{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,13]],"date-time":"2025-06-13T11:24:07Z","timestamp":1749813847407},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2009,7,22]],"date-time":"2009-07-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1248220800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Synthese"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,11]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-009-9639-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,7,21]],"date-time":"2009-07-21T14:10:35Z","timestamp":1248185435000},"page":"271-289","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["The game of inquiry: the interrogative approach to inquiry and belief revision theory"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"171","author":[{"given":"Emmanuel J.","family":"Genot","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2009,7,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"9639_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00284974","volume":"20","author":"A. Fuhrmann","year":"1991","unstructured":"Fuhrmann A. (1991) Theory contraction through base contraction. Journal of Philosophical Logic 20: 175\u2013203","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"9639_CR2","volume-title":"Knowledge in flux. Modeling the dynamics of epistemic states","author":"P. G\u00e4rdenfors","year":"1988","unstructured":"G\u00e4rdenfors P. (1988) Knowledge in flux. Modeling the dynamics of epistemic states. The MIT Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9639_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Genot, E. J. (2009). Extensive question: from research agendas to interrogative strategies. In R. Ramanujam & S. Surakkai (Eds.), Logic and its applications. Lecture notes in computer science (vol. 5378\/2009, pp. 131\u2013145). Springer","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-92701-3_9"},{"key":"9639_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00370186","volume":"50","author":"S. O. Hansson","year":"1991","unstructured":"Hansson S. O. (1991) Belief contraction without recovery. Studia Logica 50: 251\u2013260","journal-title":"Studia Logica"},{"key":"9639_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.21825\/philosophica.82548","volume":"35","author":"J. Hintikka","year":"1985","unstructured":"Hintikka J. (1985) A spectrum of logics of questioning. Philosophica 35: 135\u2013150","journal-title":"Philosophica"},{"issue":"3","key":"9639_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00167730","volume":"26","author":"J. Hintikka","year":"1987","unstructured":"Hintikka J. (1987) The interrogative approach to inquiry and probabilistic inference. Erkenntnis 26(3): 429\u2013442","journal-title":"Erkenntnis"},{"key":"9639_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00869551","volume":"74","author":"J. Hintikka","year":"1988","unstructured":"Hintikka J. (1988) What is the logic of experimental inquiry?. Synthese 74: 173\u2013190","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"9639_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-9313-7","volume-title":"Inquiry as inquiry: A logic of scientific discovery","author":"J. Hintikka","year":"1999","unstructured":"Hintikka J. (1999) Inquiry as inquiry: A logic of scientific discovery. Kluwer, Dordrecht"},{"key":"9639_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511619298.008","volume-title":"Socratic epistemology. Chap. 7","author":"J. Hintikka","year":"2007","unstructured":"Hintikka J. (2007) Logical explanations. In: Hintikka J. (eds) Socratic epistemology. Chap. 7. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 161\u2013188"},{"key":"9639_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511619298","volume-title":"Socratic epistemology","author":"J. Hintikka","year":"2007","unstructured":"Hintikka J. (2007) Socratic epistemology. Cambridge University Press, London"},{"key":"9639_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-9313-7_3","volume-title":"Inquiry as inquiry: A logic of scientific discovery","author":"J. Hintikka","year":"1999","unstructured":"Hintikka J., Halonen I., Mutanen A. (1999) Interrogative logic as a general theory of reasoning\u2019. In: Hintikka J. (eds) Inquiry as inquiry: A logic of scientific discovery. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 47\u201390"},{"key":"9639_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1022931929726","volume":"73","author":"I. Levi","year":"2003","unstructured":"Levi I. (2003) Counterexamples to recovery and the filtering conditon. Studia Logica 73: 209\u2013218","journal-title":"Studia Logica"},{"key":"9639_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/0199270708.001.0001","volume-title":"Mild contraction","author":"I. Levi","year":"2004","unstructured":"Levi I. (2004) Mild contraction. Oxford University Press, NY, USA"},{"key":"9639_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1007\/BFb0018418","volume-title":"The logic of theory change","author":"S. Lindstr\u00f6m","year":"1991","unstructured":"Lindstr\u00f6m S., Rabinowicz W. (1991) Epistemic entrenchment with incomparabilities and relational belief revision. In: Fuhrmann A., Morreau M. (eds) The logic of theory change. Springer, Berlin, pp 93\u2013126"},{"key":"9639_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1007\/s10670-006-9001-6","volume":"65","author":"E. J. Olsson","year":"2006","unstructured":"Olsson E. J., Westlund D. (2006) On the role of research agenda in epistemic change. Erkenntnis 65: 165\u2013183","journal-title":"Erkenntnis"},{"key":"9639_CR16","volume-title":"A course in game theory","author":"M. J. Osborne","year":"1994","unstructured":"Osborne M. J., Rubinstein A. (1994) A course in game theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9639_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1023\/B:SYNT.0000024914.61925.5b","volume":"139","author":"H. Rott","year":"2004","unstructured":"Rott H. (2004) A counterexample to six fundamental principles of belief formation. Synthese 139: 61\u201376","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"9639_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-86718-7","volume-title":"First-order logic","author":"R. Smullyan","year":"1968","unstructured":"Smullyan R. (1968) First-order logic. Springer, Berlin"},{"key":"9639_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-8406-7","volume-title":"The posing of questions","author":"A. Wi\u015bniewski","year":"1995","unstructured":"Wi\u015bniewski A. (1995) The posing of questions. Kluwer, Dordrecht"}],"container-title":["Synthese"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-009-9639-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11229-009-9639-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-009-9639-0","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,26]],"date-time":"2023-05-26T02:31:35Z","timestamp":1685068295000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11229-009-9639-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2009,7,22]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,11]]}},"alternative-id":["9639"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-009-9639-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["0039-7857","1573-0964"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0039-7857","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-0964","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2009,7,22]]}}}