{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,14]],"date-time":"2026-02-14T06:01:59Z","timestamp":1771048919662,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":46,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,1]],"date-time":"2026-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1767225600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,1]],"date-time":"2026-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1767225600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Scientometrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-025-05529-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,7]],"date-time":"2026-01-07T06:46:48Z","timestamp":1767768408000},"page":"583-608","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["From reviews to decisions: A joint multitask aspect sentiment leveraged framework for assisting decision prediction from academic peer reviews"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"131","author":[{"given":"Sandeep","family":"Kumar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Hardik","family":"Arora","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Tirthankar","family":"Ghosal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Asif","family":"Ekbal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"5529_CR1","unstructured":"Aduragba, O. T., Yu, J., Senthilnathan, G., & Crsitea, A. (2020). Sentence contextual encoder with BERT and BiLSTM for automatic classification with imbalanced medication tweets (pp. 165\u2013167). Barcelona, Spain (Online): Association for Computational Linguistics."},{"key":"5529_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Beltagy, I., Lo, K., Cohan, A.: Scibert: A pretrained language model for scientific text. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.10676 (2019)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/D19-1371"},{"issue":"1","key":"5529_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1007\/s00799-023-00375-0","volume":"25","author":"PK Bharti","year":"2024","unstructured":"Bharti, P. K., Ghosal, T., Agarwal, M., & Ekbal, A. (2024). Peerrec: An ai-based approach to automatically generate recommendations and predict decisions in peer review. International Journal on Digital Libraries,25(1), 55\u201372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00799-023-00375-0","journal-title":"International Journal on Digital Libraries"},{"issue":"56","key":"5529_CR4","first-page":"10","volume":"5","author":"A Birukou","year":"2011","unstructured":"Birukou, A., Wakeling, J. R., Bartolini, C., Casati, F., Marchese, M., Mirylenka, K., Osman, N., Ragone, A., Sierra, C., & Wassef, A. (2011). Alternatives to peer review: Novel approaches for research evaluation. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience,5(56), 10.","journal-title":"Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience"},{"issue":"2","key":"5529_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1087\/20100207","volume":"23","author":"L Bornmann","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2010). Reliability of reviewers\u2019 ratings when using public peer review: a case study. Learned Publishing,23(2), 124\u2013131.","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"issue":"1","key":"5529_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-020-03348-1","volume":"123","author":"ES Brezis","year":"2020","unstructured":"Brezis, E. S., & Birukou, A. (2020). Arbitrariness in the peer review process. Scientometrics,123(1), 1\u201319.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"5529_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Chakraborty, S., Goyal, P., Mukherjee, A.: Aspect-based sentiment analysis of scientific reviews. In: Huang, R., Wu, D., Marchionini, G., He, D., Cunningham, S.J., Hansen, P. (eds.) JCDL \u201920: Proceedings of the ACM\/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 2020, Virtual Event, China, August 1-5, 2020, pp. 207\u2013216. ACM, (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3383583.3398541","DOI":"10.1145\/3383583.3398541"},{"key":"5529_CR8","unstructured":"Chen, Q., Yang, M., Qin, L., Liu, J., Yan, Z., Guan, J., Peng, D., Ji, Y., Li, H., Hu, M., et al.: Ai4research: A survey of artificial intelligence for scientific research. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.01903 (2025)"},{"key":"5529_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cohan, A., Feldman, S., Beltagy, I., Downey, D., Weld, D.S.: SPECTER: Document-level Representation Learning using Citation-informed Transformers. In: ACL (2020)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2020.acl-main.207"},{"key":"5529_CR10","unstructured":"Devlin, J., Chang, M., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. CoRR abs\/1810.04805 (2018) https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1810.04805"},{"key":"5529_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ghosal, T., Verma, R., Ekbal, A., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2019). A sentiment augmented deep architecture to predict peer review outcomes (pp. 414\u2013415). IEEE.","DOI":"10.1109\/JCDL.2019.00096"},{"key":"5529_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ghosal, T., Verma, R., Ekbal, A., Saha, S., Bhattacharyya, P.: Investigating impact features in editorial pre-screening of research papers. In: Chen, J., Gon\u00e7alves, M.A., Allen, J.M., Fox, E.A., Kan, M., Petras, V. (eds.) Proceedings of the 18th ACM\/IEEE on Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL 2018, Fort Worth, TX, USA, June 03-07, 2018, pp. 333\u2013334. ACM, ??? (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3197026.3203910","DOI":"10.1145\/3197026.3203910"},{"issue":"1","key":"5529_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0259238","volume":"17","author":"T Ghosal","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ghosal, T., Kumar, S., Bharti, P. K., & Ekbal, A. (2022). Peer review analyze: A novel benchmark resource for computational analysis of peer reviews. PLoS ONE,17(1), 1\u201329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0259238","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"5529_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dim.2025.100105","author":"R Han","year":"2025","unstructured":"Han, R., Zhou, H., Zhong, J., & Zhang, C. (2025). Aspect-based sentiment evolution and its correlation with review rounds in multi-round peer reviews: A deep learning approach. Data and Information Management. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dim.2025.100105","journal-title":"Data and Information Management"},{"issue":"8","key":"5529_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1735","DOI":"10.1162\/neco.1997.9.8.1735","volume":"9","author":"S Hochreiter","year":"1997","unstructured":"Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation,9(8), 1735\u20131780. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/neco.1997.9.8.1735","journal-title":"Neural Computation"},{"issue":"1","key":"5529_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"633","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2310-5","volume":"113","author":"J Huisman","year":"2017","unstructured":"Huisman, J., & Smits, J. (2017). Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author\u2019s perspective. Scientometrics,113(1), 633\u2013650.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"5529_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jiang, Q., Chen, L., Xu, R., Ao, X., Yang, M.: A challenge dataset and effective models for aspect-based sentiment analysis. In: Inui, K., Jiang, J., Ng, V., Wan, X. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019, Hong Kong, China, November 3-7, 2019, pp. 6279\u20136284. Association for Computational Linguistics, ??? (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18653\/v1\/D19-1654","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/D19-1654"},{"key":"5529_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kang, D., Ammar, W., Dalvi, B., Zuylen, M., Kohlmeier, S., Hovy, E., Schwartz, R.: A dataset of peer reviews (peerread): Collection, insights and nlp applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.09635 (2018)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/N18-1149"},{"key":"5529_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kang, D., Ammar, W., Dalvi, B., Zuylen, M., Kohlmeier, S., Hovy, E.H., Schwartz, R.: A dataset of peer reviews (peerread): Collection, insights and NLP applications. In: Walker, M.A., Ji, H., Stent, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT 2018), Volume 1 (Long Papers), pp. 1647\u20131661. Association for Computational Linguistics, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18653\/v1\/N18-1149","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/N18-1149"},{"issue":"11","key":"5529_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"0166387","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0166387","volume":"11","author":"M Kovanis","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kovanis, M., Porcher, R., Ravaud, P., & Trinquart, L. (2016). The global burden of journal peer review in the biomedical literature: Strong imbalance in the collective enterprise. PLoS ONE,11(11), 0166387.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"4","key":"5529_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0010072","volume":"5","author":"RL Kravitz","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kravitz, R. L., Franks, P., Feldman, M. D., Gerrity, M., Byrne, C., & Tierney, W. M. (2010). Editorial peer reviewers\u2019 recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care? PLoS ONE,5(4), Article e10072.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"5529_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kumar, S., Arora, H., Ghosal, T., Ekbal, A.: Deepaspeer: towards an aspect-level sentiment controllable framework for decision prediction from academic peer reviews. In: Aizawa, A., Mandl, T., Carevic, Z., Hinze, A., Mayr, P., Schaer, P. (eds.) JCDL \u201922: The ACM\/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 2022, Cologne, Germany, June 20 - 24, 2022, p. 29. ACM, (2022). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3529372.3530937","DOI":"10.1145\/3529372.3530937"},{"key":"5529_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kumar, A., Ghosal, T., & Ekbal, A. (2021). A deep neural architecture for decision-aware meta-review generation. (pp. 222\u2013225). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/JCDL52503.2021.00064","DOI":"10.1109\/JCDL52503.2021.00064"},{"key":"5529_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kumar, S., Ghosal, T., Bharti, P. K., & Ekbal, A. (2021). Sharing is caring! joint multitask learning helps aspect-category extraction and sentiment detection in scientific peer reviews. (pp. 270\u2013273). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/JCDL52503.2021.00081","DOI":"10.1109\/JCDL52503.2021.00081"},{"key":"5529_CR25","unstructured":"Kuznetsov, I., Gurevych, I., Miyao, Y., Gao, Y., & Eger, S. (2019). Does my rebuttal matter? insights from a major. Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)."},{"issue":"4","key":"5529_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1145\/2732417","volume":"58","author":"J Langford","year":"2015","unstructured":"Langford, J., & Guzdial, M. (2015). The arbitrariness of reviews, and advice for school administrators. Communications of the ACM,58(4), 12\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2732417","journal-title":"Communications of the ACM"},{"issue":"4","key":"5529_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1145\/2732417","volume":"58","author":"J Langford","year":"2015","unstructured":"Langford, J., & Guzdial, M. (2015). The arbitrariness of reviews, and advice for school administrators. Communications of the ACM,58(4), 12\u201313.","journal-title":"Communications of the ACM"},{"issue":"1","key":"5529_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.22784","volume":"64","author":"CJ Lee","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lee, C. J., Sugimoto, C. R., Zhang, G., & Cronin, B. (2013). Bias in peer review. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology,64(1), 2\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/asi.22784","journal-title":"Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology"},{"key":"5529_CR29","unstructured":"Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., Stoyanov, V.: Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692 (2019)"},{"key":"5529_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lu, S., Kuznetsov, I., Gurevych, I.: Identifying aspects in peer reviews. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.06910 (2025)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2025.findings-emnlp.326"},{"key":"5529_CR31","first-page":"425","volume":"30","author":"SM Lundberg","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,30, 425.","journal-title":"Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems"},{"key":"5529_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Manzoor, E.A., Shah, N.B.: Uncovering latent biases in text: Method and application to peer review. In: Thirty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2021, Thirty-Third Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, IAAI 2021, The Eleventh Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2021, Virtual Event, February 2-9, 2021, pp. 4767\u20134775. AAAI Press, (2021). https:\/\/ojs.aaai.org\/index.php\/AAAI\/article\/view\/16608","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v35i6.16608"},{"issue":"218\u2013238","key":"5529_CR33","first-page":"10","volume":"428","author":"T Pradhan","year":"2021","unstructured":"Pradhan, T., Bhatia, C., Kumar, P., & Pal, S. (2021). A deep neural architecture based meta-review generation and final decision prediction of a scholarly article. Neurocomputing,428(218\u2013238), 10.","journal-title":"Neurocomputing"},{"key":"5529_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Reimers, N., & Gurevych, I.: Sentence-bert,. (2019). Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks. arxiv.org\/abs\/1908.10084","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/D19-1410"},{"key":"5529_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ribeiro, A. C., Sizo, A., Lopes Cardoso, H., & Reis, L. P. (2021). Acceptance decision prediction in peer-review through sentiment analysis (pp. 766\u2013777). Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-86230-5_60"},{"key":"5529_CR36","first-page":"49","volume":"19","author":"NB Shah","year":"2018","unstructured":"Shah, N. B., Tabibian, B., Muandet, K., Guyon, I., & Luxburg, U. (2018). Design and analysis of the NIPS 2016 review process. Journal of Machine Learning Research,19, 49\u201314934.","journal-title":"Journal of Machine Learning Research"},{"issue":"1","key":"5529_CR37","first-page":"1913","volume":"19","author":"NB Shah","year":"2018","unstructured":"Shah, N. B., Tabibian, B., Muandet, K., Guyon, I., & Von Luxburg, U. (2018). Design and analysis of the nips 2016 review process. Journal of Machine Learning Research,19(1), 1913\u20131946.","journal-title":"Journal of Machine Learning Research"},{"issue":"4","key":"5529_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1177\/014107680609900414","volume":"99","author":"R Smith","year":"2006","unstructured":"Smith, R. (2006). Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine,99(4), 178\u2013182. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/014107680609900414. PMID: 16574968.","journal-title":"Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine"},{"issue":"48","key":"5529_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12708","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1707323114","volume":"114","author":"A Tomkins","year":"2017","unstructured":"Tomkins, A., Zhang, M., & Heavlin, W. D. (2017). Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America,114(48), 12708\u201312713. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1707323114","journal-title":"Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America"},{"key":"5529_CR40","unstructured":"Tran, D., Valtchanov, A., Ganapathy, K., Feng, R., Slud, E., Goldblum, M., & Goldstein, T. (2020). An open review of openreview: A critical analysis of the machine learning conference review process. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.05137"},{"key":"5529_CR41","unstructured":"Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, L., Polosukhin, I.: Attention Is All You Need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. (2017)"},{"key":"5529_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wang, K., & Wan, X. (2018). Sentiment analysis of peer review texts for scholarly papers. (pp. 175\u2013184)","DOI":"10.1145\/3209978.3210056"},{"issue":"11","key":"5529_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1452","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.70005","volume":"76","author":"W Wu","year":"2025","unstructured":"Wu, W., Zhang, C., & Zhao, Y. (2025). Automated novelty evaluation of academic paper: A collaborative approach integrating human and large language model knowledge. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,76(11), 1452\u20131469.","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"key":"5529_CR44","unstructured":"Yuan, W., Liu, P., Neubig, G.: Can we automate scientific reviewing? CoRR abs\/2102.00176 (2021) arXiv:2102.00176"},{"issue":"117727","key":"5529_CR45","first-page":"10","volume":"206","author":"Y Yu","year":"2022","unstructured":"Yu, Y., Wang, Y., Mu, J., Li, W., Jiao, S., Wang, Z., Lv, P., & Zhu, Y. (2022). Chinese mineral named entity recognition based on BERT model. Expert Systems with Applications,206(117727), 10.","journal-title":"Expert Systems with Applications"},{"key":"5529_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1108\/AJIM-02-2024-0158","author":"H Zhou","year":"2024","unstructured":"Zhou, H., Han, R., Zhong, J., & Zhang, C. (2024). Which review aspect has a greater impact on the duration of open peer review in multiple rounds? \u2013evidence from nature communications. Aslib Journal of Information Management. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/AJIM-02-2024-0158","journal-title":"Aslib Journal of Information Management"}],"container-title":["Scientometrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-025-05529-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11192-025-05529-2","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-025-05529-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,14]],"date-time":"2026-02-14T05:06:15Z","timestamp":1771045575000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11192-025-05529-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]},"references-count":46,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]}},"alternative-id":["5529"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-025-05529-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["0138-9130","1588-2861"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0138-9130","type":"print"},{"value":"1588-2861","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"14 July 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 December 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 January 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study exclusively uses publicly available datasets (e.g., ASAP-Review) that contain anonymized peer reviews from academic conferences. No personally identifiable information was used or inferred. The work aims to assist, not replace, human judgment in the peer review process, promoting fairness, transparency, and efficiency in editorial decisions.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical Approval"}}]}}