{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,26]],"date-time":"2026-04-26T06:57:01Z","timestamp":1777186621823,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":58,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,9]],"date-time":"2024-08-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1723161600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,9]],"date-time":"2024-08-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1723161600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001809","name":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["L2224005"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["L2224005"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001809","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001809","name":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["72374160"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["72374160"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001809","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100012456","name":"National Social Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","award":["19ZDA349"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["19ZDA349"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100012456","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Scientometrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,9]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-024-05129-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,9]],"date-time":"2024-08-09T05:02:28Z","timestamp":1723179748000},"page":"5533-5556","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Spotting potential reviewers for interdisciplinary research: insights on active reviewers from Publons"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"129","author":[{"given":"Lin","family":"Zhang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ziyi","family":"Tu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yifei","family":"Yu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yuanyuan","family":"Shang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ying","family":"Huang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,9]]},"reference":[{"issue":"21","key":"5129_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e144","DOI":"10.3346\/jkms.2021.36.e144","volume":"36","author":"S Ahmed","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ahmed, S., & Anirvan, P. (2021). Top central Asian educational institutions on Publons: Analysis of researchers and reviewers. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 36(21), e144-140. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3346\/jkms.2021.36.e144","journal-title":"Journal of Korean Medical Science"},{"issue":"2\u20134","key":"5129_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1080\/10572317.2003.10762596","volume":"35","author":"S Arunachalam","year":"2003","unstructured":"Arunachalam, S. (2003). Information for research in developing countries\u2014information technology, a friend or foe? International Information & Library Review, 35(2\u20134), 133\u2013147. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10572317.2003.10762596","journal-title":"International Information & Library Review"},{"issue":"1","key":"5129_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16017","DOI":"10.1057\/palcomms.2016.17","volume":"2","author":"G Bammer","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bammer, G. (2016). What constitutes appropriate peer review for interdisciplinary research? Palgrave Communications, 2(1), 16017. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1057\/palcomms.2016.17","journal-title":"Palgrave Communications"},{"key":"5129_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e075719","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj-2023-075719","volume":"381","author":"K Ben Messaoud","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ben Messaoud, K., Schroter, S., Richards, M., & Gayet-Ageron, A. (2023). Analysis of peer reviewers\u2019 response to invitations by gender and geographical region: Cohort study of manuscripts reviewed at 21 biomedical journals before and during covid-19 pandemic. BMJ, 381, e075719. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj-2023-075719","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"6","key":"5129_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"747","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2017.08.017","volume":"35","author":"C Blockeel","year":"2017","unstructured":"Blockeel, C., Drakopoulos, P., Polyzos, N. P., Tournaye, H., & Garcia-Velasco, J. A. (2017). Review the \u201cpeer review.\u201d Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 35(6), 747\u2013749. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2017.08.017","journal-title":"Reproductive Biomedicine Online"},{"key":"5129_CR6","first-page":"3","volume":"6","author":"L Bornmann","year":"2008","unstructured":"Bornmann, L. (2008). Scientific peer review: An analysis of the peer review process from the perspective of sociology of science theories. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge, 6, 3.","journal-title":"Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge"},{"issue":"7609","key":"5129_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"684","DOI":"10.1038\/nature18315","volume":"534","author":"L Bromham","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bromham, L., Dinnage, R., & Hua, X. (2016). Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success. Nature, 534(7609), 684\u2013687. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/nature18315","journal-title":"Nature"},{"issue":"10","key":"5129_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1323","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.263.10.1323","volume":"263","author":"JC Burnham","year":"1990","unstructured":"Burnham, J. C. (1990). The evolution of editorial peer-review. JAMA\u2014Journal of the American Medical Association, 263(10), 1323\u20131329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.263.10.1323","journal-title":"JAMA\u2014Journal of the American Medical Association"},{"issue":"7","key":"5129_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1763","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23665","volume":"68","author":"N Casnici","year":"2017","unstructured":"Casnici, N., Grimaldo, F., Gilbert, N., & Squazzoni, F. (2017). Attitudes of referees in a multidisciplinary journal: An empirical analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(7), 1763\u20131771. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/asi.23665","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"3","key":"5129_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1825","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-023-04918-9","volume":"129","author":"J Cho","year":"2024","unstructured":"Cho, J. (2024). The effect East Asian researcher\u2019s academic performance on international journal review and editing activities. Scientometrics, 129(3), 1825\u20131839. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-023-04918-9","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"4","key":"5129_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"760","DOI":"10.1007\/s12109-022-09914-0","volume":"38","author":"JAT da Silva","year":"2022","unstructured":"da Silva, J. A. T., & Nazarovets, S. (2022). The role of Publons in the context of open peer review. Publishing Research Quarterly, 38(4), 760\u2013781. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12109-022-09914-0","journal-title":"Publishing Research Quarterly"},{"issue":"9","key":"5129_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"461","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2017.02.019","volume":"50","author":"EP Diamandis","year":"2017","unstructured":"Diamandis, E. P. (2017). The current peer review system is unsustainable-awaken the paid reviewer force! Clinical Biochemistry, 50(9), 461\u2013463. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2017.02.019","journal-title":"Clinical Biochemistry"},{"issue":"1","key":"5129_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"465","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2489-5","volume":"113","author":"CW Fox","year":"2017","unstructured":"Fox, C. W. (2017). Difficulty of recruiting reviewers predicts review scores and editorial decisions at six journals of ecology and evolution. Scientometrics, 113(1), 465\u2013477. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2489-5","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"10","key":"5129_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1970","DOI":"10.1002\/ece3.1480","volume":"5","author":"CW Fox","year":"2015","unstructured":"Fox, C. W., & Burns, C. S. (2015). The relationship between manuscript title structure and success: Editorial decisions and citation performance for an ecological journal. Ecology and Evolution, 5(10), 1970\u20131980. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ece3.1480","journal-title":"Ecology and Evolution"},{"issue":"1","key":"5129_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1111\/1365-2435.12529","volume":"30","author":"CW Fox","year":"2016","unstructured":"Fox, C. W., Burns, C. S., & Meyer, J. A. (2016). Editor and reviewer gender influence the peer review process but not peer review outcomes at an ecology journal. Functional Ecology, 30(1), 140\u2013153. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1365-2435.12529","journal-title":"Functional Ecology"},{"issue":"4","key":"5129_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.3325\/cmj.2012.53.386","volume":"53","author":"AY Gasparyan","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gasparyan, A. Y., & Kitas, G. D. (2012). Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals. Croatian Medical Journal, 53(4), 386\u2013389.","journal-title":"Croatian Medical Journal"},{"issue":"3","key":"5129_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1002\/leap.1155","volume":"31","author":"T Gaston","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gaston, T., & Smart, P. (2018). What influences the regional diversity of reviewers: A study of medical and agricultural\/biological sciences journals. Learned Publishing, 31(3), 189\u2013197. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/leap.1155","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"issue":"1","key":"5129_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1186\/s41073-020-00096-x","volume":"5","author":"TG Gerwing","year":"2020","unstructured":"Gerwing, T. G., Gerwing, A. M. A., Avery-Gomm, S., Choi, C.-Y., Clements, J. C., & Rash, J. A. (2020). Quantifying professionalism in peer review. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 5(1), 9. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41073-020-00096-x","journal-title":"Research Integrity and Peer Review"},{"issue":"1","key":"5129_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.3152\/147154406781776066","volume":"15","author":"L Grit","year":"2006","unstructured":"Grit, L., & Gloria, O. (2006). Introduction to a special issue on the assessment of interdisciplinary research. Research Evaluation, 15(1), 2\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3152\/147154406781776066","journal-title":"Research Evaluation"},{"key":"5129_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1108\/oir-11-2021-0604","author":"ZH Huang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Huang, Z. H., & Zong, Q. J. (2022). Identifying the characteristics of excellent peer reviewers by using Publons. Online Information Review. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/oir-11-2021-0604","journal-title":"Online Information Review"},{"key":"5129_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"498","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordhb\/9780198733522.013.40","volume-title":"The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity","author":"K Huutoniemi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Huutoniemi, K., & Rafols, I. (2017). Interdisciplinarity in research evaluation. In R. Frodeman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 498\u2013512). Oxford University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/oxfordhb\/9780198733522.013.40"},{"issue":"4","key":"5129_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"0078","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-017-0078","volume":"1","author":"T Jia","year":"2017","unstructured":"Jia, T., Wang, D. S., & Szymanski, B. K. (2017). Quantifying patterns of research-interest evolution. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(4), 0078. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41562-017-0078","journal-title":"Nature Human Behaviour"},{"issue":"2","key":"5129_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1002\/leap.1420","volume":"35","author":"AF Jorm","year":"2022","unstructured":"Jorm, A. F. (2022). Publons as a source of high volume, poorly targeted reviewer requests: The need for better standards of practice by publishers. Learned Publishing, 35(2), 285\u2013287. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/leap.1420","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"issue":"3","key":"5129_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1811","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-020-03519-0","volume":"124","author":"Y Kalmukov","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kalmukov, Y. (2020). An algorithm for automatic assignment of reviewers to papers. Scientometrics, 124(3), 1811\u20131850. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-020-03519-0","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"11","key":"5129_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0166387","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0166387","volume":"11","author":"M Kovanis","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kovanis, M., Porcher, R., Ravaud, P., & Trinquart, L. (2016). The global burden of journal peer review in the biomedical literature: Strong imbalance in the collective enterprise. PLoS One, 11(11), e0166387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0166387","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"1","key":"5129_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1177\/0001839216665364","volume":"62","author":"E Leahey","year":"2017","unstructured":"Leahey, E., Beckman, C. M., & Stanko, T. L. (2017). Prominent but less productive: The impact of interdisciplinarity on scientists\u2019 research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(1), 105\u2013139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0001839216665364","journal-title":"Administrative Science Quarterly"},{"issue":"2","key":"5129_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1002\/leap.1431","volume":"35","author":"Y Lei","year":"2022","unstructured":"Lei, Y. (2022). Is a journal\u2019s ranking related to the reviewer\u2019s academic impact? (An empirical study based on Publons). Learned Publishing, 35(2), 149\u2013162. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/leap.1431","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"issue":"2","key":"5129_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"396","DOI":"10.1177\/13505084211051047","volume":"30","author":"D Lindebaum","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lindebaum, D., & Jordan, P. J. (2021). Publishing more than reviewing? Some ethical musings on the sustainability of the peer review process. Organization, 30(2), 396\u2013406. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/13505084211051047","journal-title":"Organization"},{"issue":"6","key":"5129_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3343","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-022-04389-4","volume":"127","author":"X Liu","year":"2022","unstructured":"Liu, X., Wang, X., & Zhu, D. (2022). Reviewer recommendation method for scientific research proposals: A case for NSFC. Scientometrics, 127(6), 3343\u20133366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-022-04389-4","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"5129_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.3152\/147154406781776039","volume":"15","author":"L Liv","year":"2006","unstructured":"Liv, L. (2006). The policy challenges of peer review: Managing bias, conflict of interests and interdisciplinary assessments. Research Evaluation, 15(1), 31\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3152\/147154406781776039","journal-title":"Research Evaluation"},{"issue":"2","key":"5129_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"697","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-016-1236-4","volume":"195","author":"M MacLeod","year":"2018","unstructured":"MacLeod, M. (2018). What makes interdisciplinarity difficult? Some consequences of domain specificity in interdisciplinary practice. Synthese, 195(2), 697\u2013720. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-016-1236-4","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"5129_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-024-04977-6","author":"A Maddi","year":"2024","unstructured":"Maddi, A., & Miotti, L. (2024). On the peer review reports: Does size matter? Scientometrics. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-024-04977-6","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"5129_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.3152\/147154406781776075","volume":"15","author":"VB Mansilla","year":"2006","unstructured":"Mansilla, V. B. (2006). Assessing expert interdisciplinary work at the frontier: An empirical exploration. Research Evaluation, 15(1), 17\u201329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3152\/147154406781776075","journal-title":"Research Evaluation"},{"issue":"1","key":"5129_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16055","DOI":"10.1057\/palcomms.2016.55","volume":"2","author":"T McLeish","year":"2016","unstructured":"McLeish, T., & Strang, V. (2016). Evaluating interdisciplinary research: The elephant in the peer-reviewers\u2019 room. Palgrave Communications, 2(1), 16055. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1057\/palcomms.2016.55","journal-title":"Palgrave Communications"},{"issue":"11","key":"5129_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0166387","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0166387","volume":"11","author":"K Michail","year":"2016","unstructured":"Michail, K., Rapha\u00ebl, P., Philippe, R., & Ludovic, T. (2016). The global burden of journal peer review in the biomedical literature: Strong imbalance in the collective enterprise. PLoS One, 11(11), e0166387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0166387","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"1","key":"5129_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.3152\/147154406781776002","volume":"15","author":"L Mich\u00e8le","year":"2006","unstructured":"Mich\u00e8le, L., Gr\u00e9goire, M., Gr\u00e9goire, M., & Joshua, G. (2006). Beyond blind faith: Overcoming the obstacles to interdisciplinary evaluation. Research Evaluation, 15(1), 43\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3152\/147154406781776002","journal-title":"Research Evaluation"},{"issue":"2","key":"5129_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1017\/S1062798709990275","volume":"18","author":"M Pautasso","year":"2010","unstructured":"Pautasso, M., & Pautasso, C. (2010). Peer reviewing interdisciplinary papers. European Review, 18(2), 227\u2013237. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S1062798709990275","journal-title":"European Review"},{"issue":"3","key":"5129_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"282","DOI":"10.1525\/bio.2012.62.3.9","volume":"62","author":"AL Porter","year":"2012","unstructured":"Porter, A. L., Garner, J., & Crowl, T. (2012). Research coordination networks: Evidence of the relationship between funded interdisciplinary networking and scholarly impact. Bioscience, 62(3), 282\u2013288. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1525\/bio.2012.62.3.9","journal-title":"Bioscience"},{"key":"5129_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Publons. (2018). Publons Global State of Peer Review 2018. Retrieved from https:\/\/Publons.com\/static\/Publons-Global-State-Of-Peer-Review-2018.pdf","DOI":"10.14322\/publons.GSPR2018"},{"key":"5129_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Qi, F., Zhou, H., Sun, B., Huang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2024). Facilitating interdisciplinarity: the contributions of boundary-crossing activities among disciplines. Scientometrics. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-023-04924-x","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-023-04924-x"},{"issue":"2","key":"5129_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-009-0041-y","volume":"82","author":"I Rafols","year":"2010","unstructured":"Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263\u2013287. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-009-0041-y","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"5129_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s41073-022-00121-1","volume":"7","author":"DB Rice","year":"2022","unstructured":"Rice, D. B., Pham, B., Presseau, J., Tricco, A. C., & Moher, D. (2022). Characteristics of \u201cmega\u201d peer-reviewers. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 7(1), 1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41073-022-00121-1","journal-title":"Research Integrity and Peer Review"},{"issue":"4","key":"5129_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1002\/leap.1111","volume":"30","author":"B Rodr\u00edguez-Bravo","year":"2017","unstructured":"Rodr\u00edguez-Bravo, B., Nicholas, D., Herman, E., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Watkinson, A., Xu, J., Abrizah, A., & \u015awigo\u0144, M. (2017). Peer review: The experience and views of early career researchers. Learned Publishing, 30(4), 269\u2013277. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/leap.1111","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"issue":"2","key":"5129_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-008-0211-3","volume":"74","author":"U Sandstrom","year":"2008","unstructured":"Sandstrom, U., & Hallsten, M. (2008). Persistent nepotism in peer-review. Scientometrics, 74(2), 175\u2013189. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-008-0211-3","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"4","key":"5129_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1007\/s12021-008-9034-x","volume":"6","author":"ED Schutter","year":"2008","unstructured":"Schutter, E. D. (2008). Reviewing multi-disciplinary papers: A challenge in neuroscience? Neuroinformatics, 6(4), 253\u2013255. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12021-008-9034-x","journal-title":"Neuroinformatics"},{"issue":"8","key":"5129_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1106","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.24617","volume":"73","author":"M Seeber","year":"2022","unstructured":"Seeber, M., Vlegels, J., & Cattaneo, M. (2022). Conditions that do or do not disadvantage interdisciplinary research proposals in project evaluation. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73(8), 1106\u20131126. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/asi.24617","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"4","key":"5129_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1002\/leap.1392","volume":"34","author":"A Severin","year":"2021","unstructured":"Severin, A., & Chataway, J. (2021). Overburdening of peer reviewers: A multi-stakeholder perspective on causes and effects. Learned Publishing, 34(4), 537\u2013546. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/leap.1392","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"issue":"4","key":"5129_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1258\/jrsm.99.4.178","volume":"99","author":"R Smith","year":"2006","unstructured":"Smith, R. (2006). Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(4), 178\u2013182. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1258\/jrsm.99.4.178","journal-title":"Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine"},{"issue":"5","key":"5129_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3853","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-021-03894-2","volume":"126","author":"L Smolinsky","year":"2021","unstructured":"Smolinsky, L., Sage, D. S., Lercher, A. J., & Cao, A. (2021). Citations versus expert opinions: Citation analysis of featured reviews of the American Mathematical Society [Article]. Scientometrics, 126(5), 3853\u20133870. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-021-03894-2","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"5129_CR50","unstructured":"Taylor & Francis. (2015). Peer review in 2015. Retrieved from https:\/\/authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/White-paper-Peer-Review.pdfRetrieved%20from"},{"issue":"6","key":"5129_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1801","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-016-9821-y","volume":"23","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2017","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Al-Khatib, A. (2017). How are editors selected, recruited and approved? Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(6), 1801\u20131804. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-016-9821-y","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"3","key":"5129_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"334","DOI":"10.1002\/leap.1544","volume":"36","author":"L Waltman","year":"2023","unstructured":"Waltman, L., Kaltenbrunner, W., Pinfield, S., & Woods, H. B. (2023). How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought. Learned Publishing, 36(3), 334\u2013347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/leap.1544","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"issue":"1","key":"5129_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1002\/leap.1002","volume":"29","author":"V Warne","year":"2016","unstructured":"Warne, V. (2016). Rewarding reviewers\u2013sense or sensibility? A Wiley Study Explained. Learned Publishing, 29(1), 41\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/leap.1002","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"issue":"1","key":"5129_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1002\/leap.1006","volume":"29","author":"M Willis","year":"2016","unstructured":"Willis, M. (2016). Why do peer reviewers decline to review manuscripts? A study of reviewer invitation responses. Learned Publishing, 29(1), 5\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/leap.1006","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"key":"5129_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3346\/jkms.2020.35.e216","author":"T Yakhontova","year":"2020","unstructured":"Yakhontova, T. (2020). English writing of non-anglophone researchers. Journal of Korean Medical Science. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3346\/jkms.2020.35.e216","journal-title":"Journal of Korean Medical Science"},{"key":"5129_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/leap.1465","author":"W Yu","year":"2022","unstructured":"Yu, W., Liangbin, Z., Yuanxiang, Z., & Mengyao, C. (2022). Comparison of early career researchers and senior career researchers as peer reviewers: A questionnaire survey in China. Learned Publishing. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/leap.1465","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"issue":"2","key":"5129_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101264","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2022.101264","volume":"16","author":"GY Zhang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Zhang, G. Y., Xu, S. M., Sun, Y., Jiang, C. L., & Wang, X. W. (2022a). Understanding the peer review endeavor in scientific publishing. Journal of Informetrics, 16(2), 101264. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.joi.2022.101264","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"key":"5129_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zhang, L., Shang, Y. Y., Huang, Y., & Sivertsen, G. (2022b). Gender differences among active reviewers: an investigation based on publons. Scientometrics, 127(1), 145-179. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-021-04209-1","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-021-04209-1"}],"container-title":["Scientometrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-024-05129-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11192-024-05129-6\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-024-05129-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,21]],"date-time":"2024-10-21T01:07:20Z","timestamp":1729472840000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11192-024-05129-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,9]]},"references-count":58,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,9]]}},"alternative-id":["5129"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-024-05129-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["0138-9130","1588-2861"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0138-9130","type":"print"},{"value":"1588-2861","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"4 January 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 July 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 August 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Lin Zhang is Editor-in-Chief of <i>Scientometrics<\/i>.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}]}}