{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,28]],"date-time":"2026-03-28T18:36:33Z","timestamp":1774722993165,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":92,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,29]],"date-time":"2018-11-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1543449600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001826","name":"ZonMw","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["445001001"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["445001001"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001826","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Scientometrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,1]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-018-2969-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,29]],"date-time":"2018-11-29T05:10:56Z","timestamp":1543468256000},"page":"339-373","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":63,"title":["The ability of different peer review procedures to flag problematic publications"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"118","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0406-6261","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"S. P. J. M.","family":"Horbach","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1800-5884","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"W.","family":"Halffman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,29]]},"reference":[{"issue":"23","key":"2969_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2661","DOI":"10.1002\/(sici)1097-0258(19981215)17:23<2661::aid-sim33>3.0.co;2-b","volume":"17","author":"DG Altman","year":"1998","unstructured":"Altman, D. G. (1998). Statistical reviewing for medical journals. Statistics in Medicine, 17(23), 2661\u20132674. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/(sici)1097-0258(19981215)17:23%3c2661:aid-sim33%3e3.0.co;2-b .","journal-title":"Statistics in Medicine"},{"key":"2969_CR2","unstructured":"Amsen, E. (2014). What is open peer review.\u00a0F1000 Researchblog (Vol. 2017)."},{"issue":"9","key":"2969_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1552","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2017.07.003","volume":"46","author":"P Azoulay","year":"2017","unstructured":"Azoulay, P., Bonatti, A., & Krieger, J. L. (2017). The career effects of scandal: Evidence from scientific retractions. Research Policy, 46(9), 1552\u20131569. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.respol.2017.07.003 .","journal-title":"Research Policy"},{"issue":"3","key":"2969_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"666","DOI":"10.3758\/s13428-011-0089-5","volume":"43","author":"M Bakker","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bakker, M., & Wicherts, J. M. (2011). The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 666\u2013678. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13428-011-0089-5 .","journal-title":"Behavior Research Methods"},{"issue":"3","key":"2969_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1098\/rsnr.2015.0029","volume":"69","author":"M Baldwin","year":"2015","unstructured":"Baldwin, M. (2015). Credibility, peer review, and nature, 1945\u20131990. Notes and Records: The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science, 69(3), 337\u2013352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rsnr.2015.0029 .","journal-title":"Notes and Records: The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science"},{"issue":"2","key":"2969_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1063\/PT.3.3463","volume":"70","author":"M Baldwin","year":"2017","unstructured":"Baldwin, M. (2017). In referees we trust? Physics Today, 70(2), 44.","journal-title":"Physics Today"},{"key":"2969_CR7","first-page":"90","volume":"39","author":"EF Barroga","year":"2013","unstructured":"Barroga, E. F. (2013). Cascading peer review for open-access publishing. European Science Education, 39, 90\u201391.","journal-title":"European Science Education"},{"issue":"1","key":"2969_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1080\/1045722022000003435","volume":"12","author":"M Biagioli","year":"2002","unstructured":"Biagioli, M. (2002). From book censorship to academic peer review. Emergences: Journal for the Study of Media & Composite Cultures, 12(1), 11\u201345.","journal-title":"Emergences: Journal for the Study of Media & Composite Cultures"},{"issue":"1","key":"2969_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1177\/000271626737400102","volume":"374","author":"AD Biderman","year":"1967","unstructured":"Biderman, A. D., & Reiss, A. J. (1967). On exploring the \u201cdark figure\u201d of crime. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 374(1), 1\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/000271626737400102 .","journal-title":"The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science"},{"key":"2969_CR10","unstructured":"BioMed Central. (2017). What might peer review look like in 2030? \u00a0figshare.com.\u00a0 https:\/\/figshare.com\/articles\/What_might_peer_review_look_like_in_2030_\/4884878 ."},{"key":"2969_CR11","unstructured":"BMJ Open. (2018). Reviewer guidelines. http:\/\/bmjopen.bmj.com\/pages\/reviewerguidelines\/ ."},{"issue":"6154","key":"2969_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1126\/science.342.6154.60","volume":"342","author":"J Bohannon","year":"2013","unstructured":"Bohannon, J. (2013). Who\u2019s afraid of peer review? Science, 342(6154), 60\u201365.","journal-title":"Science"},{"issue":"3","key":"2969_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1177\/1350508417734926","volume":"25","author":"JL Callahan","year":"2017","unstructured":"Callahan, J. L. (2017). The retrospective (im)moralization of self-plagiarism: Power interests in the social construction of new norms for publishing. Organization, 25(3), 305\u2013319. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1350508417734926 .","journal-title":"Organization"},{"issue":"1","key":"2969_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1093\/rof\/rfp023","volume":"15","author":"HH Cao","year":"2009","unstructured":"Cao, H. H., Han, B., Hirshleifer, D., & Zhang, H. H. (2009). Fear of the unknown: Familiarity and economic decisions. Review of Finance, 15(1), 173\u2013206.","journal-title":"Review of Finance"},{"issue":"8","key":"2969_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"944","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.13938","volume":"72","author":"JB Carlisle","year":"2017","unstructured":"Carlisle, J. B. (2017). Data fabrication and other reasons for non-random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals. Anaesthesia, 72(8), 944\u2013952. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/anae.13938 .","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"issue":"3","key":"2969_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cortex.2012.12.016","volume":"49","author":"CD Chambers","year":"2013","unstructured":"Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609\u2013610.","journal-title":"Cortex"},{"issue":"1","key":"2969_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.3934\/Neuroscience.2014.1.4","volume":"1","author":"CD Chambers","year":"2014","unstructured":"Chambers, C. D., Feredoes, E., Muthukumaraswamy, S. D., & Etchells, P. (2014). Instead of \u201cplaying the game\u201d it is time to change the rules: Registered reports at AIMS neuroscience and beyond. AIMS Neuroscience, 1(1), 4\u201317.","journal-title":"AIMS Neuroscience"},{"key":"2969_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/femsle\/fnw115","author":"P Cintas","year":"2016","unstructured":"Cintas, P. (2016). Peer review: From recognition to improved practices. FEMS Microbiology Letters. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/femsle\/fnw115 .","journal-title":"FEMS Microbiology Letters"},{"issue":"1","key":"2969_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mrrev.2004.07.003","volume":"589","author":"LD Claxton","year":"2005","unstructured":"Claxton, L. D. (2005). Scientific authorship: Part 1. A window into scientific fraud? Mutation Research\/Reviews Mutation Research, 589(1), 17\u201330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.mrrev.2004.07.003 .","journal-title":"Mutation Research\/Reviews Mutation Research"},{"issue":"1","key":"2969_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.embor.7401143","volume":"9","author":"M Cokol","year":"2008","unstructured":"Cokol, M., Ozbay, F., & Rodriguez-Esteban, R. (2008). Retraction rates are on the rise. EMBO Reports, 9(1), 1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/sj.embor.7401143 .","journal-title":"EMBO Reports"},{"key":"2969_CR21","unstructured":"CWTS. (2018). CWTS leiden ranking\u2014Fields. http:\/\/www.leidenranking.com\/information\/fields ."},{"key":"2969_CR22","unstructured":"Davis, P. (2010). Cascading peer-review: The future of open access publishing? The Scholarly Kitchen."},{"issue":"1","key":"2969_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1007\/pl00022265","volume":"12","author":"PJD Drenth","year":"2006","unstructured":"Drenth, P. J. D. (2006). Responsible conduct in research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 13\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/pl00022265 .","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"2969_CR24","volume-title":"Handling publishing misconduct: Tools used by publishing houses and editors","author":"AR Elizondo","year":"2017","unstructured":"Elizondo, A. R., De Rijcke, S., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2017). Handling publishing misconduct: Tools used by publishing houses and editors. Leiden: Leiden University."},{"key":"2969_CR25","unstructured":"EMBO Press. (2017). About: Cross peer review. http:\/\/emboj.embopress.org\/about#Cross_peer_review ."},{"key":"2969_CR26","unstructured":"Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. (2014). Statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. R package version 1.0. 0."},{"issue":"5","key":"2969_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0005738","volume":"4","author":"D Fanelli","year":"2009","unstructured":"Fanelli, D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE, 4(5), 11. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0005738 .","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"6","key":"2969_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0127556","volume":"10","author":"D Fanelli","year":"2015","unstructured":"Fanelli, D., Costas, R., & Lariviere, V. (2015). Misconduct policies, academic culture and career stage, not gender or pressures to publish, affect scientific integrity. PLoS ONE, 10(6), 18. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0127556 .","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"42","key":"2969_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17028","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1212247109","volume":"109","author":"FC Fang","year":"2012","unstructured":"Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G., & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(42), 17028\u201317033. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1212247109 .","journal-title":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America"},{"key":"2969_CR30","unstructured":"Frontiers. (2014). Frontiers is a community-rooted, open-access academic publisher. https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/about\/reviewsystem ."},{"key":"2969_CR31","unstructured":"Fyfe, A., Coate, K., Curry, S., Lawson, S., Moxham, N., & Rostvik, C. M. (2017). Untangling academic publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research."},{"issue":"2","key":"2969_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1002\/mpo.2950130215","volume":"13","author":"SL George","year":"1985","unstructured":"George, S. L. (1985). Statistics in medical journals\u2014A survey of current policies and proposals for editors. Medical and Pediatric Oncology, 13(2), 109\u2013112. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/mpo.2950130215 .","journal-title":"Medical and Pediatric Oncology"},{"issue":"21","key":"2969_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2762","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.287.21.2762","volume":"287","author":"F Godlee","year":"2002","unstructured":"Godlee, F. (2002). Making reviewers visible: Openness, accountability, and credit. JAMA, 287(21), 2762\u20132765.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"2969_CR34","unstructured":"Goodman, S. N. (2017). Statistical review in biomedical journals: Can we get SMARTA? In Eight international congress on peer review and scientific publication, Chicago."},{"issue":"1","key":"2969_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-015-0127-y","volume":"4","author":"J Harris","year":"2015","unstructured":"Harris, J., Graue, M., Dunning, T., Haltbakk, J., Austrheim, G., Skille, N., et al. (2015). Involving people with diabetes and the wider community in diabetes research: A realist review protocol. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 146. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13643-015-0127-y .","journal-title":"Systematic Reviews"},{"issue":"2","key":"2969_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-012-0906-3","volume":"96","author":"TW He","year":"2013","unstructured":"He, T. W. (2013). Retraction of global scientific publications from 2001 to 2010. Scientometrics, 96(2), 555\u2013561. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-012-0906-3 .","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"6","key":"2969_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"814","DOI":"10.1177\/0011392116663807","volume":"65","author":"F Hesselmann","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hesselmann, F., Graf, V., Schmidt, M., & Reinhart, M. (2017). The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles. Current Sociology, 65(6), 814\u2013845. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0011392116663807 .","journal-title":"Current Sociology"},{"key":"2969_CR38","volume-title":"What it means, why it is important and how we might protect it","author":"M Hiney","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hiney, M. (2015). What it means, why it is important and how we might protect it. Brussels: Science Europe, working group research integrity."},{"key":"2969_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2017.07.003","volume":"80","author":"C Hopp","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hopp, C., & Hoover, G. A. (2017). How prevalent is academic misconduct in management research? Journal of Business Research, 80, 73\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jbusres.2017.07.003 .","journal-title":"Journal of Business Research"},{"key":"2969_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2017.09.004","author":"SPJM Horbach","year":"2017","unstructured":"Horbach, S. P. J. M., & Halffman, W. (2017a). The extent and causes of academic text recycling or \u2018self-plagiarism. Research Policy. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.respol.2017.09.004 .","journal-title":"Research Policy"},{"issue":"10","key":"2969_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0186281","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0186281","volume":"12","author":"SPJM Horbach","year":"2017","unstructured":"Horbach, S. P. J. M., & Halffman, W. (2017b). The ghosts of HeLa: How cell line misidentification contaminates the scientific literature. PLoS ONE, 12(10), e0186281. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0186281 .","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"1","key":"2969_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1186\/s41073-018-0051-5","volume":"3","author":"SPJM Horbach","year":"2018","unstructured":"Horbach, S. P. J. M., & Halffman, W. (2018). The changing forms and expectations of peer review. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 3(1), 8. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41073-018-0051-5 .","journal-title":"Research Integrity and Peer Review"},{"issue":"1","key":"2969_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S330","DOI":"10.1044\/1092-4388(2010\/09-0264)","volume":"54","author":"J Horner","year":"2011","unstructured":"Horner, J., & Minifie, F. D. (2011). Research ethics II: Mentoring, collaboration, peer review, and data management and ownership. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 54(1), S330\u2013S345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1044\/1092-4388(2010\/09-0264) .","journal-title":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research"},{"issue":"8","key":"2969_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e124","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.0020124","volume":"2","author":"JP Ioannidis","year":"2005","unstructured":"Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med, 2(8), e124.","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"2969_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.1177\/0956797611430953","volume":"23","author":"LK John","year":"2012","unstructured":"John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524\u2013532. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0956797611430953 .","journal-title":"Psychological Science"},{"issue":"7","key":"2969_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0159492","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0159492","volume":"11","author":"SF Karabag","year":"2016","unstructured":"Karabag, S. F., & Berggren, C. (2016). Misconduct, marginality and editorial practices in management, business and economics journals. PLoS ONE, 11(7), e0159492. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0159492 .","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"16","key":"2969_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2114","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.285.16.2114","volume":"285","author":"R Kaushal","year":"2001","unstructured":"Kaushal, R., Bates, D. W., Landrigan, C., McKenna, K. J., Clapp, M. D., Federico, F., et al. (2001). Medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. JAMA, 285(16), 2114\u20132120.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"1","key":"2969_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.14147","volume":"73","author":"ED Kharasch","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kharasch, E. D., & Houle, T. T. (2018). Seeking and reporting apparent research misconduct: Errors and integrity. Anaesthesia, 73(1), 125\u2013126. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/anae.14147 .","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"2969_CR49","unstructured":"KNAW. (2014). Correct citation practice, Academy advisory memorandum. KNAW, Committee on Citation Practice."},{"issue":"5","key":"2969_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tig.2015.03.006","volume":"31","author":"P Knoepfler","year":"2015","unstructured":"Knoepfler, P. (2015). Reviewing post-publication peer review. Trends in Genetics, 31(5), 221\u2013223.","journal-title":"Trends in Genetics"},{"key":"2969_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1525\/9780520917804","volume-title":"Stealing into print: Fraud, plagiarism, and misconduct in scientific publishing","author":"MC LaFollette","year":"1992","unstructured":"LaFollette, M. C. (1992). Stealing into print: Fraud, plagiarism, and misconduct in scientific publishing. New York: Univ of California Press."},{"issue":"6","key":"2969_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0127502","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0127502","volume":"10","author":"V Larivi\u00e8re","year":"2015","unstructured":"Larivi\u00e8re, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0127502. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0127502 .","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"1","key":"2969_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.22784","volume":"64","author":"CJ Lee","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lee, C. J., Sugimoto, C. R., Zhang, G., & Cronin, B. (2013). Bias in peer review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(1), 2\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/asi.22784 .","journal-title":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"1","key":"2969_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-014-9532-1","volume":"21","author":"CR Madlock-Brown","year":"2015","unstructured":"Madlock-Brown, C. R., & Eichmann, D. (2015). The (lack of) impact of retraction on citation networks. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(1), 127\u2013137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-014-9532-1 .","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"1","key":"2969_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1080\/08109029208629515","volume":"10","author":"B Martin","year":"1992","unstructured":"Martin, B. (1992). Scientific fraud and the power structure of science. Prometheus, 10(1), 83\u201398.","journal-title":"Prometheus"},{"issue":"7043","key":"2969_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"737","DOI":"10.1038\/435737a","volume":"435","author":"BC Martinson","year":"2005","unstructured":"Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., & de Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435(7043), 737\u2013738. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/435737a .","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"2969_CR57","unstructured":"Mellor, D. (2016). Registered reports: Peer review before results are known to align scientific values and practices. https:\/\/cos.io\/rr\/ ."},{"issue":"1","key":"2969_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1007\/s11024-016-9311-z","volume":"55","author":"K Montgomery","year":"2017","unstructured":"Montgomery, K., & Oliver, A. L. (2017). Conceptualizing fraudulent studies as viruses: New models for handling retractions. Minerva, 55(1), 49\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11024-016-9311-z .","journal-title":"Minerva"},{"issue":"3","key":"2969_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1027\/1864-9335\/a000192","volume":"45","author":"BA Nosek","year":"2014","unstructured":"Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports: A method to increase the credibility of published results. Social Psychology, 45(3), 137\u2013141. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1027\/1864-9335\/a000192 .","journal-title":"Social Psychology"},{"issue":"4","key":"2969_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1205","DOI":"10.3758\/s13428-015-0664-2","volume":"48","author":"MB Nuijten","year":"2016","unstructured":"Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985\u20132013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205\u20131226. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13428-015-0664-2 .","journal-title":"Behavior Research Methods"},{"issue":"12","key":"2969_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1315","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2016.11014","volume":"316","author":"K Okike","year":"2016","unstructured":"Okike, K., Hug, K. T., Kocher, M. S., & Leopold, S. S. (2016). Single-blind vs double-blind peer review in the setting of author prestige. JAMA, 316(12), 1315\u20131316. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2016.11014 .","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"6251","key":"2969_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"aac4716","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aac4716","volume":"349","author":"Open Science Collaboration","year":"2015","unstructured":"Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716.","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"2969_CR63","unstructured":"Pattinson, D., & Prater, C. (2017). Assessment of the prevalence of integrity issues in submitted manuscripts. In Paper presented at the eighth international congress on peer review and scientific publication, Chicago."},{"issue":"2","key":"2969_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1017\/S0140525X00011183","volume":"5","author":"DP Peters","year":"1982","unstructured":"Peters, D. P., & Ceci, S. J. (1982). Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(2), 187\u2013195. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0140525X00011183 .","journal-title":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences"},{"key":"2969_CR65","unstructured":"PLOS. (2018). Guidelines for reviewers. http:\/\/journals.plos.org\/plosone\/s\/reviewer-guidelines2018 ."},{"key":"2969_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7264\/n3542kvw","author":"D Pontille","year":"2014","unstructured":"Pontille, D., & Torny, D. (2014). The blind shall see! The question of anonymity in journal peer review. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7264\/n3542kvw .","journal-title":"Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology"},{"key":"2969_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.3389\/fncom.2012.00033","volume":"6","author":"U P\u00f6schl","year":"2012","unstructured":"P\u00f6schl, U. (2012). Multi-stage open peer review: scientific evaluation integrating the strengths of traditional peer review with the virtues of transparency and self-regulation. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 6, 33.","journal-title":"Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience"},{"key":"2969_CR68","unstructured":"PubPeer Foundation. (2017). PubPeer. https:\/\/pubpeer.com\/ ."},{"issue":"7610","key":"2969_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1038\/535031a","volume":"535","author":"D Rennie","year":"2016","unstructured":"Rennie, D. (2016). Make peer review scientific. Nature, 535(7610), 31\u201333.","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"2969_CR70","unstructured":"Research Square. (2017). Editorial checks and badges. https:\/\/www.researchsquare.com\/publishers\/badges ."},{"key":"2969_CR71","unstructured":"Retraction Watch. (2018). The retraction watch retraction database. http:\/\/retractiondatabase.org\/RetractionSearch.aspx? ."},{"key":"2969_CR72","unstructured":"Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review (Vol. 6, 588)."},{"key":"2969_CR73","unstructured":"Sage Open. (2018). More information: Description. https:\/\/uk.sagepub.com\/en-gb\/eur\/journal\/sage-open#description2018 ."},{"key":"2969_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7554\/elife.00799","author":"R Schekman","year":"2013","unstructured":"Schekman, R., Watt, F., & Weigel, D. (2013). The eLife approach to peer review. Elife. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/elife.00799 .","journal-title":"Elife"},{"key":"2969_CR75","unstructured":"Scheman, R., & Bennett, C. N. (2017) Assessing the outcomes of introducing a digital image quality control review into the publication process for research articles in physiology journals. In International congress on peer review and scientific publication, Chicago."},{"issue":"2","key":"2969_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"318","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23913","volume":"69","author":"M Schmidt","year":"2018","unstructured":"Schmidt, M. (2018). An analysis of the validity of retraction annotation in pubmed and the web of science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(2), 318\u2013328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/asi.23913 .","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"1","key":"2969_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1177\/001112877702300104","volume":"23","author":"WG Skogan","year":"1977","unstructured":"Skogan, W. G. (1977). Dimensions of dark figure of unreported crime. Crime & Delinquency, 23(1), 41\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/001112877702300104 .","journal-title":"Crime & Delinquency"},{"issue":"7175","key":"2969_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.318.7175.4","volume":"318","author":"R Smith","year":"1999","unstructured":"Smith, R. (1999). Opening up BMJ peer review. A Beginning that Should Lead to Complete Transparency, 318(7175), 4\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.318.7175.4 .","journal-title":"A Beginning that Should Lead to Complete Transparency"},{"issue":"4","key":"2969_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1177\/014107680609900414","volume":"99","author":"R Smith","year":"2006","unstructured":"Smith, R. (2006). Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(4), 178\u2013182.","journal-title":"Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine"},{"issue":"11","key":"2969_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"688","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.2011.043133","volume":"37","author":"RG Steen","year":"2011","unstructured":"Steen, R. G. (2011). Retractions in the medical literature: How many patients are put at risk by flawed research? Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(11), 688\u2013692. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/jme.2011.043133 .","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"key":"2969_CR81","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/ssqu.12481","author":"B Stitzel","year":"2018","unstructured":"Stitzel, B., Hoover, G. A., & Clark, W. (2018). More on plagiarism in the social sciences. Social Science Quarterly. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ssqu.12481 .","journal-title":"Social Science Quarterly"},{"issue":"6","key":"2969_CR82","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"670","DOI":"10.1177\/1745691612460687","volume":"7","author":"W Stroebe","year":"2012","unstructured":"Stroebe, W., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2012). Scientific misconduct and the myth of self-correction in science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 670\u2013688. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1745691612460687 .","journal-title":"Perspectives on Psychological Science"},{"key":"2969_CR83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1151","DOI":"10.12688\/f1000research.12037.3","volume":"6","author":"JP Tennant","year":"2017","unstructured":"Tennant, J. P., Dugan, J. M., Graziotin, D., Jacques, D. C., Waldner, F., Mietchen, D., et al. (2017). A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review. F1000Research, 6, 1151.","journal-title":"F1000Research"},{"issue":"7109","key":"2969_CR84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"635","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.315.7109.635","volume":"315","author":"MR Tramer","year":"1997","unstructured":"Tramer, M. R., Reynolds, D. J. M., Moore, R. A., & McQuay, H. J. (1997). Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study. British Medical Journal, 315(7109), 635\u2013640.","journal-title":"British Medical Journal"},{"key":"2969_CR85","volume-title":"Deviance in science: A criminological analysis","author":"M Buggenhout Van","year":"2016","unstructured":"Van Buggenhout, M., & Christiaens, J. (2016). Deviance in science: A criminological analysis. Brussels: Free University of Brussels."},{"issue":"1","key":"2969_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03086211","volume":"17","author":"MAG Heyden van der","year":"2009","unstructured":"van der Heyden, M. A. G., van de Ven, T. D., & Opthof, T. (2009). Fraud and misconduct in science: The stem cell seduction. Netherlands Heart Journal, 17(1), 25\u201329.","journal-title":"Netherlands Heart Journal"},{"key":"2969_CR87","unstructured":"Van Leeuwen, T., Reyes Elizondo, A., & De Rijcke, S. (2017). Analysis of papers retracted in the Web of Science. In PRINTEGER (Ed.). Leiden."},{"issue":"7367","key":"2969_CR88","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1038\/478026a","volume":"478","author":"R Noorden Van","year":"2011","unstructured":"Van Noorden, R. (2011). The trouble with retractions. Nature, 478(7367), 26\u201328.","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"2969_CR89","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fnins.2015.00169","author":"R Walker","year":"2015","unstructured":"Walker, R., & RochadaSilva, P. (2015). Emerging trends in peer review\u2014A survey. Frontiers in Neuroscience. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fnins.2015.00169 .","journal-title":"Frontiers in Neuroscience"},{"issue":"12","key":"2969_CR90","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2378","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.22748","volume":"63","author":"L Waltman","year":"2012","unstructured":"Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2012). A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2378\u20132392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/asi.22748 .","journal-title":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"1","key":"2969_CR91","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1087\/20100103","volume":"23","author":"HY Zhang","year":"2010","unstructured":"Zhang, H. Y. (2010). CrossCheck: An effective tool for detecting plagiarism. Learned Publishing, 23(1), 9\u201314.","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"issue":"1","key":"2969_CR92","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1007\/bf01553188","volume":"9","author":"H Zuckerman","year":"1971","unstructured":"Zuckerman, H., & Merton, R. K. (1971). Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system. Minerva, 9(1), 66\u2013100. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/bf01553188 .","journal-title":"Minerva"}],"container-title":["Scientometrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11192-018-2969-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-018-2969-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-018-2969-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,16]],"date-time":"2020-11-16T07:33:32Z","timestamp":1605512012000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11192-018-2969-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,29]]},"references-count":92,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,1]]}},"alternative-id":["2969"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-018-2969-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["0138-9130","1588-2861"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0138-9130","type":"print"},{"value":"1588-2861","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,29]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2 October 2018","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 November 2018","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}