{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,8]],"date-time":"2026-03-08T02:00:29Z","timestamp":1772935229942,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,3,7]],"date-time":"2014-03-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1394150400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Scientometrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,11]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-014-1259-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,3,6]],"date-time":"2014-03-06T01:39:53Z","timestamp":1394069993000},"page":"1067-1075","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["On the horns of a dilemma: does more funding for research lead to more research or a waste of resources that calls for optimization of researcher portfolios? An analysis using funding acknowledgement data"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"101","author":[{"given":"J.","family":"Rigby","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"K.","family":"Julian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,3,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"1259_CR1","unstructured":"Austrian Science Fund. (2014). Application Guidelines for an ERWIN SCHR\u00d6DINGER FELLOWSHIP ABROAD with Return Phase. http:\/\/www.fwf.ac.at\/de\/applications\/j\/j_application-guidelines.pdf Accessed 11 Feb 2014."},{"issue":"6","key":"1259_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"829","DOI":"10.2307\/2657504","volume":"63","author":"S Baldi","year":"1998","unstructured":"Baldi, S. (1998). Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: A network-analytic model. American Sociological Review, 63(6), 829\u2013846.","journal-title":"American Sociological Review"},{"issue":"7236","key":"1259_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1038\/458281a","volume":"458","author":"B Derby","year":"2009","unstructured":"Derby, B. (2009). Diversity of funding sources and topics is key to survival. Nature, 458(7236), 281. doi: 10.1038\/458281a .","journal-title":"Nature"},{"issue":"7434","key":"1259_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"599","DOI":"10.1038\/493599a","volume":"493","author":"HR Garner","year":"2013","unstructured":"Garner, H. R., McIver, L. J., & Waitzkin, M. B. (2013). Research funding: Same work, twice the money? Nature, 493(7434), 599\u2013601. doi: 10.1038\/493599a .","journal-title":"Nature"},{"issue":"5","key":"1259_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"302","DOI":"10.3152\/030234208X317151","volume":"35","author":"T Heinze","year":"2008","unstructured":"Heinze, T. (2008). How to sponsor ground-breaking research: A comparison of funding schemes. Science and Public Policy, 35(5), 302\u2013318.","journal-title":"Science and Public Policy"},{"issue":"4","key":"1259_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"610","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2009.01.014","volume":"38","author":"T Heinze","year":"2009","unstructured":"Heinze, T., Shapira, P., Rogers, J. D., & Senker, J. M. (2009). Organizational and institutional influences on creativity in scientific research. Research Policy, 38(4), 610\u2013623.","journal-title":"Research Policy"},{"issue":"3","key":"1259_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"288","DOI":"10.11613\/BM.2010.036","volume":"20","author":"V Katavic","year":"2010","unstructured":"Katavic, V. (2010). Responsible conduct of research: Do we need training in fraud-science? Biochemia Medica, 20(3), 288\u2013294.","journal-title":"Biochemia Medica"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"1259_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02457963","volume":"41","author":"G Lewison","year":"1998","unstructured":"Lewison, G., & Dawson, G. (1998). The effect of funding on the outputs of biomedical research. Scientometrics, 41(1\u20132), 17\u201327.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"1259_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1093\/reseval\/rvs001","volume":"21","author":"T Luukkonen","year":"2012","unstructured":"Luukkonen, T. (2012). Conservatism and risk-taking in peer review: Emerging ERC practices. Research Evaluation, 21(1), 48\u201360.","journal-title":"Research Evaluation"},{"issue":"7427","key":"1259_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1038\/492034a","volume":"492","author":"JM Nicholson","year":"2012","unstructured":"Nicholson, J. M., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2012). Research grants: Conform and be funded. Nature, 492(7427), 34\u201336. doi: 10.1038\/492034a .","journal-title":"Nature"},{"issue":"2","key":"1259_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1007\/s00109-003-0516-x","volume":"82","author":"G Radda","year":"2004","unstructured":"Radda, G., & Viney, I. (2004). From gene function to improved health: Genome research in the United Kingdom. Journal of Molecular Medicine, 82(2), 74\u201390.","journal-title":"Journal of Molecular Medicine"},{"issue":"7384","key":"1259_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1038\/482146a","volume":"482","author":"ES Reich","year":"2012","unstructured":"Reich, E. S. (2012). Duplicate-grant case puts funders under pressure. Nature, 482(7384), 146.","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"1259_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"588","DOI":"10.1038\/493588a","volume":"493","author":"ES Reich","year":"2013","unstructured":"Reich, E. S., & Myhrvold, C. L. (2013). Funding agencies urged to check for duplicate grants: Nature probe reveals lack of oversight of researchers who win two grants for similar projects. Nature, 493, 588\u2013589.","journal-title":"Nature"},{"issue":"1","key":"1259_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-012-0779-5","volume":"94","author":"J Rigby","year":"2012","unstructured":"Rigby, J. (2012). Looking for the impact of peer review: Does count of funding acknowledgements really predict research impact? Scientometrics, 94(1), 57\u201373.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"}],"container-title":["Scientometrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-014-1259-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11192-014-1259-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-014-1259-x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,8]],"date-time":"2019-08-08T01:32:55Z","timestamp":1565227975000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11192-014-1259-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,3,7]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,11]]}},"alternative-id":["1259"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-014-1259-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0138-9130","1588-2861"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0138-9130","type":"print"},{"value":"1588-2861","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,3,7]]}}}