{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,9]],"date-time":"2023-09-09T04:57:14Z","timestamp":1694235434574},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,3,24]],"date-time":"2010-03-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1269388800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Stud Logica"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,4]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11225-010-9238-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,3,23]],"date-time":"2010-03-23T05:16:28Z","timestamp":1269321388000},"page":"307-330","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Grades of Probability Modality in the Law of Evidence"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"94","author":[{"given":"Lennart","family":"\u00c5qvist","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2010,3,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"9238_CR1","unstructured":"Allen, R. J. (1994), \u2018Factual Ambiguity and a Theory of Evidence\u2019, Northwestern University Law Review 88 (1994), 604\u2013640."},{"key":"9238_CR2","unstructured":"Allen, R.J., and M.S. Pardo (2007), \u2018The Problematic Value of Mathematical Models of Evidence\u2019. Journal of Legal Studies 36 (2007), 107\u2013138."},{"key":"9238_CR3","unstructured":"\u00c5qvist, L. (1990), \u2018Logical Analysis of Epistemic Modality, an Explication of the Bolding-Ekel\u00f6f Degrees of Evidential Strength\u2019, in H. T. Klami (ed.), R\u00e4tt och Sanning (Law and Truth. A symposium on legal proof-theory in Uppsala, May 1989). Uppsala, Iustus F\u00f6rlag, 1990, pp. 43\u201354."},{"key":"9238_CR4","unstructured":"\u00c5qvist, L. (1992), \u2018Towards a Logical Theory of Legal Evidence: Semantic Analysis of the Bolding-Ekel\u00f6f Degrees of Evidential Strength\u2019, in A.A. Martino (ed.), Expert Systems in Law, Amsterdam: North-Holland, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1992, pp. 67\u201386."},{"key":"9238_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"\u00c5qvist, L. (2007), \u2018An Interpretation of Probability in the Law of Evidence Based on Pro-et-Contra Argumentation\u2019, Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (2007), 391\u2013410.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-007-9048-y"},{"key":"9238_CR6","unstructured":"\u00c5qvist, L. (1997), \u2018Systematic frame constants in defeasible deontic logic: A new form of Andersonian reduction\u2019, in D. Nute (ed.), Defeasible Deontic Logic, pp. 59\u201377. Dordrecht \/ Boston \/ London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997."},{"key":"9238_CR7","unstructured":"\u00c5qvist, L. (1999), \u2018Supererogation and offence in deontic logic: an analysis within systems of alethic modal logic with levels of perfection\u2019, in R. Sliwinski (ed.), Philosophical Crumbs (Essays Dedicated to Ann-Mari Henschen-Dahlquist on the Occasion of her Seventy-Fifth Birthday), Uppsala Philosophical Studies 49, pp. 261\u2013276. Uppsala University: Department of Philosophy, 1999."},{"key":"9238_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"\u00c5qvist, L. (2000), \u2018Three characterizability problems in deontic logic\u2019, Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (2000), 65\u201382.","DOI":"10.1080\/08066200050505760"},{"key":"9238_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"\u00c5qvist, L. (2002), \u2018Deontic Logic\u2019, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd Edition, Vol. 8, pp. 147\u2013264. Dordrecht \/ Boston \/ London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-010-0387-2_3"},{"key":"9238_CR10","unstructured":"Bolding, P.O. (1951), Bevisb\u00f6rdan och den juridiska tekniken (Burden of Proof and Legal Technique), Uppsala: Appelbergs, 1951."},{"key":"9238_CR11","unstructured":"Bolding, P.O. (1960), \u2018Aspects of the Burden of Proof\u2019, Scandinavian Studies in Law, Vol. 4 (1960), 9\u201328. Stockholm: Stockholm Institute for Sc. Law."},{"key":"9238_CR12","unstructured":"Bolding, P.O. (1988), \u2018Osannolikhet eller ovisshet? En fr\u00e5ga om behandling av alternativhypoteser vid bevisv\u00e4rderingen\u2019 (Improbability or Uncertainty? A Question about the Treatment of Alternative Hypotheses in the Evaluation of Legal Evidence), Svensk Juristtidning (The Swedish Law Review) Vol. 73 (1988), 606\u2013609."},{"key":"9238_CR13","unstructured":"Bolding, P.O. (1989), G\u00e5r det att bevisa? (Can You Prove It?), Stockholm: Norstedts F\u00f6rlag, 1989."},{"key":"9238_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cohen, L. J. (1977), The Probable and The Provable, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780198244127.001.0001"},{"key":"9238_CR15","unstructured":"Ekel\u00f6f, P.O. (1963), R\u00e4tteg\u00e5ng (Judicial Procedure) Vol. 4. 1st ed. Stockholm: Norstedts F\u00f6rlag, 1963."},{"key":"9238_CR16","unstructured":"Ekel\u00f6f, P.O. (1964), \u2018Free Evaluation of Evidence\u2019, Scandinavian Studies in Law, Vol. 8 (1964), 45\u201366. Stockholm: Stockholm Institute for Sc. Law."},{"key":"9238_CR17","unstructured":"Ekel\u00f6f, P.O. (1983), \u2018My Thoughts on Evidentiary Value, in P. G\u00e4rdenfors, B. Hansson, and N.-E. Sahlin (eds.), Evidentiary Value: Philosophical, Judicial and Psychological Aspects of a Theory (= Festschrift to S. Halld\u00e9n. Library of Theoria No. 15), pp. 9\u201326. Lund: Gleerups, 1983."},{"key":"9238_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gabbay, D.M., and J. Woods (2005), \u2018Logic and the Law: Crossing the Lines of Discipline\u2019, in V. F. Hendricks, S.A. Pedersen, and D.M. Gabbay (eds.), \u03a6NEWS (The Newsletter for Philosophical Logic and its Applications), Vol. 7 (2005), 4\u201346. Published by the Danish Network for Philosophical Logic and its Applications (= \u03a6LOG) and Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/1-4020-3092-4"},{"key":"9238_CR19","unstructured":"Goble, L. F. (1970), \u2018Grades of Modality\u2019, Logique et Analyse 51 (1970), 323\u2013334."},{"key":"9238_CR20","unstructured":"Gorphe, Fr. (1947), L\u2019appr\u00e9ciation des preuves en justice (The Assessment of Proofs in Law), Paris: Librairie du recueil Sirey, 1947."},{"key":"9238_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Harman, G. (1965), \u2018The inference to the best explanation\u2019, Philosophical Review 74:1 (1965), 88\u201395.","DOI":"10.2307\/2183532"},{"key":"9238_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kripke, S.A. (1963), \u2018Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I: Normal Modal Propositional Calculi\u2019, Zeitschrift f\u00fcr mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 9 (1963), 67\u201396.","DOI":"10.1002\/malq.19630090502"},{"key":"9238_CR23","unstructured":"Lemmon, E. J., and D. Scott, (1966), Intensional Logic, preliminary draft of initial chapters by E. J. Lemmon, July 1966, Nowadays available as An Introduction to Modal Logic (American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph No. 11) edited by K. Segerberg. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1977."},{"key":"9238_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lipton, P. (2004), Inference to the Best Explanation (2nd edition), London: Routledge, 2004.","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203470855"},{"key":"9238_CR25","unstructured":"Lycan, W.G. (1988), Judgment and Justification, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988."},{"key":"9238_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Makinson, D. (1966), \u2018On some completeness theorems in modal logic\u2019, Zeitschrift f\u00fcr mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 12 (1966), 379\u2013384.","DOI":"10.1002\/malq.19660120131"},{"key":"9238_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pardo, M.S., and R.J. Allen (2008), \u2018Juridical Proof and the Best Explanation\u2019, Law and Philosophy 27:3 (2008), 223\u2013268.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10982-007-9016-4"},{"key":"9238_CR28","unstructured":"Pennigton, N., and R. Hastie (1991), \u2018A Cognitive Model of Juror Decision Making: The Story Model\u2019, Cardozo Law Review 13:5 (1991): 519\u2013557."},{"key":"9238_CR29","unstructured":"Suppes, P. (1957), Introduction to Logic, Princeton: van Nostrand, 1957."},{"key":"9238_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Suppes, P. (1972), \u2018Finite equal-interval measurement structures\u2019, Theoria 38 (1972), 45\u201363.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-2567.1972.tb00923.x"},{"key":"9238_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Thagard, P.R. (1978), \u2018The Best Explanation: Criteria for Theory Choice\u2019, Journal of Philosophy 75:2 (1978), 76\u201392.","DOI":"10.2307\/2025686"}],"container-title":["Studia Logica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11225-010-9238-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11225-010-9238-6\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11225-010-9238-6","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,1]],"date-time":"2019-06-01T10:24:46Z","timestamp":1559384686000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11225-010-9238-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,3,24]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,4]]}},"alternative-id":["9238"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11225-010-9238-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["0039-3215","1572-8730"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0039-3215","type":"print"},{"value":"1572-8730","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,3,24]]}}}