{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,1]],"date-time":"2026-07-01T19:25:32Z","timestamp":1782933932033,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":72,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,28]],"date-time":"2026-05-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1779926400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,28]],"date-time":"2026-05-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1779926400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004837","name":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovaci\u00f3n","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["RYC2022-037076-I"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["RYC2022-037076-I"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004837","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Scientometrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,6]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-026-05668-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,28]],"date-time":"2026-05-28T14:34:31Z","timestamp":1779978871000},"page":"4151-4173","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["An analysis of the relationship between access models and retractions with peer review issues (2014\u20132024)"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"131","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0717-5271","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jorge","family":"Ma\u00f1ana-Rodr\u00edguez","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0144-8638","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Bego\u00f1a","family":"Granadino-Goenechea","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2404-0683","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"N\u00faria","family":"Bautista-Puig","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,28]]},"reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"5668_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1007\/s13224-014-0643-z","volume":"64","author":"GN Allahbadia","year":"2014","unstructured":"Allahbadia, G. N. (2014). Why correcting the literature with errata and retractions is good medical practice? The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 64(6), 377\u2013380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13224-014-0643-z","journal-title":"The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India"},{"issue":"2","key":"5668_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1037","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-020-03402-y","volume":"123","author":"S Asai","year":"2020","unstructured":"Asai, S. (2020). Market power of publishers in setting article processing charges for open access journals. Scientometrics, 123(2), 1037\u20131049. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-020-03402-y","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"5668_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.3138\/jsp.53.2.0","volume":"53","author":"S Asai","year":"2022","unstructured":"Asai, S. (2022). Strategies to increase the number of open access journals: The cases of Elsevier and Springer Nature. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 53(2), 75\u201384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3138\/jsp.53.2.0","journal-title":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing"},{"key":"5668_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1108\/IDD-09-2021-0098","author":"S Asai","year":"2023","unstructured":"Asai, S. (2023). Determinants of article processing charges for hybrid and gold open access journals. Information Discovery and Delivery. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/IDD-09-2021-0098. (in press).","journal-title":"Information Discovery and Delivery"},{"issue":"7415","key":"5668_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1038\/489179a","volume":"489","author":"J Beall","year":"2012","unstructured":"Beall, J. (2012). Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature, 489(7415), 179\u2013179. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/489179a","journal-title":"Nature"},{"issue":"1","key":"5668_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1177\/01622439221112463","volume":"49","author":"K Bell","year":"2024","unstructured":"Bell, K., Kingori, P., & Mills, D. (2024). Scholarly publishing, boundary processes, and the problem of fake peer reviews. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 49(1), 78\u2013104. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/01622439221112463","journal-title":"Science, Technology, & Human Values"},{"key":"5668_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/reseval\/rvaf017","author":"J Bhasker","year":"2025","unstructured":"Bhasker, J., & Vijay Solomon, R. (2025). The cost of deception: Pseudo-journals and exploitative article processing charges. Research Evaluation. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/reseval\/rvaf017","journal-title":"Research Evaluation"},{"key":"5668_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1401","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-018-2825-4","volume":"116","author":"F Bianchi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bianchi, F., Grimaldo, F., Bravo, G., & Squazzoni, F. (2018). The peer review game: An agent-based model of scientists facing resource constraints and institutional pressures. Scientometrics, 116, 1401\u20131420. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-018-2825-4","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"5668_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"373","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-015-1556-z","volume":"103","author":"BC Bj\u00f6rk","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bj\u00f6rk, B. C., & Solomon, D. (2015). Article processing charges in OA journals: Relationship between price and quality. Scientometrics, 103(2), 373\u2013385. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-015-1556-z","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"5668_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1087\/20140206","volume":"27","author":"B-C Bj\u00f6rk","year":"2014","unstructured":"Bj\u00f6rk, B.-C., & Solomon, D. (2014). Developing an effective diamond open access scholarly journal publishing model. Learned Publishing, 27(2), 121\u2013128. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1087\/20140206","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"issue":"6154","key":"5668_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1126\/science.2013.342.6154.342_60","volume":"342","author":"J Bohannon","year":"2013","unstructured":"Bohannon, J. (2013). Who\u2019s afraid of peer review? Science, 342(6154), 60\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.2013.342.6154.342_60","journal-title":"Science"},{"issue":"3","key":"5668_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.1002\/leap.1558","volume":"36","author":"\u00c1 Borrego","year":"2023","unstructured":"Borrego, \u00c1. (2023). Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review. Learned Publishing, 36(3), 359\u2013378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/leap.1558","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"key":"5668_CR13","unstructured":"Brockington, D. (2022). MDPI Journals: 2015 -2021. Dan Brockington. https:\/\/danbrockington.com\/2022\/11\/10\/mdpi-journals-2015-2021\/"},{"key":"5668_CR14","unstructured":"Buranyi, S. (2017). Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? The Guardian. https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/science\/2017\/jun\/27\/profitable-businessscientific-publishing-bad-for-science"},{"issue":"4","key":"5668_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"778","DOI":"10.1162\/qss_a_00272","volume":"4","author":"LA Butler","year":"2023","unstructured":"Butler, L. A., Matthias, L., Simard, M. A., Mongeon, P., & Haustein, S. (2023). The oligopoly\u2019s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges. Quantitative Science Studies, 4(4), 778\u2013799. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/qss_a_00272","journal-title":"Quantitative Science Studies"},{"key":"5668_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj-2022-071517","author":"C Candal-Pedreira","year":"2022","unstructured":"Candal-Pedreira, C., Ross, J. S., Ruano-Ravina, A., Egilman, D. S., Fern\u00e1ndez, E., & P\u00e9rez-R\u00edos, M. (2022). Retracted papers originating from paper mills: Cross sectional study. BMJ. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj-2022-071517","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"6","key":"5668_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"884","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.24979","volume":"76","author":"L C\u00e9spedes","year":"2025","unstructured":"C\u00e9spedes, L., Kozlowski, D., Pradier, C., Sainte-Marie, M. H., Shokida, N. S., Benz, P., Poitras, C., Ninkov, A. B., Ebrahimy, S., Ayeni, P., Filali, S., Li, B., & Larivi\u00e8re, V. (2025). Evaluating the linguistic coverage of OpenAlex: An assessment of metadata accuracy and completeness. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 76(6), 884\u2013895. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/asi.24979","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"key":"5668_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"422","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.embor.7400970","volume":"8","author":"M Cokol","year":"2007","unstructured":"Cokol, M., Iossifov, I., Rodriguez-Esteban, R., & Rzhetsky, A. (2007). How many scientific papers should be retracted? EMBO Reports, 8, 422\u2013423. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/sj.embor.7400970","journal-title":"EMBO Reports"},{"issue":"4","key":"5668_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2475","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-025-05293-3","volume":"130","author":"JH Culbert","year":"2025","unstructured":"Culbert, J. H., Hobert, A., Jahn, N., Haupka, N., Schmidt, M., Donner, P., & Mayr, P. (2025). Reference coverage analysis of OpenAlex compared to web of science and Scopus. Scientometrics, 130(4), 2475\u20132492. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-025-05293-3","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"10","key":"5668_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5965","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-022-04504-5","volume":"127","author":"A Day","year":"2022","unstructured":"Day, A. (2022). Exploratory analysis of text duplication in peer-review reveals peer-review fraud and paper mills. Scientometrics, 127(10), 5965\u20135987. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-022-04504-5","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"5","key":"5668_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3965","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-021-03895-1","volume":"126","author":"B Elango","year":"2021","unstructured":"Elango, B. (2021). Retracted articles in the biomedical literature from Indian authors. Scientometrics, 126(5), 3965\u20133981. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-021-03895-1","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"5668_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-019-03153-5","volume":"120","author":"M Erfanmanesh","year":"2019","unstructured":"Erfanmanesh, M., & Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2019). Is the soundness-only quality control policy of open access mega journals linked to a higher rate of published errors? Scientometrics, 120(2), 917\u2013923. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-019-03153-5","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"10","key":"5668_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3855","DOI":"10.1128\/IAI.05661-11","volume":"79","author":"FC Fang","year":"2011","unstructured":"Fang, F. C., & Casadevall, A. (2011). Retracted science and the retraction index. Infection and Immunity, 79(10), 3855\u20133859. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1128\/IAI.05661-11","journal-title":"Infection and Immunity"},{"key":"5668_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1212247109","author":"FC Fang","year":"2012","unstructured":"Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G., & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1212247109","journal-title":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences"},{"issue":"5","key":"5668_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2867","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-024-04991-7","volume":"129","author":"F Freijedo-Farinas","year":"2024","unstructured":"Freijedo-Farinas, F., Ruano-Ravina, A., P\u00e9rez-R\u00edos, M., Ross, J., & Candal-Pedreira, C. (2024). Biomedical retractions due to misconduct in Europe: Characterization and trends in the last 20 years. Scientometrics, 129(5), 2867\u20132882. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-024-04991-7","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"5668_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1093\/reseval\/rvab031","volume":"31","author":"JA Garcia","year":"2022","unstructured":"Garcia, J. A., Rodriguez-Sanchez, R., & Fdez-Valdivia, J. (2022). Fraud, specialization, and efficiency in peer review. Research Evaluation, 31(1), 15\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/reseval\/rvab031","journal-title":"Research Evaluation"},{"key":"5668_CR27","first-page":"1996","volume":"10","author":"E Garfield","year":"1996","unstructured":"Garfield, E. (1996). What is the primordial reference for the phrase \u2018Publish or Perish.\u2019 Scientist, 10, 1996.","journal-title":"Scientist"},{"key":"5668_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/leap.1525","author":"DM Gorman","year":"2023","unstructured":"Gorman, D. M. (2023). The rise of a mega-journal in public health publishing. Learned Publishing. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/leap.1525","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"issue":"10","key":"5668_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0044118","volume":"7","author":"ML Grieneisen","year":"2012","unstructured":"Grieneisen, M. L., & Zhang, M. (2012). A comprehensive survey of retracted articles from the scholarly literature. PLoS One, 7(10), Article e44118. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0044118","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"5","key":"5668_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1111\/ijpp.12278","volume":"24","author":"MA Hadi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hadi, M. A. (2016). Fake peer-review in research publication: Revisiting research purpose and academic integrity. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 24(5), 309\u2013310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ijpp.12278","journal-title":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice"},{"issue":"9","key":"5668_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"791","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMp1211794","volume":"368","author":"C Haug","year":"2013","unstructured":"Haug, C. (2013). The downside of open-access publishing. The New England Journal of Medicine, 368(9), 791\u2013793. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMp1211794","journal-title":"The New England Journal of Medicine"},{"key":"5668_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-017-9884-0","volume":"24","author":"M Hosseini","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hosseini, M., Hilhorst, M., de Beaufort, I., & Fanelli, D. (2018). Doing the right thing: A qualitative investigation of retractions due to unintentional error. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24, 189\u2013206. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-017-9884-0","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"2","key":"5668_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.5195\/jmla.2022.1441","volume":"110","author":"F Houghton","year":"2022","unstructured":"Houghton, F. (2022). Keep calm and carry on: Moral panic, predatory publishers, peer review, and the emperor\u2019s new clothes. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 110(2), 233. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5195\/jmla.2022.1441","journal-title":"Journal of the Medical Library Association"},{"issue":"41","key":"5668_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3346\/jkms.2023.38.e333","volume":"38","author":"SY Hwang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Hwang, S. Y., Yon, D. K., Lee, S. W., Kim, M. S., Kim, J. Y., Smith, L., Koyanagi, A., Solmi, M., Carvalho, A. F., Kim, E., Shin, J. I., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2023). Causes for retraction in the biomedical literature: A systematic review of studies of retraction notices. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 38(41), Article e333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3346\/jkms.2023.38.e333","journal-title":"Journal of Korean Medical Science"},{"issue":"2","key":"5668_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/00368504211016936","volume":"104","author":"P Khurana","year":"2024","unstructured":"Khurana, P., Uddin, Z., & Sharma, K. (2024). Unraveling retraction dynamics in COVID-19 research: Patterns, reasons, and implications. Science Progress, 104(2), Article 00368504211016936. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/00368504211016936","journal-title":"Science Progress"},{"issue":"2","key":"5668_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.11613\/BM.2017.031","volume":"27","author":"C Laine","year":"2017","unstructured":"Laine, C., & Winker, M. A. (2017). Identifying predatory or pseudo-journals. Biochemia Medica, 27(2), 285\u2013291. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11613\/BM.2017.031","journal-title":"Biochemia Medica"},{"key":"5668_CR37","first-page":"91","volume":"1","author":"SV Liu","year":"2006","unstructured":"Liu, S. V. (2006). Top journals\u2019 top retraction rates. Sci Ethics, 1, 91\u201393.","journal-title":"Sci Ethics"},{"issue":"2","key":"5668_CR38","first-page":"393","volume":"15","author":"ED L\u00f3pez-Cozar","year":"2024","unstructured":"L\u00f3pez-Cozar, E. D., & Mart\u00edn, A. M. (2024). La ruta de oro de la publicaci\u00f3n cient\u00edfica: Del negocio de las revistas a las revistas negocio. La fuente del negocio editorial: El negocio bibliom\u00e9trico de la evaluaci\u00f3n cient\u00edfica. Revista Mediterr\u00e1nea De Comunicaci\u00f3n Mediterranean Journal of Communication, 15(2), 393\u2013438.","journal-title":"Revista Mediterr\u00e1nea De Comunicaci\u00f3n Mediterranean Journal of Communication"},{"key":"5668_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-024-05076-3","author":"A Maddi","year":"2024","unstructured":"Maddi, A., & Miotti, L. (2024). On the peer review reports: Does size matter? Scientometrics. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-024-05076-3","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"7","key":"5668_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4231","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-024-05075-4","volume":"129","author":"A Maddi","year":"2024","unstructured":"Maddi, A., Monneau, E., Guaspare-Cartron, C., Gargiulo, F., & Dubois, M. (2024). Streetlight effect in PubPeer comments: Are open access publications more scrutinized? Scientometrics, 129(7), 4231\u20134247. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-024-05075-4","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"5668_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1017\/jme.2025.2","volume":"53","author":"ER Mattoon","year":"2025","unstructured":"Mattoon, E. R., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2025). Retracted publications on COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 53(1), 1\u201311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/jme.2025.2","journal-title":"Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics"},{"key":"5668_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2025.2542203","author":"S Mertkan","year":"2025","unstructured":"Mertkan, S., Mills, D., Takir, A., & Emmioglu Sar\u0131kaya, E. (2025). Research on retractions: A systematic review and research agenda. Accountability in Research. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08989621.2025.2542203","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"key":"5668_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mongeon, P., Hare, M., Krause, G., Marjoram, R., Riddle, P., Toupin, R., & Wilson, S. (2025). Investigating document type discrepancies between OpenAlex and the Web of Science. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS\/Actes du congr\u00e8s annuel de l'ACSI.","DOI":"10.29173\/cais1943"},{"issue":"4","key":"5668_CR44","first-page":"1789","volume":"33","author":"S Moradi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Moradi, S., & Janavi, E. (2018). A scientometrics study of Iranian retracted papers. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 33(4), 1789\u20131808.","journal-title":"Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management"},{"key":"5668_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.1007\/s40199-020-00319-4","volume":"28","author":"T Mousavi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mousavi, T., & Abdollahi, M. (2020). A review of the current concerns about misconduct in medical sciences publications and the consequences. DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 28, 359\u2013369. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40199-020-00319-4","journal-title":"DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences"},{"issue":"11","key":"5668_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-012047","volume":"6","author":"EC Moylan","year":"2016","unstructured":"Moylan, E. C., & Kowalczuk, M. K. (2016). Why articles are retracted: A retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central. British Medical Journal Open, 6(11), Article e012047. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-012047","journal-title":"British Medical Journal Open"},{"key":"5668_CR47","unstructured":"Oransky, I., & Marcus, A. (2010). Why write a blog about retractions. Retraction Watch."},{"key":"5668_CR48","unstructured":"Oransky, I., & Marcus, A. (2023a). Science Corrects Itself, Right? A Scandal at Stanford Says It Doesn\u2019t. Scientific American, August 1, 2023."},{"key":"5668_CR49","unstructured":"Oransky, I., & Marcus, A. (2023b). There\u2019s far more scientific fraud than anyone wants to admit. The Guardian, 9."},{"key":"5668_CR50","unstructured":"Ortega Priego, J. L., & Delgado-Quir\u00f3s, L. (2023). Influence of different journal publishing models in the presence and detection of scientific errors and misconduct.\u00a0Revista Espa\u00f1ola de Documentaci\u00f3n Cient\u00edfica."},{"issue":"7","key":"5668_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3769","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-024-05034-y","volume":"129","author":"JL Ortega","year":"2024","unstructured":"Ortega, J. L., & Delgado-Quir\u00f3s, L. (2024). The indexation of retracted literature in seven principal scholarly databases: A coverage comparison of dimensions, OpenAlex, pubmed, scilit, scopus, the lens and web of science. Scientometrics, 129(7), 3769\u20133785. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-024-05034-y","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"5668_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7717\/peerj-cs.10539","volume":"8","author":"J Priem","year":"2022","unstructured":"Priem, J., Piwowar, H., & Orr, R. (2022). OpenAlex: A fully open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and concepts. PeerJ Computer Science, 8, Article e10539. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7717\/peerj-cs.10539","journal-title":"PeerJ Computer Science"},{"issue":"1102","key":"5668_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"499","DOI":"10.1136\/postgradmedj-2016-133969","volume":"93","author":"X Qi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Qi, X., Deng, H., & Guo, X. (2017). Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: An overview. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 93(1102), 499\u2013503. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/postgradmedj-2016-133969","journal-title":"Postgraduate Medical Journal"},{"key":"5668_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"719","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2621-6","volume":"114","author":"MD Ribeiro","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ribeiro, M. D., & Vasconcelos, S. M. (2018). Retractions covered by retraction watch in the 2013-2015 period: Prevalence for the most productive countries. Scientometrics, 114, 719\u2013734. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2621-6","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"32","key":"5668_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.2420092122","volume":"122","author":"RA Richardson","year":"2025","unstructured":"Richardson, R. A., Hong, S. S., Byrne, J. A., Stoeger, T., & Amaral, L. A. N. (2025). The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(32), Article e2420092122. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.2420092122","journal-title":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences"},{"key":"5668_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/01655515251330579","author":"D Rodrigues","year":"2025","unstructured":"Rodrigues, D., Lopes, A., & Batista, F. (2025). Detecting incoherent citation data among three bibliometric platforms OpenAlex, Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of Information Science. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/01655515251330579","journal-title":"Journal of Information Science"},{"key":"5668_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Schroter, S., Black, N., Evans, S., Godlee, F., Osorio, L., & Smith, R. (2008). What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 101(10), 507\u2013514.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1258\/jrsm.2008.080062","DOI":"10.1258\/jrsm.2008.080062"},{"issue":"12","key":"5668_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6739","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-023-04850-y","volume":"128","author":"P Sebo","year":"2023","unstructured":"Sebo, P. (2023). Retractions in primary care journals (2000-2022). Scientometrics, 128(12), 6739\u20136760. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-023-04850-y","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"5668_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2025.2484555","author":"P Sebo","year":"2025","unstructured":"Sebo, P., & Sebo, M. (2025). Comparing the performance of retraction watch database, pubmed, and web of science in identifying retracted publications in medicine. Accountability in Research. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08989621.2025.2484555","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"issue":"6","key":"5668_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4589","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-021-03990-3","volume":"126","author":"TA Shah","year":"2021","unstructured":"Shah, T. A., Gul, S., Bashir, S., Ahmad, S., Huertas, A., Oliveira, A., Gulzar, F., Hussain Najar, A., & Chakraborty, K. (2021). Influence of accessibility (open and toll-based) of scholarly publications on retractions. Scientometrics, 126(6), 4589\u20134606. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-021-03990-3","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"10","key":"5668_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8363","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-021-04125-4","volume":"126","author":"K Sharma","year":"2021","unstructured":"Sharma, K. (2021). Team size and retracted citations reveal the patterns of retractions from 1981 to 2020. Scientometrics, 126(10), 8363\u20138374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-021-04125-4","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"4","key":"5668_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1177\/014107680609900414","volume":"99","author":"R Smith","year":"2006","unstructured":"Smith, R. (2006). Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(4), 178\u2013182. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/014107680609900414","journal-title":"Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine"},{"key":"5668_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-144-8-200604180-00123","volume":"144","author":"HC Sox","year":"2006","unstructured":"Sox, H. C., & Rennie, D. (2006). Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: Lessons from the Poehlman case. Annals of Internal Medicine, 144, 609\u2013613. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7326\/0003-4819-144-8-200604180-00123","journal-title":"Annals of Internal Medicine"},{"issue":"3","key":"5668_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"404","DOI":"10.3138\/jsp-2023-0041","volume":"55","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2024","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2024). The conceptual \u2018APC ring\u2019: Is there a risk of APC-driven guest authorship, and is a change in the culture of the APC needed? Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 55(3), 404\u2013425. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3138\/jsp-2023-0041","journal-title":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing"},{"key":"5668_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-016-2178-9","volume":"110","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2017","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Bornemann-Cimenti, H. (2017). Why do some retracted papers continue to be cited? Scientometrics, 110, 365\u2013370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-016-2178-9","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"7442","key":"5668_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"426","DOI":"10.1038\/495426a","volume":"495","author":"R Van Noorden","year":"2013","unstructured":"Van Noorden, R. (2013). The true cost of science publishing. Nature, 495(7442), 426\u2013429. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/495426a","journal-title":"Nature"},{"issue":"8051","key":"5668_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"596","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-025-00455-y","volume":"638","author":"R Van Noorden","year":"2025","unstructured":"Van Noorden, R. (2025). Exclusive: These universities have the most retracted scientific articles. Nature, 638(8051), 596\u2013599. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-025-00455-y","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"5668_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"855","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-018-0040-6","volume":"25","author":"T Wang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wang, T., Xing, Q. R., Wang, H., et al. (2019). Retracted publications in the biomedical literature from open access journals. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25, 855\u2013868. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-018-0040-6","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"5668_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10805-025-09635-x","author":"Y Wang","year":"2025","unstructured":"Wang, Y., Li, X., Cai, H., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Characteristics of biomedical retractions in China: An analysis using the retraction watch database. Journal of Academic Ethics. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10805-025-09635-x","journal-title":"Journal of Academic Ethics"},{"issue":"2","key":"5668_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1080\/00031305.2016.1154108","volume":"70","author":"RL Wasserstein","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129\u2013133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00031305.2016.1154108","journal-title":"The American Statistician"},{"issue":"2","key":"5668_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.2478\/jdis-2024-0010","volume":"9","author":"ET Zheng","year":"2024","unstructured":"Zheng, E. T., & Fu, H. Z. (2024). A comparative study on characteristics of retracted publications across different open access levels. Journal of Data and Information Science, 9(2), 22\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2478\/jdis-2024-0010","journal-title":"Journal of Data and Information Science"},{"issue":"3","key":"5668_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2023.101423","volume":"17","author":"X Zheng","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zheng, X., Chen, J., Tollas, A., & Ni, C. (2023). The effectiveness of peer review in identifying issues leading to retractions. Journal of Informetrics, 17(3), Article 101423. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.joi.2023.101423","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"}],"container-title":["Scientometrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-026-05668-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11192-026-05668-0","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-026-05668-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,1]],"date-time":"2026-07-01T17:43:17Z","timestamp":1782927797000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11192-026-05668-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,28]]},"references-count":72,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,6]]}},"alternative-id":["5668"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-026-05668-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["0138-9130","1588-2861"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0138-9130","type":"print"},{"value":"1588-2861","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,28]]},"assertion":[{"value":"1 October 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"13 May 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 May 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interests"}}]}}