{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,10]],"date-time":"2026-01-10T03:11:08Z","timestamp":1768014668905,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,3]],"date-time":"2024-05-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1714694400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,3]],"date-time":"2024-05-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1714694400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004281","name":"Narodowe Centrum Nauki","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["UMO-2017\/25\/B\/HS1\/00503"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["UMO-2017\/25\/B\/HS1\/00503"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004281","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Stud Logica"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:p>A non-Fregean framework aims to provide a formal tool for reasoning about semantic denotations of sentences and their interactions. Extending a logic to its non-Fregean version involves introducing a new connective <jats:inline-formula>\n              <jats:alternatives>\n                <jats:tex-math>$$\\equiv $$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:mo>\u2261<\/mml:mo>\n                <\/mml:math>\n              <\/jats:alternatives>\n            <\/jats:inline-formula> that allows to separate denotations of sentences from their logical values. Intuitively, <jats:inline-formula>\n              <jats:alternatives>\n                <jats:tex-math>$$\\equiv $$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:mo>\u2261<\/mml:mo>\n                <\/mml:math>\n              <\/jats:alternatives>\n            <\/jats:inline-formula> combines two sentences <jats:inline-formula>\n              <jats:alternatives>\n                <jats:tex-math>$$\\varphi $$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:mi>\u03c6<\/mml:mi>\n                <\/mml:math>\n              <\/jats:alternatives>\n            <\/jats:inline-formula> and <jats:inline-formula>\n              <jats:alternatives>\n                <jats:tex-math>$$\\psi $$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:mi>\u03c8<\/mml:mi>\n                <\/mml:math>\n              <\/jats:alternatives>\n            <\/jats:inline-formula> into a true one whenever <jats:inline-formula>\n              <jats:alternatives>\n                <jats:tex-math>$$\\varphi $$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:mi>\u03c6<\/mml:mi>\n                <\/mml:math>\n              <\/jats:alternatives>\n            <\/jats:inline-formula> and <jats:inline-formula>\n              <jats:alternatives>\n                <jats:tex-math>$$\\psi $$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:mi>\u03c8<\/mml:mi>\n                <\/mml:math>\n              <\/jats:alternatives>\n            <\/jats:inline-formula> have the same semantic correlates, describe the same situations, or have the same content or meaning. The paper aims to compare non-Fregean paraconsistent Grzegorczyk\u2019s logics (Logic of Descriptions <jats:inline-formula>\n              <jats:alternatives>\n                <jats:tex-math>$$\\textsf{LD}$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:mi>LD<\/mml:mi>\n                <\/mml:math>\n              <\/jats:alternatives>\n            <\/jats:inline-formula>, Logic of Descriptions with Suszko\u2019s Axioms <jats:inline-formula>\n              <jats:alternatives>\n                <jats:tex-math>$$\\textsf{LDS}$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:mi>LDS<\/mml:mi>\n                <\/mml:math>\n              <\/jats:alternatives>\n            <\/jats:inline-formula>, Logic of Equimeaning <jats:inline-formula>\n              <jats:alternatives>\n                <jats:tex-math>$$\\textsf{LDE}$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:mi>LDE<\/mml:mi>\n                <\/mml:math>\n              <\/jats:alternatives>\n            <\/jats:inline-formula>) with non-Fregean versions of certain well-known paraconsistent logics (Ja\u015bkowski\u2019s Discussive Logic <jats:inline-formula>\n              <jats:alternatives>\n                <jats:tex-math>$$\\textsf{D}_2$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:msub>\n                    <mml:mi>D<\/mml:mi>\n                    <mml:mn>2<\/mml:mn>\n                  <\/mml:msub>\n                <\/mml:math>\n              <\/jats:alternatives>\n            <\/jats:inline-formula>, Logic of Paradox <jats:inline-formula>\n              <jats:alternatives>\n                <jats:tex-math>$$\\textsf{LP}$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:mi>LP<\/mml:mi>\n                <\/mml:math>\n              <\/jats:alternatives>\n            <\/jats:inline-formula>, Logics of Formal Inconsistency <jats:inline-formula>\n              <jats:alternatives>\n                <jats:tex-math>$$\\textsf{LFI}{1}$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:mrow>\n                    <mml:mi>LFI<\/mml:mi>\n                    <mml:mn>1<\/mml:mn>\n                  <\/mml:mrow>\n                <\/mml:math>\n              <\/jats:alternatives>\n            <\/jats:inline-formula> and <jats:inline-formula>\n              <jats:alternatives>\n                <jats:tex-math>$$\\textsf{LFI}{2}$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:mrow>\n                    <mml:mi>LFI<\/mml:mi>\n                    <mml:mn>2<\/mml:mn>\n                  <\/mml:mrow>\n                <\/mml:math>\n              <\/jats:alternatives>\n            <\/jats:inline-formula>). We prove that Grzegorczyk\u2019s logics are either weaker than or incomparable to non-Fregean extensions of <jats:inline-formula>\n              <jats:alternatives>\n                <jats:tex-math>$$\\textsf{LP}$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:mi>LP<\/mml:mi>\n                <\/mml:math>\n              <\/jats:alternatives>\n            <\/jats:inline-formula>, <jats:inline-formula>\n              <jats:alternatives>\n                <jats:tex-math>$$\\textsf{LFI}{1}$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:mrow>\n                    <mml:mi>LFI<\/mml:mi>\n                    <mml:mn>1<\/mml:mn>\n                  <\/mml:mrow>\n                <\/mml:math>\n              <\/jats:alternatives>\n            <\/jats:inline-formula>, <jats:inline-formula>\n              <jats:alternatives>\n                <jats:tex-math>$$\\textsf{LFI}{2}$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:mrow>\n                    <mml:mi>LFI<\/mml:mi>\n                    <mml:mn>2<\/mml:mn>\n                  <\/mml:mrow>\n                <\/mml:math>\n              <\/jats:alternatives>\n            <\/jats:inline-formula>. Furthermore, we show that non-Fregean extensions of <jats:inline-formula>\n              <jats:alternatives>\n                <jats:tex-math>$$\\textsf{LP}$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:mi>LP<\/mml:mi>\n                <\/mml:math>\n              <\/jats:alternatives>\n            <\/jats:inline-formula>, <jats:inline-formula>\n              <jats:alternatives>\n                <jats:tex-math>$$\\textsf{LFI}{1}$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:mrow>\n                    <mml:mi>LFI<\/mml:mi>\n                    <mml:mn>1<\/mml:mn>\n                  <\/mml:mrow>\n                <\/mml:math>\n              <\/jats:alternatives>\n            <\/jats:inline-formula>, <jats:inline-formula>\n              <jats:alternatives>\n                <jats:tex-math>$$\\textsf{LFI}{2}$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:mrow>\n                    <mml:mi>LFI<\/mml:mi>\n                    <mml:mn>2<\/mml:mn>\n                  <\/mml:mrow>\n                <\/mml:math>\n              <\/jats:alternatives>\n            <\/jats:inline-formula>, and <jats:inline-formula>\n              <jats:alternatives>\n                <jats:tex-math>$$\\textsf{D}_2$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:msub>\n                    <mml:mi>D<\/mml:mi>\n                    <mml:mn>2<\/mml:mn>\n                  <\/mml:msub>\n                <\/mml:math>\n              <\/jats:alternatives>\n            <\/jats:inline-formula> are more expressive than their original counterparts. Our results highlight that the non-Fregean connective <jats:inline-formula>\n              <jats:alternatives>\n                <jats:tex-math>$$\\equiv $$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                  <mml:mo>\u2261<\/mml:mo>\n                <\/mml:math>\n              <\/jats:alternatives>\n            <\/jats:inline-formula> can serve as a tool for expressing various properties of the ontology underlying the logics under consideration.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11225-024-10114-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,3]],"date-time":"2024-05-03T05:02:00Z","timestamp":1714712520000},"page":"915-953","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Paraconsistency in Non-Fregean Framework"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"113","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8546-2615","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Joanna","family":"Goli\u0144ska-Pilarek","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"10114_CR1","unstructured":"Anderson, A.R., and N.D. Belnap, Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, vol.\u00a01, Princeton University Press, 1975."},{"key":"10114_CR2","unstructured":"Anderson, A.R., N.D. Belnap, and J.\u00a0Michael Dunn, Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, vol.\u00a02, Princeton University Press, 1992."},{"issue":"1","key":"10114_CR3","first-page":"103","volume":"16","author":"FG Asenjo","year":"1966","unstructured":"Asenjo, F.G., A calculus for antinomies, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 16(1):103\u2013105, 1966.","journal-title":"Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic"},{"key":"10114_CR4","volume-title":"Handbook of Paraconsistency","author":"J-Y B\u00e9ziau","year":"2007","unstructured":"B\u00e9ziau, J.-Y., W. Carnielli, and D. Gabbay, Handbook of Paraconsistency, King\u2019s College, London, 2007."},{"issue":"1","key":"10114_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02124265","volume":"28","author":"SL Bloom","year":"1971","unstructured":"Bloom, S.L., and R. Suszko, Semantics for the sentential calculus with identity, Studia Logica 28(1):77\u201381, 1971.","journal-title":"Studia Logica"},{"issue":"3","key":"10114_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1305\/ndjfl\/1093890617","volume":"13","author":"SL Bloom","year":"1972","unstructured":"Bloom, S.L., and R. Suszko, Investigations into the sentential calculus with identity, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 13(3):289\u2013308, 1972.","journal-title":"Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic"},{"key":"10114_CR7","volume-title":"Paraconsistent Logic: Consistency","author":"W Carnielli","year":"2016","unstructured":"Carnielli, W., and M.E. Coniglio, Paraconsistent Logic: Consistency, Contradiction and Negation, Springer Cham, 2016."},{"key":"10114_CR8","series-title":"Springer","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Handbook of Philosophical Logic","author":"W Carnielli","year":"2007","unstructured":"Carnielli, W., M.E. Coniglio, and J. Marcos, Logics of Formal Inconsistency, in D.\u00a0Gabbay, and F.\u00a0Guenthner, (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol.\u00a014, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2007, pp. 1\u201393."},{"key":"10114_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Carnielli, W.A., and J. Marcos, A taxonomy of C-systems, in W.\u00a0Carnielli, M.E.\u00a0Coniglio, and I.M.L. D\u2019Ottaviano, (eds.), Paraconsistency: The Logical Way to the Inconsistent. Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress on Paraconsistency (WCP 2000), vol. 228 of Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2002, pp. 1\u201394.","DOI":"10.1201\/9780203910139.pt1"},{"issue":"2","key":"10114_CR10","first-page":"81","volume":"37","author":"J Ciuciura","year":"2008","unstructured":"Ciuciura, J., Frontiers of the discursive logic, Bulletin of the Section of Logic 37(2):81\u201392, 2008.","journal-title":"Bulletin of the Section of Logic"},{"issue":"55","key":"10114_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1515\/slgr-2015-0036","volume":"42","author":"J Ciuciura","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ciuciura, J., Algebraization of Ja\u015bkowski\u2019s paraconsistent logic $${\\sf D}_{2}$$, Studies in Logic Grammar and Rhetoric 42(55):173\u2013193, 2015.","journal-title":"Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric"},{"key":"10114_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1002\/9781444314847.ch15","volume-title":"A Companion to Latin American Philosophy","author":"NCA Da Costa","year":"2009","unstructured":"Da\u00a0Costa, N.C.A., and O. Bueno, Paraconsistent logic, in S.\u00a0Nuccetelli, O.\u00a0Schutte, and O.\u00a0Bueno, (eds.), A Companion to Latin American Philosophy, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 2009, pp. 215\u2013229."},{"key":"10114_CR13","first-page":"7","volume":"4","author":"NCA Da Costa","year":"1975","unstructured":"Da\u00a0Costa, N.C.A., Remarks on Ja\u015bkowski\u2019s discussive logic, Reports on Mathematical Logic 4:7\u201316, 1975.","journal-title":"Reports on Mathematical Logic"},{"key":"10114_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Da\u00a0Costa, N.C.A., and L. Dubikajtis, On Ja\u015bkowski\u2019s discussive logic, in A.I. Arruda, N.C.A da\u00a0Costa, and R.\u00a0Chuaqui, (eds.), Non Classical Logics, Model Theory and Computability, North-Holland, 1977, pp. 37\u201356.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0049-237X(08)70644-X"},{"issue":"5","key":"10114_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1002\/malq.200510042","volume":"52","author":"J Goli\u0144ska-Pilarek","year":"2006","unstructured":"Goli\u0144ska-Pilarek, J., Number of non-Fregean sentential logics that have adequate models, Mathematical Logic Quarterly 52(5):439\u2013443, 2006.","journal-title":"Mathematical Logic Quarterly"},{"key":"10114_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Goli\u0144ska-Pilarek, J., On the minimal non-Fregean Grzegorczyk\u2019s logic, Studia Logica 104(2):209\u2013234, 2016.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11225-015-9635-y"},{"issue":"2","key":"10114_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-004-6366-3","volume":"34","author":"J Goli\u0144ska-Pilarek","year":"2005","unstructured":"Goli\u0144ska-Pilarek, J., and T. Huuskonen, Number of extensions of non-Fregean logics, Journal of Philosophical Logic 34(2):193\u2013206, 2005.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"10114_CR18","first-page":"63","volume":"40","author":"J Goli\u0144ska-Pilarek","year":"2012","unstructured":"Goli\u0144ska-Pilarek, J., and T. Huuskonen, Logic of descriptions. A new approach to the foundations of mathematics and science, Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 40, 63\u201394, 2012.","journal-title":"A new approach to the foundations of mathematics and science, Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric"},{"issue":"2","key":"10114_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1215\/00294527-3470547","volume":"57","author":"J Goli\u0144ska-Pilarek","year":"2016","unstructured":"Goli\u0144ska-Pilarek, J., and T. Huuskonen, Non-Fregean propositional logic with quantifiers, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 57(2):249\u2013279, 2016.","journal-title":"Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic"},{"key":"10114_CR20","series-title":"Logic","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-58507-9_12","volume-title":"Applications of Formal Philosophy","author":"J Goli\u0144ska-Pilarek","year":"2017","unstructured":"Goli\u0144ska-Pilarek, J., and T. Huuskonen, Grzegorczyk\u2019s non-Fregean logics and their formal properties, in R.\u00a0Urbaniak, and G.\u00a0Payette, (eds.), Applications of Formal Philosophy, vol.\u00a014 of Logic, Argumentation and Reasoning, Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 243\u2013263."},{"key":"10114_CR21","first-page":"731","volume-title":"The Lvov-Warsaw School","author":"J Goli\u0144ska-Pilarek","year":"2018","unstructured":"Goli\u0144ska-Pilarek, J., and T. Huuskonen, A mystery of Grzegorczyk\u2019s logic of descriptions, in A.\u00a0Garrido, and U.\u00a0Wybraniec-Skardowska, (eds.), The Lvov-Warsaw School. Past and Present, Studies in Universal Logic, Springer Nature, 2018, pp. 731\u2013745."},{"issue":"4","key":"10114_CR22","first-page":"445","volume":"47","author":"A Grzegorczyk","year":"2012","unstructured":"Grzegorczyk, A., Filozofia logiki i formalna logika niesymplifikacyjna, Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa 47(4):445\u2013450, 2012.","journal-title":"Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa"},{"key":"10114_CR23","first-page":"57","volume":"1","author":"S Ja\u015bkowski","year":"1948","unstructured":"Ja\u015bkowski, S., Rachunek zda\u0144 dla system\u00f3w dedukcyjnych sprzecznych, Studia Societatis Scientiarum Torunensis 1:57\u201377, 1948.","journal-title":"Studia Societatis Scientiarum Torunensis"},{"key":"10114_CR24","first-page":"171","volume":"1","author":"S Ja\u015bkowski","year":"1949","unstructured":"Ja\u015bkowski, S., O koniunkcji dyskusyjnej w rachunku zda\u0144 dla system\u00f3w dedukcyjnych sprzecznych, Studia Societatis Scientiarum Torunensis 1:171\u2013172, 1949.","journal-title":"Studia Societatis Scientiarum Torunensis"},{"key":"10114_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02134311","volume":"24","author":"S Ja\u015bkowski","year":"1969","unstructured":"Ja\u015bkowski, S., Propositional calculus for contradictory deductive systems, Studia Logica 24:143\u2013157, 1969.","journal-title":"Studia Logica"},{"issue":"1","key":"10114_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02282553","volume":"27","author":"J Kotas","year":"1971","unstructured":"Kotas, J., On the algebra of classes of formulae of Ja\u015bkowski\u2019s discussive system, Studia Logica 27(1):81\u201390, 1971.","journal-title":"Studia Logica"},{"issue":"2","key":"10114_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02120494","volume":"33","author":"J Kotas","year":"1974","unstructured":"Kotas, J., The axiomatization of S. Ja\u015bkowski\u2019s discussive system, Studia Logica 33(2):195\u2013200, 1974.","journal-title":"Ja\u015bkowski\u2019s discussive system, Studia Logica"},{"issue":"3","key":"10114_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02123281","volume":"33","author":"J Kotas","year":"1974","unstructured":"Kotas, J., On quantity of logical values in the discussive $${\\sf D}_{2}$$ system and in modular logic, Studia Logica 33(3):273\u2013275, 1974.","journal-title":"Studia Logica"},{"key":"10114_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02123384","volume":"34","author":"J Kotas","year":"1975","unstructured":"Kotas, J., Discussive sentential calculus of Ja\u015bkowski, Studia Logica 34:149\u2013168, 1975.","journal-title":"Studia Logica"},{"issue":"1","key":"10114_CR30","first-page":"21","volume":"14","author":"G Malinowski","year":"1985","unstructured":"Malinowski, G., Non-Fregean logics and other formalizations of propositional identity, Bulletin of the Section of Logic 14(1):21\u201327, 1985.","journal-title":"Bulletin of the Section of Logic"},{"key":"10114_CR31","first-page":"45","volume":"38","author":"M Nasieniewski","year":"2009","unstructured":"Nasieniewski, M., and A. Pietruszczak, New axiomatizations of the weakest regular modal logic defining Ja\u015bkowski\u2019s logic $${\\sf D}_{2}$$, Bulletin of the Section of Logic 38:45\u201350, 2009.","journal-title":"Bulletin of the Section of Logic"},{"key":"10114_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-9011-6_6","volume-title":"Logic, Reasoning, and Rationality","author":"M Nasieniewski","year":"2014","unstructured":"Nasieniewski, M., and A. Pietruszczak, A method of generating modal logics defining Ja\u015bkowski\u2019s discussive $${\\sf D}_{2}$$ consequence, in E.\u00a0Weber, D.\u00a0Wouters, and J.\u00a0Meheus, (eds.), Logic, Reasoning, and Rationality, Springer Netherlands, 2014, pp. 95\u2013123."},{"key":"10114_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1163","DOI":"10.1007\/s11225-017-9780-6","volume":"106","author":"H Omori","year":"2018","unstructured":"Omori, H., and J. Alama, Axiomatizing Ja\u015bkowski\u2019s discussive logic $${\\sf D}_2$$, Studia Logica 106:1163\u20131180, 2018.","journal-title":"Studia Logica"},{"issue":"1","key":"10114_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00258428","volume":"8","author":"G Priest","year":"1979","unstructured":"Priest, G., The Logic of Paradox, Journal of Philosophical Logic 8(1):219\u2013241, 1979.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"10114_CR35","first-page":"287","volume-title":"Handbook of Philosophical Logic","author":"G Priest","year":"2006","unstructured":"Priest, G., Paraconsistent logic, in D.\u00a0Gabbay, and F.\u00a0Guenthner, (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol.\u00a06, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 2006, pp. 287\u2013393."},{"key":"10114_CR36","first-page":"129","volume-title":"Handbook of the History of Logic","author":"G Priest","year":"2007","unstructured":"Priest, G., Paraconsistency and Dialatheism, in D.\u00a0Gabbay, and J.\u00a0Woods, (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic, vol.\u00a08, North-Holland, 2007, pp. 129\u2013204."},{"key":"10114_CR37","first-page":"105","volume":"11","author":"R Suszko","year":"1968","unstructured":"Suszko, R., Non-Fregean logic and theories, Analele Universitatii Bucuresti, Acta Logica 11:105\u2013125, 1968.","journal-title":"Analele Universitatii Bucuresti, Acta Logica"},{"issue":"1","key":"10114_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02282541","volume":"27","author":"R Suszko","year":"1971","unstructured":"Suszko, R., Identity connective and modality, Studia Logica 27(1):7\u201339, 1971.","journal-title":"Studia Logica"},{"key":"10114_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Suszko, R., Abolition of the Fregean axiom, in R.\u00a0Parikh, (ed.), Logic Colloquium, vol. 453 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1975, pp. 169\u2013239.","DOI":"10.1007\/BFb0064874"},{"key":"10114_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.12775\/LLP.2001.003","volume":"9","author":"VL Vasyukov","year":"2001","unstructured":"Vasyukov, V.L., A new axiomatization of Ja\u015bkowski\u2019s discussive logic, Logic and Logical Philosophy 9:35\u201346, 2001.","journal-title":"Logic and Logical Philosophy"},{"key":"10114_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"W\u00f3jcicki, R., R. Suszko\u2019s situational semantics, Studia Logica 43(4):323\u2013340, 1984.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00370505"}],"container-title":["Studia Logica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11225-024-10114-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11225-024-10114-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11225-024-10114-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,5]],"date-time":"2025-09-05T19:12:27Z","timestamp":1757099547000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11225-024-10114-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,3]]},"references-count":41,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10114"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11225-024-10114-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["0039-3215","1572-8730"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0039-3215","type":"print"},{"value":"1572-8730","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"3 May 2024","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}