{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T15:49:10Z","timestamp":1786981750599,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,28]],"date-time":"2025-02-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1740700800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,28]],"date-time":"2025-02-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1740700800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Scientometrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) is a metric at the publication level which is standardized across fields. It has obvious advantages over other frequently used metrics, but might also suffer from some potential limitations, raising issues about its reliability. This paper investigates one limitation\u2014the use of different All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) Codes in Scopus for journals from the same field, meaning they may not be assessed against the same benchmark (average citations per article)\u2014and suggests a potential improvement, relative to sport management, which was selected as an exemplar field. A four-step approach was applied: first, identifying sport management journals based on Scimago similarities (percentage of cited publications shared between journals, i.e., shared interests); second, mapping these journals against their different ASJC Codes; third, comparing the different ASJC Codes versus Scimago similarities; fourth, analyzing the consequence of the different ASJC Codes on FWCI. Based on Scimago similarities, 15 sport management journals were identified. They represent 15 different ASJC Codes. Overall, the ASJC Codes are not representative of Scimago similarities. The consequence is that, despite shared interests, sport management journals are not assessed against the same benchmark in the calculation of FWCI. The discussion considers why and how big the issue is. A potential improvement to the FWCI is then suggested: to use Scimago similarities rather than ASJC Codes to determine a field. The paper concludes that the FWCI is superior to other widespread metrics, while acknowledging some remaining issues not addressed by the indicator and its potential improvement.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-025-05268-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,27]],"date-time":"2025-02-27T23:17:01Z","timestamp":1740698221000},"page":"1571-1586","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Making the impact of publications within a field comparable by improving the field-weighted citation impact (FWCI): the case of sport management"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"130","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6177-5307","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nicolas","family":"Scelles","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3299-2772","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jaime A.","family":"Teixeira da Silva","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,28]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"5268_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1177\/2158244019829575","volume":"9","author":"DW Aksnes","year":"2019","unstructured":"Aksnes, D. W., Langfeldt, L., & Wouters, P. (2019). Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: An overview of basic concepts and theories. SAGE Open, 9(1), 1\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2158244019829575","journal-title":"SAGE Open"},{"issue":"2","key":"5268_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1051","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-019-03326-2","volume":"122","author":"L Bornmann","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bornmann, L., Wray, K. B., & Haunschild, R. (2020). Citation concept analysis (CCA): A new form of citation analysis revealing the usefulness of concepts for other researchers illustrated by exemplary case studies including classic books by Thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper. Scientometrics, 122(2), 1051\u20131074. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-019-03326-2","journal-title":"Kuhn and Karl R. Popper. Scientometrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"5268_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1162\/qss_a_00109","volume":"2","author":"Y Bu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Bu, Y., Waltman, L., & Huang, Y. (2021). A multi-dimensional framework for characterizing the citation impact of scientific publications. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 155\u2013183. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/qss_a_00109","journal-title":"Quantitative Science Studies"},{"key":"5268_CR4","unstructured":"Chartered Association of Business Schools (2021). AJG 2021: Academic Journal Guide: Methodology. Retrieved from https:\/\/d1sqxrh4fb2al3.cloudfront.net\/academic-journal-guide-2021-methodology-final.pdf"},{"issue":"4","key":"5268_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1007\/s12129-017-9671-3","volume":"30","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2017","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2017). The journal impact factor (JIF): Science publishing\u2019s miscalculating metric. Academic Questions, 30(4), 433\u2013441. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12129-017-9671-3","journal-title":"Academic Questions"},{"issue":"3","key":"5268_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"459","DOI":"10.1007\/s12109-020-09736-y","volume":"36","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2020","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2020). CiteScore: Advances, evolution, applications and limitations. Publishing Research Quarterly, 36(3), 459\u2013468. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12109-020-09736-y","journal-title":"Publishing Research Quarterly"},{"issue":"1","key":"5268_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.51845\/34s.1.18","volume":"34","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2021","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2021). Citations and gamed metrics: Academic integrity lost. Academic Questions, 34(1), 96\u201399. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.51845\/34s.1.18","journal-title":"Academic Questions"},{"issue":"8","key":"5268_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4887","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-023-04769-4","volume":"128","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2023","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Nazarovets, S. (2023). Partial citation analysis of five classes of retracted papers, and devising a new four-tier citation classification system for retracted (and other) papers. Scientometrics, 128(8), 4887\u20134894. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-023-04769-4","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"5268_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.3897\/VCS.126956","volume":"5","author":"J Dengler","year":"2024","unstructured":"Dengler, J. (2024). Determinants of citation impact. Vegetation Classification and Survey, 5, 169\u2013177. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3897\/VCS.126956","journal-title":"Vegetation Classification and Survey"},{"key":"5268_CR10","unstructured":"Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (2022). International comparison of the UK research base, 2022: Accompanying note. Retieved from https:\/\/assets.publishing.service.gov.uk\/government\/uploads\/system\/uploads\/attachment_data\/file\/1078073\/international-comparison-uk-research-base-2022-accompanying-note.pdf"},{"key":"5268_CR11","unstructured":"Elsevier (n.d.). SciVal topics. Retrieved from https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/products\/scival\/overview\/topics"},{"key":"5268_CR12","unstructured":"Elsevier (2022). SciVal metric: Field-weighted citation impact (FWCI). Retrieved from https:\/\/service.elsevier.com\/app\/answers\/detail\/a_id\/28192\/supporthub\/scival\/p\/10961\/"},{"key":"5268_CR13","volume-title":"Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology and humanities","author":"E Garfield","year":"1979","unstructured":"Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology and humanities. Wiley."},{"issue":"5","key":"5268_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2659","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-024-04997-2","volume":"129","author":"E G\u00f3mez-D\u00e9niz","year":"2024","unstructured":"G\u00f3mez-D\u00e9niz, E., & Dorta-Gonz\u00e1lez, P. (2024). A field- and time-normalized Bayesian approach to measuring the impact of a publication. Scientometrics, 129(5), 2659\u20132676. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-024-04997-2","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"5268_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.6087\/kcse.225","volume":"8","author":"H Jang","year":"2021","unstructured":"Jang, H. (2021). Relationship between publication indicators and citation impact indicators for publications in business, management, and accounting listed in Scopus from 2015 to 2019. Science Editing, 8(1), 18\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.6087\/kcse.225","journal-title":"Science Editing"},{"issue":"3","key":"5268_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2269","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-020-03790-1","volume":"126","author":"BS Lancho-Barrantes","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lancho-Barrantes, B. S., & Cantu-Ortiz, F. J. (2020). Quantifying the publication preferences of leading research universities. Scientometrics, 126(3), 2269\u20132310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-020-03790-1","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"4","key":"5268_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1177\/05390184221142218","volume":"61","author":"S Macdonald","year":"2023","unstructured":"Macdonald, S. (2023). The gaming of citation and authorship in academic journals: A warning from medicine. Social Science Information, 61(4), 457\u2013480. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/05390184221142218","journal-title":"Social Science Information"},{"key":"5268_CR18","unstructured":"Manchester Metropolitan University (2022). Our strategy: Our ambition for the future. Retrieved from https:\/\/www.mmu.ac.uk\/sites\/default\/files\/2022-04\/Manchester-Met-Strategy-Booklet-2022.pdf"},{"issue":"2","key":"5268_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"635","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2019.03.012","volume":"13","author":"A Purkayastha","year":"2019","unstructured":"Purkayastha, A., Palmaro, E., Falk-Krzesinski, H. J., & Baas, J. (2019). Comparison of two article-level, field-independent citation metrics: Field-weighted citation impact (FWCI) and relative citation ratio (RCR). Journal of Informetrics, 13(2), 635\u2013642. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.joi.2019.03.012","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"5268_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2014.11.010","volume":"9","author":"J Ruiz-Castillo","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ruiz-Castillo, J., & Waltman, L. (2015). Field-normalized citation impact indicators using algorithmically constructed classification systems of science. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 102\u2013117. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.joi.2014.11.010","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"key":"5268_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/23750472.2023.2216212","author":"N Scelles","year":"2023","unstructured":"Scelles, N. (2023). Sport management journals should be rated higher in journal ranking lists! Towards a better international recognition of the field. Managing Sport and Leisure. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/23750472.2023.2216212","journal-title":"Managing Sport and Leisure"},{"issue":"2242","key":"5268_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20200538","DOI":"10.1098\/rspa.2020.0538","volume":"476","author":"N Smith","year":"2020","unstructured":"Smith, N., & Cumberledge, A. (2020). Quotation errors in general science journals. Proceedings of the Royal Society a: Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 476(2242), 20200538. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rspa.2020.0538","journal-title":"Proceedings of the Royal Society a: Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences"},{"key":"5268_CR23","unstructured":"Teplitskiy, M., Duede, E., Menietti, M., & Lakhani, K. (2018). Why (almost) everything we know about citations is wrong: Evidence from authors. In: Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators in Transition, 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Leiden, 12\u201314 September. Rerieved from https:\/\/scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl\/handle\/1887\/65227"},{"key":"5268_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Thelwall, M., & Pinfield, S. (2023). Are Scopus journal field classifications ever misleading? Working Paper. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2307.15449","DOI":"10.48550\/arXiv.2307.15449"},{"key":"5268_CR25","unstructured":"Times Higher Education (2023). THE world university rankings: Methodology for overall and subject rankings for the Times Higher Education world university rankings 2024. Retrieved from https:\/\/www.timeshighereducation.com\/sites\/default\/files\/the_2024_world_university_rankings_methodology.pdf"},{"key":"5268_CR26","unstructured":"UCU University of Liverpool Branch (2021). Using Elsevier\u2019s field weighted citation index scores for redundancy selection at the University of Liverpool. Retrieved from https:\/\/ulivucunews.org.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/2-1.pdf"},{"key":"5268_CR27","unstructured":"University of Liverpool (2021). Faculty of Health & Life Sciences: Managing Change: Project SHAPE Phase 2 Amended Proposals. Retrieved from https:\/\/www.liverpool.ac.uk\/documents\/hls-project-shape-business-case-050521.pdf"},{"issue":"12","key":"5268_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2378","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.22748","volume":"63","author":"L Waltman","year":"2012","unstructured":"Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2012). A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2378\u20132392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/asi.22748","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"3","key":"5268_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"699","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-012-0913-4","volume":"96","author":"L Waltman","year":"2013","unstructured":"Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2013). Source normalized indicators of citation impact: An overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison. Scientometrics, 96(3), 699\u2013716. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-012-0913-4","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"5268_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2016.02.007","volume":"10","author":"L Waltman","year":"2016","unstructured":"Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 365\u2013391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.joi.2016.02.007","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"5268_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2016.02.003","volume":"10","author":"Q Wang","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wang, Q., & Waltman, L. (2016). Large-scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 347\u2013364.","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"}],"container-title":["Scientometrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-025-05268-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11192-025-05268-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-025-05268-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,22]],"date-time":"2025-04-22T01:16:17Z","timestamp":1745284577000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11192-025-05268-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,28]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,3]]}},"alternative-id":["5268"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-025-05268-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["0138-9130","1588-2861"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0138-9130","type":"print"},{"value":"1588-2861","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,28]]},"assertion":[{"value":"12 June 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 February 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 February 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}