{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,6]],"date-time":"2026-05-06T12:14:39Z","timestamp":1778069679297,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":44,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,7]],"date-time":"2026-03-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1772841600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,7]],"date-time":"2026-03-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1772841600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Philos Logic"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>I offer a new argument for the principle that there are no true contradictions. Because the argument relies mostly on extra-logical premises and is valid in a wide range of logics (including certain paraconsistent logics), it offers a logic-neutral justification of the law of non-contradiction.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-026-09833-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,7]],"date-time":"2026-03-07T02:55:25Z","timestamp":1772852125000},"page":"327-351","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Yet Another Argument for Non-contradiction"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"55","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5784-7953","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mart\u00edn","family":"Abreu Zavaleta","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"9833_CR1","volume-title":"Entailment: The logic of Relevance and Necessity","author":"AR Anderson","year":"1975","unstructured":"Anderson, A. R., & Belnap, N. D. (1975). Entailment: The logic of Relevance and Necessity (Vol. 1). Princeton: Princeton University Press."},{"key":"9833_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199268733.001.0001","author":"J Beall","year":"2009","unstructured":"Beall, J. (2009). Spandrels of Truth. Oxford University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199268733.001.0001","journal-title":"Oxford University Press"},{"issue":"2","key":"9833_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1080\/01445340.2023.2189807","volume":"44","author":"J Beall","year":"2023","unstructured":"Beall, J., & Ficara, E. (2023). Hegelian conjunction, hegelian contradiction. History and Philosophy of Logic, 44(2), 119\u2013131. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01445340.2023.2189807","journal-title":"History and Philosophy of Logic"},{"key":"9833_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Boghossian, P. A. (2003). The normativity of content. Philosophical Issues, 13(1), 31\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1533-6077.00003","DOI":"10.1111\/1533-6077.00003"},{"key":"9833_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bourget, D., & Chalmers, D. J. (2023). Philosophers on philosophy: The 2020 philpapers survey. Philosophers\u2019 Imprint 23. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3998\/phimp.2109","DOI":"10.3998\/phimp.2109"},{"issue":"1","key":"9833_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.2307\/2184670","volume":"91","author":"E Conee","year":"1982","unstructured":"Conee, E. (1982). Against moral dilemmas. Philosophical Review, 91(1), 87\u201397. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2184670","journal-title":"Philosophical Review"},{"issue":"1","key":"9833_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s44204-023-00131-w","volume":"3","author":"L Estrada-Gonz\u00e1lez","year":"2024","unstructured":"Estrada-Gonz\u00e1lez, L. (2024). Hegel of the gaps? truth, falsity and conjunction in hegelian contradictions. Asian Journal of Philosophy, 3(1), 1\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s44204-023-00131-w","journal-title":"Asian Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"9833_CR8","volume-title":"The language of thought","author":"JA Fodor","year":"1975","unstructured":"Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. New York: Crowell."},{"issue":"5","key":"9833_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.2307\/2024557","volume":"65","author":"BC van Fraassen","year":"1968","unstructured":"van Fraassen, B. C. (1968). Presupposition, implication, and self-reference. Journal of Philosophy, 65(5), 136\u2013152. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2024557","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"9833_CR10","volume-title":"The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, fall","author":"H Hansen","year":"2024","unstructured":"Hansen, H. (2024). Fallacies. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, fall (2024th ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab: Stanford University.","edition":"2024"},{"key":"9833_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/0198250371.001.0001","volume-title":"Hume\u2019s Problem: Induction and the Justification of Belief","author":"C Howson","year":"2000","unstructured":"Howson, C. (2000). Hume\u2019s Problem: Induction and the Justification of Belief. New York: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"9833_CR12","volume-title":"Enquiry concerning Human Understanding","author":"D Hume","year":"2007","unstructured":"Hume, D., & Millican, P. (2007). Enquiry concerning Human Understanding (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.","edition":"1"},{"key":"9833_CR13","unstructured":"Kabay, P.D. (2008). A defense of trivialism. PhD thesis, University of Melbourne."},{"issue":"3","key":"9833_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.5840\/jphil2010107310","volume":"107","author":"N Kolodny","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kolodny, N., & MacFarlane, J. (2010). Ifs and oughts. Journal of Philosophy, 107(3), 115\u2013143. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5840\/jphil2010107310","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"9833_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lewis, D. (1972). Psychophysical and theoretical identifications. Australasian Journal of Philosophy,50(3). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00048407212341301.","DOI":"10.1080\/00048407212341301"},{"key":"9833_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lewis, D. (1983). Mad Pain and Martian Pain. In Philosophical Papers Volume I. Oxford University Press,. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/0195032047.003.0009.","DOI":"10.1093\/0195032047.003.0009"},{"key":"9833_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"939","DOI":"10.1111\/phpr.13080","volume":"3","author":"M Mandelkern","year":"2024","unstructured":"Mandelkern, M. (2024). Chance, ability, and control. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 3, 939\u2013961. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/phpr.13080","journal-title":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research"},{"issue":"3","key":"9833_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.2307\/2025665","volume":"77","author":"RB Marcus","year":"1980","unstructured":"Marcus, R. B. (1980). Moral dilemmas and consistency. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(3), 121\u2013136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2025665","journal-title":"The Journal of Philosophy"},{"issue":"3","key":"9833_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-0068.00446","volume":"37","author":"AR Mele","year":"2003","unstructured":"Mele, A. R. (2003). Agents\u2019 abilities. No\u00fbs, 37(3), 447\u2013470. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1468-0068.00446","journal-title":"No\u00fbs"},{"issue":"1","key":"9833_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1007\/bf00258428","volume":"8","author":"G Priest","year":"1979","unstructured":"Priest, G. (1979). The logic of paradox. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8(1), 219\u2013241. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/bf00258428","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"9833_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1093\/aristoteliansupp\/67.1.17","volume":"67","author":"G Priest","year":"1993","unstructured":"Priest, G. (1993). Can contradictions be true? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 67, 35\u201354. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/aristoteliansupp\/67.1.17","journal-title":"Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes"},{"issue":"8","key":"9833_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"410","DOI":"10.2307\/2564636","volume":"95","author":"G Priest","year":"1998","unstructured":"Priest, G. (1998). What is so bad about contradictions? The Journal of Philosophy, 95(8), 410\u2013426. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2564636","journal-title":"The Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"9833_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199263301.001.0001","volume-title":"In Contradiction","author":"G Priest","year":"2006","unstructured":"Priest, G. (2006). In Contradiction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.","edition":"2"},{"issue":"9","key":"9833_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2353","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-017-0962-x","volume":"175","author":"J Quilty-Dunn","year":"2018","unstructured":"Quilty-Dunn, J., & Mandelbaum, E. (2018). Against dispositionalism: Belief in cognitive science. Philosophical Studies, 175(9), 2353\u20132372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11098-017-0962-x","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"key":"9833_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e261","DOI":"10.1017\/s0140525x22002849","volume":"46","author":"J Quilty-Dunn","year":"2023","unstructured":"Quilty-Dunn, J., Porot, N., & Mandelbaum, E. (2023). The best game in town: The reemergence of the language-of-thought hypothesis across the cognitive sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46, e261. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0140525x22002849","journal-title":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences"},{"key":"9833_CR26","volume-title":"Relevant Logic: A Philosophical Examination of Inference","author":"S Read","year":"1988","unstructured":"Read, S. (1988). Relevant Logic: A Philosophical Examination of Inference. Oxford: Blackwell."},{"key":"9833_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Schupbach, J.N. (2017). Troubles for bayesian formal epistemology? a response to Horgan. Res Philosophica, 95(1), 189\u2013197. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11612\/resphil.1652","DOI":"10.11612\/resphil.1652"},{"issue":"2","key":"9833_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-0068.00370","volume":"36","author":"E Schwitzgebel","year":"2002","unstructured":"Schwitzgebel, E. (2002). A phenomenal, dispositional account of belief. No\u00fbs, 36(2), 249\u2013275. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1468-0068.00370","journal-title":"No\u00fbs"},{"key":"9833_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1057\/9781137026521_5","volume-title":"New Essays on Belief: Constitution","author":"E Schwitzgebel","year":"2013","unstructured":"Schwitzgebel, E. (2013). A dispositional approach to the attitudes. In N. Nottelmann (Ed.), New Essays on Belief: Constitution (pp. 75\u201399). Palgrave: Content and Structure."},{"issue":"4","key":"9833_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1215\/00318108-112-4-447","volume":"112","author":"N Shah","year":"2003","unstructured":"Shah, N. (2003). How truth governs belief. The Philosophical Review, 112(4), 447\u2013482. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1215\/00318108-112-4-447","journal-title":"The Philosophical Review"},{"issue":"4","key":"9833_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1215\/00318108-114-4-497","volume":"114","author":"N Shah","year":"2005","unstructured":"Shah, N., & Velleman, J. D. (2005). Doxastic deliberation. Philosophical Review, 114(4), 497\u2013534. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1215\/00318108-114-4-497","journal-title":"Philosophical Review"},{"key":"9833_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Simion, M. (2022). Skepticism about epistemic dilemmas. In K. McCain, S. Stapleford, & M. Steup (Eds.) Epistemic Dilemmas: New Arguments, New Angles. Routledge, pp 109\u2013121. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9781003134565-9.","DOI":"10.4324\/9781003134565-9"},{"key":"9833_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1093\/aristoteliansupp\/67.1.17","volume":"67","author":"T Smiley","year":"1993","unstructured":"Smiley, T. (1993). Can contradictions be true? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 67, 17\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/aristoteliansupp\/67.1.17","journal-title":"Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes"},{"key":"9833_CR34","volume-title":"Inquiry","author":"R Stalnaker","year":"1987","unstructured":"Stalnaker, R. (1987). Inquiry. Cambridge: MIT Press."},{"issue":"1","key":"9833_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1111\/phpr.12307","volume":"95","author":"U Stojni\u0107","year":"2017","unstructured":"Stojni\u0107, U. (2017). One\u2019s modus ponens: Modality, coherence and logic. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 95(1), 167\u2013214. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/phpr.12307","journal-title":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research"},{"issue":"235","key":"9833_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"320","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/LIX.235.320","volume":"59","author":"PF Strawson","year":"1950","unstructured":"Strawson, P. F. (1950). On referring. Mind, 59(235), 320\u2013344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/mind\/LIX.235.320","journal-title":"Mind"},{"key":"9833_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tahko, T.E. (2009). The law of non-contradiction as a metaphysical principle. Australasian Journal of Logic, 7:32\u201347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.26686\/ajl.v7i0.1806.","DOI":"10.26686\/ajl.v7i0.1806"},{"issue":"2","key":"9833_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-007-9071-6","volume":"136","author":"PBM Vranas","year":"2007","unstructured":"Vranas, P. B. M. (2007). I ought, therefore i can. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 136(2), 167\u2013216. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11098-007-9071-6","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition"},{"issue":"4","key":"9833_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1215\/00318108-6973023","volume":"127","author":"PBM Vranas","year":"2018","unstructured":"Vranas, P. B. M. (2018). \u201cOught\u2019\u2019 Implies \u201cCan\u2019\u2019 but Does Not Imply \u201cMust\u2019\u2019: An Asymmetry between Becoming Infeasible and Becoming Overridden. The Philosophical Review, 127(4), 487\u2013514. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1215\/00318108-6973023","journal-title":"The Philosophical Review"},{"key":"9833_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-0068.36.s16.10","volume":"16","author":"R Wedgwood","year":"2002","unstructured":"Wedgwood, R. (2002). The aim of belief. Philosophical Perspectives, 16, 267\u2013297. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1468-0068.36.s16.10","journal-title":"Philosophical Perspectives"},{"key":"9833_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1111\/phis.12004","volume":"23","author":"R Wedgwood","year":"2013","unstructured":"Wedgwood, R. (2013). Rational \u2018ought\u2019 implies \u2018can\u2019. Philosophical Issues, 23, 70\u201392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/phis.12004","journal-title":"Philosophical Issues"},{"key":"9833_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Weir, A. (2004). There Are No True Contradictions. In J.C. Beall, G. Priest, & B. Armour-Garb (Eds.) The Law of Non-Contradiction. Oxford University Press.https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199265176.003.0023.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199265176.003.0023"},{"issue":"6","key":"9833_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1001","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-012-9228-4","volume":"41","author":"S Yalcin","year":"2012","unstructured":"Yalcin, S. (2012). A counterexample to modus tollens. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 41(6), 1001\u20131024. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10992-012-9228-4","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"9833_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zalta, E.N. (2004) In Defense of the Law of Non-Contradiction. In J.C Beall, G. Priest, & B. Armour-Garb (Eds.) The Law of Non-Contradiction. Oxford University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199265176.003.0024.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199265176.003.0024"}],"container-title":["Journal of Philosophical Logic"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10992-026-09833-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10992-026-09833-x","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10992-026-09833-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,6]],"date-time":"2026-05-06T11:34:47Z","timestamp":1778067287000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10992-026-09833-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,7]]},"references-count":44,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4]]}},"alternative-id":["9833"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10992-026-09833-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-3611","1573-0433"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-3611","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-0433","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"22 May 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 February 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 March 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The author has no conflict of interests to declare.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of Interest"}}]}}