{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,8]],"date-time":"2026-03-08T02:01:07Z","timestamp":1772935267391,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,6]],"date-time":"2026-01-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1767657600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,6]],"date-time":"2026-01-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1767657600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100005743","name":"Universit\u00e0 Cattolica del Sacro Cuore","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100005743","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Philos Logic"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>In the last few decades, truthmaker semantics has attracted the attention of scholars from various areas, arguably due to its philosophical underpinning and its flexibility in addressing a number of problems that are difficult to solve using alternative semantic frameworks. Attention is now focused on developing truthmaker semantics for modal logic; this paper contributes to that direction. The basic idea we introduce is that truthmakers of modal sentences are norms. This allows us to derive two interesting results: first, we introduce a new modal semantics for minimal monotonic logic; second, we provide a truthmaker semantics for every modal logic characterized by a class of Kripke frames. This is, as far as we can tell, the first general result about truthmaker semantics for normal modal logics.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-025-09826-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,6]],"date-time":"2026-01-06T12:42:21Z","timestamp":1767703341000},"page":"135-165","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["A Norm-based Truthmaker Semantics for Modal Logic"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"55","author":[{"given":"Alessandro","family":"Giordani","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-4546-823X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Vita","family":"Saitta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"9826_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bueno, O., & Shalkowski, S. A. (2021). The Routledge handbook of modality. Routledge New York.","DOI":"10.4324\/9781315742144"},{"issue":"4","key":"9826_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"517","DOI":"10.1007\/s10988-023-09407-z","volume":"47","author":"L Champollion","year":"2024","unstructured":"Champollion, L., & Timoth\u00e9e, B. (2024). Negation and modality in unilateral truthmaker semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy, 47(4), 517\u2013555.","journal-title":"Linguistics and Philosophy"},{"key":"9826_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chellas, B. F. (1980). Modal logic: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511621192"},{"issue":"3","key":"9826_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"639","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1933-1592.2010.00436.x","volume":"84","author":"F Correia","year":"2012","unstructured":"Correia, F. (2012). On the reduction of necessity to essence. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 84(3), 639\u2013653.","journal-title":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research"},{"key":"9826_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.2307\/2214160","volume":"8","author":"K Fine","year":"1994","unstructured":"Fine, K. (1994). Essence and modality: The second philosophical perspectives lecture. Philosophical Perspectives, 8, 1\u201316.","journal-title":"Philosophical Perspectives"},{"issue":"2-3","key":"9826_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"549","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-013-9281-7","volume":"43","author":"K Fine","year":"2014","unstructured":"Fine, K. (2014). Truth-maker semantics for intuitionistic logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 43(2\u20133), 549\u2013577.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"issue":"6","key":"9826_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"625","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-016-9413-y","volume":"46","author":"K Fine","year":"2017","unstructured":"Fine, K. (2017). A theory of truthmaker content I: Conjunction, disjunction and negation. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 46(6), 625\u2013674.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"9826_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"556","DOI":"10.1002\/9781118972090.ch22","volume":"2","author":"K Fine","year":"2017","unstructured":"Fine, K. (2017). Truthmaker semantics. A Companion to the Philosophy of Language, 2, 556\u2013577.","journal-title":"A Companion to the Philosophy of Language"},{"issue":"4","key":"9826_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1017\/S175502031700020X","volume":"11","author":"K Fine","year":"2018","unstructured":"Fine, K. (2018). Compliance and command I\u2013categorical imperatives. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 11(4), 609\u2013633.","journal-title":"The Review of Symbolic Logic"},{"issue":"4","key":"9826_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"634","DOI":"10.1017\/S1755020318000059","volume":"11","author":"K Fine","year":"2018","unstructured":"Fine, K. (2018). Compliance and command II, imperatives and deontics. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 11(4), 634\u2013664.","journal-title":"The Review of Symbolic Logic"},{"key":"9826_CR11","volume-title":"Conditionals, probability, and paradox: Themes from the philosophy of Dorothy Edgington","author":"K Fine","year":"2021","unstructured":"Fine, K. (2021). Constructing the impossible. In L. Walters & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Conditionals, probability, and paradox: Themes from the philosophy of Dorothy Edgington. Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"3","key":"9826_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"536","DOI":"10.1017\/S1755020318000151","volume":"12","author":"K Fine","year":"2019","unstructured":"Fine, K., & Jago, M. (2019). Logic for exact entailment. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 12(3), 536\u2013556.","journal-title":"The Review of Symbolic Logic"},{"key":"9826_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hall, N. (2020). Physical and metaphysical modality. In The Routledge handbook of modality. Routledge, pp. 265\u2013278.","DOI":"10.4324\/9781315742144-30"},{"key":"9826_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hawke, P., & \u00d6zg\u00fcn, A. (2023). Truthmaker semantics for epistemic logic. In Kit fine on truthmakers, relevance, and non-classical logic. Springer, pp. 295\u2013335.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-29415-0_15"},{"issue":"3","key":"9826_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"789","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-024-09752-9","volume":"53","author":"D Kim","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kim, D. (2024). Exact truthmaker semantics for modal logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 53(3), 789\u2013829.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"issue":"5","key":"9826_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1175","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-022-09663-7","volume":"51","author":"S Kr\u00e4mer","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kr\u00e4mer, S. (2022). Mighty belief revision. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 51(5), 1175\u20131213.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"issue":"5","key":"9826_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4751","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-019-02368-6","volume":"198","author":"S Leuenberger","year":"2021","unstructured":"Leuenberger, S., & Smith, M. (2021). Epistemic logic without closure. Synthese, 198(5), 4751\u20134774.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"9826_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Litland, J. E. (2024). Truthmaker semantics for intuitionistic modal logic. Topoi, 1\u201319.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11245-024-10094-z"},{"key":"9826_CR19","unstructured":"Lowe, E. J. (2006). The four-category ontology: A metaphysical foundation for natural science. Oxford University Press."},{"key":"9826_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199218219.001.0001","volume-title":"The metaphysics within physics","author":"T Maudlin","year":"2007","unstructured":"Maudlin, T. (2007). The metaphysics within physics. Oxford University Press."},{"key":"9826_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-67149-9","volume-title":"Neighborhood semantics for modal logic","author":"E Pacuit","year":"2017","unstructured":"Pacuit, E. (2017). Neighborhood semantics for modal logic. Springer."},{"issue":"5","key":"9826_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.26686\/ajl.v19i5.7420","volume":"19","author":"M Plebani","year":"2022","unstructured":"Plebani, M., Rosella, G., & Saitta, V. (2022). Truthmakers, incompatibility, and modality. The Australasian Journal of Logic, 19(5), 214\u2013253.","journal-title":"The Australasian Journal of Logic"},{"key":"9826_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Saitta, V. (2024). A truthmaker-based epistemic logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1\u201341.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-024-09758-3"},{"key":"9826_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/j.ctt2tt8rv","volume-title":"Aboutness","author":"S Yablo","year":"2014","unstructured":"Yablo, S. (2014). Aboutness. Princeton University Press."}],"container-title":["Journal of Philosophical Logic"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10992-025-09826-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10992-025-09826-2","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10992-025-09826-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,7]],"date-time":"2026-03-07T07:28:41Z","timestamp":1772868521000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10992-025-09826-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,6]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]}},"alternative-id":["9826"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10992-025-09826-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-3611","1573-0433"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-3611","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-0433","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"30 January 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 December 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 January 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors have no competing interests related to this work.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing Interests"}},{"value":"Not applicable","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical Approval"}}]}}