{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,26]],"date-time":"2026-02-26T15:31:04Z","timestamp":1772119864880,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":12,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,5,31]],"date-time":"2015-05-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1433030400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Scientometrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-015-1617-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,5,30]],"date-time":"2015-05-30T01:58:36Z","timestamp":1432951116000},"page":"2249-2251","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Is there bias in editorial choice? Yes"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"105","author":[{"given":"Khaled","family":"Moustafa","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,5,31]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"1617_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1038\/embor.2008.233","volume":"10","author":"L Bornmann","year":"2009","unstructured":"Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2009). The state of h index research. Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance? EMBO Reports, 10(1), 2\u20136.","journal-title":"EMBO Reports"},{"issue":"1","key":"1617_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1111\/cobi.12333","volume":"29","author":"ES Darling","year":"2015","unstructured":"Darling, E. S. (2015). Use of double-blind peer review to increase author diversity. Conservation Biology, 29(1), 297\u2013299.","journal-title":"Conservation Biology"},{"issue":"6","key":"1617_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1177\/014107680009300629","volume":"93","author":"K Eaton","year":"2000","unstructured":"Eaton, K., & Anthony, H. (2000). Bias in peer review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 93(6), 338.","journal-title":"Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine"},{"issue":"12","key":"1617_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"725","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.bdj.4811896","volume":"197","author":"M Grace","year":"2004","unstructured":"Grace, M. (2004). The role of the scientific editor. British Dental Journal, 197(12), 725\u2013734.","journal-title":"British Dental Journal"},{"key":"1617_CR5","unstructured":"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/nature\/authors\/get_published . Accessed April, 25 2015."},{"issue":"8","key":"1617_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1258\/jrsm.99.8.385","volume":"99","author":"B Lush","year":"2006","unstructured":"Lush, B. (2006). Peer review. Unreliable reviewers. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(8), 385.","journal-title":"Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine"},{"issue":"7544","key":"1617_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"414","DOI":"10.1038\/519414d","volume":"519","author":"O Mahian","year":"2015","unstructured":"Mahian, O. (2015). Corresponding authors: Is there fame bias in editorial choice? Nature, 519(7544), 414.","journal-title":"Nature"},{"issue":"1","key":"1617_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E1","DOI":"10.36076\/ppj\/2015.18.E1","volume":"18","author":"L Manchikanti","year":"2015","unstructured":"Manchikanti, L., Kaye, A. D., Boswell, M. V., & Hirsch, J. A. (2015). Medical journal peer review: Process and bias. Pain Physician, 18(1), E1\u2013E14.","journal-title":"Pain Physician"},{"issue":"4","key":"1617_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"270","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2013.804345","volume":"20","author":"AA Onitilo","year":"2013","unstructured":"Onitilo, A. A., Engel, J. M., Salzman-Scott, S. A., Stankowski, R. V., & Doi, S. A. (2013). Reliability of reviewer ratings in the manuscript peer review process: An opportunity for improvement. Accountability in Research, 20(4), 270\u2013284.","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"issue":"12","key":"1617_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2229","DOI":"10.1185\/03007995.2011.624090","volume":"27","author":"JS Phillips","year":"2011","unstructured":"Phillips, J. S. (2011). Expert bias in peer review. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 27(12), 2229\u20132233.","journal-title":"Current Medical Research and Opinion"},{"issue":"4","key":"1617_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1258\/jrsm.99.4.178","volume":"99","author":"R Smith","year":"2006","unstructured":"Smith, R. (2006). Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(4), 178\u2013182.","journal-title":"Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine"},{"issue":"1","key":"1617_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-002-0035-0","volume":"8","author":"RE Spier","year":"2002","unstructured":"Spier, R. E. (2002). Peer review and innovation. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8(1), 99\u2013108.","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"}],"container-title":["Scientometrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-015-1617-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11192-015-1617-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-015-1617-3","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,10]],"date-time":"2022-05-10T00:12:34Z","timestamp":1652141554000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11192-015-1617-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,5,31]]},"references-count":12,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]}},"alternative-id":["1617"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-015-1617-3","relation":{"has-preprint":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.31221\/osf.io\/vyt79","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.31226\/osf.io\/qrys5","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["0138-9130","1588-2861"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0138-9130","type":"print"},{"value":"1588-2861","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,5,31]]}}}