{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,2]],"date-time":"2026-03-02T22:56:28Z","timestamp":1772492188991,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,11]],"date-time":"2014-09-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1410393600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Synthese"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,1]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-014-0553-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,10]],"date-time":"2014-09-10T05:57:33Z","timestamp":1410328653000},"page":"67-78","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Disagreement, peerhood, and three paradoxes of Conciliationism"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"192","author":[{"given":"Thomas","family":"Mulligan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"553_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1215\/00318108-2006-035","volume":"116","author":"D Christensen","year":"2007","unstructured":"Christensen, D. (2007). Epistemology of disagreement: The good news. Philosophical Review, 116, 187\u2013217.","journal-title":"Philosophical Review"},{"key":"553_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"756","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1747-9991.2009.00237.x","volume":"4","author":"D Christensen","year":"2009","unstructured":"Christensen, D. (2009). Disagreement as evidence: The epistemology of controversy. Philosophy Compass, 4, 756\u2013767.","journal-title":"Philosophy Compass"},{"key":"553_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1933-1592.2010.00366.x","volume":"81","author":"D Christensen","year":"2010","unstructured":"Christensen, D. (2010). Higher-order evidence. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81, 185\u2013215.","journal-title":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research"},{"key":"553_CR4","unstructured":"Christensen, D. (2011). Disagreement, question-begging and epistemic self-criticism. Philosophers\u2019 Im-print, 11, 1\u201322."},{"key":"553_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199698370.001.0001","volume-title":"The epistemology of disagreement: New essays","author":"D Christensen","year":"2013","unstructured":"Christensen, D. (2013). Epistemic modesty defended. In D. Christensen & J. Lackey (Eds.), The epistemology of disagreement: New essays (pp. 77\u201397). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"553_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"478","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-0068.2007.00656.x","volume":"41","author":"A Elga","year":"2007","unstructured":"Elga, A. (2007). Reflection and disagreement. No\u00fbs, 41, 478\u2013502.","journal-title":"No\u00fbs"},{"key":"553_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199226078.003.0008","volume-title":"Disagreement","author":"A Elga","year":"2010","unstructured":"Elga, A. (2010). How to disagree about how to disagree. In R. Feldman & T. A. Warfield (Eds.), Disagreement (pp. 175\u2013186). New York: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"553_CR8","first-page":"216","volume-title":"Epistemology futures","author":"R Feldman","year":"2006","unstructured":"Feldman, R. (2006). Epistemological puzzles about disagreement. In S. Hetherington (Ed.), Epistemology futures (pp. 216\u2013236). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"553_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780195173079.003.0016","volume-title":"Philosophers without gods: Meditations on atheism and the secular life","author":"R Feldman","year":"2007","unstructured":"Feldman, R. (2007). Reasonable religious disagreements. In L. M. Antony (Ed.), Philosophers without gods: Meditations on atheism and the secular life (pp. 194\u2013214). New York: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"553_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"507","DOI":"10.5840\/logos-episteme2011242","volume":"2","author":"A Gelfert","year":"2011","unstructured":"Gelfert, A. (2011). Who is an epistemic peer? Logos & Episteme, 2, 507\u2013514.","journal-title":"Logos & Episteme"},{"key":"553_CR11","volume-title":"Religious belief and religious skepticism","author":"G Gutting","year":"1982","unstructured":"Gutting, G. (1982). Religious belief and religious skepticism. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press."},{"key":"553_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780199285891.003.0007","volume-title":"Oxford studies in epistemology","author":"T Kelly","year":"2005","unstructured":"Kelly, T. (2005). The epistemic significance of disagreement. In T. S. Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Oxford studies in epistemology (Vol. 1, pp. 167\u2013196). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"553_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199226078.003.0007","volume-title":"Disagreement","author":"T Kelly","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kelly, T. (2010). Peer disagreement and higher-order evidence. In R. Feldman & T. A. Warfield (Eds.), Disagreement (pp. 111\u2013174). New York: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"553_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199698370.003.0003","volume-title":"The epistemology of disagreement: New essays","author":"T Kelly","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kelly, T. (2013). Disagreement and the burdens of judgment. In D. Christensen & J. Lackey (Eds.), The epistemology of disagreement: New essays (pp. 31\u201353). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"553_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-2567.2012.01149.x","volume":"79","author":"A Konigsberg","year":"2013","unstructured":"Konigsberg, A. (2013). The problem with uniform solutions to peer disagreement. Theoria, 79, 96\u2013126.","journal-title":"Theoria"},{"key":"553_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199226078.003.0003","volume-title":"Disagreement","author":"H Kornblith","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kornblith, H. (2010). Belief in the face of controversy. In R. Feldman & T. A. Warfield (Eds.), Disagreement (pp. 29\u201352). New York: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"553_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199577477.003.0015","volume-title":"Social epistemology","author":"J Lackey","year":"2010","unstructured":"Lackey, J. (2010). A justificationist view of disagreement\u2019s epistemic significance. In A. Haddock, A. Millar, & D. Pritchard (Eds.), Social epistemology (pp. 298\u2013325). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"553_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1080\/00048402.2013.829506","volume":"92","author":"E Lord","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lord, E. (2014). From independence to conciliationism: An obituary. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 92, 365\u2013377.","journal-title":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"553_CR19","unstructured":"Pittard, J. (manuscript). Resolute conciliationism. Retrieved 28 Aug 2014 from http:\/\/www.johnpittard.com\/John_Pittard\/Research_files\/Pittard.%20Resolute%20Conciliationism.pdf ."},{"key":"553_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"278","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199577477.003.0014","volume-title":"Social epistemology","author":"E Sosa","year":"2010","unstructured":"Sosa, E. (2010). The epistemology of disagreement. In A. Haddock, A. Millar, & D. Pritchard (Eds.), Social epistemology (pp. 278\u2013297). Oxford: Oxford University Press."}],"container-title":["Synthese"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-014-0553-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11229-014-0553-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-014-0553-8","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,2]],"date-time":"2024-06-02T10:42:32Z","timestamp":1717324952000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11229-014-0553-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,11]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,1]]}},"alternative-id":["553"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-014-0553-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["0039-7857","1573-0964"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0039-7857","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-0964","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,11]]}}}