{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,6]],"date-time":"2026-04-06T07:32:38Z","timestamp":1775460758576,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,4]],"date-time":"2017-09-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1504483200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Scientometrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2504-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,4]],"date-time":"2017-09-04T07:05:39Z","timestamp":1504508739000},"page":"1229-1231","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Comment to: Does China need to rethink its metrics- and citation-based research rewards policies?"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"113","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1946-5065","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Fei","family":"Shu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,4]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"2504_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"635","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-007-2036-x","volume":"79","author":"\u00c9 Archambault","year":"2009","unstructured":"Archambault, \u00c9., & Larivi\u00e8re, V. (2009). History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences. Scientometrics, \n                           79(3), 635\u2013649.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"2504_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2012.12.003","volume":"7","author":"L Bornmann","year":"2013","unstructured":"Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2013). The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000. Journal of Informetrics, \n                           7(2), 286\u2013291. doi:\n                    10.1016\/j.joi.2012.12.003\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"issue":"10","key":"2504_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2003","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23309","volume":"66","author":"R Costas","year":"2015","unstructured":"Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P. (2015a). Do \u201caltmetrics\u201d correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, \n                           66(10), 2003\u20132019. doi:\n                    10.1002\/asi.23309\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"3","key":"2504_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.1108\/AJIM-12-2014-0173","volume":"67","author":"R Costas","year":"2015","unstructured":"Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P. (2015b). The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media: Large-scale disciplinary comparison of social media metrics with citations. Aslib Journal of Information Management, \n                           67(3), 260\u2013288. doi:\n                    10.1108\/Ajim-12-2014-0173\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Aslib Journal of Information Management"},{"issue":"7","key":"2504_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1123","DOI":"10.1177\/1090820X14542973","volume":"34","author":"PE Cress","year":"2014","unstructured":"Cress, P. E. (2014). Using altmetrics and social media to supplement impact factor: Maximizing your article\u2019s academic and societal impact. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, \n                           34(7), 1123\u20131126.","journal-title":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal"},{"key":"2504_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/jmir.2012","author":"G Eysenbach","year":"2011","unstructured":"Eysenbach, G. (2011). Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research. doi:\n                    10.2196\/jmir.2012\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Internet Research"},{"issue":"12","key":"2504_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e50109","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0050109","volume":"7","author":"S Fausto","year":"2012","unstructured":"Fausto, S., Machado, F. A., Bento, L. F. J., Iamarino, A., Nahas, T. R., & Munger, D. S. (2012). Research blogging: Indexing and registering the change in science 2.0. PLoS ONE, \n                           7(12), e50109. doi:\n                    10.1371\/journal.pone.0050109\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"3","key":"2504_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0120495","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0120495","volume":"10","author":"S Haustein","year":"2015","unstructured":"Haustein, S., Costas, R., & Larivi\u00e8re, V. (2015). Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: The effect of document properties and collaboration patterns. PLoS ONE, \n                           10(3), e0120495.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"2","key":"2504_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"461","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-011-0580-x","volume":"91","author":"X Li","year":"2012","unstructured":"Li, X., Thelwall, M., & Giustini, D. (2012). Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement. Scientometrics, \n                           91(2), 461\u2013471.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"11","key":"2504_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2140","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.22731","volume":"63","author":"GA Lozano","year":"2012","unstructured":"Lozano, G. A., Larivi\u00e8re, V., & Gingras, Y. (2012). The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers\u2019 citations in the digital age. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, \n                           63(11), 2140\u20132145.","journal-title":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology"},{"key":"2504_CR11","volume-title":"China statistical yearbook","author":"National Bureau of Statistics of China","year":"2015","unstructured":"National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2015). China statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press."},{"key":"2504_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Quan, W., Chen, B., & Shu, F. (2017). Publish or impoverish: An investigation of the monetary reward system of science in China (1999\u20132016). Aslib Journal of Information Management, 69(5), 1\u201318.","DOI":"10.1108\/AJIM-01-2017-0014"},{"issue":"7079","key":"2504_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"498","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.314.7079.497","volume":"314","author":"PO Seglen","year":"1997","unstructured":"Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ: British Medical Journal, \n                           314(7079), 498.","journal-title":"BMJ: British Medical Journal"},{"key":"2504_CR14","unstructured":"Shu, F. (2017). M-score: An indicator quantifying individual\u2019s scientific research output. Paper presented at the 16th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Wuhan, China."},{"issue":"3","key":"2504_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1853","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2430-y","volume":"112","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2017","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2017). Does China need to rethink its metrics- and citation-based research rewards policies? Scientometrics, \n                           112(3), 1853\u20131857. doi:\n                    10.1007\/s11192-017-2430-y\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"2504_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-013-0993-9","volume":"97","author":"M Thelwall","year":"2013","unstructured":"Thelwall, M. (2013). Assessing non-standard article impact using F1000 labels. Scientometrics, \n                           97(2), 383\u2013395.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"5","key":"2504_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e64841","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0064841","volume":"8","author":"M Thelwall","year":"2013","unstructured":"Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivi\u00e8re, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS ONE, \n                           8(5), e64841.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"}],"container-title":["Scientometrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2504-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2504-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2504-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,11]],"date-time":"2018-09-11T18:33:53Z","timestamp":1536690833000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2504-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,4]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]}},"alternative-id":["2504"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2504-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0138-9130","1588-2861"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0138-9130","type":"print"},{"value":"1588-2861","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,4]]}}}