{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,10]],"date-time":"2026-02-10T02:02:47Z","timestamp":1770688967155,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":42,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,2]],"date-time":"2016-02-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1454371200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Scientometrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,4]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-016-1869-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,2]],"date-time":"2016-02-02T05:27:07Z","timestamp":1454390827000},"page":"15-26","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Priority criteria in peer review of scientific articles"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"107","author":[{"given":"Olgica","family":"Nedi\u0107","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Aleksandar","family":"Dekanski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"1869_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.12688\/f1000research.5686.1","volume":"3","author":"J Aleksic","year":"2014","unstructured":"Aleksic, J., Alexa, A., Attwood, T. K., Chue Hong, N., Dahl\u00f6, M., Davey, R., et al. (2014). An open science peer review oath. F1000Research, 3, 271. doi: 10.12688\/f1000research.5686.2 .","journal-title":"F1000Research"},{"issue":"15","key":"1869_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E9","DOI":"10.1039\/B409821H","volume":"6","author":"M Ashfold","year":"2004","unstructured":"Ashfold, M., & Appleyard, S. (2004). Standards for the quality and originality of articles in PCCP? A notice to authors and referees. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 6(15), E9. doi: 10.1039\/b409821h .","journal-title":"Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics"},{"issue":"2","key":"1869_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"482","DOI":"10.2307\/20062123","volume":"72","author":"OH Azar","year":"2005","unstructured":"Azar, O. H. (2005). The review process in economics: Is it too fast? Southern Economic Journal, 72(2), 482\u2013491. doi: 10.2307\/20062123 .","journal-title":"Southern Economic Journal"},{"issue":"2","key":"1869_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jaccedu.2008.04.001","volume":"26","author":"CD Bailey","year":"2008","unstructured":"Bailey, C. D., Hermanson, D. R., & Louwers, T. J. (2008). An examination of the peer review process in accounting journals. Journal of Accounting Education, 26(2), 55\u201372. doi: 10.1016\/j.jaccedu.2008.04.001 .","journal-title":"Journal of Accounting Education"},{"issue":"2","key":"1869_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1152\/advan.00104.2006","volume":"31","author":"DJ Benos","year":"2007","unstructured":"Benos, D. J., Bashari, E., Chaves, J. M., Gaggar, A., Kapoor, N., LaFrance, M., et al. (2007). The ups and downs of peer review. Advances in Physiology Education, 31(2), 145\u2013152. doi: 10.1152\/advan.00104.2006 .","journal-title":"Advances in Physiology Education"},{"key":"1869_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Birukou, A., Wakeling, J. R., Bartolini, C., Casati, F., Marchese, M., Mirylenka, K., et al. (2011). Alternatives to peer review: Novel approaches for research evaluation. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 5, 56. http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/entrez\/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=22174702","DOI":"10.3389\/fncom.2011.00056"},{"issue":"3","key":"1869_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-007-1950-2","volume":"77","author":"L Bornmann","year":"2008","unstructured":"Bornmann, L., Nast, I., & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication. Scientometrics, 77(3), 415\u2013432. doi: 10.1007\/s11192-007-1950-2 .","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"12","key":"1869_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e51928","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0051928","volume":"7","author":"X Bosch","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bosch, X., Hern\u00e1ndez, C., Pericas, J. M., Doti, P., & Maru\u0161i\u0107, A. (2012). Misconduct policies in high-impact biomedical journals. PLoS One, 7(12), e51928. doi: 10.1371\/journal.pone.0051928 .","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"4","key":"1869_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.bdj.2012.721","volume":"213","author":"RKF Clark","year":"2012","unstructured":"Clark, R. K. F. (2012). Peer review: A view based on recent experience as an author and reviewer. British Dental Journal, 213(4), 153\u2013154. doi: 10.1038\/sj.bdj.2012.721 .","journal-title":"British Dental Journal"},{"issue":"6","key":"1869_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1266","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2015.01.006","volume":"44","author":"TE Day","year":"2015","unstructured":"Day, T. E. (2015). The big consequences of small biases: A simulation of peer review. Research Policy, 44(6), 1266\u20131270. doi: 10.1016\/j.respol.2015.01.006 .","journal-title":"Research Policy"},{"issue":"25","key":"1869_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2211","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2008.12.001","volume":"52","author":"AN DeMaria","year":"2008","unstructured":"DeMaria, A. N. (2008). Looking back. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 52(25), 2211\u20132212. doi: 10.1016\/j.jacc.2008.12.001 .","journal-title":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology"},{"key":"1869_CR12","unstructured":"Ernst, E., & Resch, K. L. (1994). Reviewer bias: A blinded experimental study. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, 124(2), 178\u2013182. http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/8051481"},{"issue":"4","key":"1869_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1515\/libri-2013-0021","volume":"63","author":"C Fein","year":"2013","unstructured":"Fein, C. (2013). Multidimensional Journal Evaluation of PLOS ONE. Libri, 63(4), 259\u2013271. doi: 10.1515\/libri-2013-0021 .","journal-title":"Libri"},{"issue":"1","key":"1869_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rce.2011.11.004","volume":"212","author":"J Garc\u00eda Puig","year":"2012","unstructured":"Garc\u00eda Puig, J., Gaspar Alonso-Vega, G., & R\u00edos Blanco, J. J. (2012). Report of the editors, 2011. Revista Cl\u00ednica Espa\u00f1ola, 212(1), 31\u201339. doi: 10.1016\/j.rce.2011.11.004 .","journal-title":"Revista Cl\u00ednica Espa\u00f1ola"},{"key":"1869_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.3389\/fncom.2012.00018","volume":"6","author":"SS Ghosh","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ghosh, S. S., Klein, A., Avants, B., & Millman, K. J. (2012). Learning from open source software projects to improve scientific review. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 6, 18. doi: 10.3389\/fncom.2012.00018 .","journal-title":"Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience"},{"issue":"3","key":"1869_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.280.3.237","volume":"280","author":"F Godlee","year":"1998","unstructured":"Godlee, F., Gale, C. R., & Martyn, C. N. (1998). Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 280(3), 237\u2013240. doi: 10.1001\/jama.280.3.237 .","journal-title":"JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association"},{"issue":"3","key":"1869_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1175\/BAMS-D-11-00129.1","volume":"93","author":"M Golden","year":"2012","unstructured":"Golden, M., & Schultz, D. M. (2012). Quantifying the volunteer effort of scientific peer reviewing. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 93(3), 337\u2013345. doi: 10.1175\/BAMS-D-11-00129.1 .","journal-title":"Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society"},{"key":"1869_CR18","unstructured":"Guraya, S. Y. (2014). Accuracy of references in scholarly journals: An analysis of 450 references in ten biomedical journals. European Science Editing, 40(4), 88\u201390. http:\/\/www.scopus.com\/inward\/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84920670315&partnerID=tZOtx3y1"},{"key":"1869_CR19","unstructured":"Hesman Saey, T. (2015). Is redoing scientific research the best way to find truth? Science News 187(2), January 13. https:\/\/www.sciencenews.org\/article\/redoing-scientific-research-best-way-find-truth"},{"issue":"7548","key":"1869_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1038\/520429a","volume":"520","author":"D Hicks","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429\u2013431. doi: 10.1038\/520429a .","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"1869_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-13-74","volume":"13","author":"RC-M Ho","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ho, R. C.-M., Mak, K.-K., Tao, R., Lu, Y., Day, J. R., & Pan, F. (2013). Views on the peer review system of biomedical journals: an online survey of academics from high-ranking universities. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, 74. doi: 10.1186\/1471-2288-13-74 .","journal-title":"BMC Medical Research Methodology"},{"issue":"9","key":"1869_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1047","DOI":"10.1038\/ng.f.217","volume":"40","author":"R Hoffmann","year":"2008","unstructured":"Hoffmann, R. (2008). A wiki for the life sciences where authorship matters. Nature Genetics, 40(9), 1047\u20131051. doi: 10.1038\/ng.f.217 .","journal-title":"Nature Genetics"},{"issue":"5753","key":"1869_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1402","DOI":"10.1126\/science.310.5753.1402","volume":"310","author":"C Holden","year":"2005","unstructured":"Holden, C. (2005). Stem cell research. Korean cloner admits lying about oocyte donations. Science, 310(5753), 1402\u20131403. doi: 10.1126\/science.310.5753.1402 .","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"1869_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6920-12-83","volume":"12","author":"D Houry","year":"2012","unstructured":"Houry, D., Green, S., & Callaham, M. (2012). Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial. BMC Medical Education, 12, 83. doi: 10.1186\/1472-6920-12-83 .","journal-title":"BMC Medical Education"},{"issue":"1","key":"1869_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"274","DOI":"10.4103\/0973-1229.109347","volume":"11","author":"SG Kachewar","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kachewar, S. G., & Sankaye, S. B. (2013). Reviewer index: A new proposal of rewarding the reviewer. Mens Sana Monographs, 11(1), 274\u2013284. doi: 10.4103\/0973-1229.109347 .","journal-title":"Mens Sana Monographs"},{"issue":"4","key":"1869_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1547-5069.2008.00255.x","volume":"40","author":"MH Kearney","year":"2008","unstructured":"Kearney, M. H., Baggs, J. G., Broome, M. E., Dougherty, M. C., & Freda, M. C. (2008). Experience, time investment, and motivators of nursing journal peer reviewers. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 40(4), 395\u2013400. doi: 10.1111\/j.1547-5069.2008.00255.x .","journal-title":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship"},{"issue":"6","key":"1869_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1000","DOI":"10.1109\/JPROC.2008.921613","volume":"96","author":"CM Kelty","year":"2008","unstructured":"Kelty, C. M., Burrus, S., & Baranuik, R. G. (2008). Peer review anew: Three principles and a case study in publication quality assurance. Proceedings of the IEEE, 96(6), 1000\u20131011. doi: 10.1109\/JPROC.2008.921613 .","journal-title":"Proceedings of the IEEE"},{"issue":"10","key":"1869_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1321","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1990.03440100021002","volume":"263","author":"DA Kronick","year":"1990","unstructured":"Kronick, D. A. (1990). Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 263(10), 1321\u20131322. doi: 10.1001\/jama.1990.03440100021002 .","journal-title":"JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association"},{"issue":"1","key":"1869_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1186\/1741-7015-10-124","volume":"10","author":"M Laakso","year":"2012","unstructured":"Laakso, M., & Bj\u00f6rk, B.-C. (2012). Anatomy of open access publishing: A study of longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC Medicine, 10(1), 124. doi: 10.1186\/1741-7015-10-124 .","journal-title":"BMC Medicine"},{"issue":"4","key":"1869_CR30","first-page":"25","volume":"26","author":"G Marchionini","year":"2008","unstructured":"Marchionini, G. (2008). Editorial: Reviewer merits and review control in an age of electronic manuscript management system. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 26(4), 25. doi: 10.1145\/1402256.1402264 .","journal-title":"ACM Transactions on Information Systems"},{"issue":"2","key":"1869_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1016\/j.aos.2008.08.003","volume":"34","author":"P Moizer","year":"2009","unstructured":"Moizer, P. (2009). Publishing in accounting journals: A fair game? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(2), 285\u2013304. doi: 10.1016\/j.aos.2008.08.003 .","journal-title":"Accounting, Organizations and Society"},{"issue":"2","key":"1869_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1744-6198.2009.00131.x","volume":"44","author":"DD Moos","year":"2009","unstructured":"Moos, D. D., & Hawkins, P. (2009). Barriers and strategies to the revision process from an editor\u2019s perspective. Nursing Forum, 44(2), 79\u201392. doi: 10.1111\/j.1744-6198.2009.00131.x .","journal-title":"Nursing Forum"},{"issue":"7","key":"1869_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"959","DOI":"10.2298\/JSC150306036N","volume":"80","author":"O Nedi\u0107","year":"2015","unstructured":"Nedi\u0107, O., & Dekanski, A. (2015). A survey on the Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society publishing policies\u2014On the occasion of the 80th volume. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, 80(7), 959\u2013969. doi: 10.2298\/JSC150306036N .","journal-title":"Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society"},{"issue":"1","key":"1869_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-015-1527-4","volume":"103","author":"J Oosterhaven","year":"2015","unstructured":"Oosterhaven, J. (2015). Too many journals? Towards a theory of repeated rejections and ultimate acceptance. Scientometrics, 103(1), 261\u2013265. doi: 10.1007\/s11192-015-1527-4 .","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"1869_CR35","unstructured":"Reuters, T. (2015). IP & Science. http:\/\/ip-science.thomsonreuters.com\/"},{"issue":"2","key":"1869_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"360","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1418218112","volume":"112","author":"K Siler","year":"2014","unstructured":"Siler, K., Lee, K., & Bero, L. (2014). Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(2), 360\u2013365. doi: 10.1073\/pnas.1418218112 .","journal-title":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences"},{"issue":"1","key":"1869_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1087\/20110109","volume":"24","author":"L Souder","year":"2011","unstructured":"Souder, L. (2011). The ethics of scholarly peer review: A review of the literature. Learned Publishing, 24(1), 55\u201374. doi: 10.1087\/20110109 .","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"issue":"1","key":"1869_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2012.04.014","volume":"42","author":"F Squazzoni","year":"2013","unstructured":"Squazzoni, F., Bravo, G., & Tak\u00e1cs, K. (2013). Does incentive provision increase the quality of peer review? An experimental study. Research Policy, 42(1), 287\u2013294. doi: 10.1016\/j.respol.2012.04.014 .","journal-title":"Research Policy"},{"key":"1869_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1186\/s12916-014-0179-1","volume":"12","author":"PF Stahel","year":"2014","unstructured":"Stahel, P. F., & Moore, E. E. (2014). Peer review for biomedical publications: We can improve the system. BMC Medicine, 12, 179. doi: 10.1186\/s12916-014-0179-1 .","journal-title":"BMC Medicine"},{"issue":"5","key":"1869_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.1007\/s11017-012-9233-1","volume":"33","author":"G Steinhauser","year":"2012","unstructured":"Steinhauser, G., Adlassnig, W., Risch, J. A., Anderlini, S., Arguriou, P., Armendariz, A. Z., et al. (2012). Peer review versus editorial review and their role in innovative science. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 33(5), 359\u2013376. doi: 10.1007\/s11017-012-9233-1 .","journal-title":"Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics"},{"issue":"6","key":"1869_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"703.e1\u2013e5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.053","volume":"211","author":"AM Vintzileos","year":"2014","unstructured":"Vintzileos, A. M., Ananth, C. V., Odibo, A. O., Chauhan, S. P., Smulian, J. C., & Oyelese, Y. (2014). The relationship between a reviewer\u2019s recommendation and editorial decision of manuscripts submitted for publication in obstetrics. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 211(6), 703.e1\u2013e5.","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"1869_CR42","unstructured":"Yalow, R. S. (1977). Radioimmunoassay: A probe for fine structure of biologic systems. Nobel Lecture. http:\/\/www.nobelprize.org\/nobel_prizes\/medicine\/laureates\/1977\/yalow-lecture.pdf"}],"container-title":["Scientometrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-016-1869-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11192-016-1869-6\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-016-1869-6","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,4]],"date-time":"2019-09-04T05:45:37Z","timestamp":1567575937000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11192-016-1869-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,2]]},"references-count":42,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,4]]}},"alternative-id":["1869"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-016-1869-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["0138-9130","1588-2861"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0138-9130","type":"print"},{"value":"1588-2861","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,2]]}}}