{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,1]],"date-time":"2026-03-01T02:03:19Z","timestamp":1772330599392,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,28]],"date-time":"2017-01-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1485561600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004543","name":"China Scholarship Council","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["201506270024"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["201506270024"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004543","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"National Social Science Foundation of China","award":["CTQ023"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["CTQ023"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Scientometrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,4]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2251-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,28]],"date-time":"2017-01-28T10:12:27Z","timestamp":1485598347000},"page":"267-283","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":34,"title":["Context of altmetrics data matters: an investigation of count type and user category"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"111","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9241-6630","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Houqiang","family":"Yu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"2251_CR2","unstructured":"Altmetric LLP. (2016). How are Twitter demographics determined? https:\/\/help.altmetric.com\/support\/solutions\/articles\/6000060978-how-are-twitter-demographics ."},{"key":"2251_CR3","unstructured":"Andersen, J. P., & Haustein, S. (2015). Influence of study type on Twitter activity for medical research papers. Retrieved from https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1507.00154 ."},{"issue":"1","key":"2251_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-010-0306-5","volume":"87","author":"C Bartneck","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bartneck, C., & Kokkelmans, S. (2010). Detecting h-index manipulation through self-citation analysis. Scientometrics, 87(1), 85\u201398.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"3","key":"2251_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1123","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-015-1565-y","volume":"103","author":"L Bornmann","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bornmann, L. (2015a). Alternative metrics in scientometrics: A meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics. Scientometrics, 103(3), 1123\u20131144.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"3","key":"2251_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1108\/AJIM-09-2014-0115","volume":"67","author":"L Bornmann","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bornmann, L. (2015b). Usefulness of altmetrics for measuring the broader impact of research: A case study using data from PLOS and F1000Prime. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(3), 305\u2013319.","journal-title":"Aslib Journal of Information Management"},{"key":"2251_CR7","unstructured":"Bornmann, L., & Haunschild, R. (2015). t factor: A metric for measuring impact on Twitter. Retrieved from http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1508.02179 ."},{"issue":"3","key":"2251_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"356","DOI":"10.1108\/AJIM-12-2014-0180","volume":"67","author":"TD Bowman","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bowman, T. D. (2015). Differences in personal and professional tweets of scholars. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(3), 356\u2013371.","journal-title":"Aslib Journal of Information Management"},{"issue":"10","key":"2251_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2003","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23309","volume":"66","author":"R Costas","year":"2015","unstructured":"Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P. (2015). Do \u201caltmetrics\u201d correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(10), 2003\u20132019.","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"1","key":"2251_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2015.11.003","volume":"10","author":"R Haunschild","year":"2016","unstructured":"Haunschild, R., & Bornmann, L. (2016). Normalization of Mendeley reader counts for impact assessment. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1), 62\u201373.","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"key":"2251_CR11","unstructured":"Haustein, S., Bowman, T. D., & Costas, R. (2015). When is an article actually published? An analysis of online availability, publication, and indexation dates. Retrieved from https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1505.00796 ."},{"issue":"1","key":"2251_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"232","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23456","volume":"67","author":"S Haustein","year":"2016","unstructured":"Haustein, S., Bowman, T. D., Holmberg, K., et al. (2016). Tweets as impact indicators: Examining the implications of automated bot accounts on Twitter. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(1), 232\u2013238.","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"key":"2251_CR13","unstructured":"Haustein, S., & Costas, R. (2015). Identifying Twitter audiences: Who is tweeting about scientific papers? Retrieved from https:\/\/www.asist.org\/SIG\/SIGMET\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/sigmet2015_paper_11.pdf ."},{"issue":"3","key":"2251_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0120495","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0120495","volume":"10","author":"S Haustein","year":"2015","unstructured":"Haustein, S., Costas, R., & Lariviere, V. (2015b). Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: The effect of document properties and collaboration patterns. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0120495.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"4","key":"2251_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"656","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23101","volume":"65","author":"S Haustein","year":"2014","unstructured":"Haustein, S., Peters, I., Sugimoto, C. R., Thelwall, M., et al. (2014). Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4), 656\u2013669.","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"2","key":"2251_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1027","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-014-1229-3","volume":"101","author":"K Holmberg","year":"2014","unstructured":"Holmberg, K., & Thelwall, M. (2014). Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1027\u20131042.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"2251_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.5865\/IJKCT.2015.5.1.015","volume":"5","author":"HR Jamali","year":"2015","unstructured":"Jamali, H. R., & Alimohammadi, D. (2015). Blog citations as indicators of the societal impact of research: Content analysis of social sciences blogs. International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology, 5(1), 15\u201332.","journal-title":"International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology"},{"key":"2251_CR18","unstructured":"Ke, Q., Ahn, Y. Y., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). A systematic identification and analysis of scientists on Twitter. Retrieved from https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1608.06229 ."},{"key":"2251_CR19","unstructured":"Maleki, A. (2016). Do tweets indicate scholarly communication? Retrieved from http:\/\/altmetrics.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/altmetrics16_paper_8.pdf ."},{"key":"2251_CR20","unstructured":"Mamtora, J., & Haddow, G. (2015). From bibliometrics to altmetrics: An Australian study. Presented at IFLA academic and research libraries satellite conference. In The Quest for deeper meaning of research support, Cape Town, South Africa, 13\u201314 August, 2015."},{"key":"2251_CR21","unstructured":"NISO. (2016). Altmetrics definitions and use cases. Retrieved from http:\/\/www.niso.org\/topics\/tl\/altmetrics_initiative\/ ."},{"issue":"7","key":"2251_CR22","first-page":"85","volume":"233","author":"LP Song","year":"2015","unstructured":"Song, L. P., Chen, W., & He, Y. (2015). Empirical study on article level scientific evaluation\u2014take PLoS ONE as example. Library Work and Study, 233(7), 85\u201388.","journal-title":"Library Work and Study"},{"issue":"5","key":"2251_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e64841","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0064841","volume":"8","author":"M Thelwall","year":"2013","unstructured":"Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Lariviere, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS ONE, 8(5), e64841.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"4","key":"2251_CR24","first-page":"20","volume":"42","author":"HQ Yu","year":"2016","unstructured":"Yu, H. Q., Hemminger, B. M., Qiu, J. P., & Xiao, T. T. (2016). Study on characteristics of sina weibo altmetrics. Journal of Library Science in China, 42(4), 20\u201336.","journal-title":"Journal of Library Science in China"},{"issue":"2","key":"2251_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1491","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-014-1264-0","volume":"101","author":"Z Zahedi","year":"2014","unstructured":"Zahedi, Z., Costas, R., & Wouters, P. (2014). How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of alternative metrics\u2019 in scientific publications. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1491\u20131513.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"}],"container-title":["Scientometrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2251-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2251-z\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2251-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,25]],"date-time":"2017-06-25T05:15:14Z","timestamp":1498367714000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2251-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,28]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,4]]}},"alternative-id":["2251"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2251-z","relation":{},"ISSN":["0138-9130","1588-2861"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0138-9130","type":"print"},{"value":"1588-2861","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,28]]}}}