{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,1]],"date-time":"2026-04-01T09:30:40Z","timestamp":1775035840096,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,29]],"date-time":"2018-09-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1538179200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100002739","name":"Aarhus Universitets Forskningsfond","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["AUFF-E-2017-FLS-7-3"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["AUFF-E-2017-FLS-7-3"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100002739","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Scientometrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,12]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-018-2922-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,29]],"date-time":"2018-09-29T05:13:14Z","timestamp":1538197994000},"page":"2009-2019","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":42,"title":["Retractions in Science"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"117","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8688-3390","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"K. Brad","family":"Wray","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2909-4306","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Line Edslev","family":"Andersen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"2922_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2242-0","volume":"113","author":"J Bar-Ilan","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bar-Ilan, J., & Halevi, G. (2017). Post retraction citations in context: A case study. Scientometrics, 113, 547\u2013565.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"6357","key":"2922_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1248","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aap9539","volume":"357","author":"J Berg","year":"2017","unstructured":"Berg, J. (2017). Editorial expression of concern. Science, 357(6357), 1248.","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"2922_CR3","unstructured":"Budd, J. M., Coble, Z. C., & Anderson, K. M. (2011). Retracted publications in biomedicine: Cause for concern. In Association of college and research libraries national conference proceedings (pp. 390\u2013395)"},{"issue":"3","key":"2922_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"296","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.280.3.296","volume":"280","author":"JM Budd","year":"1998","unstructured":"Budd, J. M., Sievert, M., & Schultz, T. R. (1998). Phenomena of retraction: Reasons for retraction and citations to the publications. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280(3), 296\u2013297.","journal-title":"Journal of the American Medical Association"},{"issue":"5","key":"2922_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"422","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.embor.7400970","volume":"8","author":"M Cokol","year":"2007","unstructured":"Cokol, M., Iossifor, I., Rodriguez-Esteban, R., & Rzhetsky, A. (2007). How many scientific papers should be retracted? EMBO Reports, 8(5), 422\u2013423.","journal-title":"EMBO Reports"},{"issue":"4592","key":"2922_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1126\/science.6828878","volume":"220","author":"BJ Culliton","year":"1983","unstructured":"Culliton, B. J. (1983). Coping with fraud: The Darsee case. Science, 220(4592), 31\u201335.","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"2922_CR7","volume-title":"Little science, big science","author":"D Solla Price de","year":"1963","unstructured":"de Solla Price, D. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press."},{"issue":"12","key":"2922_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1001563","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001563","volume":"10","author":"D Fanelli","year":"2013","unstructured":"Fanelli, D. (2013). Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign. PLOS Medicine, 10(12), e1001563.","journal-title":"PLOS Medicine"},{"issue":"10","key":"2922_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3855","DOI":"10.1128\/IAI.05661-11","volume":"27","author":"FC Fang","year":"2011","unstructured":"Fang, F. C., & Casadevall, A. (2011). Editorial: Retracted science and the retraction index. Infection and Immunity, 27(10), 3855\u20133859.","journal-title":"Infection and Immunity"},{"issue":"42","key":"2922_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17028","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1212247109","volume":"109","author":"FC Fang","year":"2012","unstructured":"Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G., & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(42), 17028\u201317033.","journal-title":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences"},{"issue":"10","key":"2922_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0044118","volume":"7","author":"ML Grieneisen","year":"2012","unstructured":"Grieneisen, M. L., & Zhang, M. (2012). A comprehensive survey of retracted articles from the scholarly literature. PLoS ONE, 7(10), 1\u201315.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"2922_CR12","first-page":"85","volume-title":"The Oxford handbook of the science of science communication","author":"J Hilgard","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hilgard, J., & Jamieson, K. H. (2017). Science as \u2018broken\u2019 versus science as \u2018self-correcting\u2019: How retractions and peer-review problems are exploited to attack science. In K. H. Jamieson, D. Kahan, & D. A. Scheufele (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the science of science communication (pp. 85\u201392). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"2922_CR13","first-page":"135","volume-title":"Science and selection: Essays on biological evolution and the philosophy of science","author":"DL Hull","year":"2001","unstructured":"Hull, D. L. (2001). Why scientists behave scientifically. In D. L. Hull (Ed.), Science and selection: Essays on biological evolution and the philosophy of science (pp. 135\u2013138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"2922_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"495","DOI":"10.1126\/science.298.5593.495","volume":"298","author":"D Kennedy","year":"2002","unstructured":"Kennedy, D. (2002). Next steps in the Sch\u00f6n affair. Science, 298, 495.","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"2922_CR15","first-page":"119","volume-title":"The Oxford handbook of the science of science communication","author":"A Marcus","year":"2017","unstructured":"Marcus, A., & Oransky, I. (2017). Is there a retraction problem? And, if so, what can we do about it? In K. H. Jamieson, D. Kahan, & D. A. Scheufele (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the science of science communication (pp. 119\u2013126). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"3","key":"2922_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.3366\/epi.2005.2.3.161","volume":"2","author":"K Mathiesen","year":"2006","unstructured":"Mathiesen, K. (2006). The epistemic features of group beliefs. Episteme, 2(3), 161\u2013175.","journal-title":"Episteme"},{"key":"2922_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1610","DOI":"10.1126\/science.326.5960.1610","volume":"326","author":"RF Service","year":"2009","unstructured":"Service, R. F. (2009). A dark tale behind two retractions. Science, 326, 1610\u20131611.","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"2922_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1038\/478026a","volume":"478","author":"R Noorden Van","year":"2011","unstructured":"Van Noorden, R. (2011). The trouble with retractions. Nature, 478, 26\u201328.","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"2922_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.2010.040964","volume":"37","author":"E Wager","year":"2011","unstructured":"Wager, E., & Williams, P. (2011). Why and how do journals retract articles?: An analysis of Medline retractions 1988\u20132008. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37, 567\u2013570.","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"key":"2922_CR20","first-page":"117","volume-title":"Scientific collaboration and collective knowledge: New essays","author":"KB Wray","year":"2018","unstructured":"Wray, K. B. (2018). The impact of collaboration on the epistemic cultures of science. In T. Boyer-Kassem, C. Mayo-Wilson, & M. Weisberg (Eds.), Scientific collaboration and collective knowledge: New essays (pp. 117\u2013134). Oxford: Oxford University Press."}],"container-title":["Scientometrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11192-018-2922-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-018-2922-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-018-2922-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,2]],"date-time":"2022-09-02T23:56:43Z","timestamp":1662163003000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11192-018-2922-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,29]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,12]]}},"alternative-id":["2922"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-018-2922-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["0138-9130","1588-2861"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0138-9130","type":"print"},{"value":"1588-2861","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,29]]},"assertion":[{"value":"22 May 2018","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 September 2018","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}