{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,19]],"date-time":"2026-03-19T11:12:53Z","timestamp":1773918773700,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":12,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,28]],"date-time":"2019-06-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1561680000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,28]],"date-time":"2019-06-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1561680000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Scientometrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,9]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-019-03160-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,28]],"date-time":"2019-06-28T07:11:53Z","timestamp":1561705913000},"page":"1225-1235","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":18,"title":["The language of peer review reports on articles published in the BMJ, 2014\u20132017: an observational study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"120","author":[{"given":"Alberto","family":"Falk Delgado","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Gregory","family":"Garretson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Anna","family":"Falk Delgado","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"3160_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-009-0011-4","volume":"83","author":"L Bornmann","year":"2009","unstructured":"Bornmann, L., Weymuth, C., & Daniel, H.-D. (2009). A content analysis of referees\u2019 comments: How do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low or high-impact journal differ? Scientometrics,\n                           83, 493\u2013506. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-009-0011-4\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"3160_CR2","volume-title":"The effectiveness of editorial peer review","author":"RH Fletcher","year":"2003","unstructured":"Fletcher, R. H., & Fletcher, S. (2003). The effectiveness of editorial peer review. London: BMJ Books."},{"key":"3160_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jeap.2008.02.004","volume":"7","author":"I Fortanet","year":"2008","unstructured":"Fortanet, I. (2008). Evaluative language in peer review referee reports. Journal of English for Academic Purposes,\n                           7, 27\u201337.","journal-title":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes"},{"key":"3160_CR4","unstructured":"Glonti, K., Hren, D., Carter, S., & Schroter, S. (2017). Linguistic features in peer reviewer reports: How peer reviewers communicate their recommendations. \n                    https:\/\/peerreviewcongress.org\/prc17-0234\n                    \n                  ."},{"key":"3160_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"c6424","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c6424","volume":"341","author":"T Groves","year":"2010","unstructured":"Groves, T. (2010). Is open peer review the fairest system? Yes. BMJ,\n                           341, c6424. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.c6424\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"3160_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"g5394","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.g5394","volume":"349","author":"T Groves","year":"2014","unstructured":"Groves, T., & Loder, E. (2014). Prepublication histories and open peer review at the BMJ. BMJ,\n                           349, g5394. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.g5394\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"3160_CR7","unstructured":"Liu, B. (2018). A list of English positive and negative opinion words or sentiment words \n                    https:\/\/www.cs.uic.edu\/~liub\/FBS\/sentiment-analysis.html\n                    \n                  . Accessed 25 Feb 2018."},{"issue":"10","key":"3160_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1371","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1990.03440100079012","volume":"263","author":"RA McNutt","year":"1990","unstructured":"McNutt, R. A., Evans, A. T., Fletcher, R. H., & Fletcher, S. W. (1990). The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review: A randomized trial. JAMA,\n                           263(10), 1371\u20131376.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"3160_CR9","unstructured":"Nielsen, F. \u00c5. (2011). Evaluation of a word list for sentiment analysis in microblog. In Big things come in small packages 718 in CEUR workshop proceedings (pp. 93\u201398)."},{"issue":"1","key":"3160_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1016\/j.esp.2009.07.002","volume":"29","author":"PW Philippa Mungra","year":"2010","unstructured":"Philippa Mungra, P. W. (2010). Peer review process in medical research publication. English for Specific Purposes,\n                           29(1), 43\u201353. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.esp.2009.07.002\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"English for Specific Purposes"},{"key":"3160_CR11","unstructured":"The BMJ. (2018). \n                    http:\/\/www.bmj.com\/about-bmj\/publishing-model\n                    \n                  . Accessed 03 May 2018."},{"issue":"3","key":"3160_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"436","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8640.2012.00460.x","volume":"29","author":"SMAP Turney","year":"2013","unstructured":"Turney, S. M. A. P. (2013). Crowdsourcing a word-emotion association lexicon. Computational Intelligence,\n                           29(3), 436\u2013465.","journal-title":"Computational Intelligence"}],"container-title":["Scientometrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-019-03160-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11192-019-03160-6\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-019-03160-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,27]],"date-time":"2020-06-27T02:37:19Z","timestamp":1593225439000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11192-019-03160-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,28]]},"references-count":12,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,9]]}},"alternative-id":["3160"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-019-03160-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["0138-9130","1588-2861"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0138-9130","type":"print"},{"value":"1588-2861","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,28]]},"assertion":[{"value":"9 February 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 June 2019","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}