{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,13]],"date-time":"2026-02-13T05:47:45Z","timestamp":1770961665748,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,9,21]],"date-time":"2016-09-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1474416000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Synthese"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,10]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-016-1216-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,9,21]],"date-time":"2016-09-21T18:56:19Z","timestamp":1474484179000},"page":"4309-4342","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Informational dynamics of epistemic possibility modals"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"195","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6810-7918","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Peter","family":"Hawke","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Shane","family":"Steinert-Threlkeld","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,9,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"1216_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ciardelli, I., Groenendijk, J., & Roelofsen, F. (2009). Attention! might in inquisitive semantics. In E. Cormany, S. Ito & D. Lutz, (Eds.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory (SALT 19), pp. 91\u2013108","DOI":"10.3765\/salt.v19i0.2520"},{"issue":"6","key":"1216_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1643","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-014-0404-7","volume":"192","author":"IA Ciardelli","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ciardelli, I. A., & Roelofsen, F. (2015). Inquisitive dynamic epistemic logic. Synthese, 192(6), 1643\u20131687. doi: 10.1007\/s11229-014-0404-7 .","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"issue":"488","key":"1216_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"867","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/fzt091","volume":"122","author":"C Dorr","year":"2013","unstructured":"Dorr, C., & Hawthorne, J. (2013). Embedding epistemic modals. Mind, 122(488), 867\u2013913. doi: 10.1093\/mind\/fzt091 .","journal-title":"Mind"},{"key":"1216_CR4","unstructured":"Hansson, S. O. (2014). Logic of belief revision. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, (Winter). Retrieved from http:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/archives\/win2014\/entries\/logic-belief-revision ."},{"key":"1216_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hawke, P., & Steinert-Threlkeld, S. (2015a). Informational dynamics of \u2018might\u2019 assertions. In W. vander Hoek, W. Holliday & W. Wang (Eds.), Logic, Rationality, and Interaction (pp. 143\u2013155). Berlin: Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-662-48561-3_12"},{"key":"1216_CR6","unstructured":"Hawke, P., & Steinert-Threlkeld, S. (2015b). Epistemic modality and the dynamics of discourse (manuscript)."},{"key":"1216_CR7","unstructured":"Holliday, W. H., & Icard, T. F. (2010). Moorean phenomena in epistemic logic. In L. Beklemishev, V. Goranko & V. Shehtman, (Eds.), Advances in modal logic (Vol. 8, pp. 178\u2013199). Fort Worth, TX: College Publications"},{"key":"1216_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kratzer, A. (1981). The notional category of modality. In H. Eikmeyer & H. Rieser (Eds.), Words, worlds, and context (pp. 38\u201374). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110842524-004"},{"key":"1216_CR9","unstructured":"Kratzer, A. (1991). Modality. In A. von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (Eds.), Semantik (chapter 29, pp 639\u2013650). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter."},{"key":"1216_CR10","volume-title":"Modals and conditionals","author":"A Kratzer","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kratzer, A. (2012). Modals and conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"1216_CR11","volume-title":"Counterfactuals","author":"D Lewis","year":"1973","unstructured":"Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. New York: Wiley."},{"key":"1216_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-009-9012-8_6","volume":"2","author":"D Lewis","year":"1980","unstructured":"Lewis, D. (1980). Index, context, and content. Philosophy and Grammar, 2, 79\u2013100.","journal-title":"Philosophy and Grammar"},{"key":"1216_CR13","unstructured":"Lin, H. (2013). Acceptance-conditional semantics & modality-disjunction interaction. In USC Deontic Modality Workshop"},{"key":"1216_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-1344-4","volume-title":"Reasoning about preference dynamics","author":"F Liu","year":"2011","unstructured":"Liu, F. (2011). Reasoning about preference dynamics. Dordrecht: Springer."},{"key":"1216_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"MacFarlane, J. (2011a). Epistemic modals are assessment-sensitive. In A. Egan & B. Weatherson (Eds.), Epistemic modality (pp. 144\u2013179). Oxford: Oxford University Press","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199591596.003.0006"},{"key":"1216_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"MacFarlane, J. (2011b). What is assertion? In J. Brown & H. Cappelen (Eds.), Assertion: New philosophical essays (pp. 79\u201397). Oxford: Oxford University Press","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199573004.003.0004"},{"key":"1216_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199682751.001.0001","volume-title":"Assessment sensitivity","author":"J MacFarlane","year":"2014","unstructured":"MacFarlane, J. (2014). Assessment sensitivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199682751.001.0001 ."},{"issue":"1","key":"1216_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1215\/00318108-1728705","volume":"122","author":"S Moss","year":"2013","unstructured":"Moss, S. (2013). Epistemology formalized. Philosophical Review, 122(1), 1\u201343. doi: 10.1215\/00318108-1728705 .","journal-title":"Philosophical Review"},{"issue":"5","key":"1216_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3765\/sp.8.5","volume":"8","author":"S Moss","year":"2015","unstructured":"Moss, S. (2015). On the semantics and pragmatics of epistemic vocabulary. Semantics and Pragmatics, 8(5), 1\u201381. doi: 10.3765\/sp.8.5 .","journal-title":"Semantics and Pragmatics"},{"issue":"10","key":"1216_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1688","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lingua.2005.05.009","volume":"116","author":"A Papafragou","year":"2006","unstructured":"Papafragou, A. (2006). Epistemic modality and truth conditions. Lingua, 116(10), 1688\u20131702. doi: 10.1016\/j.lingua.2005.05.009 .","journal-title":"Lingua"},{"key":"1216_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780199292424.001.0001","volume-title":"Modality","author":"P Portner","year":"2009","unstructured":"Portner, P. (2009). Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"1216_CR22","unstructured":"Rott, H. (2009). Shifting priorities: Simple representations for twenty-seven iterated theory change operators. In D. Makinson, J. Malinkowski, & H. Wansing (Eds.), Towards mathematical philosophy. Trends in logic (Vol. 28, pp. 269\u2013296). Dordrecht: Springer."},{"issue":"3","key":"1216_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-009-9461-8","volume":"174","author":"M Schulz","year":"2010","unstructured":"Schulz, M. (2010). Epistemic modals and informational consequence. Synthese, 174(3), 385\u2013395. doi: 10.1007\/s11229-009-9461-8 .","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"issue":"3","key":"1216_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1007\/s11050-004-2900-7","volume":"13","author":"M Simons","year":"2005","unstructured":"Simons, M. (2005). Dividing things up: The semantics of or and the modal\/or interaction. Natural Language Semantics, 13(3), 271\u2013316. doi: 10.1007\/s11050-004-2900-7 .","journal-title":"Natural Language Semantics"},{"issue":"471","key":"1216_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"777","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/fzp105","volume":"118","author":"R Sorensen","year":"2009","unstructured":"Sorensen, R. (2009). Meta-agnosticism: Higher order epistemic possibility. Mind, 118(471), 777\u2013784. doi: 10.1093\/mind\/fzp105 .","journal-title":"Mind"},{"key":"1216_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199645169.001.0001","volume-title":"Context","author":"R Stalnaker","year":"2014","unstructured":"Stalnaker, R. (2014). Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"1216_CR27","unstructured":"Swanson, E. (2006). Interactions with context. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology."},{"key":"1216_CR28","unstructured":"V\u00e4\u00e4n\u00e4nen, J. (2008). Modal dependence logic. In K. R. Apt & R. van Rooij (Eds.), New perspectives on games and interaction. Texts in logic and games (Vol. 4, pp. 237\u2013254). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press"},{"key":"1216_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511974533","volume-title":"Logical dynamics of information and interaction","author":"J Benthem van","year":"2011","unstructured":"van Benthem, J. (2011). Logical dynamics of information and interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"issue":"2","key":"1216_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.3166\/jancl.17.157-182","volume":"17","author":"J Benthem van","year":"2007","unstructured":"van Benthem, J., & Liu, F. (2007). Dynamic logic of preference upgrade. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 17(2), 157\u2013182. doi: 10.3166\/jancl.17.157-182 .","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics"},{"key":"1216_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008219821036","volume":"6","author":"J Does van der","year":"1997","unstructured":"van der Does, J., Groeneveld, W., & Veltman, F. (1997). An update on \u201cmight\u201d. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 6, 361\u2013381.","journal-title":"Journal of Logic, Language, and Information"},{"issue":"3","key":"1216_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00248150","volume":"25","author":"F Veltman","year":"1996","unstructured":"Veltman, F. (1996). Defaults in update semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 25(3), 221\u2013261. doi: 10.1007\/BF00248150 .","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"1216_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199591596.003.0004","volume-title":"Epistemic modality","author":"K von Fintel","year":"2011","unstructured":"von Fintel, K. (2011). \u2018Might\u2019 made right. In A. Egan & B. Weatherson (Eds.), Epistemic modality (pp. 108\u2013130). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"1","key":"1216_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1215\/00318108-1728714","volume":"122","author":"M Willer","year":"2013","unstructured":"Willer, M. (2013). Dynamics of epistemic modality. Philosophical Review, 122(1), 45\u201392. doi: 10.1215\/00318108-1728714 .","journal-title":"Philosophical Review"},{"issue":"464","key":"1216_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"983","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/fzm983","volume":"116","author":"S Yalcin","year":"2007","unstructured":"Yalcin, S. (2007). Epistemic modals. Mind, 116(464), 983\u20131026. doi: 10.1093\/mind\/fzm983 .","journal-title":"Mind"},{"issue":"471","key":"1216_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"787","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/fzp106","volume":"118","author":"S Yalcin","year":"2009","unstructured":"Yalcin, S. (2009). More on epistemic modals. Mind, 118(471), 787\u2013793. doi: 10.1093\/mind\/fzp106 .","journal-title":"Mind"},{"key":"1216_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199591596.003.0011","volume-title":"Nonfactualism about epistemic modality","author":"S Yalcin","year":"2011","unstructured":"Yalcin, S. (2011). Epistemic modality. In A. Egan & B. Weatherson (Eds.), Nonfactualism about epistemic modality (pp. 295\u2013332). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"1216_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yalcin, S. (2016). Belief as question-sensitive. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","DOI":"10.1111\/phpr.12330"},{"key":"1216_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1011255819284","volume":"8","author":"TE Zimmermann","year":"2000","unstructured":"Zimmermann, T. E. (2000). Free choice disjunction and epistemic possibility. Natural Language Semantics, 8, 255\u2013290.","journal-title":"Natural Language Semantics"}],"container-title":["Synthese"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11229-016-1216-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-016-1216-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-016-1216-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,19]],"date-time":"2024-06-19T14:05:48Z","timestamp":1718805948000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11229-016-1216-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,9,21]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,10]]}},"alternative-id":["1216"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-016-1216-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["0039-7857","1573-0964"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0039-7857","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-0964","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,9,21]]}}}