{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,15]],"date-time":"2026-02-15T03:29:42Z","timestamp":1771126182001,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,4]],"date-time":"2017-02-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1486166400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"funder":[{"name":"Japan Patent Attorneys Association"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Scientometrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,4]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2272-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,4]],"date-time":"2017-02-04T09:22:08Z","timestamp":1486200128000},"page":"159-183","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["The relation of patent description and examination with validity: an empirical study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"111","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8910-8717","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yutaka","family":"Niidome","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,4]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"2272_CR1","first-page":"185","volume":"26","author":"JR Allison","year":"1998","unstructured":"Allison, J. R., & Lemley, M. A. (1998). Empirical evidence on the validity of litigated patents. AIPLA Quarterly Journal, 26(3), 185\u2013275.","journal-title":"AIPLA Quarterly Journal"},{"key":"2272_CR2","unstructured":"Barney, J. A., & Barney, J. R. (2003). U.S. Patent No. 6,556,992. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office."},{"key":"2272_CR3","unstructured":"Beaujean, A. A. (2012). BaylorEdPsych: R package for Baylor University educational psychology quantitative courses. R package version 0.5. http:\/\/CRAN.R-project.org\/package=BaylorEdPsych . Accessed December 23, 2014."},{"issue":"2","key":"2272_CR4","first-page":"16","volume":"9","author":"DR Bestor","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bestor, D. R., & Hamp, E. (2010). Peer to patent: A cure for our ailing patent examination system. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 9(2), 16\u201328.","journal-title":"Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property"},{"key":"2272_CR5","unstructured":"Chongsuvivatwong, V. (2012). epicalc: Epidemiological calculator. R package version 2.15.1.0. http:\/\/CRAN.R-project.org\/package=epicalc . Accessed December 23, 2014."},{"key":"2272_CR6","unstructured":"Cockburn, I. M., Kortum, S., & Stern, S. (2002). Are all patent examiners equal? The impact of characteristics on patent statistics and litigation outcomes. National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working paper no. 8980."},{"key":"2272_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"844","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2013.01.003","volume":"42","author":"CA Cotropia","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cotropia, C. A., Lemley, M. A., & Sampat, B. (2013). Do applicant patent citations matter? Research Policy, 42, 844\u2013854.","journal-title":"Research Policy"},{"key":"2272_CR8","unstructured":"Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2011). An {R} companion to applied regression (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http:\/\/socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca\/jfox\/Books\/Companion . Accessed December 23, 2014."},{"key":"2272_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Graham, S. J. H., Hall, B. H., Harhoff, D., & Mowery, D. C. (2002). Post-issue patent \u201cquality control\u201d: A comparative study of US patent re-examinations and European patent oppositions. National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working paper no. 8807.","DOI":"10.3386\/w8807"},{"key":"2272_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1016\/S0165-1765(00)00265-2","volume":"69","author":"D Guellec","year":"2000","unstructured":"Guellec, D., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2000). Applications, grants and the value of patent. Economics Letters, 69, 109\u2013114.","journal-title":"Economics Letters"},{"key":"2272_CR11","unstructured":"Hall, B. H., & Ziedonis. R. (2007). An empirical analysis of patent litigation in the semiconductor industry. Working paper. http:\/\/www.epip.eu\/conferences\/epip02\/files\/HallZiedonis07_PatentLitigation_AEA.pdf . Accessed November 28, 2014."},{"key":"2272_CR12","unstructured":"Hall, B. H., Graham, S. J. H., Harhoff, D., & Mowery, D. C. (2003). Prospects for improving U.S. patent quality via post-grant opposition. National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working paper no. 9731."},{"issue":"1","key":"2272_CR13","first-page":"16","volume":"36","author":"B Hall","year":"2005","unstructured":"Hall, B., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics, 36(1), 16\u201338.","journal-title":"RAND Journal of Economics"},{"key":"2272_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"443","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijindorg.2004.01.001","volume":"22","author":"D Harhoff","year":"2004","unstructured":"Harhoff, D., & Reitzig, M. (2004). Determinants of opposition against EPO patent grants\u2014The case of biotechnology and pharmaceuticals. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22, 443\u2013480.","journal-title":"International Journal of Industrial Organization"},{"key":"2272_CR15","volume-title":"Innovation and its discontents\u2014How our broken patent system is endangering innovation and progress, and what to do about it","author":"A Jaffe","year":"2004","unstructured":"Jaffe, A., & Lerner, J. (2004). Innovation and its discontents\u2014How our broken patent system is endangering innovation and progress, and what to do about it. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press."},{"key":"2272_CR16","unstructured":"Jansen, W. (2009). Examining the relation between patent value and patent claims. Eindhoven: Eindhoven. http:\/\/alexandria.tue.nl\/extra1\/afstversl\/tm\/Jansen%202009.pdf . Accessed July 27, 2016."},{"key":"2272_CR17","unstructured":"Kobayashi, T. (2013). The effect of the accelerated examination system on patent invalidation risks and social surplus. National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies. Master thesis. http:\/\/www3.grips.ac.jp\/~ip\/pdf\/paper2012\/MJI12501kobayashi.pdf . Accessed October 21, 2014 (in Japanese)."},{"issue":"1","key":"2272_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.2307\/2696401","volume":"32","author":"JO Lanjouw","year":"2001","unstructured":"Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (2001). Characteristics of patent litigation: a window on competition. RAND Journal of Economics, 32(1), 129\u2013151.","journal-title":"RAND Journal of Economics"},{"issue":"4","key":"2272_CR19","first-page":"1495","volume":"95","author":"MA Lemley","year":"2001","unstructured":"Lemley, M. A. (2001). Rational ignorance at the patent office. Northwestern University Law Review, 95(4), 1495\u20131532.","journal-title":"Northwestern University Law Review"},{"issue":"1","key":"2272_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1740-1461.2011.01245.x","volume":"9","author":"RJ Mann","year":"2012","unstructured":"Mann, R. J., & Underweiser, M. (2012). A new look at patent quality: Relating patent prosecution to validity. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 9(1), 1\u201332.","journal-title":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies"},{"issue":"4","key":"2272_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"839","DOI":"10.2307\/1122920","volume":"90","author":"RP Merges","year":"1990","unstructured":"Merges, R. P., & Nelson, R. R. (1990). On the complex economics of patent scope. Columbia Law Review, 90(4), 839\u2013916.","journal-title":"Columbia Law Review"},{"key":"2272_CR22","unstructured":"Nagaoka, S., & Yamauchi, I. (2013). The effect of the length of time to examination start on examination results and stability. Institute of Intellectual Property. Fiscal year 2012 analysis report on economic growth in our nation resulting from industrial property applicant behavior, etc., pp. 25\u201364 (in Japanese)."},{"key":"2272_CR23","unstructured":"Nagata, K., & Watanabe, T. (2008). Empirical analysis on Japan patent quality. Abstracts of the 6th annual academic research meeting of the intellectual property association of Japan (June 28\u201329, 2008), pp. 326\u2013329 (in Japanese)."},{"issue":"3","key":"2272_CR24","first-page":"75","volume":"206","author":"K Nakamura","year":"2012","unstructured":"Nakamura, K. (2012). Pre-grant information submissions by the third party: Impacts on patent examination quality. Kokumin Keizai Zasshi, 206(3), 75\u201396. (in Japanese).","journal-title":"Kokumin Keizai Zasshi"},{"key":"2272_CR25","unstructured":"Nakamura, K. (2013). Analysis on stability of rights in invalidation trials. Institute of Intellectual Property. Fiscal year 2012 analysis report on economic growth in our nation resulting from industrial property applicant behavior, etc, pp. 121\u2013149 (in Japanese)."},{"key":"2272_CR26","unstructured":"Nakamura, K., Shimbo, T., & Nagaoka, S. (2011). Economic analysis on the information submission system, oppositions, appeals against rejection, and invalidation trials. Institute of Intellectual Property. Fiscal year 2010 research report on applicant behavior, etc. towards the industrialization of inventions in our nation, pp. 153\u2013183 (in Japanese)."},{"key":"2272_CR27","unstructured":"Niiyama, R. (2007). The study on the risk of patent invalidation. National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies. Master thesis. http:\/\/www3.grips.ac.jp\/~ip\/pdf\/paper2006\/MJI06052niiyama.pdf . Accessed April 9, 2014 (in Japanese)."},{"issue":"1","key":"2272_CR28","first-page":"123","volume":"20","author":"BS Noveck","year":"2006","unstructured":"Noveck, B. S. (2006). \u201cPeer to Patent\u201d: Collective intelligence, open review, and patent reform. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 20(1), 123\u2013162.","journal-title":"Harvard Journal of Law & Technology"},{"issue":"3","key":"2272_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1016\/j.econlet.2008.08.014","volume":"101","author":"A Palangkaraya","year":"2008","unstructured":"Palangkaraya, A., Jensen, P. H., & Webster, E. (2008). Applicant behaviour in patent examination request lags. Economics Letters, 101(3), 243\u2013245.","journal-title":"Economics Letters"},{"key":"2272_CR30","unstructured":"R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http:\/\/www.R-project.org\/ . Accessed November 23, 2014."},{"key":"2272_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"939","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2004.02.004","volume":"33","author":"M Reitzig","year":"2004","unstructured":"Reitzig, M. (2004). Improving patent valuations for management purposes\u2014Validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales. Research Policy, 33, 939\u2013957.","journal-title":"Research Policy"},{"key":"2272_CR32","volume-title":"Determinants of patent quality: An empirical analysis","author":"BN Sampat","year":"2005","unstructured":"Sampat, B. N. (2005). Determinants of patent quality: An empirical analysis. New York: Columbia Univ."},{"key":"2272_CR33","unstructured":"Scellato, G., Calderini, M., Caviggioli, F., Franzoni, C., Ughetto, E., Kica, E., et al. (2011). Study on the quality of the patent system in Europe. European Commission; Tender MARKT\/2009\/11\/D."},{"key":"2272_CR34","volume-title":"Interlocking patent rights and modularity: Insights from the Gillette Fusion razor","author":"C Sternitzke","year":"2012","unstructured":"Sternitzke, C. (2012). Interlocking patent rights and modularity: Insights from the Gillette Fusion razor. Copenhagen: DRUID Society, CBS."},{"issue":"3","key":"2272_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1080\/10438591003668638","volume":"20","author":"N Zeebroeck van","year":"2011","unstructured":"van Zeebroeck, N., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2011a). The vulnerability of patent value determinants. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 20(3), 283\u2013308.","journal-title":"Economics of Innovation and New Technology"},{"issue":"6","key":"2272_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1080\/10438591003668646","volume":"20","author":"N Zeebroeck van","year":"2011","unstructured":"van Zeebroeck, N., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2011b). Filing strategies and patent value. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 20(6), 539\u2013561.","journal-title":"Economics of Innovation and New Technology"}],"container-title":["Scientometrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2272-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2272-7\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2272-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,25]],"date-time":"2017-06-25T05:47:14Z","timestamp":1498369634000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2272-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,4]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,4]]}},"alternative-id":["2272"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2272-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["0138-9130","1588-2861"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0138-9130","type":"print"},{"value":"1588-2861","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,4]]}}}