{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,17]],"date-time":"2026-04-17T15:53:34Z","timestamp":1776441214817,"version":"3.51.2"},"reference-count":124,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,22]],"date-time":"2015-07-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1437523200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Synthese"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,6]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-015-0815-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,21]],"date-time":"2015-07-21T14:27:24Z","timestamp":1437488844000},"page":"1833-1873","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":40,"title":["A normative framework for argument quality: argumentation schemes with a Bayesian foundation"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"193","author":[{"given":"Ulrike","family":"Hahn","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jos","family":"Hornikx","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"815_CR1","volume-title":"A theory of legal argumentation","author":"R Alexy","year":"1989","unstructured":"Alexy, R. (1989). A theory of legal argumentation. Oxford: Clarendon Press."},{"key":"815_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1215\/00294527-2010-025","volume":"51","author":"D Atkinson","year":"2010","unstructured":"Atkinson, D., & Peijnenburg, J. (2010). Justification by infinite loops. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 51, 407\u2013416.","journal-title":"Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic"},{"key":"815_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1023\/B:ARTI.0000046007.11806.9a","volume":"11","author":"F Bex","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bex, F., Prakken, H., Reed, C., & Walton, D. (2003). Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence: Argumentation schemes and generalisations. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 11, 125\u2013165.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence and Law"},{"key":"815_CR4","volume-title":"Pattern recognition and machine learning","author":"CM Bishop","year":"2006","unstructured":"Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern recognition and machine learning. New York: Springer."},{"key":"815_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/047172212X","volume-title":"Introduction to Bayesian statistics","author":"WM Bolstad","year":"2004","unstructured":"Bolstad, W. M. (2004). Introduction to Bayesian statistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley."},{"key":"815_CR6","volume-title":"Bayesian epistemology","author":"L Bovens","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bovens, L., & Hartmann, S. (2003). Bayesian epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"815_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1020913625002","volume":"57","author":"L Bovens","year":"2002","unstructured":"Bovens, L., & Olsson, E. J. (2002). Believing more, risking less: On coherence, truth and non-trivial extensions. Erkenntnis, 57, 137\u2013150.","journal-title":"Erkenntnis"},{"key":"815_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tics.2006.05.007","volume":"10","author":"N Chater","year":"2006","unstructured":"Chater, N., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Yuille, A. (2006). Probabilistic models of cognition: Conceptual foundations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 287\u2013291.","journal-title":"Trends in Cognitive Sciences"},{"key":"815_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1007889322192","volume":"14","author":"U Christmann","year":"2000","unstructured":"Christmann, U., Mischo, C., & Flender, J. (2000a). Argumentational integrity: A training program for dealing with unfair argumentational contributions. Argumentation, 14, 339\u2013360.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"815_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1177\/0261927X00019003003","volume":"19","author":"U Christmann","year":"2000","unstructured":"Christmann, U., Mischo, C., & Groeben, N. (2000b). Components of the evaluation of integrity violations in argumentative discussions: Relevant factors and their relationships. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19, 315\u2013341.","journal-title":"Journal of Language and Social Psychology"},{"key":"815_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.1016\/0169-2070(89)90012-5","volume":"5","author":"RT Clemen","year":"1989","unstructured":"Clemen, R. T. (1989). Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography. International Journal of Forecasting, 5, 559\u2013583.","journal-title":"International Journal of Forecasting"},{"key":"815_CR12","first-page":"199","volume":"15","author":"A Corner","year":"2009","unstructured":"Corner, A., & Hahn, U. (2009). Evaluating science arguments: Evidence, uncertainty, uncertainty, and argument strength. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 199\u2013212.","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied"},{"key":"815_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3579","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-012-0211-y","volume":"190","author":"A Corner","year":"2013","unstructured":"Corner, A., & Hahn, U. (2013). Normative theories of argumentation: Are some norms better than others? Synthese, 190, 3579\u20133610.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"815_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jml.2010.10.002","volume":"64","author":"A Corner","year":"2011","unstructured":"Corner, A., Hahn, U., & Oaksford, M. (2011). The psychological mechanism of the slippery slope argument. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 153\u2013170.","journal-title":"Journal of Memory and Language"},{"key":"815_CR15","volume-title":"Essai sur l\u2019Application de l\u2019Analyse \u00e0 la Probabilit\u00e9 des D\u00e9cisions Rendues \u00e0 la Pluralit\u00e9 des Voix","author":"NC Condorcet de","year":"1785","unstructured":"de Condorcet, N. C. (1785). Essai sur l\u2019Application de l\u2019Analyse \u00e0 la Probabilit\u00e9 des D\u00e9cisions Rendues \u00e0 la Pluralit\u00e9 des Voix. Paris: Imprimerie Royale."},{"key":"815_CR16","first-page":"129","volume-title":"Minds, machines and evolution","author":"DC Dennett","year":"1984","unstructured":"Dennett, D. C. (1984). Cognitive wheels: The frame problem of AI. In C. Hookaway (Ed.), Minds, machines and evolution (pp. 129\u2013151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"815_CR17","volume-title":"The psychology of attitudes","author":"AH Eagly","year":"1993","unstructured":"Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Belmont, CA: Thompson\/ Wadsworth."},{"key":"815_CR18","volume-title":"Bayes or bust?","author":"J Earman","year":"1992","unstructured":"Earman, J. (1992). Bayes or bust?. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press."},{"key":"815_CR19","volume-title":"Influence, belief, and argument: an introduction to responsible persuasion","author":"D Ehninger","year":"1974","unstructured":"Ehninger, D. (1974). Influence, belief, and argument: an introduction to responsible persuasion. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman."},{"key":"815_CR20","volume-title":"Decision by debate","author":"D Ehningner","year":"1963","unstructured":"Ehningner, D., & Brockriede, W. (1963). Decision by debate. New York: Dodd, Mead."},{"key":"815_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780198525134.001.0001","volume-title":"If","author":"J StB T Evans","year":"2004","unstructured":"Evans, J. St B T., & Over, D. E. (2004). If. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"3","key":"815_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/10691898.1997.11910597","volume":"5","author":"R Falk","year":"1997","unstructured":"Falk, R., & Well, A. D. (1997). Many faces of the correlation coefficient. Journal of Statistics Education, 5(3), 1\u201318.","journal-title":"Journal of Statistics Education"},{"key":"815_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"652","DOI":"10.1086\/289982","volume":"63","author":"B Fitelson","year":"1996","unstructured":"Fitelson, B. (1996). Wayne, Horwich and evidential diversity. Philosophy of Science, 63, 652\u2013660.","journal-title":"Philosophy of Science"},{"key":"815_CR24","first-page":"1142","volume":"82","author":"R Forsythe","year":"1992","unstructured":"Forsythe, R., Nelson, F., Neumann, G. R., & Wright, J. (1992). Anatomy of an experimental political stock market. The American Economic Review, 82, 1142\u20131161.","journal-title":"The American Economic Review"},{"key":"815_CR25","volume-title":"Safe and sound","author":"J Fox","year":"2000","unstructured":"Fox, J., & Das, S. (2000). Safe and sound. Menlo Park: AAAI Press."},{"key":"815_CR26","first-page":"263","volume-title":"Fallacies: Classical and contemporary readings","author":"JB Freeman","year":"1995","unstructured":"Freeman, J. B. (1995). The appeal to popularity and presumption by common knowledge. In H. V. Hansen & R. C. Pinto (Eds.), Fallacies: Classical and contemporary readings (pp. 263\u2013273). University Park: University of Pennsylvania Press."},{"key":"815_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1038\/075450a0","volume":"75","author":"F Galton","year":"1907","unstructured":"Galton, F. (1907). Vox populi. Nature, 75, 450\u2013451.","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"815_CR28","volume-title":"Argumentatieschema\u2019s in pragma-dialectisch perspectief: Een theoretisch en empirisch onderzoek","author":"BJ Garssen","year":"1997","unstructured":"Garssen, B. J. (1997). Argumentatieschema\u2019s in pragma-dialectisch perspectief: Een theoretisch en empirisch onderzoek. Amsterdam: IFOTT."},{"key":"815_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.121.1.149","volume":"121","author":"D Gigone","year":"1997","unstructured":"Gigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1997). Proper analysis of the accuracy of group judgments. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 149\u2013167.","journal-title":"Psychological Bulletin"},{"key":"815_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9337.2006.00331.x","volume":"19","author":"DM Godden","year":"2006","unstructured":"Godden, D. M., & Walton, D. N. (2006). Argument from expert opinion as legal evidence: Critical questions and admissibility criteria of expert testimony in the American legal system. Ratio Juris, 19, 261\u2013286.","journal-title":"Ratio Juris"},{"key":"815_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"398","DOI":"10.1037\/h0074666","volume":"7","author":"K Gordon","year":"1924","unstructured":"Gordon, K. (1924). Group judgments in the field of lifted weights. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 7, 398\u2013400.","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Psychology"},{"key":"815_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_12","volume-title":"Argumentation in artificial intelligence","author":"TF Gordon","year":"2009","unstructured":"Gordon, T. F., & Walton, D. (2009). Proof burdens and standards. In I. Rahwan & G. Simari (Eds.), Argumentation in artificial intelligence (pp. 239\u2013260). Berlin: Springer."},{"key":"815_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"875","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.010","volume":"171","author":"T Gordon","year":"2007","unstructured":"Gordon, T., Prakken, H., & Walton, D. (2007). The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artificial Intelligence, 171, 875\u2013896.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"815_CR34","volume-title":"Signal detection theory and psycho-physics","author":"DM Green","year":"1966","unstructured":"Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psycho-physics. New York: Wiley."},{"key":"815_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00125672","volume":"15","author":"B Grofman","year":"1983","unstructured":"Grofman, B., Owen, G., & Feld, S. L. (1983). Thirteen theorems in search of the truth. Theory and Decision, 15, 261\u2013278.","journal-title":"Theory and Decision"},{"key":"815_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1177\/1745691611400240","volume":"6","author":"U Hahn","year":"2011","unstructured":"Hahn, U. (2011). The problem of circularity in evidence, argument and explanation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 172\u2013182.","journal-title":"Perspectives on Psychological Science"},{"key":"815_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hahn, U. (2014). The Bayesian boom: Good thing or bad? Frontiers in Cognitive Science, 5, Article 765.","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2014.00765"},{"key":"815_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v29i4.2903","volume":"29","author":"U Hahn","year":"2009","unstructured":"Hahn, U., Harris, A. J. L., & Corner, A. J. (2009). Argument content and argument source: An exploration. Informal Logic, 29, 337\u2013367.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"815_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-005-5233-2","volume":"152","author":"U Hahn","year":"2006","unstructured":"Hahn, U., & Oaksford, M. (2006a). A Bayesian approach to informal argument fallacies. Synthese, 152, 207\u2013236.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"815_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v26i1.428","volume":"26","author":"U Hahn","year":"2006","unstructured":"Hahn, U., & Oaksford, M. (2006b). Why a normative theory of argument strength and why might one want it to be Bayesian? Informal Logic, 26, 1\u201324.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"815_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"704","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-295X.114.3.704","volume":"114","author":"U Hahn","year":"2007","unstructured":"Hahn, U., & Oaksford, M. (2007a). The rationality of informal argumentation: A Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies. Psychological Review, 114, 704\u2013732.","journal-title":"Psychological Review"},{"key":"815_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-007-9022-6","volume":"21","author":"U Hahn","year":"2007","unstructured":"Hahn, U., & Oaksford, M. (2007b). The burden of proof and its role in argumentation. Argumentation, 21, 39\u201361.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"815_CR43","volume-title":"The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning","author":"U Hahn","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hahn, U., & Oaksford, M. (2012). Rational argument. In Holyoak & Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning. Oxford: Oxford university Press."},{"key":"815_CR44","unstructured":"Hahn, U., Oaksford, M. & Bayindir, H. (2005). How convinced should we be by negative evidence? In Proceedings of the 27th annual meeting of the cognitive science society."},{"key":"815_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hahn, U., Oaksford, M., & Harris, A. J. (2013). Testimony and argument: A Bayesian perspective. In F. Zenker (Ed.), Bayesian argumentation (pp. 15\u201328). Dordrecht: Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-5357-0_2"},{"key":"815_CR46","first-page":"173","volume-title":"The handbook of rational and social choice","author":"A Hajek","year":"2008","unstructured":"Hajek, A. (2008). Dutch book arguments. In P. Anand, P. Pattanaik, & C. Puppe (Eds.), The handbook of rational and social choice (pp. 173\u2013196). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"815_CR47","volume-title":"Fallacies","author":"CL Hamblin","year":"1970","unstructured":"Hamblin, C. L. (1970). Fallacies. London: Methuen."},{"key":"815_CR48","volume-title":"Judgment and decision making: Psychological perspectives","author":"D Hardman","year":"2009","unstructured":"Hardman, D. (2009). Judgment and decision making: Psychological perspectives. Chichester: BPS Blackwell."},{"key":"815_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"414","DOI":"10.1080\/13546783.2013.801367","volume":"19","author":"AJL Harris","year":"2013","unstructured":"Harris, A. J. L., Corner, A., & Hahn, U. (2013). James is polite and punctual (and useless): A Bayesian formalisation of faint praise. Thinking & Reasoning, 19, 414\u2013429.","journal-title":"Thinking & Reasoning"},{"key":"815_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Harris, A. J. L., Hahn, U., Hsu, A. S., & Madsen, J. K. (2015). The appeal to expert opinion: Quantitative support for a Bayesian network approach. Cognitive Science.","DOI":"10.1111\/cogs.12276"},{"key":"815_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1080\/13546783.2012.670753","volume":"18","author":"AJL Harris","year":"2012","unstructured":"Harris, A. J. L., Hsu, A. S., & Madsen, J. K. (2012). Because Hitler did it! Quantitative tests of Bayesian argumentation using ad hominem. Thinking and Reasoning, 18, 311\u2013343.","journal-title":"Thinking and Reasoning"},{"key":"815_CR52","unstructured":"Hastings, A. C. (1962). A reformulation of the modes of reasoning in argumentation. Unpublished dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL."},{"key":"815_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1080\/13546783.2013.807303","volume":"20","author":"H Hoeken","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hoeken, H., Sorm, E., & Schellens, P. J. (2014). Arguing about the likelihood of consequences: Laypeople\u2019s criteria to distinguish strong arguments from weak ones. Thinking and Reasoning, 20, 77\u201398.","journal-title":"Thinking and Reasoning"},{"key":"815_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"394","DOI":"10.1080\/13546783.2012.669986","volume":"18","author":"H Hoeken","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hoeken, H., Timmers, R., & Schellens, P. J. (2012). Arguing about desirable consequences: What constitutes a convincing argument? Thinking and Reasoning, 18, 394\u2013416.","journal-title":"Thinking and Reasoning"},{"key":"815_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1016\/0030-5073(78)90037-5","volume":"21","author":"R Hogarth","year":"1978","unstructured":"Hogarth, R. (1978). A note on aggregating opinions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21, 40\u201346.","journal-title":"Organizational Behavior and Human Performance"},{"key":"815_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"443","DOI":"10.1080\/03637750701716578","volume":"74","author":"J Hornikx","year":"2007","unstructured":"Hornikx, J., & Hoeken, H. (2007). Cultural differences in the persuasiveness of evidence types and evidence quality. Communication Monographs, 74, 443\u2013463.","journal-title":"Communication Monographs"},{"key":"815_CR57","volume-title":"Scientific reasoning: The Bayesian approach","author":"C Howson","year":"1993","unstructured":"Howson, C., & Urbach, P. (1993). Scientific reasoning: The Bayesian approach. La Salle, IL: Open Court."},{"key":"815_CR58","volume-title":"Critical thinking and communication: The use of reason in argument","author":"ES Inch","year":"2009","unstructured":"Inch, E. S., & Warnick, B. H. (2009). Critical thinking and communication: The use of reason in argument (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.","edition":"6"},{"key":"815_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Joensson, M., Hahn, U. & Olsson, E. (2015). The kind of group you want to belong to: Effects of group structure on group accuracy. Cognition. Online first.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2015.04.013"},{"key":"815_CR60","volume-title":"A probabilistic analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti evidence","author":"JB Kadane","year":"1996","unstructured":"Kadane, J. B., & Schum, D. A. (1996). A probabilistic analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti evidence. Chichester: Wiley."},{"key":"815_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1023\/B:ARGU.0000024044.34360.82","volume":"18","author":"J Katzav","year":"2004","unstructured":"Katzav, J., & Reed, C. A. (2004). On argumentation schemes and the natural classification of arguments. Argumentation, 18, 239\u2013259.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"815_CR62","volume-title":"Alltagslogik: Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern","author":"M Kienpointner","year":"1992","unstructured":"Kienpointner, M. (1992). Alltagslogik: Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Friedrich Frommann."},{"key":"815_CR63","volume-title":"Perception as Bayesian inference","year":"1996","unstructured":"Knill, D. C., & Richards, W. (Eds.). (1996). Perception as Bayesian inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"815_CR64","first-page":"41","volume":"23","author":"K Korb","year":"2004","unstructured":"Korb, K. (2004). Bayesian informal logic and fallacy. Informal Logic, 23, 41\u201370.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"815_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1201\/9780203491294","volume-title":"Bayesian artificial intelligence","author":"KB Korb","year":"2003","unstructured":"Korb, K. B., & Nicholson, A. E. (2003). Bayesian artificial intelligence. Boca Raton: CRC Press."},{"key":"815_CR66","unstructured":"Korb, K. B., McConachy, R. & Zukerman, I. (1997). A cognitive model of argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 19th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 400\u2013405)."},{"key":"815_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"617","DOI":"10.2307\/2111584","volume":"36","author":"KK Ladha","year":"1992","unstructured":"Ladha, K. K. (1992). The Condorcet jury theorem, free speech, and correlated votes. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 617\u2013634.","journal-title":"American Journal of Political Science"},{"key":"815_CR68","unstructured":"Laplace, P. S. (1951). A philosophical essay on probabilities (F. W. Truscott & F. L. Emory, Trans.). New York: Dover Publications. (Original work published 1814)."},{"key":"815_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"236","DOI":"10.1086\/651318","volume":"77","author":"H Leitgeb","year":"2010","unstructured":"Leitgeb, H., & Pettigrew, R. (2010). An objective justification of Bayesianism II: The consequences of minimizing inaccuracy. Philosophy of Science, 77, 236\u2013272.","journal-title":"Philosophy of Science"},{"key":"815_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1525\/9780520318328-009","volume-title":"Studies in inductive logic and probability","author":"D Lewis","year":"1980","unstructured":"Lewis, D. (1980). A subjectivist\u2019s guide to objective chance. In Richard C. Jeffrey (Ed.), Studies in inductive logic and probability (Vol. II, pp. 263\u2013293). Berkeley: University of California Press."},{"key":"815_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1037\/h0042344","volume":"55","author":"I Lorge","year":"1958","unstructured":"Lorge, I., Fox, D., Davitz, J., & Brenner, M. (1958). A survey of studies contrasting the quality of group performance and individual performance, 1920\u20131957. Psychological Bulletin, 55, 337\u2013372.","journal-title":"Psychological Bulletin"},{"key":"815_CR72","first-page":"89","volume":"3","author":"R McConachy","year":"1999","unstructured":"McConachy, R., & Zukerman, I. (1999). Towards a dialogue capability in a Bayesian argumentation system. ETAI 3\u2014Electronic Transactions of Artificial Intelligence (Section D), 3, 89\u2013124.","journal-title":"ETAI 3\u2014Electronic Transactions of Artificial Intelligence (Section D)"},{"key":"815_CR73","unstructured":"McConachy, R., Korb, K. B., & Zukerman, I. (1998). Deciding what not to say: An attentional-probabilistic approach to argument presentation. In Proceedings of the 20th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 669\u2013674), Madison, Wisconsin."},{"key":"815_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1017\/S0140525X10000968","volume":"34","author":"H Mercier","year":"2011","unstructured":"Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 57\u201374.","journal-title":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences"},{"key":"815_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1086\/289983","volume":"63","author":"WC Myrvold","year":"1996","unstructured":"Myrvold, W. C. (1996). Bayesianism and diverse evidence: A reply to Andrew Wayne. Philosophy of Science, 63, 661\u2013665.","journal-title":"Philosophy of Science"},{"key":"815_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1080\/00461520.2011.558816","volume":"46","author":"EM Nussbaum","year":"2011","unstructured":"Nussbaum, E. M. (2011). Argumentation, dialogue theory, and probability modeling: Alternative frameworks for argumentation research in education. Educational Psychologist, 46, 84\u2013106.","journal-title":"Educational Psychologist"},{"key":"815_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"443","DOI":"10.1080\/10508406.2011.564567","volume":"20","author":"EM Nussbaum","year":"2011","unstructured":"Nussbaum, E. M., & Edwards, O. V. (2011). Critical questions and argument stratagems: A framework for enhancing and analyzing students\u2019 reasoning practices. Journal of Learning Sciences, 20, 443\u2013488.","journal-title":"Journal of Learning Sciences"},{"key":"815_CR78","volume-title":"Persuasion: Theory and research","author":"DJ O\u2019Keefe","year":"2002","unstructured":"O\u2019Keefe, D. J. (2002). Persuasion: Theory and research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.","edition":"2"},{"key":"815_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"608","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-295X.101.4.608","volume":"101","author":"M Oaksford","year":"1994","unstructured":"Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1994). A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psychological Review, 101, 608\u2013631.","journal-title":"Psychological Review"},{"key":"815_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1037\/h0085798","volume":"58","author":"M Oaksford","year":"2004","unstructured":"Oaksford, M., & Hahn, U. (2004). A Bayesian approach to the argument from ignorance. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 75\u201385.","journal-title":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology"},{"key":"815_CR81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Oaksford, M., & Hahn, U. (2007). Induction, deduction and argument strength in human reasoning and argumentation. In A. Feeney, & E. Heit (Eds.), Inductive reasoning (pp. 269\u2013301). Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511619304.012"},{"key":"815_CR82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"246","DOI":"10.2307\/3655648","volume":"94","author":"EJ Olsson","year":"2002","unstructured":"Olsson, E. J. (2002). What is the problem of coherence and truth? Journal of Philosophy, 94, 246\u2013272.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"815_CR83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-006-9056-6","volume":"157","author":"EJ Olsson","year":"2007","unstructured":"Olsson, E. J., & Schubert, S. (2007). Reliability conducive measures of coherence. Synthese, 157, 297\u2013308.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"815_CR84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/0199279993.001.0001","volume-title":"Against coherence: Truth, probability, and justification","author":"EJ Olsson","year":"2005","unstructured":"Olsson, E. J. (2005). Against coherence: Truth, probability, and justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"815_CR85","volume-title":"The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies","author":"SE Page","year":"2005","unstructured":"Page, S. E. (2005). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press."},{"key":"815_CR86","volume-title":"Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems","author":"J Pearl","year":"1988","unstructured":"Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman."},{"key":"815_CR87","volume-title":"The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation","author":"C Perelman","year":"1969","unstructured":"Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press."},{"key":"815_CR88","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4612-4964-1","volume-title":"Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change","author":"RE Petty","year":"1986","unstructured":"Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer."},{"key":"815_CR89","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/1887.001.0001","volume-title":"Cognitive carpentry: A blueprint for how to build a person","author":"JL Pollock","year":"1995","unstructured":"Pollock, J. L. (1995). Cognitive carpentry: A blueprint for how to build a person. Cambridge: MIT Press."},{"key":"815_CR90","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-005-4418-7","volume":"19","author":"H Prakken","year":"2005","unstructured":"Prakken, H. (2005). AI & law, logic and argument schemes. Argumentation, 19, 303\u2013320.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"815_CR91","first-page":"219","volume-title":"Handbook of philosophical logic","author":"H Prakken","year":"2002","unstructured":"Prakken, H., & Vreeswijk, G. A. W. (2002). Logics for defeasible argumentation. In D. M. Gabbay & F. Guenthner (Eds.), Handbook of philosophical logic (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 219\u2013318). Dordrecht\/Boston\/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.","edition":"2"},{"key":"815_CR92","volume-title":"Argumentation in artificial intelligence","year":"2009","unstructured":"Rahwan, I., & Simari, G. R. (Eds.). (2009). Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Dordrecht: Springer."},{"key":"815_CR93","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"961","DOI":"10.1142\/S0218213004001922","volume":"13","author":"C Reed","year":"2004","unstructured":"Reed, C., & Rowe, G. (2004). Araucaria: Software for argument analysis, diagramming and representation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Tools, 13, 961\u2013980.","journal-title":"International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Tools"},{"key":"815_CR94","volume-title":"Foundations of argument: Effective communication for critical thinking","author":"JC Reinard","year":"1991","unstructured":"Reinard, J. C. (1991). Foundations of argument: Effective communication for critical thinking. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown."},{"key":"815_CR95","volume-title":"Plausible reasoning","author":"N Rescher","year":"1976","unstructured":"Rescher, N. (1976). Plausible reasoning. Assen: Van Gorcum."},{"key":"815_CR96","volume-title":"Argumentation and the decision making process","author":"RD Rieke","year":"1984","unstructured":"Rieke, R. D., & Sillars, M. O. (1984). Argumentation and the decision making process. New York: Harper Collins."},{"key":"815_CR97","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1086\/289693","volume":"59","author":"RD Rosenkrantz","year":"1992","unstructured":"Rosenkrantz, R. D. (1992). The justification of induction. Philosophy of Science, 59, 527\u2013539.","journal-title":"Philosophy of Science"},{"key":"815_CR98","volume-title":"Redelijke argumenten: Een onderzoek naar normen voor kritische lezers","author":"PJ Schellens","year":"1985","unstructured":"Schellens, P. J. (1985). Redelijke argumenten: Een onderzoek naar normen voor kritische lezers. Dordrecht: Foris."},{"key":"815_CR99","volume-title":"The evidential foundations of probabilistic reasoning","author":"DA Schum","year":"1994","unstructured":"Schum, D. A. (1994). The evidential foundations of probabilistic reasoning. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press."},{"key":"815_CR100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1007800305762","volume":"14","author":"AF Snoeck Henkemans","year":"2000","unstructured":"Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2000). State-of-the-art: The structure of argumentation. Argumentation, 14, 447\u2013473.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"815_CR101","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"550","DOI":"10.1037\/h0070482","volume":"15","author":"JR Stroop","year":"1932","unstructured":"Stroop, J. R. (1932). Is the judgment of the group better than that of the average member of the group? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 550\u2013562.","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Psychology"},{"key":"815_CR102","volume-title":"The wisdom of crowds","author":"J Surowiecki","year":"2004","unstructured":"Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company Inc."},{"key":"815_CR103","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.2469\/faj.v43.n3.50","volume":"43","author":"JL Treynor","year":"1987","unstructured":"Treynor, J. L. (1987). Market efficiency and the bean jar experiment. Financial Analysts Journal, 43, 50\u201353.","journal-title":"Financial Analysts Journal"},{"key":"815_CR104","volume-title":"A systematic theory of argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach","author":"FH Eemeren van","year":"2004","unstructured":"van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"815_CR105","first-page":"1033","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 5th conference of the international society for the study of argumentation","author":"B Verheij","year":"2003","unstructured":"Verheij, B. (2003a). Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: Towards a methodology for the investigation of argumentation schemes. In F. H. van Eemeren, A. Blair, C. Willard, & F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th conference of the international society for the study of argumentation (pp. 1033\u20131037). Amsterdam: Sic Sat."},{"key":"815_CR106","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/13.3.319","volume":"13","author":"B Verheij","year":"2003","unstructured":"Verheij, B. (2003b). Deflog: On the logical interpretation of prima facie justified assumptions. Journal of Logic and Computation, 13, 319\u2013346.","journal-title":"Journal of Logic and Computation"},{"key":"815_CR107","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1023\/B:ARTI.0000046008.49443.36","volume":"11","author":"B Verheij","year":"2004","unstructured":"Verheij, B. (2004). Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: An approach to legal logic. Artificial intelligence and Law, 11, 167\u2013195.","journal-title":"Artificial intelligence and Law"},{"key":"815_CR108","volume-title":"Informal logic","author":"DN Walton","year":"1989","unstructured":"Walton, D. N. (1989). Informal logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"815_CR109","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning","author":"DN Walton","year":"1996","unstructured":"Walton, D. N. (1996). Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum."},{"key":"815_CR110","volume-title":"Appeal to expert opinion: Arguments from authority","author":"DN Walton","year":"1997","unstructured":"Walton, D. N. (1997). Appeal to expert opinion: Arguments from authority. University Park, PA: Penn State Press."},{"key":"815_CR111","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Walton, D. N. (1998). The new dialectic: Conversational contexts of argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.","DOI":"10.3138\/9781442681859"},{"key":"815_CR112","volume-title":"Appeal to popular opinion","author":"DN Walton","year":"1999","unstructured":"Walton, D. N. (1999). Appeal to popular opinion. University Park, PA: Penn State Press."},{"key":"815_CR113","first-page":"141","volume":"21","author":"DM Walton","year":"2001","unstructured":"Walton, D. M. (2001). Abductive, presumptive, and plausible arguments. Informal Logic, 21, 141\u2013169.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"815_CR114","volume-title":"Relevance in argumentation","author":"DN Walton","year":"2004","unstructured":"Walton, D. N. (2004). Relevance in argumentation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum."},{"key":"815_CR115","volume-title":"Fundamentals of critical argumentation","author":"DN Walton","year":"2006","unstructured":"Walton, D. N. (2006). Fundamentals of critical argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"815_CR116","volume-title":"Witness testimony evidence: Argumentation, artificial intelligence, and law","author":"DN Walton","year":"2008","unstructured":"Walton, D. N. (2008). Witness testimony evidence: Argumentation, artificial intelligence, and law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"815_CR117","unstructured":"Walton, D., & Gordon, T. F. (2005). Critical questions in computational models of legal argument. In P. E. Dunne, & T. Bench-Capon (Ed.), International workshop on argumentation in artificial intelligence and law (pp. 103\u2013111). Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers."},{"key":"815_CR118","unstructured":"Walton, D., & Gordon, T. F. (2014). How to formalize informal logic. In Mohammed, D., & Lewi\u0144ski, M. (Eds.), Virtues of argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the Ontario society for the study of argumentation (OSSA), 22\u201326 May 2013(pp. 1\u201313). Windsor, ON: OSSA."},{"key":"815_CR119","unstructured":"Walton, D., & Reed, C. (2002). Argumentation schemes and defeasible inferences. In Workshop on computational models of natural argument, 15th European conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 11\u201320)."},{"key":"815_CR120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes","author":"DN Walton","year":"2008","unstructured":"Walton, D. N., Reed, C., & Macagno, F. (2008). Argumentation schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"815_CR121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1086\/289842","volume":"62","author":"A Wayne","year":"1995","unstructured":"Wayne, A. (1995). Bayesianism and diverse evidence. Philosophy of Science, 62, 111\u2013121.","journal-title":"Philosophy of Science"},{"key":"815_CR122","unstructured":"Whately, R. (1846). Elements of rhetoric: Comprising an analysis of the laws of moral evidence and of persuasion, with rules for argumentative composition and elocution\/c by Richard Whately. B. Fellowes."},{"key":"815_CR123","unstructured":"Woods, J., Irvine, A., & Walton, D. N. (2004). Argument: Critical thinking, logic and the fallacies, Revised Edition. Toronto: Prentice Hall."},{"key":"815_CR124","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"443","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_22","volume-title":"Argumentation in artificial intelligence","author":"I Zukerman","year":"2009","unstructured":"Zukerman, I. (2009). Towards probabilistic argumentation. In I. Rahwan & G. R. Simari (Eds.), Argumentation in artificial intelligence (pp. 443\u2013462). Dordrecht: Springer."}],"container-title":["Synthese"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-015-0815-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11229-015-0815-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-015-0815-0","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,18]],"date-time":"2022-05-18T17:40:31Z","timestamp":1652895631000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11229-015-0815-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,22]]},"references-count":124,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,6]]}},"alternative-id":["815"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-015-0815-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["0039-7857","1573-0964"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0039-7857","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-0964","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,22]]}}}