{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,24]],"date-time":"2026-04-24T03:57:19Z","timestamp":1777003039047,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":64,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,3]],"date-time":"2020-01-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1578009600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,3]],"date-time":"2020-01-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1578009600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100003130","name":"Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["G.OC42.13N"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["G.OC42.13N"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100003130","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Scientometrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,3]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-019-03343-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,3]],"date-time":"2020-01-03T14:02:35Z","timestamp":1578060155000},"page":"1387-1405","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":29,"title":["How do journals of different rank instruct peer reviewers? Reviewer guidelines in the field of management"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"122","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0162-6289","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marco","family":"Seeber","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,3]]},"reference":[{"issue":"6615","key":"3343_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1038\/385402a0","volume":"385","author":"RV Alatalo","year":"1997","unstructured":"Alatalo, R. V., Mappes, J., & Elgar, M. A. (1997). Heritabilities and paradigm shifts. Nature,385(6615), 402.","journal-title":"Nature"},{"issue":"6","key":"3343_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e5910","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0005910","volume":"4","author":"L Allen","year":"2009","unstructured":"Allen, L., Jones, C., Dolby, K., Lynn, D., & Walport, M. (2009). Looking for landmarks: The role of expert review and bibliometric analysis in evaluating scientific publication outputs. PLoS ONE,4(6), e5910.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"7604","key":"3343_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"452","DOI":"10.1038\/533452a","volume":"533","author":"M Baker","year":"2016","unstructured":"Baker, M. (2016). 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature News,533(7604), 452.","journal-title":"Nature News"},{"issue":"3","key":"3343_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"538","DOI":"10.1086\/700070","volume":"109","author":"M Baldwin","year":"2018","unstructured":"Baldwin, M. (2018). Scientific autonomy, public accountability, and the rise of \u201cpeer review\u201d in the Cold War United States. Isis,109(3), 538\u2013558.","journal-title":"Isis"},{"issue":"30","key":"3343_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8414","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1603723113","volume":"113","author":"S Balietti","year":"2016","unstructured":"Balietti, S., Goldstone, R. L., & Helbing, D. (2016). Peer review and competition in the Art Exhibition Game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,113(30), 8414\u20138419.","journal-title":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences"},{"issue":"2","key":"3343_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.5465\/amle.2004.13500489","volume":"3","author":"AG Bedeian","year":"2004","unstructured":"Bedeian, A. G. (2004). Peer review and the social construction of knowledge in the management discipline. Academy of Management Learning & Education,3(2), 198\u2013216.","journal-title":"Academy of Management Learning & Education"},{"issue":"2","key":"3343_CR7","first-page":"23","volume":"6","author":"L Bornmann","year":"2008","unstructured":"Bornmann, L. (2008). Scientific peer review: An analysis of the peer review process from the perspective of sociology of science theories. Human Architecture,6(2), 23.","journal-title":"Human Architecture"},{"key":"3343_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.3389\/fnhum.2013.00291","volume":"7","author":"B Brembs","year":"2013","unstructured":"Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munaf\u00f2, M. (2013). Deep impact: Unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in human Neuroscience,7, 291.","journal-title":"Frontiers in human Neuroscience"},{"issue":"4","key":"3343_CR9","first-page":"302","volume":"47","author":"JM Campanario","year":"1996","unstructured":"Campanario, J. M. (1996). Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,47(4), 302\u2013310.","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"3","key":"3343_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1177\/1075547098019003002","volume":"19","author":"JM Campanario","year":"1998","unstructured":"Campanario, J. M. (1998a). Peer review for journals as it stands today\u2014Part 1. Science communication,19(3), 181\u2013211.","journal-title":"Science communication"},{"issue":"4","key":"3343_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1177\/1075547098019004002","volume":"19","author":"JM Campanario","year":"1998","unstructured":"Campanario, J. M. (1998b). Peer review for journals as it stands today\u2014Part 2. Science Communication,19(4), 277\u2013306.","journal-title":"Science Communication"},{"issue":"2","key":"3343_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"549","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-008-2141-5","volume":"81","author":"JM Campanario","year":"2009","unstructured":"Campanario, J. M. (2009). Rejecting and resisting nobel class discoveries: Accounts by Nobel laureates. Scientometrics,81(2), 549\u2013565.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"3343_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.5465\/amj.2010.48037314","volume":"53","author":"F Castellucci","year":"2010","unstructured":"Castellucci, F., & Ertug, G. (2010). What\u2019s in it for them? Advantages of higher-status partners in exchange relationships. Academy of Management Journal,53(1), 149\u2013166.","journal-title":"Academy of Management Journal"},{"issue":"6","key":"3343_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1145\/1743546.1743569","volume":"53","author":"J Chen","year":"2010","unstructured":"Chen, J., & Konstan, J. A. (2010). Conference paper selectivity and impact. Communications of the ACM,53(6), 79\u201383.","journal-title":"Communications of the ACM"},{"issue":"4523","key":"3343_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"881","DOI":"10.1126\/science.7302566","volume":"214","author":"S Cole","year":"1981","unstructured":"Cole, S., & Simon, G. A. (1981). Chance and consensus in peer review. Science,214(4523), 881\u2013886.","journal-title":"Science"},{"issue":"1","key":"3343_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.5465\/amr.2009.0486","volume":"36","author":"KG Corley","year":"2011","unstructured":"Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review,36(1), 12\u201332.","journal-title":"Academy of Management Review"},{"key":"3343_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110879735","volume-title":"Translating organizational change","author":"B Czarniawska","year":"1996","unstructured":"Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. (1996). Travels of ideas. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevo (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 13\u201347). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter."},{"issue":"10","key":"3343_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1385","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1990.03440100097014","volume":"263","author":"K Dickersin","year":"1990","unstructured":"Dickersin, K. (1990). The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA,263(10), 1385\u20131389.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"3343_CR19","unstructured":"Ellison, G. T. H., & Rosato, M. (2002). The impact of editorial guidelines on the classification of race\/ethnicity in the British Medical Journal. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 56(2)."},{"issue":"12","key":"3343_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1274","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2012.06.009","volume":"65","author":"E Evangelou","year":"2012","unstructured":"Evangelou, E., Siontis, K. C., Pfeiffer, T., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2012). Perceived information gain from randomized trials correlates with publication in high\u2013impact factor journals. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,65(12), 1274\u20131281.","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology"},{"issue":"4","key":"3343_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.1016\/0191-8869(92)90066-X","volume":"13","author":"HJ Eysenck","year":"1992","unstructured":"Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1992). Peer review: Advice to referees and contributors. Personality and Individual Differences,13(4), 393\u2013399.","journal-title":"Personality and Individual Differences"},{"issue":"5","key":"3343_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e5738","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0005738","volume":"4","author":"D Fanelli","year":"2009","unstructured":"Fanelli, D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE,4(5), e5738.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"3343_CR23","unstructured":"Franklin, J. (2017). Results masked review: Peer review without publication bias. https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/connectreviewers-update\/results-masked-review-peer-review-without-publication-bias."},{"key":"3343_CR24","unstructured":"Hackett, E. J., & Chubin, D. E. (2003). Peer review for the 21st century: Applications to education research. National Research Council workshop."},{"issue":"6","key":"3343_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1346","DOI":"10.5465\/amj.2007.28166119","volume":"50","author":"DC Hambrick","year":"2007","unstructured":"Hambrick, D. C. (2007). The field of management\u2019s devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing? Academy of Management Journal,50(6), 1346\u20131352.","journal-title":"Academy of Management Journal"},{"key":"3343_CR26","volume-title":"Thinking, fast and slow","author":"D Kahneman","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Macmillan."},{"issue":"1","key":"3343_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1093\/sf\/sos123","volume":"91","author":"AL Kalleberg","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kalleberg, A. L. (2012). Social Forces at 90. Social Forces,91(1), 1\u20132.","journal-title":"Social Forces"},{"issue":"2","key":"3343_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.5465\/amle.2002.8509336","volume":"1","author":"DC Kayes","year":"2002","unstructured":"Kayes, D. C. (2002). Experiential learning and its critics: Preserving the role of experience in management learning and education. Academy of Management Learning & Education,1(2), 137\u2013149.","journal-title":"Academy of Management Learning & Education"},{"key":"3343_CR29","volume-title":"The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science","author":"K Knorr-Cetina","year":"1981","unstructured":"Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press."},{"key":"3343_CR30","volume-title":"The structure of scientific revolutions","author":"T Kuhn","year":"1962","unstructured":"Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press."},{"key":"3343_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7208\/chicago\/9780226217239.001.0001","volume-title":"The essential tension","author":"T Kuhn","year":"1977","unstructured":"Kuhn, T. (1977). The essential tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press."},{"key":"3343_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.4159\/9780674054158","volume-title":"How professors think","author":"M Lamont","year":"2009","unstructured":"Lamont, M. (2009). How professors think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press."},{"issue":"3","key":"3343_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1351","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-019-03164-2","volume":"120","author":"M Langer","year":"2019","unstructured":"Langer, M., K\u00f6nig, C. J., & Honecker, H. (2019). What might get published in management and applied psychology? Experimentally manipulating implicit expectations of reviewers regarding hedges. Scientometrics,120(3), 1351\u20131371.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"3343_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.3152\/147154406781776039","volume":"15","author":"L Langfeldt","year":"2006","unstructured":"Langfeldt, L. (2006). The policy challenges of peer review: Managing bias, conflict of interests and interdisciplinary assessment. Research Evaluation,15(1), 31\u201341.","journal-title":"Research Evaluation"},{"key":"3343_CR35","volume-title":"Science in action","author":"B Latour","year":"1987","unstructured":"Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press."},{"issue":"1","key":"3343_CR36","first-page":"2","volume":"64","author":"C Lee","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lee, C., et al. (2013). Bias in peer review. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,64(1), 2\u201317.","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"key":"3343_CR37","first-page":"21","volume-title":"Human resource management: A critical text","author":"K Legge","year":"2001","unstructured":"Legge, K. (2001). Silver bullet or spent round? Assessing the meaning of the \u201chigh commitment management\u201d\/performance relationship. In J. Storey (Ed.), Human resource management: A critical text (pp. 21\u201336). London: Thomson Learning."},{"issue":"1","key":"3343_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1093\/reseval\/rvs001","volume":"21","author":"T Luukkonen","year":"2012","unstructured":"Luukkonen, T. (2012). Conservatism and risk-taking in peer review: Emerging ERC practices. Research Evaluation,21(1), 48\u201360.","journal-title":"Research Evaluation"},{"issue":"2","key":"3343_CR39","first-page":"26","volume":"20","author":"A McCook","year":"2006","unstructured":"McCook, A. (2006). Is peer review broken? Submissions are up, reviewers are overtaxed, and authors are lodging complaint after complaint about the process at top-tier journals. What\u2019s wrong with peer review? The scientist,20(2), 26\u201335.","journal-title":"The scientist"},{"issue":"3810","key":"3343_CR40","first-page":"56","volume":"159","author":"RK Merton","year":"1968","unstructured":"Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science,159(3810), 56\u201363.","journal-title":"The Matthew Effect in Science. Science"},{"key":"3343_CR41","volume-title":"The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations","author":"RK Merton","year":"1973","unstructured":"Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago press."},{"issue":"3","key":"3343_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"250","DOI":"10.5465\/amle.2003.10932132","volume":"2","author":"JB Miner","year":"2003","unstructured":"Miner, J. B. (2003). The rated importance, scientific validity and practical usefulness of organizational behavior theories: A quantitative review. Academy of Management Learning and Education,2(3), 250\u2013268.","journal-title":"Academy of Management Learning and Education"},{"issue":"1","key":"3343_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-015-1765-5","volume":"106","author":"P Mongeon","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics,106(1), 213\u2013228.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"3343_CR44","volume-title":"Silencing scientists and scholars in other fields: Power, paradigm controls, peer review, and scholarly communication","author":"G Moran","year":"1998","unstructured":"Moran, G. (1998). Silencing scientists and scholars in other fields: Power, paradigm controls, peer review, and scholarly communication. Greenwich, CN: Ablex."},{"issue":"6","key":"3343_CR45","first-page":"915","volume":"19","author":"J Murphy","year":"2012","unstructured":"Murphy, J., & Zhu, J. (2012). Neo-colonialism in the academy? Anglo-American domination in management journals. Organization,19(6), 915\u2013927.","journal-title":"Anglo-American domination in management journals. Organization"},{"issue":"5","key":"3343_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"747","DOI":"10.1111\/joms.12280","volume":"54","author":"G Patriotta","year":"2017","unstructured":"Patriotta, G. (2017). Crafting papers for publication: Novelty and convention in academic writing. Journal of Management Studies,54(5), 747\u2013759.","journal-title":"Journal of Management Studies"},{"issue":"12","key":"3343_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1145\/1035134.1035153","volume":"47","author":"DA Patterson","year":"2004","unstructured":"Patterson, D. A. (2004). The health of research conferences and the dearth of big idea papers. Communication ACM,47(12), 23\u201324.","journal-title":"Communication ACM"},{"issue":"3","key":"3343_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1093\/reseval\/rvx019","volume":"26","author":"E Reale","year":"2017","unstructured":"Reale, E., & Zinilli, A. (2017). Evaluation for the allocation of university research project funding: Can rules improve peer review? Research Evaluation,26(3), 190\u2013198.","journal-title":"Research Evaluation"},{"key":"3343_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.4135\/9781452231570.n26","volume-title":"Rhythms of academic life: Personal accounts of careers in academia","author":"E Romanelli","year":"1996","unstructured":"Romanelli, E. (1996). Becoming a reviewer: Lessons somewhat painfully learned. In P. J. Frost & M. S. Taylor (Eds.), Rhythms of academic life: Personal accounts of careers in academia (pp. 263\u2013268). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage."},{"issue":"2","key":"3343_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-008-0211-3","volume":"74","author":"U Sandstr\u00f6m","year":"2007","unstructured":"Sandstr\u00f6m, U., & H\u00e4llsten, M. (2007). Persistent nepotism in peer-review. Scientometrics,74(2), 175\u2013189.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"3343_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2309-y","volume":"113","author":"E Sarig\u00f6l","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sarig\u00f6l, E., Garcia, D., Scholtes, I., & Schweitzer, F. (2017). Quantifying the effect of editor\u2013author relations on manuscript handling times. Scientometrics,113(1), 609\u2013631.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"3","key":"3343_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.5465\/amj.2002.25891519","volume":"45","author":"M Schminke","year":"2002","unstructured":"Schminke, M. (2002). From the editors: Tensions. Academy of Management Journal,45(3), 487\u2013490.","journal-title":"Academy of Management Journal"},{"issue":"1","key":"3343_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2264-7","volume":"113","author":"M Seeber","year":"2017","unstructured":"Seeber, M., & Bacchelli, A. (2017). Does single blind peer review hinder newcomers? Scientometrics,113(1), 567\u2013585.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"3343_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"360","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1418218112","volume":"112","author":"K Siler","year":"2015","unstructured":"Siler, K., Lee, K., Bero, L., et al. (2015). Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,112(2), 360\u2013365.","journal-title":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences"},{"issue":"1","key":"3343_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1177\/0162243916656919","volume":"42","author":"K Siler","year":"2017","unstructured":"Siler, K., & Strang, D. (2017). Peer review and scholarly originality: Let 1,000 flowers bloom, but don\u2019t step on any. Science, Technology and Human Values,42(1), 29\u201361.","journal-title":"Science, Technology and Human Values"},{"issue":"1419","key":"3343_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1098\/rspb.1999.0677","volume":"266","author":"LW Simmons","year":"1999","unstructured":"Simmons, L. W., Tomkins, J. L., Kotiaho, J. S., & Hunt, J. (1999). Fluctuating paradigm. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences,266(1419), 593\u2013595.","journal-title":"Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences"},{"issue":"4","key":"3343_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1177\/014107680609900414","volume":"99","author":"R Smith","year":"2006","unstructured":"Smith, R. (2006). Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine,99(4), 178\u2013182.","journal-title":"Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine"},{"issue":"1","key":"3343_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2518-4","volume":"113","author":"F Squazzoni","year":"2017","unstructured":"Squazzoni, F., Brezis, E., & Marusic, A. (2017). Scientometrics of peer review. Scientometrics,113(1), 501\u2013502.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"3343_CR59","unstructured":"Starbuck, W. H. (2003). How much better are the most prestigious journals? The statistics of academic publication. Unpublished manuscript, New York University."},{"issue":"5","key":"3343_CR60","first-page":"15","volume":"203","author":"L Warren","year":"2003","unstructured":"Warren, L. (2003). Galileo didn\u2019t publish his observations in scholarly journals. National Geographics,203(5), 15.","journal-title":"National Geographics"},{"key":"3343_CR61","volume-title":"Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses","author":"AC Weller","year":"2001","unstructured":"Weller, A. C. (2001). Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses. Medford, New Jersey: Information Today Inc."},{"key":"3343_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511608360","volume-title":"An introduction to science studies: The philosophical and social aspects of science and technology","author":"JM Ziman","year":"1984","unstructured":"Ziman, J. M. (1984). An introduction to science studies: The philosophical and social aspects of science and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"3343_CR63","volume-title":"Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States","author":"H Zuckerman","year":"1977","unstructured":"Zuckerman, H. (1977). Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States. London: Transaction Publishers."},{"issue":"1","key":"3343_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01553188","volume":"9","author":"H Zuckerman","year":"1971","unstructured":"Zuckerman, H., & Merton, R. K. (1971). Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system. Minerva,9(1), 66\u2013100.","journal-title":"Minerva"}],"container-title":["Scientometrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-019-03343-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11192-019-03343-1\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-019-03343-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,2]],"date-time":"2021-01-02T00:40:34Z","timestamp":1609548034000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11192-019-03343-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,3]]},"references-count":64,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,3]]}},"alternative-id":["3343"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-019-03343-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["0138-9130","1588-2861"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0138-9130","type":"print"},{"value":"1588-2861","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"15 June 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 January 2020","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}