{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,28]],"date-time":"2025-06-28T11:40:08Z","timestamp":1751110808224,"version":"3.41.0"},"reference-count":66,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,19]],"date-time":"2025-05-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1747612800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,19]],"date-time":"2025-05-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1747612800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"European Union\u2019s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme","award":["101034440"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["101034440"]}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100021638","name":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["435-2022-0324"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["435-2022-0324"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100021638","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100002428","name":"Austrian Science Fund","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["10.55776\/I6372"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["10.55776\/I6372"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100002428","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"TU Wien"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Philos Logic"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:p>The traditional definition of permission as the dual of obligation oversimplifies its many applications, often yielding undesirable consequences. Recent literature recognizes the need to distinguish various types of permissions but often overlooks potential preferences associated with them. In contrast, the Sanskrit philosophical school of M\u012bm\u0101\u1e43s\u0101 refutes the interdefinability of deontic concepts, and asserts that permissions always refer to less desirable actions (\u2018better-not\u2019 permissions), and are exceptions to prohibitions or negative obligations. This article analyzes the concept of M\u012bm\u0101\u1e43s\u0101 permission, compares it with contemporary theories and formalizes it while carefully preserving its essential characteristics. We transform M\u012bm\u0101\u1e43s\u0101\u2019s reasoning principles for permission into Hilbert axioms and introduce neighbourhood semantics, incorporating ceteris-paribus preferences. The resulting logic is evaluated against various paradoxes from contemporary deontic logic and applied to a scenario from Sanskrit jurisprudence.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-025-09798-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,19]],"date-time":"2025-05-19T09:37:03Z","timestamp":1747647423000},"page":"651-689","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["M\u012bm\u0101\u1e43s\u0101 on \u2018better-not\u2019 Permissions"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"54","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6947-8772","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Agata","family":"Ciabattoni","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-6149-5684","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Josephine","family":"Dik","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8017-9466","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Elisa","family":"Freschi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"9798_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Alchourr\u00f3n, C. E. (2015). Permissory Norms and Normative Systems (1984\/86\/2012). In: C. Bernal, C. Huerta, T. Mazzarese, et\u00a0al. (Eds.), Essays in Legal Philosophy. Oxford University Press, (pp. 324\u2013336). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780198729365.003.0023","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780198729365.003.0023"},{"key":"9798_CR2","unstructured":"Alchourr\u00f3n, C. E., & Bulygin, E. (1984). Permission and permissive norms. In: H. R\u00fc\u00dfmann (Ed.), Theorie der Normen. Festgabe f\u00fcr Ota Weinberger zum 65. Geburtstag. Duncker & Humblot Berlin, (pp. 349\u2013371)."},{"key":"9798_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Anglberger, A. J. J., Dong, H., & Roy, O. (2014). Open reading without free choice. In: F. Cariani, D. Grossi, J. Meheus, et\u00a0al. (Eds.), Deontic Logic and Normative Systems. Springer International Publishing, Cham, (pp. 19\u201332). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-08615-6_3","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-08615-6_3"},{"key":"9798_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"\u00c5qvist, L. (1984). Deontic logic. In: D. Gabbay, & F. Guenthner (Eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic: Volume II. Springer, Dordrecht, (pp. 605\u2013714). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0022481200041256","DOI":"10.1017\/s0022481200041256"},{"issue":"3","key":"9798_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-005-6196-z","volume":"145","author":"N Asher","year":"2005","unstructured":"Asher, N., & Bonevac, D. (2005). Free choice permission is strong permission. Synth, 145(3), 303\u2013323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-005-6196-z","journal-title":"Synth"},{"issue":"10","key":"9798_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3765\/sp.3.10","volume":"3","author":"C Barker","year":"2010","unstructured":"Barker, C. (2010). Free choice permission as resource-sensitive reasoning. Semantics and Pragmatics, 3(10), 1\u201338. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3765\/sp.3.10","journal-title":"Semantics and Pragmatics"},{"issue":"1","key":"9798_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1007\/S10992-008-9085-3","volume":"38","author":"J van Benthem","year":"2009","unstructured":"van Benthem, J., Girard, P., & Roy, O. (2009). Everything else being equal: A modal logic for Ceteris Paribus preferences. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 38(1), 83\u2013125. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/S10992-008-9085-3","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"9798_CR8","unstructured":"van Berkel, K., & Lyon, T. (2021). The varieties of ought-implies-can and deontic STIT logic. In: F. Liu, A. Marra, P. Portner, et\u00a0al. (Eds.), Deontic Logic and Normative Systems - 15th International Conference, DEON 2020\/21, Munich, Germany [virtual], July 21-24, 2021. College Publications, (pp. 56\u201376)."},{"key":"9798_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"van Berkel, K., Ciabattoni, A., Freschi, E., et al. (2023). Deontic paradoxes in M\u012bm\u0101m\u0323s\u0101 logics: There and back again. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 32(1), 19\u201362. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/S10849-022-09375-W","DOI":"10.1007\/S10849-022-09375-W"},{"key":"9798_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Blackburn, P., Rijke, M., & d., & Venema, Y. (2001). Modal Logic. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, Cambridge University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9781107050884","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781107050884"},{"key":"9798_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Boella, G., & van\u00a0der Torre, L. (2003). Permissions and obligations in hierarchical normative systems. In: J. Zeleznikow, G. Sartor (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, ICAIL \u201903, (p 109\u2013118). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/1047788.1047818","DOI":"10.1145\/1047788.1047818"},{"key":"9798_CR12","volume-title":"A Law Dictionary","author":"J Bouvier","year":"1856","unstructured":"Bouvier, J. (1856). A Law Dictionary. Philadelphia: Childs and Peterson."},{"key":"9798_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Broersen, J., & van\u00a0der Torre, L. (2012). Ten problems of deontic logic and normative reasoning in computer science. Lectures on Logic and Computation: ESSLLI 2010, Selected Lecture Notes (pp. 55\u201388). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-31485-8_2","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-31485-8_2"},{"key":"9798_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511621192","author":"BF Chellas","year":"1980","unstructured":"Chellas, B. F. (1980). Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9780511621192","journal-title":"Cambridge University Press, Cambridge."},{"key":"9798_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ciabattoni, A., Freschi, E., Genco, F. A., et\u00a0al. (2015). M\u012bm\u0101m\u0323s\u0101 deontic logic: Proof theory and applications. In: H. De\u00a0Nivelle (Ed.), Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods. Springer International Publishing, Cham, (pp. 323\u2013338). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-24312-2_22","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-24312-2_22"},{"key":"9798_CR16","unstructured":"Ciabattoni, A., Dik, J., & Freschi, E. (2023). Disambiguating Permissions: A Contribution from M\u012bm\u0101m\u0323s\u0101. In: J. Maranh\u00e3o , C. Peterson, & C. Stra\u00dfer, et\u00a0al. (Eds.), Deontic Logic and Normative Systems - 16th International Conference, DEON 2023, Trois-Rivi\u00e8res, QC, Canada, July 5-7, 2023. College Publications, (pp. 99\u2013118)."},{"key":"9798_CR17","volume-title":"Preference and Obligation","author":"S Danielsson","year":"1968","unstructured":"Danielsson, S. (1968). Preference and Obligation. Uppsala: Filosofiska F\u00e4reningen."},{"key":"9798_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Davis, D. R. Jr. (2023). Sex with Purpose. M\u012bm\u0101m\u0323s\u0101 Rules and the Dharma of Marital Intercourse. Religions of South Asia, 17(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1558\/rosa.25454","DOI":"10.1558\/rosa.25454"},{"key":"9798_CR19","unstructured":"Dignum, F., Meyer, J. J. C., & Wieringa, R. (1994). Contextual permission: A solution to the free choice paradox. In: A. Jones, & M. Sergot (Eds.), Second International Workshop on Deontic Logic in Computer Science, (pp. 107\u2013135)."},{"issue":"4","key":"9798_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1158","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exab022","volume":"31","author":"H Dong","year":"2021","unstructured":"Dong, H. (2021). Logic of defeasible permission and its dynamics. Journal of Logic and Computation, 31(4), 1158\u20131193. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/logcom\/exab022","journal-title":"Journal of Logic and Computation"},{"key":"9798_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dong, H. (2022). Permission and obligation in ceteris paribus. In: Computability Theory and Foundations of Mathematics: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computability Theory and Foundations of Mathematics, (pp. 157\u2013165). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1142\/9789811259296_0007","DOI":"10.1142\/9789811259296_0007"},{"key":"9798_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dong, H., Gratzl, N., & Roy, O. (2018). Open reading and free choice permission: a perspective in substructural logics. In: International Conference on Logic and Argumentation, Springer, (pp. 81\u2013115).","DOI":"10.1007\/978-981-13-7791-4_5"},{"key":"9798_CR23","volume-title":"L\u00f3gica, proposici\u00f3n y norma","author":"DT Echave","year":"1980","unstructured":"Echave, D. T., Urquijo, M. E., & Guibourg, R. (1980). L\u00f3gica, proposici\u00f3n y norma. Buenos Aires: Astrea."},{"key":"9798_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Freschi, E. (2018). The role of paribh\u0101\u1e63\u0101s in M\u012bm\u0101m\u0323s\u0101: Rational rules of textual exegesis. Asiatische Studien\/\u00c9tudes Asiatiques, 72(2), 567\u2013595.","DOI":"10.1515\/asia-2018-0018"},{"key":"9798_CR25","unstructured":"Freschi, E. (2024). M\u012bm\u0101m\u0323s\u0101 and dharma\u015b\u0101stra sources on permissions. In: P. A., Maas & A. Cerulli (Eds.), Suhr\u0323dayasam\u0323hit\u0101. A Compendium of Studies on South Asian Culture, Philosophy, and Religion. Dedicated to Dominik Wujastyk, Studia Indologica Universitatis Halensis, (vol.\u00a028). Universit\u00e4tsverlag Halle-Wittenberg, Halle-Wittenberg."},{"issue":"3","key":"9798_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"659","DOI":"10.1111\/theo.12307","volume":"87","author":"E Freschi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Freschi, E., & Pascucci, M. (2021). Deontic concepts and their clash in M\u012bm\u0101m\u0323s\u0101: Towards an interpretation. Theoria, 87(3), 659\u2013703. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/theo.12307","journal-title":"Theoria"},{"issue":"1","key":"9798_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.2979\/jourworlphil.2.1.05","volume":"2","author":"E Freschi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Freschi, E., Ciabattoni, A., Genco, F. A., et al. (2017). Understanding prescriptive texts: Rules and logic as elaborated by the M\u012bm\u0101m\u0323s\u0101 school. Journal of World Philosophies, 2(1), 47\u201366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2979\/jourworlphil.2.1.05","journal-title":"Journal of World Philosophies"},{"issue":"2","key":"9798_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jal.2014.01.003","volume":"12","author":"D Gabbay","year":"2014","unstructured":"Gabbay, D., Gammaitoni, L., & Sun, X. (2014). The paradoxes of permission an action based solution. Journal of Applied Logic, 12(2), 179\u2013191. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jal.2014.01.003","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Logic"},{"key":"9798_CR29","volume-title":"2021","author":"D Gabbay","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gabbay, D., Horty, J., Parent, X., et al. (2021). 2021. Handbook of deontic logic and normative systems: College Publications."},{"key":"9798_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Governatori, G. (2015). Thou shalt is not you will. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, ICAIL \u201915, (pp. 63\u201368). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2746090.2746105","DOI":"10.1145\/2746090.2746105"},{"key":"9798_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Governatori, G., Olivieri, F., Rotolo, A., et\u00a0al. (2011). Three concepts of defeasible permission. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. IOS Press, (pp. 63\u201372). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/978-1-60750-981-3-63","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-60750-981-3-63"},{"key":"9798_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"799","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-013-9295-1","volume":"42","author":"G Governatori","year":"2013","unstructured":"Governatori, G., Olivieri, F., Rotolo, A., et al. (2013). Computing strong and weak permissions in defeasible logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 42, 799\u2013829. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10992-013-9295-1","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"issue":"3","key":"9798_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"421","DOI":"10.1007\/s10781-021-09465-2","volume":"49","author":"E Guhe","year":"2021","unstructured":"Guhe, E. (2021). Killing gently by means of the \u015ayena: The Navya-Ny\u0101ya analysis of vedic and secular injunctions (vidhi) and prohibitions (ni\u1e63edha) from the perspective of dynamic deontic logic. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 49(3), 421\u2013449. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10781-021-09465-2","journal-title":"Journal of Indian Philosophy"},{"issue":"1","key":"9798_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1111\/phpe.12137","volume":"34","author":"JE Gustafsson","year":"2020","unstructured":"Gustafsson, J. E. (2020). Permissibility is the only feasible deontic primitive. Philosophical Perspectives, 34(1), 117\u2013133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/phpe.12137","journal-title":"Philosophical Perspectives"},{"key":"9798_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hansson, B. (1969). An analysis of some deontic logics. No$$\\hat{u}$$s, 3(4), 373\u2013398. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2214372","DOI":"10.2307\/2214372"},{"key":"9798_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hansson, S. O. (1990). Preference-based deontic logic (pdl). Journal of Philosophical Logic, 93\u2013122. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF00211186","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00211186"},{"issue":"3","key":"9798_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00248152","volume":"25","author":"SO Hansson","year":"1996","unstructured":"Hansson, S. O. (1996). What is ceteris paribus preference? Journal of Philosophical Logic, 25(3), 307\u2013332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF00248152","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"9798_CR38","first-page":"195","volume-title":"Handbook of deontic logic and normative systems","author":"SO Hansson","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hansson, S. O., et al. (2013). The varieties of permission. In D. M. Gabbay, J. Horty, & X. Parent (Eds.), Handbook of deontic logic and normative systems (pp. 195\u2013240). London: College Publications."},{"issue":"3","key":"9798_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exv057","volume":"29","author":"SO Hansson","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hansson, S. O. (2015). In defence of deontic diversity. Journal of Logic and Computation, 29(3), 349\u2013367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/logcom\/exv057","journal-title":"Journal of Logic and Computation"},{"key":"9798_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Heyd, D. (Ed.) (2023). Handbook of Supererogation. Springer Nature Singapore.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-981-99-3633-5"},{"key":"9798_CR41","unstructured":"Hilpinen, R., & McNamara, P. (2013). Deontic logic: A historical survey and introduction. In: D. Gabbay, J. Horty, X. Parent, et\u00a0al. (Eds.), Handbook of Deontic Logic and Normative Systems. College Publications, (pp. 3\u2013136)."},{"key":"9798_CR42","unstructured":"Jh\u0101, G. (Ed.). (1999). Manu-smr\u0323ti. With the \u2018Manubh\u0101\u1e63ya\u2019 of Medh\u0101tithi. Edited with the help of several manuscripts (2nd ed.). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass."},{"key":"9798_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lellmann, B., Gulisano, F., & Ciabattoni, A. (2021). M\u012bm\u0101m\u0323s\u0101 deontic reasoning using specificity: a proof theoretic approach. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 29(3), 351\u2013394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-020-09278-w","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-020-09278-w"},{"key":"9798_CR44","volume-title":"Counterfactuals","author":"D Lewis","year":"1973","unstructured":"Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Oxford: Blackwell."},{"issue":"2","key":"9798_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exab088","volume":"32","author":"A Loreggia","year":"2022","unstructured":"Loreggia, A., Lorini, E., & Sartor, G. (2022). Modelling ceteris paribus preferences with deontic logic. Journal of Logic and Computation, 32(2), 347\u2013368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/logcom\/exab088","journal-title":"Journal of Logic and Computation"},{"key":"9798_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lorini, E. (2020). Rethinking epistemic logic with belief bases. Artificial Intelligence, 282, 103233. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.artint.2020.103233https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0004370219300293","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2020.103233"},{"issue":"4","key":"9798_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1024806529939","volume":"32","author":"D Makinson","year":"2003","unstructured":"Makinson, D., & van der Torre, L. (2003). Permission from an input\/output perspective. Journal of philosophical logic, 32(4), 391\u2013416. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1024806529939","journal-title":"Journal of philosophical logic"},{"issue":"4","key":"9798_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1004748624537","volume":"29","author":"D Makinson","year":"2000","unstructured":"Makinson, D., & van der Torre, L. W. N. (2000). Input\/output logics. Journal of philosophical logic, 29(4), 383\u2013408. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1004748624537","journal-title":"Input\/output logics. Journal of philosophical logic"},{"key":"9798_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1007\/bf00370674","volume":"57","author":"P McNamara","year":"1996","unstructured":"McNamara, P. (1996). Doing well enough: Toward a logic for common-sense morality. Studia logica, 57, 167\u2013192. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/bf00370674","journal-title":"Studia logica"},{"key":"9798_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"McNamara, P. (2006). Deontic logic. In: D. M. Gabbay, & J. Woods (Eds.), Logic and the Modalities in the Twentieth Century, Handbook of the History of Logic, (vol.\u00a07, p 197\u2013288). North-Holland. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S1874-5857(06)80029-4","DOI":"10.1016\/S1874-5857(06)80029-4"},{"key":"9798_CR51","unstructured":"McNamara, P. (2023). Extensions and variations of the DWE framework. In: J. Maranh\u00e3o, C. Peterson, C. Stra\u00dfer, et\u00a0al (Eds.), Deontic Logic and Normative Systems - 16th International Conference, DEON 2023, Trois-Rivi\u00e8res, QC, Canada, July 5-7, 2023. College Publications, (pp. 177\u2013197)"},{"key":"9798_CR52","unstructured":"Meinong, A. (1894). Psychologisch-ethische Untersuchungen zur Werththeorie. Leuschner & Lubensky."},{"key":"9798_CR53","unstructured":"Olszewski, M., Parent, X., & van\u00a0der Torre, L. (2021). Input\/output logic with a consistency check-the case of permission. In: F. Liu, A. Marra, P. Portner, et\u00a0al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Deontic Logic and Normative Systems - 15th International Conference, DEON 2020\/21, Munich, Germany [virtual], July 21-24, 2021, (pp. 358\u2013375)."},{"key":"9798_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00370671","volume":"57","author":"H Prakken","year":"1996","unstructured":"Prakken, H., & Sergot, M. (1996). Contrary-to-duty obligations. Studia Logica, 57, 91\u2013115. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF00370671","journal-title":"Studia Logica"},{"issue":"1","key":"9798_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.2307\/2268596","volume":"11","author":"A Ross","year":"1944","unstructured":"Ross, A. (1944). Imperatives and logic. Philosophy of Science, 11(1), 30\u201346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2268596","journal-title":"Philosophy of Science"},{"key":"9798_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199645169.001.0001","volume-title":"Context","author":"R Stalnaker","year":"2014","unstructured":"Stalnaker, R. (2014). Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"1","key":"9798_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1017\/s0953820803001055","volume":"16","author":"R Stern","year":"2004","unstructured":"Stern, R. (2004). Does \u2018ought\u2019 imply \u2018can\u2019? And did Kant think it does? Utilitas, 16(1), 42\u201361. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0953820803001055","journal-title":"Utilitas"},{"issue":"1","key":"9798_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jal.2010.01.001","volume":"8","author":"A Stolpe","year":"2010","unstructured":"Stolpe, A. (2010). A theory of permission based on the notion of derogation. Journal of applied logic, 8(1), 97\u2013113. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jal.2010.01.001","journal-title":"Journal of applied logic"},{"key":"9798_CR59","unstructured":"Subb\u0101\u015b\u0101str\u012b (Ed.) (1929-1934) \u015ar\u012bmajjaiminipran\u0323itam\u0323 M\u012bm\u0101m\u0323s\u0101dar\u015banam. $$\\bar{\\rm A}$$nand\u0101\u015bramamudr\u0101n\u0323\u0101laya, Poona."},{"key":"9798_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Urmson, J. O. (1958). Saints and heroes. In: A. I. Melden (Ed.), Essays in Moral Philosophy. University of Washington Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0031819100050762","DOI":"10.1017\/S0031819100050762"},{"key":"9798_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Van\u00a0Fraassen, B. C. (1973). The logic of conditional obligation. Exact Philosophy, D Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland (pp. 151\u2013172). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/bf00255570","DOI":"10.1007\/bf00255570"},{"issue":"237","key":"9798_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/LX.237.1","volume":"60","author":"GH von Wright","year":"1951","unstructured":"von Wright, G. H. (1951). Deontic logic. Mind, 60(237), 1\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/mind\/LX.237.1","journal-title":"Mind"},{"key":"9798_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2218217","author":"GH von Wright","year":"1963","unstructured":"von Wright, G. H. (1963). Norm and Action. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London,. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2218217","journal-title":"Routledge and Kegan Paul, London,"},{"key":"9798_CR64","volume-title":"An Essay in Deontic Logic and the General Theory of Action: With a Bibliography of Deontic and Imperative Logic","author":"GH von Wright","year":"1968","unstructured":"von Wright, G. H. (1968). An Essay in Deontic Logic and the General Theory of Action: With a Bibliography of Deontic and Imperative Logic. Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. Co."},{"key":"9798_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"von Wright, G. H. (1970). Deontic logic and the theory of conditions. In: R. Hilpinen (Ed.), Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings. Springer Netherlands, (pp. 159\u2013177). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-94-010-3146-2_7","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-010-3146-2_7"},{"key":"9798_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"549","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-021-01670-9","volume":"179","author":"A Zylberman","year":"2022","unstructured":"Zylberman, A. (2022). Moral rights without balancing. Philosophical Studies, 179, 549\u2013569. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11098-021-01670-9","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"}],"container-title":["Journal of Philosophical Logic"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10992-025-09798-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10992-025-09798-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10992-025-09798-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,28]],"date-time":"2025-06-28T11:03:12Z","timestamp":1751108592000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10992-025-09798-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,19]]},"references-count":66,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,6]]}},"alternative-id":["9798"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10992-025-09798-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-3611","1573-0433"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0022-3611"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1573-0433"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,19]]},"assertion":[{"value":"22 March 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"22 April 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 May 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing Interests"}}]}}