{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,20]],"date-time":"2026-04-20T11:43:15Z","timestamp":1776685395273,"version":"3.51.2"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,20]],"date-time":"2018-02-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1519084800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Scientometrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,5]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-018-2680-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,20]],"date-time":"2018-02-20T14:02:44Z","timestamp":1519135364000},"page":"1107-1113","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":62,"title":["Multiple versions of the h-index: cautionary use for formal academic purposes"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"115","author":[{"given":"Jaime A.","family":"Teixeira da Silva","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Judit","family":"Dobr\u00e1nszki","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,20]]},"reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"2680_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"727","DOI":"10.1108\/EL-12-2011-0174","volume":"31","author":"SL Adriaansee","year":"2013","unstructured":"Adriaansee, S. L., & Rensleigh, C. (2013). Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar: A content comprehensiveness comparison. The Electronic Library, 31(6), 727\u2013744. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/EL-12-2011-0174\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"The Electronic Library"},{"issue":"2","key":"2680_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-008-0216-y","volume":"74","author":"J Bar-Ilan","year":"2008","unstructured":"Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Which h-index?\u2014A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257\u2013271. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-008-0216-y\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"2680_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1038\/embor.2008.233","volume":"10","author":"L Bornmann","year":"2009","unstructured":"Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2009). The state of h index research. Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance? EMBO Reports, 10(1), 2\u20136. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/embor.2008.233\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"EMBO Reports"},{"key":"2680_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2007.02.001","volume":"1","author":"R Costas","year":"2007","unstructured":"Costas, R., & Bordons, M. (2007). The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. Journal of Infometrics, 1, 193\u2013203. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.joi.2007.02.001\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Journal of Infometrics"},{"key":"2680_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.3390\/publications5030020","volume":"5","author":"JW Flatt","year":"2017","unstructured":"Flatt, J. W., Blassime, A., & Vayena, E. (2017). Improving the measurement of scientific success by reporting a self-citation index. Publications, 5, 20. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/publications5030020\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Publications"},{"issue":"4","key":"2680_CR6","first-page":"15","volume":"1","author":"W Gl\u00e4nzel","year":"2005","unstructured":"Gl\u00e4nzel, W., & Persson, O. (2005). H-index for price medallists. ISSI Newsletter, 1(4), 15\u201318.","journal-title":"ISSI Newsletter"},{"issue":"3","key":"2680_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"823","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2017.06.005","volume":"11","author":"G Halevi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Halevi, G., Moed, H., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2017). Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation\u2014Review of the literature. Journal of Infometrics, 11(3), 823\u2013834. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.joi.2017.06.005\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Journal of Infometrics"},{"issue":"46","key":"2680_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16569","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.0507655102","volume":"102","author":"JE Hirsch","year":"2005","unstructured":"Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual\u2019s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 102(46), 16569\u201316572. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.0507655102\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA"},{"issue":"15","key":"2680_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.21037\/atm.2017.06.24","volume":"5","author":"G Lippi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lippi, G., & Mattiuzzi, C. (2017). Scientist impact factor (SIF): A new metric for improving scientists\u2019 evaluation? Annals of Translational Medicine, 5(15), 303. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21037\/atm.2017.06.24\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Annals of Translational Medicine"},{"issue":"3","key":"2680_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1179","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2427-6","volume":"112","author":"O Popova","year":"2017","unstructured":"Popova, O., Romanov, D., Drozdov, A., & Gerashchenko, A. (2017). Citation-based criteria of the significance of the research activity of scientific teams. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1179\u20131202. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2427-6\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"2680_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1007\/s40596-016-0654-4","volume":"41","author":"S Saraykar","year":"2017","unstructured":"Saraykar, S., Saleh, A., & Selek, S. (2017). The association between NIMH funding and h-index in psychiatry. Academic Psychiatry, 41, 455\u2013459. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40596-016-0654-4\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Academic Psychiatry"},{"issue":"1","key":"2680_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.3171\/2013.8.JNS13938","volume":"120","author":"PF Svider","year":"2014","unstructured":"Svider, P. F., Husain, Q., Folbe, A. J., Couldwell, W. T., Liu, J. K., & Eloy, J. A. (2014). Assessing national institutes of health funding and scholarly impact in neurological surgery. Journal of Neurosurgery, 120(1), 191\u2013196. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2013.8.JNS13938\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Journal of Neurosurgery"},{"issue":"Special Issue 1","key":"2680_CR13","first-page":"92","volume":"7","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2013","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2013). The global science factor v. 1.1: A new system for measuring and quantifying quality in science. The Asian and Australasian Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology, 7(Special Issue 1), 92\u2013101.","journal-title":"The Asian and Australasian Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology"},{"issue":"3","key":"2680_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.5901\/ajis.2016.v5n3p13","volume":"5","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2016","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2016). Science watchdogs. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 5(3), 13\u201315. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5901\/ajis.2016.v5n3p13\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies"},{"issue":"4","key":"2680_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1007\/s12129-017-9671-3","volume":"30","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2017","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2017). The journal impact factor (JIF): Science publishing\u2019s miscalculating metric. Academic Questions, 30(4), 433\u2013441.","journal-title":"Academic Questions"},{"key":"2680_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-017-9873-7","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2017","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Bern\u00e8s, S. (2017). Clarivate analytics: Continued omnia vanitas impact factor culture. Science and Engineering Ethics. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-017-9873-7\n                    \n                  . (in press).","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"1","key":"2680_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-016-2178-9","volume":"110","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2017","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Bornemann-Cimenti, H. (2017). Why do some retracted papers continue to be cited? Scientometrics, 110(1), 365\u2013370. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-016-2178-9\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"3","key":"2680_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1653","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-016-2227-4","volume":"110","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2017","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Dobr\u00e1nszki, J. (2017). Highly cited retracted papers. Scientometrics, 110(3), 1653\u20131661. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-016-2227-4\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Scientometrics"}],"container-title":["Scientometrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11192-018-2680-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-018-2680-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-018-2680-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,19]],"date-time":"2019-02-19T20:15:43Z","timestamp":1550607343000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11192-018-2680-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,20]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,5]]}},"alternative-id":["2680"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-018-2680-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["0138-9130","1588-2861"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0138-9130","type":"print"},{"value":"1588-2861","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,20]]},"assertion":[{"value":"9 October 2017","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 February 2018","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}