{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,24]],"date-time":"2026-03-24T01:18:36Z","timestamp":1774315116812,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":55,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,28]],"date-time":"2024-06-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1719532800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,28]],"date-time":"2024-06-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1719532800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100006198","name":"Goddard Space Flight Center","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["SESDA IV contract No. 80GSFC17C0003"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["SESDA IV contract No. 80GSFC17C0003"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100006198","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Scientometrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>The rapid increase of Earth science data from remote sensing, models, and ground-based observations highlights an urgent need for effective data management practices. Data repositories track provenance and usage metrics which are crucial for ensuring data integrity and scientific reproducibility. Although the introduction of Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) for datasets in the late 1990s has significantly aided in crediting creators and enhancing dataset discoverability (akin to traditional research citations), considerable challenges persist in establishing linkage of datasets used with scholarly documents. This study evaluates the citation coverage of datasets from NASA\u2019s Earth Observing System Data and Information System (EOSDIS) across several major bibliographic sources \u2012 namely Google Scholar (GS), Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, Crossref, and DataCite\u2014which helps data managers in making informed decisions when selecting bibliographic sources. We provide a robust and comprehensive understanding of the citation landscape, crucial for advancing data management practices and advancing open science. Our study searched and analyzed temporal trends across the bibliographic sources for publications that cite approximately 11,000 DOIs associated with EOSDIS datasets, yielding 17,000 unique journal and conference articles, reports, and book records linked to 3,000 dataset DOIs. GS emerged as the most comprehensive source while Crossref lagged significantly behind the other major sources. Crossref\u2019s record references revealed that the absence of dataset DOIs and shortcomings in the Crossref Event data interface likely contributed to its underperformance. Scopus initially outperformed WoS until 2020, after which WoS began to show superior performance. Overall, our study underscores the necessity of utilizing multiple bibliographic sources for citation analysis, particularly for exploring dataset-to-document connections.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-024-05073-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,28]],"date-time":"2024-06-28T04:03:28Z","timestamp":1719547408000},"page":"3681-3704","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":39,"title":["Comparison of datasets citation coverage in Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, Crossref, and DataCite"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"129","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0224-5004","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Irina","family":"Gerasimov","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6126-5369","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Binita","family":"KC","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0587-9387","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Armin","family":"Mehrabian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7262-9615","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"James","family":"Acker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7585-8018","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Michael P.","family":"McGuire","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"5073_CR1","unstructured":"ANDS\u2014Australian National Data Service. (2024). Data.Gov.Au. Retrieved April 11, 2024, from https:\/\/data.gov.au\/data\/organization\/about\/australian-national-data-service"},{"issue":"1","key":"5073_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1162\/qss_a_00019","volume":"1","author":"J Baas","year":"2020","unstructured":"Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., C\u00f4t\u00e9, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377\u2013386. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/qss_a_00019","journal-title":"Quantitative Science Studies"},{"key":"5073_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Behnke, J., Mitchell, A., & Ramapriyan, H. (2019). NASA\u2019s Earth Observing Data and Information System \u2013 Near-Term Challenges. Data Science Journal, 18(1), Article 1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5334\/dsj-2019-040","DOI":"10.5334\/dsj-2019-040"},{"key":"5073_CR4","unstructured":"De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the science citation index to cybermetrics. Scarecrow press. ISBN 978\u20130810867130."},{"issue":"1","key":"5073_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"363","DOI":"10.1162\/qss_a_00018","volume":"1","author":"C Birkle","year":"2020","unstructured":"Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D. A., Schnell, J., & Adams, J. (2020). Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 363\u2013376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/qss_a_00018","journal-title":"Quantitative Science Studies"},{"key":"5073_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1109\/COINFO.2009.66","volume":"2009","author":"J Brase","year":"2009","unstructured":"Brase, J. (2009). DataCite\u2014A Global Registration Agency for Research Data. Fourth International Conference on Cooperation and Promotion of Information Resources in Science and Technology, Beijing, 2009, 257\u2013261. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/COINFO.2009.66","journal-title":"Fourth International Conference on Cooperation and Promotion of Information Resources in Science and Technology, Beijing"},{"issue":"1","key":"5073_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/1742-5581-3-1","volume":"3","author":"JF Burnham","year":"2006","unstructured":"Burnham, J. F. (2006). Scopus database: A review. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3(1), 1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1742-5581-3-1","journal-title":"Biomedical Digital Libraries"},{"issue":"4","key":"5073_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1039","DOI":"10.1108\/IJLM-04-2019-0110","volume":"30","author":"K Chapman","year":"2019","unstructured":"Chapman, K., & Ellinger, A. E. (2019). An evaluation of Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar citations in operations management. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 30(4), 1039\u20131053. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/IJLM-04-2019-0110","journal-title":"The International Journal of Logistics Management"},{"key":"5073_CR9","unstructured":"COCI\u2014The OpenCitations Index of Crossref open DOI-to-citations. (2024) OpenCitations. Retrieved April 6, 2024, from https:\/\/opencitations.net\/index\/coci"},{"key":"5073_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"CODATA-ICSTI\u2014Task Group on Data Citation Standards and Practices, (2013). Out of Cite, Out of Mind: The Current State of Practice, Policy, and Technology for the Citation of Data. Data Science Journal, 12 75. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2481\/dsj.OSOM13-043","DOI":"10.2481\/dsj.OSOM13-043"},{"key":"5073_CR11","unstructured":"Corporation for Digital Scholarship. (2022). Zotero [Computer software]. Retrieved from www.zotero.org"},{"key":"5073_CR12","unstructured":"Costas, R., Meijer, I., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P. F. (2013). The value of research data metrics for datasets from a cultural and technical point of view. A knowledge exchange report. Leiden. Retrieved June 6, 2022, from https:\/\/hdl.handle.net\/1887\/23586"},{"issue":"1","key":"5073_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.5334\/dsj-2019-009","volume":"18","author":"H Cousijn","year":"2019","unstructured":"Cousijn, H., Feeney, P., Lowenberg, D., Presani, E., & Simons, N. (2019). Bringing Citations and Usage Metrics Together to Make Data Count. Data Science Journal, 18(1), 9. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5334\/dsj-2019-009","journal-title":"Data Science Journal"},{"key":"5073_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Delgado L\u00f3pez-C\u00f3zar, E., Orduna-Malea, E., & Mart\u00edn-Mart\u00edn, A. (2018). Google Scholar as a data source for research assessment arXiv. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.1806.04435","DOI":"10.48550\/arXiv.1806.04435"},{"key":"5073_CR15","unstructured":"Dudek, J., Mongeon, P., & Bergmans, J. (2019). DataCite as a Potential Source for Open Data Indicators. ISSI, 2037\u20132042."},{"key":"5073_CR16","unstructured":"van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2019). Accuracy of citation data in Web of Science and Scopus. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv: 1906.07011."},{"key":"5073_CR17","unstructured":"EOSDIS - Earth Observing System Data and Information System, NASA (2024). Retrieved April 17, 2024, from https:\/\/www.earthdata.nasa.gov\/eosdis"},{"key":"5073_CR18","unstructured":"ESA\u2014European Space Agency. (2024). Retrieved April 17, 2024, from https:\/\/www.esa.int\/"},{"key":"5073_CR19","unstructured":"USGS - U.S. Geological Survey. (2024). Retrieved April 17, 2024, from https:\/\/www.usgs.gov\/"},{"issue":"1","key":"5073_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-018-2958-5","volume":"118","author":"M Gusenbauer","year":"2019","unstructured":"Gusenbauer, M. (2019). Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases. Scientometrics, 118(1), 177\u2013214. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-018-2958-5","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"3","key":"5073_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"823","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2017.06.005","volume":"11","author":"G Halevi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Halevi, G., Moed, H., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2017). Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation\u2014Review of the Literature. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3), 823\u2013834. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.joi.2017.06.005","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"5073_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-019-03114-y","volume":"120","author":"A-W Harzing","year":"2019","unstructured":"Harzing, A.-W. (2019). Two new kids on the block: How do Crossref and Dimensions compare with Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus and the Web of Science? Scientometrics, 120(1), 341\u2013349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-019-03114-y","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"5073_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"787","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-015-1798-9","volume":"106","author":"A-W Harzing","year":"2016","unstructured":"Harzing, A.-W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787\u2013804. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-015-1798-9","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"5073_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1213","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-019-03217-6","volume":"121","author":"I Heibi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Heibi, I., Peroni, S., & Shotton, D. (2019). Software review: COCI, the OpenCitations Index of Crossref open DOI-to-DOI citations. Scientometrics, 121(2), 1213\u20131228. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-019-03217-6","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"5073_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"414","DOI":"10.1162\/qss_a_00022","volume":"1","author":"G Hendricks","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hendricks, G., Tkaczyk, D., Lin, J., & Feeney, P. (2020). Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 414\u2013427. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/qss_a_00022","journal-title":"Quantitative Science Studies"},{"key":"5073_CR26","unstructured":"Hirsch, M. (2024, January 11). DataCite\u2019s Thriving Community: 3000 Repositories and Counting. DataCite. Retrieved April 12, 2024 from https:\/\/datacite.org\/blog\/datacites-thriving-community-3000-repositories-and-counting\/"},{"key":"5073_CR27","unstructured":"I4OC - Initiative for Open Citations, (2024). Retrieved April 6, 2024, from https:\/\/i4oc.org\/"},{"issue":"1","key":"5073_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1016\/j.patter.2020.100007","volume":"1","author":"N Khan","year":"2020","unstructured":"Khan, N., Pink, C. J., & Thelwall, M. (2020). Identifying data sharing and reuse with scholix: potentials and limitations. Patterns, 1(1), 7. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.patter.2020.100007","journal-title":"Patterns"},{"issue":"1","key":"5073_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1038\/sdata.2015.39","volume":"2","author":"JE Kratz","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kratz, J. E., & Strasser, C. (2015). Making data count. Scientific Data, 2(1), 5. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/sdata.2015.39","journal-title":"Scientific Data"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"5073_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1080\/08963568.2021.1916724","volume":"26","author":"M Levine-Clark","year":"2021","unstructured":"Levine-Clark, M., & Gil, E. L. (2021). A new comparative citation analysis: google scholar, microsoft academic, scopus, and web of science. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 26(1\u20132), 145\u2013163. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08963568.2021.1916724","journal-title":"Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship"},{"issue":"4","key":"5073_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1160","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2018.09.002","volume":"12","author":"A Mart\u00edn-Mart\u00edn","year":"2018","unstructured":"Mart\u00edn-Mart\u00edn, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & Delgado L\u00f3pez-C\u00f3zar, E. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160\u20131177. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.joi.2018.09.002","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"5073_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"871","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-020-03690-4","volume":"126","author":"A Mart\u00edn-Mart\u00edn","year":"2021","unstructured":"Mart\u00edn-Mart\u00edn, A., Thelwall, M., Orduna-Malea, E., & Delgado L\u00f3pez-C\u00f3zar, E. (2021). Google scholar, microsoft academic, scopus, dimensions, web of science, and opencitations\u2019 COCI: A multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations. Scientometrics, 126(1), 871\u2013906. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-020-03690-4","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"5073_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2016.04.017","volume":"10","author":"HF Moed","year":"2016","unstructured":"Moed, H. F., Bar-Ilan, J., & Halevi, G. (2016). A new methodology for comparing Google Scholar and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 533\u2013551. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.joi.2016.04.017","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"5073_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-015-1765-5","volume":"106","author":"P Mongeon","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213\u2013228. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-015-1765-5","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"5073_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mooney, H., & Newton, M. P. (2012). The Anatomy of a Data Citation: Discovery, Reuse, and Credit. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 1(1). 20210729115526","DOI":"10.7710\/2162-3309.1035"},{"key":"5073_CR36","unstructured":"NCEI\u2014National Centers for Environmental Information. (2024). Retrieved April 11, 2024, from https:\/\/www.ncei.noaa.gov\/"},{"issue":"1","key":"5073_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"443","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2240-2","volume":"111","author":"H Park","year":"2017","unstructured":"Park, H., & Wolfram, D. (2017). An examination of research data sharing and re-use: Implications for data citation practice. Scientometrics, 111(1), 443\u2013461. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2240-2","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"5073_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.5334\/dsj-2019-052","volume":"18","author":"MA Parsons","year":"2019","unstructured":"Parsons, M. A., Duerr, R. E., & Jones, M. B. (2019). The history and future of data citation in practice. Data Science Journal, 18(1), 52. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5334\/dsj-2019-052","journal-title":"Data Science Journal"},{"issue":"1","key":"5073_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.3163\/1536-5050.104.1.020","volume":"104","author":"LL Pavlech","year":"2016","unstructured":"Pavlech, L. L. (2016). Data citation index. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 104(1), 88\u201390. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3163\/1536-5050.104.1.020","journal-title":"Journal of the Medical Library Association"},{"issue":"1","key":"5073_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"428","DOI":"10.1162\/qss_a_00023","volume":"1","author":"S Peroni","year":"2020","unstructured":"Peroni, S., & Shotton, D. (2020). OpenCitations, an infrastructure organization for open scholarship. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 428\u2013444. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/qss_a_00023","journal-title":"Quantitative Science Studies"},{"issue":"2","key":"5073_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"723","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-016-1887-4","volume":"107","author":"I Peters","year":"2016","unstructured":"Peters, I., Kraker, P., Lex, E., Gumpenberger, C., & Gorraiz, J. (2016). Research data explored: An extended analysis of citations and altmetrics. Scientometrics, 107(2), 723\u2013744. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-016-1887-4","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"3","key":"5073_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1093\/reseval\/rvv049","volume":"25","author":"AAM Prins","year":"2016","unstructured":"Prins, A. A. M., Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Wouters, P. F. (2016). Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: A comparison with Web of Science data. Research Evaluation, 25(3), 264\u2013270. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/reseval\/rvv049","journal-title":"Research Evaluation"},{"issue":"12","key":"5073_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2964","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23529","volume":"67","author":"N Robinson-Garc\u00eda","year":"2016","unstructured":"Robinson-Garc\u00eda, N., Jim\u00e9nez-Contreras, E., & Torres-Salinas, D. (2016). Analyzing data citation practices using the data citation index. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(12), 2964\u20132975. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/asi.23529","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"3","key":"5073_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"841","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2017.07.003","volume":"11","author":"N Robinson-Garcia","year":"2017","unstructured":"Robinson-Garcia, N., Mongeon, P., Jeng, W., & Costas, R. (2017). DataCite as a novel bibliometric source: Coverage, strengths and limitations. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3), 841\u2013854. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.joi.2017.07.003","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"key":"5073_CR45","unstructured":"SerpApi. (2024). [Computer software]. Retrieved from www.serpapi.com"},{"issue":"1","key":"5073_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23917","volume":"69","author":"G Silvello","year":"2018","unstructured":"Silvello, G. (2018). Theory and practice of data citation. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(1), 6\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/asi.23917","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"key":"5073_CR47","unstructured":"SPD-41a\u2014Scientific information policy for NASA\u2019s science mission directorate. (2022). Retrieved April 17, 2024, from https:\/\/science.nasa.gov\/researchers\/open-science\/science-information-policy\/"},{"issue":"2","key":"5073_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"430","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2018.03.006","volume":"12","author":"M Thelwall","year":"2018","unstructured":"Thelwall, M. (2018). Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science? Journal of Informetrics, 12(2), 430\u2013435. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.joi.2018.03.006","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"key":"5073_CR120","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Van Noorden, R. (2014). Google Scholar pioneer on search engine\u2019s future. Nature. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/nature.2014.16269","DOI":"10.1038\/nature.2014.16269"},{"key":"5073_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Vannan, S., Downs, R. R., Meier, W., Wilson, B. E., & Gerasimov, I. V. (2020), Data sets are foundational to research. Why don\u2019t we cite them?, Eos, 101, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1029\/2020EO151665","DOI":"10.1029\/2020EO151665"},{"issue":"1","key":"5073_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1162\/qss_a_00112","volume":"2","author":"M Visser","year":"2021","unstructured":"Visser, M., van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2021). Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 20\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/qss_a_00112","journal-title":"Quantitative Science Studies"},{"key":"5073_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wanchoo, L., James, N., & Ramapriyan, H. (2017). NASA EOSDIS Data Identifiers: Approach and System. Data Science Journal, 16(15). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5334\/dsj-2017-015","DOI":"10.5334\/dsj-2017-015"},{"key":"5073_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wilkinson, M. D., et al., (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1): 1\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/sdata.2016.18.","DOI":"10.1038\/sdata.2016.18"},{"key":"5073_CR53","unstructured":"Winkler, W. E. (1990). String comparator metrics and enhanced decision rules in the Fellegi-Sunter model of record linkage. (No. ED325505; p. 8). Retrieved June 6, 2022, from https:\/\/eric.ed.gov\/?id=ED325505"},{"issue":"1","key":"5073_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23919","volume":"69","author":"M Zhao","year":"2018","unstructured":"Zhao, M., Yan, E., & Li, K. (2018). Data set mentions and citations: A content analysis of full-text publications. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(1), 32\u201346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/asi.23919","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"}],"container-title":["Scientometrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-024-05073-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11192-024-05073-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-024-05073-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,26]],"date-time":"2024-07-26T21:58:46Z","timestamp":1722031126000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11192-024-05073-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,28]]},"references-count":55,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,7]]}},"alternative-id":["5073"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-024-05073-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["0138-9130","1588-2861"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0138-9130","type":"print"},{"value":"1588-2861","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,28]]},"assertion":[{"value":"29 March 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 May 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 June 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors certify that there is no actual or potential conflict of interest concerning this article.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}