{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,2]],"date-time":"2024-03-02T22:22:41Z","timestamp":1709418161842},"reference-count":45,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,5]],"date-time":"2020-09-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1599264000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,5]],"date-time":"2020-09-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1599264000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100002661","name":"Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100002661","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Software Qual J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,12]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11219-020-09521-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,5]],"date-time":"2020-09-05T15:02:36Z","timestamp":1599318156000},"page":"1615-1643","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["What lies behind requirements? A quality assessment of statement grounds in requirements elicitation"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"28","author":[{"given":"Corentin","family":"Burnay","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sarah","family":"Bouraga","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Joseph","family":"Gillain","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ivan J.","family":"Jureta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"9521_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1142\/S0218194098000212","volume":"8","author":"G Antoniou","year":"1998","unstructured":"Antoniou, G. (1998). The role of nonmonotonic representations in requirements engineering. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 8, 385\u2013399.","journal-title":"International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering"},{"key":"9521_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Billington, D., Estivill-Castro, V., Hexel, R., & Rock, A. (2011). Requirements engineering via non-monotonic logics and state diagrams. In Maciaszek, LeszekA. and Loucopoulos, P., ed.: Evaluation of novel approaches to software engineering. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (pp. 121\u2013135).","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-23391-3_9"},{"key":"9521_CR3","unstructured":"Boden, M.A. (2013). Creativity In Berys Gaut and Dominic McIver Lopes, ed. The Routledge companion to aesthetics. Routledge Handbooks Online."},{"key":"9521_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brewka, G., Niemel\u00e4, I., & Truszczynski, M. (2007). Nonmonotonic reasoning. In Handbook of Knowledge Representation. Volume 3 (pp. 239\u2013284).","DOI":"10.1016\/S1574-6526(07)03006-4"},{"key":"9521_CR5","unstructured":"Brewka, G., Roelofsen, F., & Serafini, L. (2007). Contextual default reasoning. In IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 268\u2013273)."},{"key":"9521_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burnay, C. (2016). Are stakeholders the only source of information for requirements engineers? Toward a taxonomy of elicitation information sources.","DOI":"10.1145\/2965085"},{"key":"9521_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burnay, C., Jureta, I.J., & Faulkner, S. (2014). An exploratory study of topic importance in requirements elicitation interviews. In Proc. 26th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE\u201914) (pp. 180\u2013195).","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-07881-6_13"},{"key":"9521_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Christel, M.G., & Kang, K.C. (1992). Issues in requirements elicitation. Technical Report CMU\/SEI-92-TR-12 ESC-TR-92-012.","DOI":"10.21236\/ADA258932"},{"key":"9521_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Davis, A.M., Dieste, O., Hickey, A.M., Juristo, N., & Moreno, A.M. (2006). Effectiveness of requirements elicitation techniques: empirical results derived from a systematic review. In Proc. 14th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering (pp. 179\u2013188).","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2006.17"},{"key":"9521_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Easterbrook, S., Singer, J., Storey, M.A., & Damian, D. (2008). Selecting empirical methods for software engineering research. In Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering (pp. 285\u2013311).","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-84800-044-5_11"},{"key":"9521_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Elrakaiby, Y., Ferrari, A., Spoletini, P., Gnesi, S., & Nuseibeh, B. (2017). Using argumentation to explain ambiguity in requirements elicitation interviews. In Proceedings-2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference RE 2017 (pp. 51\u201360).","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2017.27"},{"key":"9521_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ferrari, A., Spoletini, P., & Gnesi, S. (2015). Ambiguity as a resource to disclose tacit knowledge. In 2015 IEEE 23rd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), IEE (pp. pp. 26\u201335).","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2015.7320405"},{"key":"9521_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1037\/a0024338","volume":"141","author":"CO Fritz","year":"2012","unstructured":"Fritz, C.O., Morris, P.E., & Richler, J.J. (2012). Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology:, General, 141, 2\u201318.","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Psychology:, General"},{"key":"9521_CR14","unstructured":"Goguen, J.A., & Linde, C. (1993). Techniques for requirements elicitation. In Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (pp. 152\u2013164)."},{"key":"9521_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gotel, O.C.Z., & Finkelstein, A.C.W. (1994). An analysis of the requirements traceability problem. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Requirements Engineering, IEEE (pp. 94\u2013101).","DOI":"10.1109\/ICRE.1994.292398"},{"key":"9521_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1007\/s00766-011-0134-z","volume":"18","author":"G G\u0117nova","year":"2013","unstructured":"G\u0117nova, G., Fuentes, J.M., Llorens, J., Hurtado, O., & Moreno, V. (2013). A framework to measure and improve the quality of textual requirements. Requirements Engineering, 18, 25\u201341.","journal-title":"Requirements Engineering"},{"key":"9521_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Greenspan, S., Mylopoulos, J., & Borgida, A. (1994). On formal requirements modeling languages: RML revisited. In Proc. 16th International Conference on Software engineering (pp. 135\u2013147).","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSE.1994.296773"},{"key":"9521_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1080\/07421222.2004.11045786","volume":"20","author":"AM Hickey","year":"2004","unstructured":"Hickey, A.M., & Davis, A.M. (2004). A unified model of requirements elicitation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 65\u201384.","journal-title":"Journal of Management Information Systems"},{"key":"9521_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ionita, D., Bullee, J. W., & Wieringa, R. J. (2014). Argumentation-based security requirements elicitation: the next round. In 2014 IEEE 1st International Workshop on Evolving Security and Privacy Requirements Engineering ESPRE 2014 - Proceedings (pp. 7\u201312).","DOI":"10.1109\/ESPRE.2014.6890521"},{"key":"9521_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jureta, I.J., Mylopoulos, J., & Faulkner, S. (2008). Revisiting the core ontology and problem in requirements engineering. In Proc. 16th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering (pp. 71\u201380).","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2008.13"},{"key":"9521_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Karlsson, J. (1996). Software requirements prioritizing. In Proc. 2nd IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering (pp. 110\u2013116).","DOI":"10.1109\/ICRE.1996.491435"},{"key":"9521_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1109\/MS.2004.1331305","volume":"21","author":"N Maiden","year":"2004","unstructured":"Maiden, N., Gizikis, A., & Robertson, S. (2004). Provoking creativity: imagine what your requirements could be like. IEEE Software, 21, 68\u201375.","journal-title":"IEEE Software"},{"key":"9521_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1049\/sej.1996.0024","volume":"11","author":"N Maiden","year":"1996","unstructured":"Maiden, N., & Rugg, G. (1996). ACRE: selecting methods for requirements acquisition. Software Engineering Journal, 11, 183\u2013192.","journal-title":"Software Engineering Journal"},{"key":"9521_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(80)90011-9","volume":"13","author":"J McCarthy","year":"1980","unstructured":"McCarthy, J. (1980). Circumscription - a form of non-monotonic reasoning. Artificial intelligence, 13, 27\u201339.","journal-title":"Artificial intelligence"},{"key":"9521_CR25","unstructured":"Merriam-Webster online. (December 10, 2019). Belief. https:\/\/www.merriamwebster.com\/dictionary\/Belief?utm_campaign=sd&utm_medium=serp&utm_source=jsonld."},{"key":"9521_CR26","unstructured":"Moore, R. (1984). Possible-world semantics for autoepistemic logic."},{"key":"9521_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nuseibeh, B., & Easterbrook, S. (2000). Requirements engineering: a roadmap. In Proc. Workshop on the Future of Software Engineering. Volume 1. 35\u201346.","DOI":"10.1145\/336512.336523"},{"key":"9521_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-005-9063-z","volume":"146","author":"FJ Pelletier","year":"2005","unstructured":"Pelletier, F.J., & Elio, R. (2005). The case for psychologism in default and inheritance reasoning. Synthese, 146, 7\u201335.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"9521_CR29","unstructured":"Pohl, K. (2010). Requirements engineering: fundamentals, principles, and techniques. Springer Publishing Company Incorporated."},{"key":"9521_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(88)90077-X","volume":"36","author":"D Poole","year":"1988","unstructured":"Poole, D. (1988). A logical framework for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 36, 27\u201347.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9521_CR31","unstructured":"Princeton University: About WordNet. (2010). WordNetPrinceton University. <http:\/\/wordnet.princeton.edu>."},{"key":"9521_CR32","unstructured":"Rahwan, I., & Simari, G. (2009). Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Heidelberg."},{"key":"9521_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(80)90014-4","volume":"13","author":"R Reiter","year":"1980","unstructured":"Reiter, R. (1980). A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 13, 81\u2013132.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9521_CR34","unstructured":"Robertson, S., & Robertson, J. (2012). Mastering the requirements process: getting requirements right Addison-wesley."},{"key":"9521_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rolland, C., Grosz, G., & Kla, R. (1999). Experience with goal-scenario coupling in requirements engineering. In Proc IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering IEEE Comput. Soc (pp. 74\u201381).","DOI":"10.1109\/ISRE.1999.777987"},{"key":"9521_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Saeki, M., Matsumura, K., & ichi Shimoda Kaiya, H. (1996). Structuring utterance records of requirements elicitation meetings based on speech act theory. In ICRE. 21.","DOI":"10.1109\/ICRE.1996.491426"},{"key":"9521_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Searle, J.R. (1969). Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge university press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139173438"},{"key":"9521_CR38","unstructured":"Steup, M. (2014). Epistemology. In Edward N. Zalta, ed.: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring 201 edn. (pp. 1\u201334)."},{"key":"9521_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sutcliffe, A., & Ryan, M. (1998). Experience with SCRAM, a scenario requirements analysis method. In Proc. 3rd IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering (pp. 164\u2013171).","DOI":"10.1109\/ICRE.1998.667822"},{"key":"9521_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sutcliffe, A., & Sawyer, P. (2013). Requirements elicitation: towards the unknown unknowns. In Proc. 21st IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference RE IEEE (pp. 92\u2013104).","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2013.6636709"},{"key":"9521_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Zee, M., Bex, F., & Ghanavati, S. (2015). Rationalization of goal models in GRL using formal argumentation. In 2015 IEEE 23rd International Requirements Engineering Conference RE 2015 - Proceedings (pp. 220\u2013225).","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2015.7320426"},{"key":"9521_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yu, Y., Tun, T.T., Tedeschi, A., Franqueira, V.N., & Nuseibeh, B. (2011). Openargue: supporting argumentation to evolve secure software systems. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 19th International Requirements Engineering Conference RE 2011 (pp. 351\u2013352).","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2011.6051671"},{"key":"9521_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zowghi, D., & Coulin, C. (2005). Requirements elicitation: a survey of techniques, approaches, and tools. In Aurum, Ayb\u00fcke and Wohlin, C., ed.: Engineering and managing software requirements. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 19\u201346.","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-28244-0_2"},{"key":"9521_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zowghi, D., Ghose, A., & Peppas, P. (1996). A framework for reasoning about requirements evolution.","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-61532-6_14"},{"key":"9521_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zowghi, D., & Offen, R. (1997). A logical framework for modeling and reasoning about the evolution of requirements. In Proc. 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (pp. 247\u2013257).","DOI":"10.1109\/ISRE.1997.566875"}],"container-title":["Software Quality Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11219-020-09521-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11219-020-09521-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11219-020-09521-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,4]],"date-time":"2021-09-04T23:32:57Z","timestamp":1630798377000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11219-020-09521-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,5]]},"references-count":45,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,12]]}},"alternative-id":["9521"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11219-020-09521-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["0963-9314","1573-1367"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0963-9314","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-1367","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"5 September 2020","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}