{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,3]],"date-time":"2024-07-03T08:36:20Z","timestamp":1719995780254},"reference-count":10,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,6]],"date-time":"2012-10-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1349481600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Scientometrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,7]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-012-0863-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,5]],"date-time":"2012-10-05T05:53:34Z","timestamp":1349416414000},"page":"255-257","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Impact factor: Imperfect but not yet replaceable"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"96","author":[{"given":"Stuart","family":"Brody","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"863_CR1","unstructured":"Braun, T. (Ed.) (2012). Special discussion issue on journal impact factors [Special issue]. Scientometrics, 92(2)."},{"key":"863_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-006-0147-4","volume":"69","author":"T Braun","year":"2006","unstructured":"Braun, T., Glanzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2006). A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 69, 169\u2013173.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"8985","key":"863_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1300","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(95)91904-X","volume":"346","author":"S Brody","year":"1995","unstructured":"Brody, S. (1995). Impact factor as the best operational measure of medical journals. Lancet, 346(8985), 1300\u20131301.","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"863_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-012-0769-7","volume":"92","author":"P Jacso","year":"2012","unstructured":"Jacso, P. (2012). Grim tales about the impact factor and the h-index in the web of science and the journal citation reports databases: reflections on Vanclay\u2019s criticism. Scientometrics, 92, 325\u2013354.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"863_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01173636","volume":"1","author":"MJ Mahoney","year":"1977","unstructured":"Mahoney, M. J. (1977). Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1, 161\u2013175.","journal-title":"Cognitive Therapy and Research"},{"key":"863_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-012-0679-8","volume":"92","author":"HF Moed","year":"2012","unstructured":"Moed, H. F., Colledge, L., Reedijk, J., Felix Moya-Anegon, F., Guerrero-Bote, V., Plume, A., et al. (2012). Citation-based metrics are appropriate tools in journal assessment provided that they are accurate and used in an informed way. Scientometrics, 92, 367\u2013376.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"863_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-012-0689-6","volume":"92","author":"DA Pendlebury","year":"2012","unstructured":"Pendlebury, D. A., & Adams, J. (2012). Comments on a critique of the Thomson Reuters journal impact factor. Scientometrics, 92, 395\u2013401.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"863_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-012-0634-8","volume":"92","author":"AI Pudovkin","year":"2012","unstructured":"Pudovkin, A. I., & Garfield, E. (2012). Rank normalization of impact factors will resolve Vanclay\u2019s dilemma with TRIF. Comments on the paper by Jerome Vanclay. Scientometrics, 92, 409\u2013412.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"4","key":"863_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e10204","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0010204","volume":"5","author":"J Rizkallah","year":"2010","unstructured":"Rizkallah, J., & Sin, D. D. (2010). Integrative approach to quality assessment of medical journals using impact factor, eigenfactor, and article influence scores. PLoS ONE, 5(4), e10204.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"863_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-011-0561-0","volume":"92","author":"JK Vanclay","year":"2012","unstructured":"Vanclay, J. K. (2012). Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? Scientometrics, 92, 211\u2013238.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"}],"container-title":["Scientometrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-012-0863-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11192-012-0863-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-012-0863-x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,1]],"date-time":"2019-06-01T09:34:25Z","timestamp":1559381665000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11192-012-0863-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,6]]},"references-count":10,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,7]]}},"alternative-id":["863"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-012-0863-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0138-9130","1588-2861"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0138-9130","type":"print"},{"value":"1588-2861","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,6]]}}}