{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,1]],"date-time":"2026-02-01T01:57:36Z","timestamp":1769911056056,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,24]],"date-time":"2020-07-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1595548800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,24]],"date-time":"2020-07-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1595548800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Scientometrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>In this paper, we provide insight into the editorial process as seen from the perspective of journal editors. We study a dataset obtained from the Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, which contains information about submitted and rejected manuscripts, in order to find differences between local (Serbian) and external (non-Serbian) submissions. We show that external submissions (mainly from India, Iran and China) constitute the majority of all submissions, while local submissions are in the minority. Most of submissions are rejected for technical reasons (e.g. wrong manuscript formatting or problems with images) and many users resubmit the same paper without making necessary corrections. Manuscripts with just one author are less likely to pass the technical check, which can be attributed to missing metadata. Articles from local authors are better prepared and require fewer resubmissions on average before they are accepted for peer review. The peer review process for local submissions takes less time than for external papers and local submissions are more likely to be accepted for publication. Also, while there are more men than women among external users, this trend is reversed for local users. In the combined group of local and external users, articles submitted by women are more likely to be published than articles submitted by men.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-020-03619-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,24]],"date-time":"2020-07-24T17:03:03Z","timestamp":1595610183000},"page":"115-133","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["The hurdles of academic publishing from the perspective of journal editors: a case study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"125","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3952-0260","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maciej J.","family":"Mrowinski","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Agata","family":"Fronczak","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Piotr","family":"Fronczak","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Olgica","family":"Nedic","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Aleksandar","family":"Dekanski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,24]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"3619_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1186\/s41073-016-0022-7","volume":"1","author":"AYK Albert","year":"2016","unstructured":"Albert, A. Y. K., Gow, J. L., Cobra, A., & Vines, T. H. (2016). Is it becoming harder to secure reviewers for peer review? A test with data from five ecology journals. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 1(1), 14.","journal-title":"Research Integrity and Peer Review"},{"issue":"5885","key":"3619_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1126\/science.1162115","volume":"321","author":"B Alberts","year":"2008","unstructured":"Alberts, B., Hanson, B., & Kelner, K. L. (2008). Reviewing peer review. Science, 321(5885), 15.","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"3619_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1038\/515467a","volume":"515","author":"M Arns","year":"2014","unstructured":"Arns, M. (2014). Open access is tiring out peer reviewers. Nature, 515, 467.","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"3619_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1016\/j.physa.2016.03.032","volume":"456","author":"M Ausloos","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ausloos, M., Nedic, O., & Dekanski, A. (2016a). Day of the week effect in paper submission\/acceptance\/rejection to\/in\/by peer review journals. Physica A, 456, 197\u2013203.","journal-title":"Physica A"},{"issue":"1","key":"3619_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-015-1704-5","volume":"106","author":"M Ausloos","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ausloos, M., Nedic, O., Fronczak, A., & Fronczak, P. (2016b). Quantifying the quality of peer reviewers through Zipf\u2019s law. Scientometrics, 106(1), 347\u2013368.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"3619_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1038\/489179a","volume":"489","author":"J Beall","year":"2012","unstructured":"Beall, J. (2012). Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature, 489, 179.","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"3619_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e981","DOI":"10.7717\/peerj.981","volume":"3","author":"BC Bj\u00f6rk","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bj\u00f6rk, B. C. (2015). Have the \u201cmega-journals\u201d reached the limits to growth? PeerJ, 3, e981.","journal-title":"PeerJ"},{"issue":"4","key":"3619_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"914","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2013.09.001","volume":"7","author":"BC Bj\u00f6rk","year":"2013","unstructured":"Bj\u00f6rk, B. C., & Solomon, D. (2013). The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 914\u2013923.","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"issue":"4","key":"3619_CR9","first-page":"595","volume":"48","author":"M Breuning","year":"2015","unstructured":"Breuning, M., Backstrom, J., Brannon, J., Gross, B. I., & Widmeier, M. (2015). Reviewer fatigue? Why scholars decline to review their peers\u2019 work. PS: Political Science & Politics, 48(4), 595\u2013600.","journal-title":"PS: Political Science & Politics"},{"key":"3619_CR10","unstructured":"Elsevier. (2017). Gender in the global research landscape report. https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/research-intelligence\/resource-library\/gender-report"},{"issue":"3","key":"3619_CR11","first-page":"1513","volume":"113","author":"TF Frandsen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Frandsen, T. F. (2017). Are predatory journals undermining the credibility of science? A Bibliometric Analysis of Citers. Scientometrics, 113(3), 1513\u20131528.","journal-title":"A Bibliometric Analysis of Citers. Scientometrics"},{"issue":"11","key":"3619_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0166387","volume":"11","author":"M Kovanis","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kovanis, M., Porcher, R., Ravaud, P., & Trinquart, L. (2016). The global burden of journal peer review in the biomedical literature: Strong imbalance in the collective enterprise. PLOS ONE, 11(11), 1\u201314.","journal-title":"PLOS ONE"},{"issue":"1","key":"3619_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1186\/1741-7015-10-124","volume":"10","author":"M Laakso","year":"2012","unstructured":"Laakso, M., & Bj\u00f6rk, B. C. (2012). Anatomy of open access publishing: A study of longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC Medicine, 10(1), 124.","journal-title":"BMC Medicine"},{"issue":"6","key":"3619_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0020961","volume":"6","author":"M Laakso","year":"2011","unstructured":"Laakso, M., Welling, P., Bukvova, H., Nyman, L., Bj\u00f6rk, B. C., & Hedlund, T. (2011). The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLOS ONE, 6(6), 1\u201310.","journal-title":"PLOS ONE"},{"issue":"1\/3","key":"3619_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10533-010-9530-6","volume":"101","author":"K Lajtha","year":"2010","unstructured":"Lajtha, K., & Baveye, P. C. (2010). Editorial: How should we deal with the growing peer-review problem? Biogeochemistry, 101(1\/3), 1\u20133.","journal-title":"Biogeochemistry"},{"issue":"7479","key":"3619_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1038\/504211a","volume":"504","author":"V Larivi\u00e8re","year":"2013","unstructured":"Larivi\u00e8re, V., Ni, C., Gingras, Y., Cronin, B., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science. Nature, 504(7479), 211.","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"3619_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1038\/541455a","volume":"541","author":"J Lerback","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lerback, J., & Hanson, B. (2017). Journals invite too few women to referee. Nature, 541, 455\u2013457.","journal-title":"Nature"},{"issue":"2","key":"3619_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"442","DOI":"10.1016\/0005-2795(75)90109-9","volume":"405","author":"BW Matthews","year":"1975","unstructured":"Matthews, B. W. (1975). Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure, 405(2), 442\u2013451.","journal-title":"Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure"},{"issue":"6","key":"3619_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"961","DOI":"10.1002\/jwmg.763","volume":"78","author":"E Merrill","year":"2014","unstructured":"Merrill, E. (2014). Reviewer overload and what can we do about it. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 78(6), 961\u2013962.","journal-title":"The Journal of Wildlife Management"},{"issue":"1","key":"3619_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-016-1871-z","volume":"107","author":"MJ Mrowinski","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mrowinski, M. J., Fronczak, A., Fronczak, P., Nedic, O., & Ausloos, M. (2016). Review time in peer review: Quantitative analysis and modelling of editorial workflows. Scientometrics, 107(1), 271\u2013286.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"9","key":"3619_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0184711","volume":"12","author":"MJ Mrowinski","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mrowinski, M. J., Fronczak, P., Fronczak, A., Ausloos, M., & Nedic, O. (2017). Artificial intelligence in peer review: How can evolutionary computation support journal editors? PLOS ONE, 12(9), 1\u201311.","journal-title":"PLOS ONE"},{"issue":"7","key":"3619_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"959","DOI":"10.2298\/JSC150306036N","volume":"80","author":"O Nedic","year":"2015","unstructured":"Nedic, O., & Dekanski, A. (2015). A survey on publishing policies of the Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society\u2014on the occasion of the 80th volume. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, 80(7), 959\u2013969.","journal-title":"Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society"},{"issue":"8","key":"3619_CR23","first-page":"1","volume":"10","author":"VM Nguyen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Nguyen, V. M., Haddaway, N. R., Gutowsky, L. F. G., Wilson, A. D. M., Gallagher, A. J., Donaldson, M. R., et al. (2015). How long is too long in contemporary peer review? Perspectives from authors publishing in conservation biology journals. PLOS ONE, 10(8), 1\u201320.","journal-title":"PLOS ONE"},{"issue":"1","key":"3619_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1087\/20150104","volume":"28","author":"D Nicholas","year":"2015","unstructured":"Nicholas, D., Watkinson, A., Jamali, H., Herman, E., Tenopir, C., Volentine, R., et al. (2015). Peer Review: Still king in the digital age. Learned Publishing, 28(1), 15\u201321.","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"key":"3619_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1038\/530148a","volume":"530","author":"K Powell","year":"2016","unstructured":"Powell, K. (2016). Does it take too long to publish research? Nature, 530, 148\u2013151.","journal-title":"Nature"},{"issue":"3","key":"3619_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-008-9059-4","volume":"14","author":"DB Resnik","year":"2008","unstructured":"Resnik, D. B., Gutierrez-Ford, C., & Peddada, S. (2008). Perceptions of ethical problems with scientific journal peer review: An exploratory study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(3), 305\u2013310.","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"1","key":"3619_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2309-y","volume":"113","author":"E Sarig\u00f6l","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sarig\u00f6l, E., Garcia, D., Scholtes, I., & Schweitzer, F. (2017). Quantifying the effect of editor-author relations on manuscript handling times. Scientometrics, 113(1), 609\u2013631.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"3619_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2264-7","volume":"113","author":"M Seeber","year":"2017","unstructured":"Seeber, M., & Bacchelli, A. (2017). Does single blind peer review hinder newcomers? Scientometrics, 113(1), 567\u2013585.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"4","key":"3619_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.18564\/jasss.1821","volume":"14","author":"F Squazzoni","year":"2011","unstructured":"Squazzoni, F., & Tak\u00e1cs, K. (2011). Social simulation that \u2019peers into peer review\u2019. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 14(4), 3.","journal-title":"Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation"},{"key":"3619_CR30","unstructured":"UNESCO. (2015). Unesco science report: Towards 2030. https:\/\/en.unesco.org\/unescosciencereport"},{"key":"3619_CR31","unstructured":"Ware, M., & Mabe, M. (2015). The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (4th edition). Tech. rep., International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers"},{"issue":"5827","key":"3619_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1036","DOI":"10.1126\/science.1136099","volume":"316","author":"S Wuchty","year":"2007","unstructured":"Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036\u20131039.","journal-title":"Science"},{"issue":"7","key":"3619_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1406","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23265","volume":"66","author":"J Xia","year":"2014","unstructured":"Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2014). Who publishes in \u201cpredatory\u201d journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406\u20131417.","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"}],"container-title":["Scientometrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-020-03619-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11192-020-03619-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-020-03619-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,24]],"date-time":"2021-07-24T00:32:30Z","timestamp":1627086750000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11192-020-03619-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,24]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,10]]}},"alternative-id":["3619"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-020-03619-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0138-9130","1588-2861"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0138-9130","type":"print"},{"value":"1588-2861","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,24]]},"assertion":[{"value":"1 October 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 July 2020","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}