{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,1]],"date-time":"2026-02-01T03:53:53Z","timestamp":1769918033976,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,14]],"date-time":"2017-08-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1502668800000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Scientometrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,10]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2489-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,14]],"date-time":"2017-08-14T06:03:06Z","timestamp":1502690586000},"page":"465-477","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":24,"title":["Difficulty of recruiting reviewers predicts review scores and editorial decisions at six journals of ecology and evolution"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"113","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7545-7967","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Charles W.","family":"Fox","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,14]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"2489_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1186\/s41073-016-0022-7","volume":"1","author":"AY Albert","year":"2016","unstructured":"Albert, A. Y., Gow, J. L., Cobra, A., & Vines, T. H. (2016). Is it becoming harder to secure reviewers for peer review? A test with data from five ecology journals. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 1(1), 14.","journal-title":"Research Integrity and Peer Review"},{"key":"2489_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s11270-010-0355-7","volume":"214","author":"PC Baveye","year":"2011","unstructured":"Baveye, P. C., & Trevors, J. T. (2011). How can we encourage peer-reviewing? Water, Air, and Soil pollution, 214, 1\u20133.","journal-title":"Water, Air, and Soil pollution"},{"issue":"12","key":"2489_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e14331","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0014331","volume":"5","author":"L Bornmann","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Daniel, H. D. (2010a). A reliability-generalization study of journal peer reviews: A multilevel meta-analysis of inter-rater reliability and its determinants. PLoS ONE, 5(12), e14331.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"2","key":"2489_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-009-0011-4","volume":"83","author":"L Bornmann","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bornmann, L., Weymuth, C., & Daniel, H. D. (2010b). A content analysis of referees\u2019 comments: How do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low-or high-impact journal differ? Scientometrics, 83(2), 493\u2013506.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"04","key":"2489_CR5","first-page":"595","volume":"48","author":"M Breuning","year":"2015","unstructured":"Breuning, M., Backstrom, J., Brannon, J., Gross, B. I., & Widmeier, M. (2015). Reviewer fatigue? Why scholars decline to review their peers\u2019 work. PS: Political Science and Politics, 48(04), 595\u2013600.","journal-title":"PS: Political Science and Politics"},{"key":"2489_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1016\/j.biocon.2015.02.025","volume":"186","author":"A Campos-Arceiz","year":"2015","unstructured":"Campos-Arceiz, A., Primack, R. B., & Koh, L. P. (2015). Reviewer recommendations and editors\u2019 decisions for a conservation journal: Is it just a crapshoot? And do Chinese authors get a fair shot? Biological Conservation, 186, 22\u201327.","journal-title":"Biological Conservation"},{"issue":"5","key":"2489_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"591","DOI":"10.1037\/0003-066X.45.5.591","volume":"45","author":"DW Fiske","year":"1990","unstructured":"Fiske, D. W., & Fogg, L. F. (1990). But the reviewers are making different criticisms of my paper! Diversity and uniqueness in reviewer comments. American Psychologist, 45(5), 591.","journal-title":"American Psychologist"},{"issue":"1","key":"2489_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1186\/s41073-017-0027-x","volume":"2","author":"CW Fox","year":"2017","unstructured":"Fox, C. W., Albert, A. Y., & Vines, T. H. (2017a). Recruitment of reviewers is becoming harder at some journals: a test of the influence of reviewer fatigue at six journals in ecology and evolution. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2(1), 3.","journal-title":"Research Integrity and Peer Review"},{"issue":"10","key":"2489_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1970","DOI":"10.1002\/ece3.1480","volume":"5","author":"CW Fox","year":"2015","unstructured":"Fox, C. W., & Burns, C. S. (2015). The relationship between manuscript title structure and success: Editorial decisions and citation performance for an ecological journal. Ecology and Evolution, 5(10), 1970\u20131980.","journal-title":"Ecology and Evolution"},{"issue":"1","key":"2489_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1111\/1365-2435.12529","volume":"30","author":"CW Fox","year":"2016","unstructured":"Fox, C. W., Burns, C. S., & Meyer, J. A. (2016a). Editor and reviewer gender influence the peer review process but not peer review outcomes at an ecology journal. Functional Ecology, 30(1), 140\u2013153.","journal-title":"Functional Ecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"2489_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1111\/1365-2435.12587","volume":"30","author":"CW Fox","year":"2016","unstructured":"Fox, C. W., Burns, C. S., Muncy, A. D., & Meyer, J. A. (2016b). Gender differences in patterns of authorship do not affect peer review outcomes at an ecology journal. Functional Ecology, 30(1), 126\u2013139.","journal-title":"Functional Ecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"2489_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"270","DOI":"10.1111\/1365-2435.12665","volume":"31","author":"CW Fox","year":"2017","unstructured":"Fox, C. W., Burns, C. S., Muncy, A. D., & Meyer, J. A. (2017b). Author-suggested reviewers: Gender differences and influences on the peer review process at an ecology journal. Functional Ecology, 31(1), 270\u2013280.","journal-title":"Functional Ecology"},{"key":"2489_CR13","unstructured":"Goldman, H. V. (2015) The scarce peer reviewer and challenges journal editors face. \n                        http:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/the-scarce-peer-reviewer-and-challenges-journal-editors-face\n                        \n                    . Accessed 2 May 2017."},{"key":"2489_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"971","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2331-0","volume":"111","author":"KM Kallmes","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kallmes, K. M., Brinjikji, W., Ahmed, A. T., & Kallmes, D. F. (2017). Difficulty in finding manuscript reviewers is not associated with manuscript acceptance rates: a study of the peer-review process at the journal Radiology. Scientometrics, 111, 971\u2013978. doi:\n                        10.1007\/s11192-017-2331-0\n                        \n                    .","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"2489_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10533-010-9530-6","volume":"101","author":"K Lajtha","year":"2010","unstructured":"Lajtha, K., & Baveye, P. C. (2010). How should we deal with the growing peer-review problem? Biogeochemistry, 101, 1\u20133.","journal-title":"Biogeochemistry"},{"issue":"2","key":"2489_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"422","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2009.12.008","volume":"205","author":"J Mingers","year":"2010","unstructured":"Mingers, J., & Xu, F. (2010). The drivers of citations in management science journals. European Journal of Operational Research, 205(2), 422\u2013430.","journal-title":"European Journal of Operational Research"},{"issue":"2","key":"2489_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"412","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23405","volume":"67","author":"HF Moed","year":"2016","unstructured":"Moed, H. F., & Halevi, G. (2016). On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(2), 412\u2013431.","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"7465","key":"2489_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"546","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.329.7465.546","volume":"329","author":"TV Perneger","year":"2004","unstructured":"Perneger, T. V. (2004). Relation between online \u201chit counts\u201d and subsequent citations: Prospective study of research papers in the BMJ. BMJ, 329(7465), 546\u2013547.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"6","key":"2489_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0130450","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0130450","volume":"10","author":"DN Sattler","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sattler, D. N., McKnight, P. E., Naney, L., & Mathis, R. (2015). Grant peer review: improving inter-rater reliability with training. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0130450.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"2489_CR20","unstructured":"Sense About Science (2009). Peer Review Survey 2009. \n                        http:\/\/archive.senseaboutscience.org\/pages\/peer-review-survey-2009.html\n                        \n                    . Accessed 2 May 2017."},{"issue":"1","key":"2489_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1186\/1746-160X-3-27","volume":"3","author":"T Stamm","year":"2007","unstructured":"Stamm, T., Meyer, U., Wiesmann, H. P., Kleinheinz, J., Cehreli, M., & Cehreli, Z. C. (2007). A retrospective analysis of submissions, acceptance rate, open peer review operations, and prepublication bias of the multidisciplinary open access journal Head & Face Medicine. Head and Face Medicine, 3(1), 27.","journal-title":"Head and Face Medicine"},{"issue":"3","key":"2489_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1509\/jmkg.71.3.171","volume":"71","author":"S Stremersch","year":"2007","unstructured":"Stremersch, S., Verniers, I., & Verhoef, P. C. (2007). The quest for citations: Drivers of article impact. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 171\u2013193.","journal-title":"Journal of Marketing"},{"issue":"5","key":"2489_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e64841","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0064841","volume":"8","author":"M Thelwall","year":"2013","unstructured":"Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivi\u00e8re, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS ONE, 8(5), e64841.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"1","key":"2489_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1136\/jech.2006.049817","volume":"61","author":"L Tite","year":"2007","unstructured":"Tite, L., & Schroter, S. (2007). Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61(1), 9\u201312.","journal-title":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health"},{"issue":"3","key":"2489_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1533","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2308-z","volume":"111","author":"L Vaughan","year":"2017","unstructured":"Vaughan, L., Tang, J., & Yang, R. (2017). Investigating disciplinary differences in the relationships between citations and downloads. Scientometrics, 111(3), 1533\u20131545.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"7327","key":"2489_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1041","DOI":"10.1038\/4681041a","volume":"468","author":"T Vines","year":"2010","unstructured":"Vines, T., Rieseberg, L., & Smith, H. (2010). No crisis in supply of peer reviewers. Nature, 468(7327), 1041.","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"2489_CR27","volume-title":"Peer Review in scholarly journals: An international study into the perspective of the scholarly community","author":"M Ware","year":"2008","unstructured":"Ware, M., & Monkman, M. (2008). Peer Review in scholarly journals: An international study into the perspective of the scholarly community. Bristol: Mark Ware Consulting."},{"issue":"1","key":"2489_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1002\/leap.1006","volume":"29","author":"M Willis","year":"2016","unstructured":"Willis, M. (2016). Why do peer reviewers decline to review manuscripts? A study of reviewer invitation responses. Learned Publishing, 29(1), 5\u20137.","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"issue":"1","key":"2489_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1016\/j.emj.2015.12.004","volume":"34","author":"MA Zaharie","year":"2016","unstructured":"Zaharie, M. A., & Osoian, C. L. (2016). Peer review motivation frames: A qualitative approach. European Management Journal, 34(1), 69\u201379.","journal-title":"European Management Journal"}],"container-title":["Scientometrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2489-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2489-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2489-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,5]],"date-time":"2017-10-05T07:45:50Z","timestamp":1507189550000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2489-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,14]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,10]]}},"alternative-id":["2489"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2489-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["0138-9130","1588-2861"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0138-9130","type":"print"},{"value":"1588-2861","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,14]]}}}