{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,29]],"date-time":"2026-06-29T10:47:45Z","timestamp":1782730065904,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,2]],"date-time":"2024-07-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1719878400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,2]],"date-time":"2024-07-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1719878400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100018693","name":"HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["101086295"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["101086295"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100018693","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100003407","name":"Ministero dell\u2019Istruzione, dell\u2019Universit\u00e0 e della Ricerca","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["2022SM4XC8"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["2022SM4XC8"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100003407","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100014810","name":"Fondazione di Sardegna","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["F73C22001360007"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["F73C22001360007"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100014810","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100013003","name":"Universit\u00e0 degli Studi di Cagliari","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100013003","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Philos Logic"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Strict-Tolerant Logic (<jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:tex-math>$$\\textrm{ST}$$<\/jats:tex-math><mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:mtext>ST<\/mml:mtext>\n                <\/mml:math><\/jats:alternatives><\/jats:inline-formula>) underpins na\u00efve theories of truth and vagueness (respectively including a fully disquotational truth predicate and an unrestricted tolerance principle) without jettisoning any classically valid laws. The classical sequent calculus without Cut is sometimes advocated as an appropriate proof-theoretic presentation of <jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:tex-math>$$\\textrm{ST}$$<\/jats:tex-math><mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:mtext>ST<\/mml:mtext>\n                <\/mml:math><\/jats:alternatives><\/jats:inline-formula>. Unfortunately, there is only a partial correspondence between its derivability relation and the relation of local metainferential <jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:tex-math>$$\\textrm{ST}$$<\/jats:tex-math><mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:mtext>ST<\/mml:mtext>\n                <\/mml:math><\/jats:alternatives><\/jats:inline-formula>-validity \u2013 these relations coincide only upon the addition of elimination rules and only within the propositional fragment of the calculus, due to the non-invertibility of the quantifier rules. In this paper, we present two calculi for first-order <jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:tex-math>$$\\textrm{ST}$$<\/jats:tex-math><mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:mtext>ST<\/mml:mtext>\n                <\/mml:math><\/jats:alternatives><\/jats:inline-formula> with an eye to recapturing this correspondence in full. The first calculus is close in spirit to the Epsilon calculus. The other calculus includes rules for the discharge of sequent-assumptions; moreover, it is normalisable and admits interpolation.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-024-09766-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,2]],"date-time":"2024-07-02T10:03:08Z","timestamp":1719914588000},"page":"1291-1320","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Sequent Calculi for First-order $$\\textrm{ST}$$"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"53","author":[{"given":"Francesco","family":"Paoli","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Adam","family":"P\u0159enosil","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,2]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"9766_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1017\/jsl.2018.51","volume":"84","author":"JP Aguilera","year":"2019","unstructured":"Aguilera, J. P., & Baaz, M. (2019). Unsound inferences make proofs shorter. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 84(1), 102\u2013122.","journal-title":"Journal of Symbolic Logic"},{"issue":"2\u20133","key":"9766_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1016\/0304-3975(88)90037-0","volume":"57","author":"A Avron","year":"1988","unstructured":"Avron, A. (1988). The semantics and proof theory of linear logic. Theoretical Computer Science, 57(2\u20133), 161\u2013184.","journal-title":"Theoretical Computer Science"},{"issue":"2","key":"9766_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.36446\/af.2021.461","volume":"41","author":"E Barrio","year":"2021","unstructured":"Barrio, E., & Pailos, F. (2021). Why a logic is not only its set of valid inferences. An\u00e1lisis Filos\u00f3fico, 41(2), 261\u2013272.","journal-title":"An\u00e1lisis Filos\u00f3fico"},{"key":"9766_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12561","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-021-03343-w","volume":"199","author":"E Barrio","year":"2021","unstructured":"Barrio, E., Pailos, F., & Calderon, J. T. (2021). Anti-exceptionalism, truth and the BA-plan. Synthese, 199, 12561\u201312586.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"issue":"5","key":"9766_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-014-9342-6","volume":"44","author":"E Barrio","year":"2015","unstructured":"Barrio, E., Rosenblatt, L., & Tajer, D. (2015). The logics of strict-tolerant logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 44(5), 551\u2013571.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"9766_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"764","DOI":"10.1090\/S0002-9904-1944-08235-9","volume":"50","author":"G Birkhoff","year":"1944","unstructured":"Birkhoff, G. (1944). Subdirect unions in universal algebra. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 50, 764\u2013768.","journal-title":"Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society"},{"key":"9766_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-010-9165-z","volume":"41","author":"P Cobreros","year":"2012","unstructured":"Cobreros, P., Egr\u00e9, P., Ripley, D., & van Rooij, R. (2012). Tolerant, classical, strict. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 41, 347\u201385.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"issue":"488","key":"9766_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"841","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/fzt110","volume":"122","author":"P Cobreros","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cobreros, P., Egr\u00e9, P., Ripley, D., & van Rooij, R. (2013). Reaching transparent truth. Mind, 122(488), 841\u2013866.","journal-title":"Mind"},{"key":"9766_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1057","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-020-09560-x","volume":"49","author":"P Cobreros","year":"2020","unstructured":"Cobreros, P., Egr\u00e9, P., Ripley, D., & van Rooij, R. (2020). Inferences and metainferences in ST. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 49, 1057\u20131077.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"9766_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1521","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-021-09619-3","volume":"51","author":"B Da R\u00e9","year":"2022","unstructured":"Da R\u00e9, B., Szmuc, D., & Teijeiro, P. (2022). Derivability and metainferential validity. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 51, 1521\u20131547.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"9766_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-25365-3_18","volume-title":"Graham Priest on Dialetheism and Paraconsistency","author":"B Dicher","year":"2019","unstructured":"Dicher, B., & Paoli, F. (2019). ST, LP, and tolerant metainferences. In C. Ba\u015fkent & G. Ferguson (Eds.), Graham Priest on Dialetheism and Paraconsistency (pp. 383\u2013407). Berlin: Springer."},{"key":"9766_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1261","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-021-09630-8","volume":"51","author":"TM Ferguson","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ferguson, T. M., Ram\u00edrez-C\u00e1mara, E., & Deep, S. T. (2022). Journal of Philosophical Logic, 51, 1261\u20131293.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"9766_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1453","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-021-09623-7","volume":"51","author":"R French","year":"2022","unstructured":"French, R. (2022). Metasequents and tetravaluations. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 51, 1453\u20131476.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"9766_CR14","unstructured":"Girard, J. -Y. (1976). Three-valued logic and cut-elimination: The actual meaning of Takeuti\u2019s conjecture. Dissertationes Mathematicae, 136."},{"issue":"3","key":"9766_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1093\/analys\/anab032","volume":"81","author":"R Golan","year":"2021","unstructured":"Golan, R. (2021). There is no tenable notion of global metainferential validity. Analysis, 81(3), 411\u2013420.","journal-title":"Analysis"},{"issue":"4","key":"9766_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1296","DOI":"10.1017\/S1755020322000090","volume":"16","author":"R Golan","year":"2023","unstructured":"Golan, R. (2023). A simple sequent system for minimally inconsistent LP. Review of Symbolic Logic, 16(4), 1296\u20131311.","journal-title":"Review of Symbolic Logic"},{"key":"9766_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4759","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-018-1687-x","volume":"196","author":"U Hlobil","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hlobil, U. (2019). Faithfulness for naive validity. Synthese, 196, 4759\u20134774.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"issue":"19","key":"9766_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.2307\/2024634","volume":"72","author":"S Kripke","year":"1975","unstructured":"Kripke, S. (1975). Outline of a theory of truth. Journal of Philosophy, 72(19), 690\u2013716.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"9766_CR19","unstructured":"Leisenring, A. (1969). Mathematical Logic and Hilbert\u2019s$$\\epsilon $$-Symbol. London: MacDonald Technical and Scientific."},{"key":"9766_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-44381-7","volume-title":"Metainferential Logics","author":"F Pailos","year":"2023","unstructured":"Pailos, F., & Da R\u00e9, B. (2023). Metainferential Logics. Berlin: Springer."},{"key":"9766_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Powell, T. (2019). Computational interpretations of classical reasoning: From the Epsilon calculus to stateful programs. In S. Centrone, et al. (Eds), Mathesis Universalis, Computability and Proof, Synthese Library (vol. 412). Springer, Cham. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-20447-1-14","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-20447-1-14"},{"issue":"6","key":"9766_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1255","DOI":"10.1007\/s11225-017-9746-8","volume":"105","author":"A P\u0159enosil","year":"2017","unstructured":"P\u0159enosil, A. (2017). Cut elimination, identity elimination, and interpolation in Super-Belnap logics. Studia Logica, 105(6), 1255\u20131289.","journal-title":"Studia Logica"},{"key":"9766_CR23","unstructured":"Priest, G. (2021). Substructural solutions to the semantic paradoxes: A dialetheic perspective, talk given at the Logic and Metaphysics Seminar. CUNY."},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"9766_CR24","first-page":"35","volume":"39","author":"AP Pynko","year":"2010","unstructured":"Pynko, A. P. (2010). Gentzen\u2019s cut-free calculus versus the logic of paradox. Bulletin of the Section of Logic, 39(1\u20132), 35\u201342.","journal-title":"Bulletin of the Section of Logic"},{"issue":"5","key":"9766_CR25","first-page":"1","volume":"13","author":"D Ripley","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ripley, D. (2013). Revising up: Strengthening classical logic in the face of paradox. Philosophers\u2019 Imprint, 13(5), 1\u201313.","journal-title":"Philosophers\u2019 Imprint"},{"issue":"1","key":"9766_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1080\/00048402.2011.630010","volume":"91","author":"D Ripley","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ripley, D. (2013). Paradoxes and failures of cut. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 91(1), 139\u2013164.","journal-title":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"9766_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1284","DOI":"10.2307\/2274279","volume":"49","author":"P Schroeder-Heister","year":"1984","unstructured":"Schroeder-Heister, P. (1984). A natural extension of natural deduction. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 49, 1284\u20131300.","journal-title":"Journal of Symbolic Logic"},{"issue":"2","key":"9766_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.36446\/af.2021.459","volume":"41","author":"P Teijeiro","year":"2021","unstructured":"Teijeiro, P. (2021). Strength and stability. An\u00e1lisis Filos\u00f3fico, 41(2), 337\u2013349.","journal-title":"An\u00e1lisis Filos\u00f3fico"},{"key":"9766_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139168717","volume-title":"Basic Proof Theory","author":"AS Troelstra","year":"2000","unstructured":"Troelstra, A. S., & Schwichtenberg, H. (2000). Basic Proof Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9766_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zach, R. (2017). Semantics and proof theory of the Epsilon calculus. In: S. Ghosh, & S. Prasad (Eds.), Logic and Its Applications, ICLA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (vol. 10119). Springer, Berlin. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-662-54069-5-4","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-662-54069-5-4"}],"container-title":["Journal of Philosophical Logic"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10992-024-09766-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10992-024-09766-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10992-024-09766-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,4]],"date-time":"2024-10-04T10:25:09Z","timestamp":1728037509000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10992-024-09766-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,2]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,10]]}},"alternative-id":["9766"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10992-024-09766-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-3611","1573-0433"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-3611","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-0433","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"27 October 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"12 June 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 July 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical Approval"}},{"value":"The authors have no competing interests of a financial or personal nature.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}]}}