{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,28]],"date-time":"2025-09-28T20:49:53Z","timestamp":1759092593355,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,3]],"date-time":"2020-01-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1578009600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,3]],"date-time":"2020-01-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1578009600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Scientometrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>There is evidence that having more readable abstracts and introductions help authors get cited. I show that, in economics, there is also an effect of readability on the probability of publishing in a Top 5 journal (and in a higher-ranked journal in general). I compute readability measures for a set of working papers and examine the journals in which they get published. My results suggest that previous estimates of the effect on citations are downward biased, as higher-ranked journals are more widely read and cited.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-019-03332-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,3]],"date-time":"2020-01-03T12:02:51Z","timestamp":1578052971000},"page":"1671-1681","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Write better, publish better"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"122","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6233-2292","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Diego","family":"Marino Fages","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"3332_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1016\/j.econlet.2018.09.023","volume":"173","author":"M Dowling","year":"2018","unstructured":"Dowling, M., Hammami, H., & Zreik, O. (2018). Easy to read, easy to cite? Economics Letters, 173, 100\u2013103.","journal-title":"Economics Letters"},{"issue":"8","key":"3332_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2623","DOI":"10.1096\/fj.08-107938","volume":"22","author":"ME Falagas","year":"2008","unstructured":"Falagas, M. E., Kouranos, V. D., Arencibia-Jorge, R., & Karageorgopoulos, D. E. (2008). Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor. The FASEB Journal, 22(8), 2623\u20132628.","journal-title":"The FASEB Journal"},{"key":"3332_CR3","unstructured":"Guerini, M., Pepe, A., & Lepri, B. (2012). Do linguistic style and readability of scientific abstracts affect their virality? In Sixth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media (pp. 475\u2013478)."},{"issue":"3","key":"3332_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1025008802657","volume":"57","author":"J Hartley","year":"2003","unstructured":"Hartley, J., Pennebaker, J. W., & Fox, C. (2003). Abstracts, introductions and discussions: How far do they differ in style? Scientometrics, 57(3), 389\u2013398.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"3332_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Heckman, J. J, & Moktan, S. (2018). Publishing and promotion in economics: The tyranny of the top five. Technical Report, National Bureau of Economic Research.","DOI":"10.3386\/w25093"},{"key":"3332_CR6","unstructured":"Hengel, E. (2017). Publishing while Female. Are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review."},{"issue":"4","key":"3332_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1016\/S0927-5371(01)00041-0","volume":"8","author":"A Hollis","year":"2001","unstructured":"Hollis, A. (2001). Co-authorship and the output of academic economists. Labour Economics, 8(4), 503\u2013530.","journal-title":"Labour Economics"},{"issue":"3","key":"3332_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2019.07.004","volume":"13","author":"C Lu","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lu, C., Bu, Y., Dong, X., Wang, J., Ding, Y., Larivi\u00e8re, V., et al. (2019). Analyzing linguistic complexity and scientific impact. Journal of Informetrics, 13(3), 817\u2013829.","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"key":"3332_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Marino Fages, D. (2019). Data for: Write Better, Publish Better, Mendeley Data, V1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17632\/mmfttcywgy.1.","DOI":"10.17632\/mmfttcywgy.1"},{"key":"3332_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1016\/j.econlet.2019.02.017","volume":"180","author":"BC McCannon","year":"2019","unstructured":"McCannon, B. C. (2019). Readability and research impact. Economics Letters, 180, 76\u201379.","journal-title":"Economics Letters"},{"issue":"3","key":"3332_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"679","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-012-0937-9","volume":"96","author":"A Okulicz-Kozaryn","year":"2013","unstructured":"Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2013). Cluttered writing: Adjectives and adverbs in academia. Scientometrics, 96(3), 679\u2013681.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"3332_CR12","first-page":"20","volume":"3","author":"JV Richardson Jr","year":"1977","unstructured":"Richardson, J. V, Jr. (1977). Readability and readership of journals in library science. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 3(1), 20\u201322.","journal-title":"Journal of Academic Librarianship"},{"issue":"1","key":"3332_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1509\/jmkg.72.1.108","volume":"72","author":"AG Sawyer","year":"2008","unstructured":"Sawyer, A. G., Laran, J., & Xu, J. (2008). The readability of marketing journals: Are award-winning articles better written? Journal of Marketing, 72(1), 108\u2013117.","journal-title":"Journal of Marketing"},{"issue":"4","key":"3332_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1177\/107769904802500402","volume":"25","author":"CE Swanson","year":"1948","unstructured":"Swanson, C. E. (1948). Readability and readership: A controlled experiment. Journalism Bulletin, 25(4), 339\u2013343.","journal-title":"Journalism Bulletin"}],"container-title":["Scientometrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-019-03332-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11192-019-03332-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-019-03332-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,2]],"date-time":"2021-01-02T00:41:23Z","timestamp":1609548083000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11192-019-03332-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,3]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,3]]}},"alternative-id":["3332"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-019-03332-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["0138-9130","1588-2861"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0138-9130"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1588-2861"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"20 September 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 January 2020","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}