{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,24]],"date-time":"2025-11-24T10:34:45Z","timestamp":1763980485509,"version":"3.45.0"},"reference-count":55,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,7]],"date-time":"2025-09-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1757203200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,7]],"date-time":"2025-09-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1757203200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Scientometrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,10]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-025-05416-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,7]],"date-time":"2025-09-07T02:19:07Z","timestamp":1757211547000},"page":"5821-5847","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Dynamic optimization of peer review length using information density analysis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"130","author":[{"given":"Prabhat Kumar","family":"Bharti","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Tirath","family":"Bhathawala","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"5416_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Abdullahi, M. S., Adamu, S., & Umar, B. (2020). An appraisal of the efficacy of measures of readability in identifying level of text difficulty among the intermediate ESL learners. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 25(7), 59\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.9790\/0837-2507065965","DOI":"10.9790\/0837-2507065965"},{"key":"5416_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-015-1704-","volume":"106","author":"M Ausloos","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ausloos, M., Nedic, O., Fronczak, A., & Fronczak, P. (2016). Quantifying the quality of peer reviewers through Zipf\u2019s law. Scientometrics, 106, 347\u2013368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-015-1704-","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"5416_CR3","unstructured":"Bansal, S., & Aggarwal, C. (2025). textstat: Python package to calculate text statistics. https:\/\/pypi.org\/project\/textstat\/"},{"key":"5416_CR4","unstructured":"Bharti, P., Ghosal, T., Agarwal, M., & Ekbal, A. (2022a). A method for automatically estimating the informativeness of peer reviews. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on natural language processing (icon) (pp. 280\u2013289). https:\/\/aclanthology.org\/2022.icon-main.34"},{"key":"5416_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bharti, P. K., Ghosal, T., Agarwal, M., & Ekbal, A. (2022b). betterPR: A dataset for estimating the constructiveness of peer review comments. In International conference on theory and practice of digital libraries (pp. 500\u2013505).","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-16802-4_53"},{"key":"5416_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bharti, P. K., Ghosal, T., Agrawal, M., & Ekbal, A. (2022c). How confident was your reviewer? Estimating reviewer confidence from peer review texts. In International workshop on document analysis systems (pp. 126\u2013139).","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-06555-2_9"},{"issue":"1","key":"5416_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1007\/s00799-023-00375-0","volume":"25","author":"PK Bharti","year":"2024","unstructured":"Bharti, P. K., Ghosal, T., Agarwal, M., & Ekbal, A. (2024a). PEERRec: An AI-based approach to automatically generate recommendations and predict decisions in peer review. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 25(1), 55\u201372.","journal-title":"International Journal on Digital Libraries"},{"key":"5416_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bharti, P. K., Kumar, A., Ghosal, T., Agrawal, M., & Ekbal, A. (2022d). Can a machine generate a meta-review? How far are we? In International conference on text, speech, and dialogue (pp. 275\u2013287).","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-16270-1_23"},{"issue":"4","key":"5416_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1291","DOI":"10.1007\/s10579-023-09662-3","volume":"58","author":"PK Bharti","year":"2024","unstructured":"Bharti, P. K., Navlakha, M., Agarwal, M., & Ekbal, A. (2024b). PolitePEER: Does peer review hurt? A dataset to gauge politeness intensity in the peer reviews. Language Resources and Evaluation, 58(4), 1291\u20131313.","journal-title":"Language Resources and Evaluation"},{"key":"5416_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bharti, P. K., Ranjan, S., Ghosal, T., Agrawal, M., & Ekbal, A. (2021). PEERAssist: Leveraging on paper-review interactions to predict peer review decisions. In Towards open and trustworthy digital societies: 23rd international conference on Asia-Pacific digital libraries, ICADL 2021, virtual event, December 1\u20133, 2021, proceedings 23 (pp. 421\u2013435).","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-91669-5_33"},{"issue":"1","key":"5416_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1002\/aris.2011.1440450112","volume":"45","author":"L Bornmann","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bornmann, L. (2011). Scientific peer review. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 45(1), 197\u2013245. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/aris.2011.1440450112","journal-title":"Annual Review of Information Science and Technology"},{"key":"5416_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1010933404324","volume":"45","author":"L Breiman","year":"2001","unstructured":"Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5\u201332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1010933404324","journal-title":"Machine Learning"},{"issue":"4","key":"5416_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1207\/s1532690xci0804_2","volume":"8","author":"P Chandler","year":"1991","unstructured":"Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293\u2013332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1207\/s1532690xci0804_2","journal-title":"Cognition and Instruction"},{"issue":"2","key":"5416_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1007\/s40881-019-00073-9","volume":"5","author":"Y Chen","year":"2019","unstructured":"Chen, Y., & Konstan, J. A. (2019). Online field experiments: A selective survey of methods. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 5(2), 192\u2013209. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40881-019-00073-9","journal-title":"Journal of the Economic Science Association"},{"issue":"1","key":"5416_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1177\/0963721409359277","volume":"19","author":"N Cowan","year":"2010","unstructured":"Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 51\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0963721409359277","journal-title":"Current Directions in Psychological Science"},{"issue":"1","key":"5416_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-0663.100.1.223","volume":"100","author":"KE De Leeuw","year":"2008","unstructured":"De Leeuw, K. E., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). A comparison of three measures of cognitive load: Evidence for separable measures of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane load. Journal of Educational Psychology,\n100(1), 223\u2013234. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0022-0663.100.1.223","journal-title":"Journal of Educational Psychology"},{"key":"5416_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3346\/jkms.2025.40.e92","author":"B Doskaliuk","year":"2025","unstructured":"Doskaliuk, B., Zimba, O., Yessirkepov, M., Klishch, I., & Yatsyshyn, R. (2025). Artificial intelligence in peer review: Enhancing efficiency while preserving integrity. Journal of Korean Medical Science. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3346\/jkms.2025.40.e92","journal-title":"Journal of Korean Medical Science"},{"key":"5416_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12054","DOI":"10.3389\/bjbs.2024.12054","volume":"81","author":"JA Drozdz","year":"2024","unstructured":"Drozdz, J. A., & Ladomery, M. R. (2024). The peer review process: Past, present, and future. British Journal of Biomedical Science, 81, 12054. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/bjbs.2024.12054","journal-title":"British Journal of Biomedical Science"},{"key":"5416_CR19","unstructured":"Explosion. (2023). spaCy language model: en_core_web_sm. https:\/\/spacy.io\/models\/en#en_core_web_sm"},{"key":"5416_CR20","unstructured":"Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge."},{"issue":"4","key":"5416_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1016\/S0346-251X(97)00048-1","volume":"25","author":"G Fulcher","year":"1997","unstructured":"Fulcher, G. (1997). Text difficulty and accessibility: Reading formulae and expert judgement. System, 25(4), 497\u2013513.","journal-title":"System"},{"key":"5416_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ghosal, T., Kumar, S., Bharti, P. K., & Ekbal, A. (2022). Peer review analyze: A novel benchmark resource for computational analysis of peer reviews. PLoS ONE,17(1), Article e0259238. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0259238","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0259238"},{"key":"5416_CR23","unstructured":"Goldberg, A., Stelmakh, I., Cho, K., Oh, A., Agarwal, A., Belgrave, D., & Shah, N. B. (2023). Peer reviews of peer reviews: A randomized controlled trial and other experiments. arXiv Preprint. arXiv:2311.09497"},{"key":"5416_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2013). Halliday\u2019s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203431269"},{"issue":"1","key":"5416_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.6087\/kcse.2014.1.9","volume":"1","author":"I Hames","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hames, I. (2014). The changing face of peer review. Science Editing, 1(1), 9\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.6087\/kcse.2014.1.9","journal-title":"Science Editing"},{"key":"5416_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1697","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2489-330","volume":"124","author":"SPJM Horbach","year":"2020","unstructured":"Horbach, S. P. J. M., & Halffman, W. (2020). The ability of different peer review procedures to flag problematic publications. Scientometrics, 124, 1697\u20131726. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2489-330","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"5416_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"633","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2310-5","volume":"113","author":"J Huisman","year":"2017","unstructured":"Huisman, J., & Smits, J. (2017). Duration and quality of the peer review process. Scientometrics, 113(1), 633\u2013650. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2310-5","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"5416_CR28","unstructured":"Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press."},{"key":"5416_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K. (2019). Academic discourse and global publishing: Disciplinary persuasion in changing times. Routledge.","DOI":"10.4324\/9780429433962"},{"key":"5416_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.MR000016.pub3","author":"T Jefferson","year":"2007","unstructured":"Jefferson, T., Rudin, M., Brodney Folse, S., & Davidoff, F. (2007). Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.MR000016.pub3","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"issue":"1","key":"5416_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10648-010-9150-7","volume":"23","author":"S Kalyuga","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory: How many types of load does it really need? Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 1\u201319. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10648-010-9150-7","journal-title":"Educational Psychology Review"},{"key":"5416_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kang, D., Ammar, W., Dalvi, B., Van\u00a0Zuylen, M., Kohlmeier, S., Hovy, E., & Schwartz, R. (2018). A dataset of peer reviews (PeerRead): Collection, insights and NLP applications. arXiv Preprint. arXiv:1804.09635","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/N18-1149"},{"key":"5416_CR33","unstructured":"Kaufmann, T., Weng, P., Bengs, V., & H\u00fcllermeier, E. (2023). A survey of reinforcement learning from human feedback. arXiv Preprint, 10. arXiv:2312.14925"},{"issue":"1","key":"5416_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.22784","volume":"64","author":"CJ Lee","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lee, C. J., Sugimoto, C. R., Zhang, G., & Cronin, B. (2013). Bias in peer review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,\n64(1), 2\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/asi.22784","journal-title":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology"},{"key":"5416_CR35","unstructured":"Lutz, B., Pr\u00f6llochs, N., & Neumann, D. (2019). The longer the better? The interplay between review length and line of argumentation in online consumer reviews. arXiv Preprint. arXiv:1909.05192"},{"key":"5416_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-024-04977-6","author":"A Maddi","year":"2024","unstructured":"Maddi, A., & Miotti, L. (2024). On the peer review reports: Does size matter? Scientometrics. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-024-04977-6","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"5416_CR37","unstructured":"Martin, J., & Rose, D. (2009). Genre relations: Mapping culture. Equinox."},{"issue":"2","key":"5416_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1037\/h0043158","volume":"63","author":"GA Miller","year":"1956","unstructured":"Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81\u201397. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/h0043158","journal-title":"Psychological Review"},{"issue":"1","key":"5416_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s41239-025-00502-8","volume":"22","author":"H Mu","year":"2024","unstructured":"Mu, H., & Schunn, C. D. (2024). The good, bad, and ugly of comment prompts: Effects on length and helpfulness of peer feedback. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), 1\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41239-025-00502-8","journal-title":"International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education"},{"issue":"1","key":"5416_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.22798","volume":"64","author":"A Mulligan","year":"2013","unstructured":"Mulligan, A., Hall, L., & Raphael, E. (2013). Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(1), 132\u2013161. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/asi.22798","journal-title":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"1","key":"5416_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1207\/S15326985EP3801_1","volume":"38","author":"F Paas","year":"2003","unstructured":"Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1207\/S15326985EP3801_1","journal-title":"Educational Psychologist"},{"key":"5416_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2014). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 27\u201342). Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139547369.004"},{"key":"5416_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511844744","volume-title":"Cognitive load theory","author":"JL Plass","year":"2010","unstructured":"Plass, J. L., Moreno, R., & Br\u00fcnken, R. (2010). Cognitive load theory. Cambridge University Press."},{"issue":"7","key":"5416_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1145\/2979672","volume":"57","author":"S Price","year":"2014","unstructured":"Price, S., & Flach, P. A. (2014). Computational support for academic peer review: A perspective from artificial intelligence. Communications of the ACM, 57(7), 85\u201389. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2979672","journal-title":"Communications of the ACM"},{"key":"5416_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review. F1000Research,6, 588. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12688\/f1000research.11369.2","DOI":"10.12688\/f1000research.11369.2"},{"key":"5416_CR46","unstructured":"Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T. (2019). DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: Smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter. arXiv Preprint. https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1910.01108"},{"issue":"6","key":"5416_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1145\/3528086","volume":"65","author":"NB Shah","year":"2022","unstructured":"Shah, N. B. (2022). Challenges, experiments, and computational solutions in peer review. Communications of the ACM, 65(6), 76\u201387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3528086","journal-title":"Communications of the ACM"},{"key":"5416_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2016.08.008","volume":"70","author":"JP Singh","year":"2017","unstructured":"Singh, J. P., Irani, S., Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Saumya, S., & Roy, P. K. (2017). Predicting the \u201chelpfulness\u2019\u2019 of online consumer reviews. Journal of Business Research, 70, 346\u2013355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jbusres.2016.08.008","journal-title":"Journal of Business Research"},{"key":"5416_CR49","unstructured":"Slate, J. R., & Charlesworth\u00a0Jr, J. R. (1988). Information processing theory: Classroom applications. Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC). https:\/\/files.eric.ed.gov\/fulltext\/ED293792.pdf"},{"key":"5416_CR50","unstructured":"Soergel, D., Saunders, A., & McCallum, A. (2013). Open scholarship and peer review: A time for experimentation. In ICML workshop on peer reviewing and publishing models."},{"key":"5416_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8","volume":"55","author":"J Sweller","year":"2011","unstructured":"Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 55, 37\u201376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8","journal-title":"Psychology of Learning and Motivation"},{"issue":"48","key":"5416_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12708","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1707323114","volume":"114","author":"A Tomkins","year":"2017","unstructured":"Tomkins, A., Zhang, M., & Heavlin, W. D. (2017). Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,\n114(48), 12708\u201312713. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1707323114","journal-title":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America"},{"issue":"2","key":"5416_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1007\/s10648-005-3951-0","volume":"17","author":"JJG Van Merri\u00ebnboer","year":"2005","unstructured":"Van Merri\u00ebnboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review,\n17(2), 147\u2013177. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10648-005-3951-0","journal-title":"Educational Psychology Review"},{"key":"5416_CR54","unstructured":"Ware, M. (2016). Peer review: Benefits, perceptions and alternatives (Technical Report). Publishing Research Consortium."},{"key":"5416_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yuan, W., Liu, P., & Neubig, G. (2021). Can we automate scientific reviewing? arXiv Preprint. arXiv:2102.00176","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.1.12862"}],"container-title":["Scientometrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-025-05416-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11192-025-05416-w\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-025-05416-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,24]],"date-time":"2025-11-24T10:31:26Z","timestamp":1763980286000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11192-025-05416-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,7]]},"references-count":55,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,10]]}},"alternative-id":["5416"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-025-05416-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["0138-9130","1588-2861"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0138-9130"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1588-2861"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"23 March 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"13 August 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 September 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 October 2025","order":5,"name":"change_date","label":"Change Date","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Update","order":6,"name":"change_type","label":"Change Type","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The Subsection \"Heuristic Optimization Algorithm\" under the section \"Experiments and validation\", the incorrect algorithm has been corrected.","order":7,"name":"change_details","label":"Change Details","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}