203303177"},{"key":"9217_CR62","unstructured":"Williams, M.-A. (1996). Towards a practical approach to belief revision: Reason-based change. In L.\u00a0C. Aiello, J. Doyle, & S.\u00a0C. Shapiro (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 1996), (pp. 412\u2013420). Cambridge, MA."}],"container-title":["Journal of Philosophical Logic"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10992-011-9217-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10992-011-9217-z\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10992-011-9217-z","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,19]],"date-time":"2019-06-19T21:32:29Z","timestamp":1560979949000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10992-011-9217-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,11,25]]},"references-count":62,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,2]]}},"alternative-id":["9217"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10992-011-9217-z","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-3611","1573-0433"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-3611","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-0433","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,11,25]]}}}